Antibiotic therapy in case of positive cultures of kidney transplant preservation fluid: a nationwide survey of prescribing practices

Interpreting and managing preservation fluids positive for Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Culturing preservation fluids of solid organs before transplantation is not a standardized procedure. In this review, we aim to describe the state-of-the-art of literature evidence in this debated setting with a special focus on Gram-negative bacteria (GNB).

RECENT FINDINGS

Contamination of preservation fluids is frequent, but preservation fluids related infections are rare and most commonly caused by high-risk pathogens, including GNB. GNB preservation fluids related infections are characterized by high morbidity and mortality. Recent studies showed improved outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients receiving antibiotic therapy tailored according to preservation fluids cultures especially when multidrug-resistant GNB are found. A robust procurement network is needed to alert recipients' centers in cases of positivity and the support of transplant infectious diseases specialists is essential to choose the best therapy.

SUMMARY

Culturing preservation fluids is a further step into preventing donor-derived infections. Interpreting and managing GNB positivity require a multidisciplinary team with specific skills. Standardized randomized trials are needed for insight into the real utility of preservation fluids cultures, the role of preservation fluids positivity, and the impact of antimicrobial therapy.

Effect of preservation fluid contamination and associated possible donor-derived infections on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

The study aims to analyze the epidemiology of preservation fluid (PF) contamination and investigate the impact of PF contamination and possible donor-derived infections(p-DDI) on early postoperative prognosis in kidney transplant (KT) recipients.

METHODS

A total of 256 PF samples were collected for microbiological evaluation from all KT recipients who received deceased donor donations in our hospital from June 2018 to August 2022. Data on the baseline and clinical characteristics of these PF corresponding to recipients and donors were extracted from the electronic medical record. It mainly included the early postoperative complications and prognosis of KT recipients.

RESULTS

From June 2018 to August 2022, 597 kidney transplants were performed in our center, with 260 recipients receiving kidney transplantation from donation after citizens' death. A total of 256 samples of PF were collected, of which 64.5% (165/256) were culture positive, and 24.6% (63/165) of the culture-positive PF were polymicrobial contamination. A total of 238 strains were isolated, of which coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) had the highest proportion of 34.0% (81/238), followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae with 20.6% (49/238) and Escherichia coli with 8.8% (21/238). Recipients with culture-positive PF had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative infection (55.8% vs. 20.9%, P < 0.001) and DGF (38.2% vs. 24.2%, P = 0.023). In addition, the incidence of p-DDI was 12.9% (33/256). CRKP was the most common pathogen causing p-DDI. The recipients who developed p-DDI had a higher rate of graft loss (9.1% vs. 0.4%, P < 0.001), mortality (12.1% vs. 3.1%, P = 0.018), and longer postoperative hospital stay (30 days (19.5-73.5) vs. (22 days (18-32), P < 0.05) compared with recipients who did not develop p-DDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Culture-positive PF is potentially significant for KT recipients, and p-DDI may increase the risk of poor prognosis for recipients. Prophylactic anti-infective treatment should be actively performed for highly virulent or multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens (especially Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae, CRKP) in PF to avoid the occurrence of p-DDI.

Development of a Risk Prediction Model for Infection After Kidney Transplantation Transmitted from Bacterial Contaminated Preservation Solution

Background

The risk of transplant recipient infection is unknown when the preservation solution culture is positive.

Methods

We developed a prediction model to evaluate the infection in kidney transplant recipients within microbial contaminated preservation solution. Univariate logistic regression was utilized to identify risk factors for infection. Both stepwise selection with Akaike information criterion (AIC) was used to identify variables for multivariate logistic regression. Selected variables were incorporated in the nomograms to predict the probability of infection for kidney transplant recipients with microbial contaminated preservation solution.

Results

Age, preoperative creatinine, ESKAPE, PCT, hemofiltration, and sirolimus had a strongest association with infection risk, and a nomogram was established with an AUC value of 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.80) and Brier index 0.20 (95% confidence interval, 0.18-0.23). Finally, we found that when the infection probability was between 20% and 80%, the model oriented antibiotic strategy should have higher net benefits than the default strategy using decision curve analysis.

Conclusion

Our study developed and validated a risk prediction model for evaluating the infection of microbial contaminated preservation solutions in kidney transplant recipients and demonstrated good net benefits when the total infection probability was between 20% and 80%.

Optimal Perioperative Antimicrobial Management Strategies of Kidney Transplant Recipients Guided by Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing of Deceased Donors' Microbiology Samples

Background

There is no consensus on the optimal use of perioperative antibiotics prophylaxis after kidney transplantation, but there is a common trend to limit the duration of antibiotic use worldwide. Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has emerged as a novel technology for pathogen detection in clinical practice due to its noninvasive, rapid, precise and high susceptibility to detect infectious pathogens. However, data are lacking on whether mNGS analyses could be used to detect pathogens and guide anti-infection regimens in kidney transplant donors and recipients.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study to review all clinic data of mNGS and traditional laboratory methods (TMs) for pathogen detection in kidney transplant recipients and their corresponding deceased donors from August 1, 2021 to October 30, 2022 in our center.

Results

A total of 57 donors and 112 of their corresponding recipients were included. The antimicrobial strategy mainly depended on mNGS results combined with traditional pathogen culture and clinical conditions. The percentages of positive pathogen detected by mNGS in blood, urine, bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and preservation fluids (PFs) were 50.9% (29/57), 35.1% (20/57), 84.2% (48/57) and 54.4% (31/57) respectively, and were 24.6% (14/57), 15.8% (9/57), 57.9% (33/57) and 14.1% (8/57) respectively when using TMs. mNGS could detected all of pathogens which were detected by TMs. However, samples with negative TMs testing can be additionally detected as positive by mNGS (15/43 in blood, 11/48 in urine, 15/24 in BALF and 23/49 in PFs). Drug resistance genes were detected in 9 donors by mNGS,which were consistent with 6 donors by TMs. There was only one case of donor-derived infection in this study.

Conclusion

This study showed that it is effective to combine mNGS with traditional pathogen detection methods and clinical features to develop optimal perioperative antimicrobial management strategies for deceased donor kidney transplantation.

The Association of Organ Preservation Fluid Pathogens with Early Infection-Related Events after Kidney Transplantation

(1) Background: The need to elucidate the microbial patterns in preservation fluid and explore their relationship with early infection-related events post kidney transplant and investigate antimicrobial resistance and the effects of preemptive antibiotic therapy. (2) Methods: This retrospective study analyzed the clinical data of 514 kidney transplant donors and 808 recipients from April 2015 to October 2020. Clinical data of donor and recipient characteristics, preservation fluid microbes, early infections (≤30 days), probable donor-derived infections (P-DDIs), antimicrobial resistance and preemptive antibiotic therapy was collected. (3) Results: The incidence of bloodstream (10.3% versus 5.2%, p = 0.006) and graft-site infections (9.7% versus 4.6%, p = 0.004) was significantly higher in recipients with culture-positive preservation fluid. In addition, recipients with ESKAPE pathogens or Candida species had a notably higher rate of bloodstream infections (14.1% versus 6.9%, p = 0.033) and graft-site infections (16.7% versus 3.5%, p < 0.01) than those with other positive pathogens. Preemptive antibiotic therapy decreased the bloodstream infection rate (11.8% versus 35.7%, p = 0.047) when preservation fluid was positive for ESKAPE pathogens. (4) Conclusions: Culture-positive preservation fluid has potential implications for kidney transplant recipients. ESKAPE pathogens or Candida species in preservation fluid as well as their antimicrobial resistance properties and non-preemptive antibiotic therapy could pose a risk of early infection-related events.