A study to evaluate the first dose of gentamicin needed to achieve a peak plasma concentration of 30 mg/l in patients hospitalized for severe sepsis

Recommended gentamicin peak plasma levels rarely reached, even with recommended dosages

INTRODUCTION

The recommended gentamicin peak plasma concentration range is 32-40 mg/L; we aimed to determine how frequently it was reached, and for which gentamicin doses.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 601 gentamicin peak plasma concentrations in 501 patients aged ≥15 in our institution between 2013 and 2023.

RESULTS

Median gentamicin dose was 5.9 mg/kg [IQR 4.1-7.9]. Median peak plasma concentration was 16.5 mg/L [IQR 10.8-22.8] and was strongly correlated with dose (p < 0.0001). Only 5.7 % of values were ≥32 mg/L, including 22.8 % for dose ≥10 mg/kg.

CONCLUSION

This suggests that existing recommendations regarding either dose or target concentration for gentamicin should be modified.

Risk Factors Associated with Antibiotic Exposure Variability in Critically Ill Patients: A Systematic Review

(1) Background: Knowledge about the behavior of antibiotics in critically ill patients has been increasing in recent years. Some studies have concluded that a high percentage may be outside the therapeutic range. The most likely cause of this is the pharmacokinetic variability of critically ill patients, but it is not clear which factors have the greatest impact. The aim of this systematic review is to identify risk factors among critically ill patients that may exhibit significant pharmacokinetic alterations, compromising treatment efficacy and safety. (2) Methods: The search included the PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase databases. (3) Results: We identified 246 observational studies and ten clinical trials. The most studied risk factors in the literature were renal function, weight, age, sex, and renal replacement therapy. Risk factors with the greatest impact included renal function, weight, renal replacement therapy, age, protein or albumin levels, and APACHE or SAPS scores. (4) Conclusions: The review allows us to identify which critically ill patients are at a higher risk of not reaching therapeutic targets and helps us to recognize the extensive number of risk factors that have been studied, guiding their inclusion in future studies. It is essential to continue researching, especially in real clinical practice and with clinical outcomes.

Clinical Pharmacokinetics of Gentamicin in Various Patient Populations and Consequences for Optimal Dosing for Gram-Negative Infections: An Updated Review

Gentamicin is an aminoglycoside antibiotic with a small therapeutic window that is currently used primarily as part of short-term empirical combination therapy. Gentamicin dosing schemes still need refinement, especially for subpopulations where pharmacokinetics can differ from pharmacokinetics in the general adult population: obese patients, critically ill patients, paediatric patients, neonates, elderly patients and patients on dialysis. This review summarizes the clinical pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in these patient populations and the consequences for optimal dosing of gentamicin for infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria, highlighting new insights from the last 10 years. In this period, several new population pharmacokinetic studies have focused on these subpopulations, providing insights into the typical values of the most relevant pharmacokinetic parameters, the variability of these parameters and possible explanations for this variability, although unexplained variability often remains high. Both dosing schemes and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) targets varied widely between these studies. A gentamicin starting dose of 7 mg/kg based on total body weight (or on adjusted body weight in obese patients) appears to be the optimal strategy for increasing the probability of target attainment (PTA) after the first administration for the most commonly used PK/PD targets in adults and children older than 1 month, including critically ill patients. However, evidence that increasing the PTA results in higher efficacy is lacking; no studies were identified that show a correlation between estimated or predicted PK/PD target attainment and clinical success. Although it is unclear if performing therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for optimization of the PTA is of clinical value, it is recommended in patients with highly variable pharmacokinetics, including patients from all subpopulations that are critically ill (such as elderly, children and neonates) and patients on intermittent haemodialysis. In addition, TDM for optimization of the dosing interval, targeting a trough concentration of at least < 2 mg/L but preferably < 0.5–1 mg/L, has proven to reduce nephrotoxicity and is therefore recommended in all patients receiving more than one dose of gentamicin. The usefulness of the daily area under the plasma concentration–time curve for predicting nephrotoxicity should be further investigated. Additionally, more research is needed on the optimal PK/PD targets for efficacy in the clinical situations in which gentamicin is currently used, that is, as monotherapy for urinary tract infections or as part of short-term combination therapy.

Use of Gentamicin for Sepsis and Septic Shock in Anaesthesia-Intensive Care Unit: A Clinical Practice Evaluation

Objective

Numerous cases of gentamicin underdosing have been described in the literature in the context of sepsis and septic shock in anaesthesia-intensive care units (ICU). A survey of clinical practice was conducted with the aim to rationalise the use of gentamicin in the unit. The secondary objective was to propose a corrective formula for adjusting individual dosage.

Methods

A single-centre survey was used to determine the initial dose of gentamicin administered, in an anaesthesia-ICU, during the first hours of sepsis/septic shock. An initial retrospective phase allowed focusing on the points of improvement in terms of prescription. A second prospective phase enabled the evaluation of benefits following the implemented changes.

Results

Fifty-one patients were included during the retrospective phase (2014–2015) and 28 patients during the prospective phase (2016–2017). Out-of-guideline prescriptions significantly decreased between these two study periods (i.e., pulmonary infections decreased from 70.5% to 18%, p<0.001) and the mean±standard deviation administered dosage increased from 7.3±1.2 mg kg⁻¹ to 9.5±1.5 mg kg⁻¹ (p<0.001). Nevertheless, the proportion of Cmax (peak plasma concentration) ≥30 mg L⁻¹ and the mean Cmax did not change significantly. A significant association (p<0.05) was found between Cmax, body mass index, haematocrit and creatinine, enabling a corrective formula to be proposed.

Conclusion

The present study allowed improvement in gentamicin prescription in an anaesthesia-ICU. A Cmax ≥30 mg L⁻¹ remains difficult to achieve, but a Cmax ≥16 mg L⁻¹ could be considered relevant for community infections and would be more attainable. A corrective formula could be used to adjust the dosage.

New paradigm for rapid achievement of appropriate therapy in special populations: coupling antibiotic dose optimization rapid microbiological methods

INTRODUCTION

Some special patient populations (e.g. critically ill, burns, hematological malignancy, post-major surgery, post-major trauma) have characteristics that lead to higher rates of failure and mortality associated with infection. Choice of effective antibiotics and optimized doses are challenging in these patients that are commonly infected by multidrug-resistant pathogens. Areas covered: A review of the importance of diagnosis and the place of newer microbiological methods (e.g. whole-genome sequencing) to ensure rapid transition from empiric to directed antibiotic therapy is provided. The effects of pathophysiological changes on antibiotic pharmacokinetics are also provided. Expert opinion: Product information dosing regimens do not address the pharmacokinetic alterations that can occur in special patient populations and increase the likelihood of therapeutic failure and the emergence of bacterial resistance. Altered dosing approaches, supplemented with the use of dosing software and therapeutic drug monitoring, may be needed to ensure optimal antibiotic exposure and better therapeutic outcomes in these patients with severe infection. Dose optimization needs to be coupled with advanced microbiological techniques that enable rapid microbiological identification and characterization of resistance mechanism to ensure that maximally effective directed therapy can be chosen.

Determinants of amikacin first peak concentration in critically ill patients

Amikacin antimicrobial effect has been correlated with the ratio of the peak concentration (C_max ) to the minimum inhibitory concentration. A target C_max ≥ 60-80 mg/L has been suggested. It has been shown that such target is not achieved in a large proportion of critically ill patients in intensive care units. A retrospective analysis was performed to examine the determinants of C_max ≥ 80 mg/L on the first peak in 339 critically ill patients treated by amikacin. The influence of available variables on C_max target attainment was analyzed using a classification and regression tree (CART) and logistic regression. Mean C_max in the 339 patients was 73.0 ± 23.9 mg/L, with a target attainment rate (TAR, C_max ≥ 80 mg/L) of 37.5%. In CART analysis, the strongest predictor of amikacin target peak attainment was dose per kilogram of lean body weight (dose/LBW). TAR was 60.1% in patients with dose/LBW ≥ 37.8 vs. 19.9% in patients with lower dose/LBW (OR = 6.0 (95% CI: 3.6-10.2)). Renal function was a secondary predictor of C_max . Logistic regression analysis identified dose per kilogram of ideal body weight (OR = 1.13 (95% CI: 1.09-1.17)) and creatinine clearance (OR = 0.993 (95% CI: 0.988-0.998)) as predictors of target peak achievement. Based on our results, an amikacin dose ≥ 37.8 mg/kg of LBW should be used to optimize the attainment of C_max ≥ 80 mg/L after the first dose in critically ill patients. An even higher dose may be necessary in patients with normal renal function.

Short-Course Adjunctive Gentamicin as Empirical Therapy in Patients With Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Prospective Observational Cohort Study

Background.

Metaanalyses failed to demonstrate clinical benefits of beta lactam plus aminoglycoside combination therapy compared to beta lactam monotherapy in patients with sepsis. However, few data exist on the effects of short-course adjunctive aminoglycoside therapy in sepsis patients with organ failure or shock.

Methods.

We prospectively enrolled consecutive patients with severe sepsis or septic shock in 2 intensive care units in the Netherlands from 2011 to 2015. Local antibiotic protocols recommended empirical gentamicin add-on therapy in only 1 of the units. We used logistic regression analyses to determine the association between gentamicin use and the number of days alive and free of renal failure, shock, and death, all on day 14.

Results.

Of 648 patients enrolled, 245 received gentamicin (222 of 309 [72%] in hospital A and 23 of 339 [7%] in hospital B) for a median duration of 2 days (interquartile range, 1-3). The adjusted odds ratios associated with gentamicin use were 1.39 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.00-1.94) for renal failure, 1.34 (95% CI, 0.96-1.86) for shock duration, and 1.41 (95% CI, 0.94-2.12) for day-14 mortality. Based on in vitro susceptibilities, inappropriate (initial) gram-negative coverage was given in 9 of 245 (4%) and 18 of 403 (4%) patients treated and not treated with gentamicin, respectively (P = .62).

Conclusions.

Short-course empirical gentamicin use in patients with sepsis was associated with an increased incidence of renal failure but not with faster reversal of shock or improved survival in a setting with low prevalence of antimicrobial resistance.

Experience With Prophylactic Gentamicin During Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Doses

BACKGROUND

Gentamicin has been determined to be active against a wide range of bacterial infections and has been commonly used as a preoperative antibiotic for inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation. However, the best dosing regimen to produce the safest optimal prophylactic effect remains to be determined.

AIM

To compare low- and high-dose gentamicin as prophylaxis during IPP implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed two groups of patients who underwent IPP placement from April 14, 2012 through April 13, 2016. Group 1 was composed of 490 patients who underwent IPP placement from April 14, 2012 through April 13, 2014 and received a low dose of preoperative gentamicin at 80 mg every 8 hours for 1 day. Group 2 was composed of 407 patients who underwent IPP placement from April 14, 2014 through April 13, 2016 and received a single high dose of preoperative gentamicin at 5 mg/kg. We compared the infection rates of IPP and any gentamicin-related toxicities. The same surgeon performed all procedures. All patients received additional vancomycin 1 g before incision and at 12 hours postoperatively.

OUTCOME

Demographic data and IPP infection rate were compared and potential toxicities from the higher dose of gentamicin were closely monitored.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences in mean age, mean body mass index, and mean interval for IPP placement and IPP infection between the two groups. No toxicity was seen with the higher gentamicin dose. Six cases in group 1 (five de novo cases and one redo case, infection rate = 1.22%) and three cases in group 2 (two de novo cases and one redo case, infection rate = 0.74%) were found to have IPP infection. The infection rate in group 2 appeared to be lower than that in group 1, although a significant statistical difference was not achieved (P = .057).

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These findings would help guide urologists in choosing an optimal preoperative gentamicin dose for IPP surgery.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS

This is the first study to report on the usage of high-dose preoperative gentamicin for IPP surgery but with limitations as a retrospective study.

CONCLUSIONS

Although not achieving a statistical difference, there was a trend for patients receiving a higher dose of preoperative gentamicin to have a lower IPP infection rate. No toxicity was encountered from the 5-mg/kg gentamicin dose. We recommend following prophylactic high-dose gentamicin guidelines. Xie D, Gheiler V, Lopez I, et al. Experience With Prophylactic Gentamicin During Penile Prosthesis Surgery: A Retrospective Comparison of Two Different Doses. J Sex Med 2017;14:1160-1164.