Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives

A Systematic Review of Pharmacokinetic Studies of Colistin and Polymyxin B in Adult Populations

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The pharmacokinetics of polymyxins are highly variable and conventional dosing regimens may likely lead to sub-optimal exposures and outcomes, particularly in critically ill patients with multi-drug-resistant infections. The aim of this systematic review is to describe the published pharmacokinetic data and to investigate variables that have been shown to affect the pharmacokinetics of colistimethate sodium, colistin, and polymyxin B in adult populations.

METHODS

Sixty studies were identified. A total of 27 and 33 studies described the pharmacokinetics of colistin and polymyxin B, respectively.

RESULTS

The most common dosing regimen for colistimethate sodium was a loading dose of 9 MIU, followed by 9 MIU/day in two to three divided doses, while for polymyxin B, a loading dose of 100-200 mg, followed by 50-100 mg every 12 h was given. Studies that used colistin sulfate instead of colistimethate sodium reported lower inter-individual variability, which may be attributed to the formulation of colistin sulfate being an active drug. The volume of distribution for colistin is typically lower in healthy individuals than in critically ill patients, owing to variations in physiological and pathological conditions. The clearance of colistimethate sodium in critically ill patients not undergoing dialysis was higher, around 13 L/h, compared with those receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, where clearance ranged from 2.31 to 8.23 L/h. In patients receiving continuous renal replacement therapy, clearance of colistin was higher compared with colistimethate sodium (2.06-6.63 L/h and 1.57-3.85 L/h, respectively). Colistin protein binding in critically ill patients ranged from 51% to 79%. The volume of distribution of polymyxin B was similar between critically ill and acutely ill patients, with range of 6.3-33.1 L and 6.22-38.6 L, respectively. Clearance of polymyxin B was also almost similar between critically ill and acutely ill patients (range of 1.27-2.32 L/h). There were two studies that reported free drug concentrations instead of the total drug concentrations of polymyxin B. In critically ill patients, protein binding ranged from 48.8% to 92.4% for polymyxin B. Creatinine clearance was the most common patient characteristic associated with altered clearance of colistimethate sodium and/or colistin, and polymyxin B.

CONCLUSIONS

Critically ill patients exhibit complex pharmacokinetics for colistin and polymyxin B, influenced by renal function, body weight, and clinical factors such as acute kidney injury, augmented renal clearance, serum albumin, and liver function. These factors necessitate individualized dosing adjustments to avoid toxicity and achieve therapeutic efficacy. Model-informed precision dosing provides a promising approach to optimize their use by integrating population pharmacokinetic parameters, patient-specific variables, and therapeutic drug monitoring, ensuring a balance between efficacy, safety, and resistance prevention.

Polymyxin B adjuvants against polymyxin B- and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria

Aim: Polymyxin B (PMB) is one of the few therapeutic options for treating infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB). However, the emergence of PMB-resistant CR-GNB strains has prompted the exploration of antibiotic adjuvants as potential therapeutic avenues. Thus, this study evaluates the potential of 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid derivatives (DNH01, DNH11, DNH13 and DNH20) and isoniazid-N-acylhydrazones (INZ1-7, INZ9 and INZ11) as adjuvants to enhance PMB efficacy against CR-GNB.Materials & methods: MIC, MBC and drug combination assays were conducted using multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Enterobacterales and Acinetobacter baumannii. In addition, the effects of PMB and PMB + DNH derivatives were assessed through flow cytometry and scanning electron microscopy (SEM).Results: DNH01, DNH11 and DNH20, unlike the INH-acylhydrazones, significantly restored PMB activity (MIC ≤ 2 μg/ml) in 80% of the tested isolates. Flow cytometry and SEM assays confirmed that DNH derivatives rescued the activity of PMB, yielding results comparable to those expected for PMB alone but at 256-fold lower concentrations.Conclusion: These findings suggest DNH derivatives hold substantial promise as PMB adjuvants to combat PMB-resistant CR-GNB infections.

Rapid colorimetric polymyxin B microelution directly from positive blood bottles: because patients with serious infections should not have to wait for results of culture-based methodologies

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of the rapid colorimetric polymyxin B microelution (RCPEm) in determining polymyxin B resistance directly from Enterobacterales-positive blood cultures.

METHODS

A set volume of positive blood culture bottles (diluted 1:10) was inoculated into a glucose-broth-phenol red solution (NP solution), where a polymyxin B disk was previously eluted (final concentration of 3 µg/mL). Test was read each 1 h for up to 4 h. Color change from red/orange to yellow indicated resistant isolates. Results were compared to the reference method, broth microdilution (BMD), performed from colonies grown on solid media from the same blood culture bottle.

RESULTS

One hundred fifty-two Enterobacterales-positive blood cultures were evaluated, 22.4% (34/152) of them resistant to polymyxin B (including 6.6% with borderline MICs). When performing directly from positive blood cultures (RCPEm-BC), specificity and sensitivity were 99.1% and 94.1%, respectively. Of note, 79.4% (27/34) of truly resistant isolates required 3 h of incubation, compared to the 18 ± 2 h incubation that microtiter plates of BMD demand before reading can be performed.

CONCLUSIONS

RCPEm directly from blood cultures has great potential to be part of the routine of clinical microbiology laboratories to establish polymyxin B susceptibility, impacting outcome of patients with bloodstream infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Prevalence of colistin resistance in clinical isolates of Acinetobacter baumannii: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The development of colistin resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii during treatment has been identified in certain patients, often leading to prolonged or recurrent infections. As colistin, is the last line of therapy for A. baumannii infections that are resistant to almost all other antibiotics, colistin-resistant A. baumannii strains currently represent a significant public health threat, particularly in healthcare settings where there is significant selective pressure.

AIM

The aim of this study was to comprehensively determine the prevalence of colistin resistance in A. baumannii from clinical samples. Regional differences in these rates were also investigated using subgroup analyses.

METHOD

The comprehensive search was conducted using "Acinetobacter baumannii", "Colistin resistant" and all relevant keywords. A systematic literature search was performed after searching in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus databases up to April 25, 2023. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software version 17 and sources of heterogeneity were evaluated using I2. The potential for publication bias was explored using Egger's tests. A total of 30,307 articles were retrieved. After a thorough evaluation, 734 studies were finally eligible for inclusion in the present systematic review and meta-analysis.

RESULT

According to the results, the prevalence of resistance to colistin among A. baumannii isolates was 4% (95% CI 3-5%), which has increased significantly from 2% before 2011 to 5% after 2012. South America had the highest resistance rate to this antibiotic. The broth microdilution method had the highest level of resistance, while the agar dilution showed the lowest level.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis found a low prevalence of colistin resistance among A. baumannii isolates responsible for infections worldwide from 2000 to 2023. However, there is a high prevalence of colistin-resistant isolates in certain countries. This implies an urgent public health threat, as colistin is one of the last antibiotics available for the treatment of infections caused by XDR strains of A. baumannii.

Effectiveness of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in Gram-Negative Nosocomial Pneumonia: A Real-World Study in India

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The incidences of nosocomial pneumonia in intensive care units (ICUs) in India have been reported to range from 9% to 58% and are associated with a mortality rate of 30-70%. Ceftazidime-avibactam has activity against OXA-48-like carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) and has a safer adverse effect profile as compared to the nephrotoxic colistin. The current study aimed to assess the effectiveness and usage pattern of ceftazidime-avibactam in gram-negative hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in real-world settings in India.

METHODS

Electronic medical records of hospitalized patients in three prominent medical centers in India (Fortis Memorial Research Centre, Gurugram, S L Raheja Hospital, Mumbai, and Fortis Hospital, Anandapur, Kolkata) with nosocomial pneumonia and documented gram-negative Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP)-confirmed infection were collected. This study assessed the effectiveness, usage pattern of ceftazidime-avibactam, and clinical and microbiological cure rates.

RESULTS

Among the 116 patients included, 78.45% (91/116) showed clinical cure. Microbiological cure was observed in nine out of 13 (69.23%) patients. In the subset analysis, a clinical cure rate of 84.85% (28/33) and microbiological recovery rate of 62.50% (5/8) were observed when ceftazidime-avibactam was initiated within 72 hours of diagnosis. Ceftazidime-avibactam was administered for a mean (±SD) duration of 7.79 ± 4.43 days, with improvement in signs and symptoms reported among 91.38% (106/116). Ceftazidime-avibactam showed a susceptibility of 56% (28/56) in the study.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed a better clinical and microbiological cure rate with a safer tolerability profile of ceftazidime-avibactam in carbapenem-resistant KP nosocomial pneumonia and VAP. This study has further demonstrated that ceftazidime-avibactam may be used as one of the viable treatment choices in carbapenem-resistant KP with favorable clinical outcomes.

Challenges in the Detection of Polymyxin Resistance: From Today to the Future

Antimicrobial resistance is known to be one of the greatest global threats to human health, and is one of the main causes of death worldwide. In this scenario, polymyxins are last-resort antibiotics to treat infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria. Currently, the reference test to evaluate the susceptibility of isolates to polymyxins is the broth microdilution method; however, this technique has numerous complications and challenges for use in laboratory routines. Several phenotypic methods have been reported as being promising for implementation in routine diagnostics, including the BMD commercial test, rapid polymyxin NP test, polymyxin elution test, culture medium with polymyxins, and the Polymyxin Drop Test, which require materials for use in routines and must be easy to perform. Furthermore, Sensititre®, molecular tests, MALDI-TOF MS, and Raman spectroscopy present reliable results, but the equipment is not found in most microbiology laboratories. In this context, this review discusses the main laboratory methodologies that allow the detection of resistance to polymyxins, elucidating the challenges and perspectives.

Severe infections caused by difficult-to-treat Gram-negative bacteria

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) in Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) poses a significant global health concern, contributing to increased infections, mortality rates, and healthcare costs. This review discusses the main clinical manifestations, therapeutic options, and recent findings in managing antibiotic-resistant GNB, with a focus on difficult-to-treat infections.

RECENT FINDINGS

Difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR) is a novel classification that identifies GNB exhibiting intermediate or resistant phenotypes to first-line agents in the carbapenem, beta-lactam, and fluoroquinolone categories. The main pathogens implicated in severe infections include DTR Enterobacterales, DTR Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and DTR Acinetobacter baumannii. Although the clinical implications of DTR strains are still under investigation, certain studies have linked them to prolonged hospital stays and poor patient outcomes.

SUMMARY

Severe infections caused by DTR-GNB pose a formidable challenge for healthcare providers and represent a growing global health issue. The proper administration and optimization of novel antibiotics at our disposal are of paramount importance for combating bacterial resistance and improving patient prognosis.

Loss of exclusivity of ceftazidime/avibactam in low- and middle-income countries: a test for antibiotic stewardship practice

Ceftazidime/avibactam is a last-line antibiotic, to be used as a targeted therapy for certain carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative infections and not to be used as an empirical therapy or as a carbapenem-sparing therapy. After a span of 5 years, the antibiotic recently lost its exclusivity and become a generic drug in India. It is assumed that generic players will aggressively market the drug, making it freely available even in pharmacies catering to primary- and secondary-care hospitals. We thus foresee certain potential adverse implications of introducing generic versions of ceftazidime/avibactam into the Indian market; as they will be a challenge to the antibiotic stewardship. In the real world scenario, the stewardship system in India is fragile, therefore, we may see empirical use of ceftazidime/avibactam even in primary and secondary-care hospitals. The existing widespread prevalence of MBL-producing isolates in India, will be further enhanced by the indiscriminate use of ceftazidime/avibactam.

Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Gram-negative sepsis remains one of the most difficult to treat infections in intensive care units (ICUs). Carbapenems are often considered to be robust and reliable options for treating infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. The dominance of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has emerged as one of the greatest challenges faced by the medical community today. Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae may be resistant to all beta lactam antimicrobials including carbapenems and often, are even resistant to other classes of drugs. There are limited studies comparing polymyxin-based therapies with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based therapies for treating infections caused by CRE.

Methods

A retrospective study comparing outcomes between patients with bacteremia caused by CRE treated with polymyxin-based combination therapy and CAZ-AVI-based therapy (with or without aztreonam).

Results

Of total 104 patients, 78 (75%) were in the CAZ-AVI group. There was no significant difference in the underlying comorbidities between the two groups. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly higher in the polymyxin group (p = 0.017). Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy was 66% less likely to be associated with day 14 mortality (p = 0.048) and 67% less likely to be associated with day 28 mortality (p = 0.039) as compared with polymyxin-based therapy.

Conclusion

Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy may be a superior option to polymyxin-based therapy for infections caused by CRE. This can have significant practical applications, in terms of optimizing therapy for the individual patient as well as sparing polymyxins and reducing the use of polymyxins in our hospitals.

How to cite this article

Prayag PS, Patwardhan SA, Panchakshari S, Sambasivam R, Dhupad S, Soman RN, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):444-450.

Failure to predict amikacin elimination in critically ill patients with cancer based on the estimated glomerular filtration rate: applying PBPK approach in a therapeutic drug monitoring study

PURPOSE

The aim of this work was to integrate the Therapeutic Drug Monitoring (TDM) with the model-informed precision dosing (MIPD) approach, using Physiologically-based Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modelling and simulation, to explore the relationship between amikacin exposure and estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in critically ill patients with cancer.

METHODS

In the TDM study, samples from 51 critically-ill patients with cancer treated with amikacin were analysed. Patients were stratified according to renal function based on GFR status. A full-body PBPK model with 12 organs model was developed using Simcyp V. 21, including steady-state volume of distribution of 0.21 L/kg and renal clearance of 6.9 L/h in healthy adults. PK parameters evaluated were within the 2-fold error range.

RESULTS

During the validation step, predicted vs observed amikacin clearance values after single infusion dose in patients with normal renal function, mild and moderate renal impairment were 7.6 vs 8.1 L/h (7.5 mg/kg dose); 3.8 vs 4.5 L/h (1500 mg dose) and 2.2 vs 3.1 L/h (25 mg/kg dose), respectively. However, predicted vs observed amikacin clearance after a single dose infusion of 1400 mg in critically-ill patients with cancer were 1.46 vs 1.63 (P = 0.6406) L/h (severe), 2.83 vs 1.08 (P < 0.05) L/h (moderate), 4.23 vs 2.49 (P = 0.0625) L/h (mild) and 7.41 vs 3.36 (P < 0.05) L/h (normal renal function).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that estimated GFR did not predict amikacin elimination in critically-ill patients with cancer. Further studies are necessary to find amikacin PK covariates to optimize the pharmacotherapy in this population. Therefore, TDM of amikacin is imperative in cancer patients.

Feasibility of Using Ceftazidime-Avibactam as a Therapeutic Option for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Multidrug-Resistant Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Based on Its Susceptibility Profile

Background In the era of increased antimicrobial resistance, there are limited therapeutic options available for the treatment of bacteremia caused by multidrug-resistant organisms (MDROs). This study aims to find out the feasibility of using ceftazidime/avibactam (CZA) as a therapeutic option for bloodstream infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa based on its susceptibility profile. Materials and methods The isolates were routinely subjected to antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) by an automated AST system (VITEK-2). Those isolates found as MDR (resistant to at least one drug for ≥3 antimicrobial classes) were tested against CZA by Kirby-Bauer's disk diffusion (kb-DD) method. Results A total number of 293 MDR Enterobacterales and 31 MDR P. aeruginosa isolates were included. Of these, 87.3% of isolates were found as carbapenem-resistant (CR), whereas 12.7% of isolates were found as carbapenem susceptible. About 30.6% of MDROs were susceptible to CZA. Among carbapenem-resistant organisms (CROs), CR Klebsiella pneumoniae(33.5%) is most susceptible to CZA, compared to CR P. aeruginosa(0%)and CREscherichia coli(3.2%). Among the MDR isolates that were susceptible to CZA (30.6%), the majority had poor susceptibility against other β-lactam-β-lactamase inhibitor (BL-BLI) agents. Among all antimicrobial agents tested against CROs, colistin (96%) was found to have the best susceptibility profile. Conclusion It is observed that CZA is an acceptable therapeutic option for the treatment of bacteremia caused by MDROs, especially CROs. Therefore, it is important for the laboratories to perform the AST for CZA if the healthcare settings intend to use CZA for the management of such "difficult-to-treat" bloodstream infections.

Antimicrobial peptides against polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: a patent review

The spread of polymyxin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae strains represents an emerging health challenge, limiting treatment options for the patients. Thus, the development of new antimicrobials is an urgent requirement. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) are a large class of compounds that are part of innate immune response; these peptides are promising compounds in the field of antimicrobial resistance and are present in all organisms. The present review evaluated patents on antimicrobial peptides tested against polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae, available on Espacenet as of September 2022. A total of 1313 patents were examined and 1197 excluded as they were out of focus for this review; 104 patents of peptides tested against K. pneumoniae were included; of which only 14 were tested against polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae strains. The results indicated that all AMPs evaluated were in the experimental or pre-clinical phase; the clinical phase is pending. Furthermore, a few peptides were tested effectively against polymyxin-resistant K. pneumoniae. Although, the research and patent filing alone are not enough to develop a suitable antimicrobial therapy, they can represent good starting point upon which to develop new antimicrobials. More investment is required to push these pharmaceuticals through the stages of development to introduce them into the market.

Resistance to beta-lactams in Gram-negative bacilli: relevance and potential therapeutic alternatives

The indiscriminate and massive antibiotic use in the clinical practice and in agriculture or cattle during the past few decades has produced a serious world health problem that entails high morbidity and mortality: the antibiotic multi-drug resistance. In 2017 and 2019, the World Health Organization published a list of urgent threats and priorities in the context of drug resistance, which only included Gram-negative bacteria and specially focused on carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, as well as carbapenem and third generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. This scenario emphasizes the need of developing and testing new antibiotics from different families, such as new beta-lactams, highlighting cefiderocol and its original mechanism of action; new beta-lactamase inhibitors, with vaborbactam or relebactam among others; new quinolones such as delafloxacin, and also omadacycline or eravacycline, as members of the tetracycline family. The present work reviews the importance and impact of Gram-negative bacterial infections and their resistance mechanisms, and analyzes the current therapeutic paradigm as well as the role of new antibiotics with a promising future in the era of multi and pan-drug resistance.

Early and Appropriate Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Indian Scenario

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens exerts a substantial burden on the healthcare infrastructure worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, especially, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the topmost priority while developing newer antimicrobials. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria also poses a challenge when choosing the empiric antimicrobial therapy for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms ultimately result in increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased cost of management. To tackle these challenges, newer antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam were explored. The article also discusses the in vitro activity and therapeutic efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam along with its pharmacokinetic properties and the role it will play in the management of MDR Gram-negative organisms in the Indian setting. Several studies have highlighted the role of early and appropriate antibiotic use in the reduction of mortality in patients with Gram-negative infections. Timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy for serious infections leads to favorable clinical outcomes. Early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam while treating MDR Gram-negative infections has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. We have also summarized the information on outcomes achieved by early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam.

Diagnosis and management of infections caused by multidrug-resistant bacteria: guideline endorsed by the Italian Society of Infection and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT), the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI) and the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM)

Management of patients with infections caused by multidrug-resistant organisms is challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach to achieve successful clinical outcomes. The aim of this paper is to provide recommendations for the diagnosis and optimal management of these infections, with a focus on targeted antibiotic therapy. The document was produced by a panel of experts nominated by the five endorsing Italian societies, namely the Italian Association of Clinical Microbiologists (AMCLI), the Italian Group for Antimicrobial Stewardship (GISA), the Italian Society of Microbiology (SIM), the Italian Society of Infectious and Tropical Diseases (SIMIT) and the Italian Society of Anti-Infective Therapy (SITA). Population, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes (PICO) questions about microbiological diagnosis, pharmacological strategies and targeted antibiotic therapy were addressed for the following pathogens: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales; carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa; carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. A systematic review of the literature published from January 2011 to November 2020 was guided by the PICO strategy. As data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were expected to be limited, observational studies were also reviewed. The certainty of evidence was classified using the GRADE approach. Recommendations were classified as strong or conditional. Detailed recommendations were formulated for each pathogen. The majority of available RCTs have serious risk of bias, and many observational studies have several limitations, including small sample size, retrospective design and presence of confounders. Thus, some recommendations are based on low or very-low certainty of evidence. Importantly, these recommendations should be continually updated to reflect emerging evidence from clinical studies and real-world experience.

Effectiveness and Nephrotoxicity of Intravenous Polymyxin B in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections Among Chinese Children

Background: No clinical study on the use of polymyxin B in Chinese children has been reported, thus making it difficult for pediatric clinicians to rationally select these drugs.

Methods: A retrospective analysis of children treated with polymyxin B during hospitalization in a hospital from June 2019 to June 2021 was conducted to analyze its effectiveness and the incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) during treatment with polymyxin B.

Results: A total of 55 children were included in this study, and the results showed that the intravenous polymyxin B-based regimen had an effective rate of 52.7% in the treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) infection in children. The results of the subgroup analysis showed that the course of treatment was longer in the favorable clinical response group than in the unfavorable outcome group (p = 0.027) and that electrolyte disturbances in children during the course of treatment could lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes (p = 0.042). The risk of incidence of AKI during treatment was 27.3%, and the all-cause mortality rate in the children on their discharge from the hospital was 7.3%.

Conclusion: Polymyxin B can be used as a salvage therapy for CR-GNB infection in children when no other susceptible antibiotics are available, and the monitoring of kidney function should be strengthened.

Polymyxin B-Associated Nephrotoxicity and Its Predictors: A Retrospective Study in Carbapenem-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections

Polymyxin B (PMB), a kind of polymyxin, was widely used in carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacterial (CR-GNB) infections. However, adverse reactions such as nephrotoxicity and neurotoxicity limit its use in clinical practice. The aim of this study was to explore PMB associated with nephrotoxicity and its predictors. Patients who received PMB intravenous drip for more than 72 h were eligible for the study. Characteristics of patients, concomitant nephrotoxic agents, underlying disease, and antimicrobial susceptibility were submitted for descriptive analysis. Univariate analysis and binary logistic regression were used to assess the factors leading to acute kidney injury (AKI). AKI was assessed with serum creatinine variations according to the classification of risk (stage R), injury (stage I), failure (stage F), loss, and end-stage of kidney disease. Among 234 patients with CR-GNB infections who used PMB in our study, 67 (28.63%) patients developed AKI, including 31 (14.25%) patients in stage R, 15 (6.41%) patients in stage I, and 21 (8.97%) patients in stage F. The incident rate of PMB-related nephrotoxicity in patients with normal renal function was 32.82% (43/131). The higher risk factors of AKI include males [odds ratio (OR) = 3.237; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = 1.426–7.350], digestive system diseases [OR = 2.481 (1.127–5.463)], using furosemide (&gt;20 mg/day) [OR = 2.473 (1.102–5.551)], and baseline serum creatinine [OR = 0.994 (0.990–0.999)]. Nonparametric tests of K-independent samples showed that baseline serum creatinine and the PMB maintenance dose were associated with the severity of nephrotoxicity (both p &lt; 0.05). Male, digestive system diseases, using furosemide (&gt;20 mg/day), and high baseline serum creatinine were the independent risk factors of PMB-associated AKI development. The maintenance dose of PMB may be related to the severity of AKI. These risk factors should be taken into consideration when initiating PMB-based therapy. The serum creatinine value should be closely monitored when using PMB.

Meropenem/Vaborbactam Plus Aztreonam as a Possible Treatment Strategy for Bloodstream Infections Caused by Ceftazidime/Avibactam-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae: A Retrospective Case Series and Literature Review

Objectives: The aim of this study was to describe our experience of a combination treatment including meropenem/vaborbactam (M/V) plus aztreonam (ATM) for bloodstream infections (BSIs) due to ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CAZ/AVI-R-Kp), for which gene typing was not available at the time the blood culture (BC) results were obtained. Methods: Between 20 July and 22 August 2021, in our hospital laboratory, the molecular test for carbapenemase gene typing was not available. All Gram-negative bloodstream infections were recorded, and characteristics of patients were analysed. Among them, three patients had positive BCs for CAZ/AVI-R-Kp, and the empirical therapy was switched to M/V plus ATM pending phenotypic testing of sensitivity to M/V. Therapy was subsequently targeted on the basis of the results of this test. Results: KPC and NDM represent the most prevalent carbapenemases in our polyclinic. Three patients with CAZ/AVI-R-Kp sepsis were treated with M/V plus ATM not knowing the carbapenemase gene. Two had an NDM-Kp infection for which, upon obtaining the result of sensitivity to M/V, combination therapy was maintained. The third had KPC-Kp infection for which ATM was discontinued, after the acquisition of an antibiogram reporting full sensitivity to M/V (MIC = 0.25 mg/L). One patient with NDM-Kp infection died due to complications of the underlying disease for which he was hospitalised. Conclusions: Meropenem/vaborbactam plus ATM and subsequent de-escalation could represent a possible therapeutic strategy in severe CAZ/AVI-R-Kp infections when carbapenemase gene typing is not rapidly available.

Polymyxin and lipopeptide antibiotics: membrane-targeting drugs of last resort

The polymyxin and lipopeptide classes of antibiotics are membrane-targeting drugs of last resort used to treat infections caused by multi-drug-resistant pathogens. Despite similar structures, these two antibiotic classes have distinct modes of action and clinical uses. The polymyxins target lipopolysaccharide in the membranes of most Gram-negative species and are often used to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant species such as Escherichia coli, Acinetobacter baumannii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. By contrast, the lipopeptide daptomycin requires membrane phosphatidylglycerol for activity and is only used to treat infections caused by drug-resistant Gram-positive bacteria such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci. However, despite having distinct targets, both antibiotic classes cause membrane disruption, are potently bactericidal in vitro and share similarities in resistance mechanisms. Furthermore, there are concerns about the efficacy of these antibiotics, and there is increasing interest in using both polymyxins and daptomycin in combination therapies to improve patient outcomes. In this review article, we will explore what is known about these distinct but structurally similar classes of antibiotics, discuss recent advances in the field and highlight remaining gaps in our knowledge.

Assessment of In-Vitro Synergy of Fosfomycin with Meropenem, Amikacin and Tigecycline in Whole Genome Sequenced Extended and Pan Drug Resistant Klebsiella Pneumoniae: Exploring A Colistin Sparing Protocol

Fosfomycin has emerged as a very useful antimicrobial in management of extremely drug resistant (XDR) and pan drug resistant (PDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae. In this study, we assessed in-vitro synergy of colistin sparing combinations of fosfomycin (FOS) with meropenem (MEM), tigecycline (TGC) and amikacin (AK) against XDR and PDR Klebsiella pneumoniae. Method: Non-replicate fully characterised 18 clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae (15 XDR and 3 PDR strains) were subjected to in-vitro synergy testing by checkerboard and time kill assay. Combinations tested were FOS-MEM, FOS-TGC and FOS-AK with glucose-6-phosphate being incorporated in all runs.WGS was carried out on the Illumina next-generation sequencing platform. Results: FOS-MEM and FOS-AK both demonstrated excellent synergy against all PDRs and all but one XDR. Synergy led to lowering of MICs to susceptible breakpoints. FOS-TGC demonstrated antagonism. MLST-231 K. pneumoniae predominated (14), followed by ST-395 (3) and ST147 (1). Majority harboured OXA-232 (n = 15), while n = 2 carried NDM-1 type and n = 1 co-carried NDM-5 + OXA-232. Mortality was high in both ST-231 (57.1%) and ST-395 (66.6%). Synergy was observed despite widespread presence of resistance markers against aminoglycosides [aph(3′)-Ic, aacA4, and rmtf], beta-lactams [blaSHV-11, blaTEM-1b, blaCTX-M-15, and blaOXA-232], fosfomycin [fosA6 and fosA5] and presence of porin proteins OmpK37, OmpA and K. pneumoniae antibiotic efflux pumps Kpn F, H, G, and E. Conclusion: FOS + MEM and FOS + AK are excellent colistin sparing combinations against ST 231, ST-395 and ST-147 XDR and PDR K. pneumoniae. FOS with fewer side effects than colistin, excellent tissue distribution and minimal side effects may be recommended in combination with meropenem.

Susceptibility testing for aztreonam plus ceftazidime/avibactam combination: A general guidance for clinical microbiology laboratories in India

Metallo beta-lactamases-producing Gram-negative infection is often challenging and there is no defined treatment option. In recent years, the combination of aztreonam with ceftazidime-avibactam has gained much clinical attention mainly for MBL-producing Enterobacterales, while MBL-producing P. aeruginosa and A. baumannii are likely to be resistant. A consensus susceptibility testing method for this triple combination has yet to be recommended. Various methods such as broth disk elution, disk stacking, gradient strip stacking, and strip crossing have been proposed for testing this combination. Among them, broth disk elution and strip based testing methods showed good correlation with the broth micro-dilution method.

Place in Therapy of the Newly Available Armamentarium for Multi-Drug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens: Proposal of a Prescription Algorithm

The worldwide propagation of antimicrobial resistance represents one of the biggest threats to global health and development. Multi-drug-resistant organisms (MDROs), including carbapenem-resistant non-fermenting Gram-negatives and Enterobacterales, present a heterogeneous and mutating spread. Infections by MDRO are often associated with an unfavorable outcome, especially among critically ill populations. The polymyxins represented the backbone of antibiotic regimens for Gram-negative MDROs in recent decades, but their use presents multiple pitfalls. Luckily, new agents with potent activity against MDROs have become available in recent times and more are yet to come. Now, we have the duty to make the best use of these new therapeutic tools in order not to prematurely compromise their effectiveness and at the same time improve patients’ outcomes. We reviewed the current literature on ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam and cefiderocol, focusing on antimicrobial spectrum, on the prevalence and mechanisms of resistance development and on the main in vitro and clinical experiences available so far. Subsequently, we performed a step-by-step construction of a speculative algorithm for a reasoned prescription of these new antibiotics, contemplating both empirical and targeted use. Attention was specifically posed on patients with life-risk conditions and in settings with elevated prevalence of MDRO.

Multicenter Clinical Evaluation Of ETEST® Plazomicin (PLZ) For Susceptibility Testing Of Enterobacterales

Plazomicin (PLZ), brand name ZEMDRI (Cipla Therapeutics), is a novel aminoglycoside antibiotic approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for treatment of complicated urinary tract infections including pyelonephritis. ETEST® is a gradient diffusion method that represents an alternative to the more laborious broth micro-dilution (BMD) method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). A multi-center evaluation of the performance of the new ETEST® PLZ (bioMérieux) was conducted in comparison with BMD following FDA and International Standards Organization (ISO) recommendations using FDA-defined breakpoints. Clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (n=598) were included. Fifty-three isolates were resistant to PLZ according to BMD. Overall, the ETEST® PLZ demonstrated 99.0% Essential Agreement (EA), 92.8% Category Agreement (CA), 1.9% Very Major Errors (VME), 0% Major Errors (ME) and 7.0% minor Errors (mE) with both clinical and challenge isolates of Enterobacterales. The VME was found for a single Serratia marcescens strain. Individual species demonstrated EA rates ≥ 90%. In conclusion, we report that ETEST® PLZ represents an accurate tool for performing PLZ AST of Enterobacterales.

Polymyxin resistance in Enterobacterales: overview and epidemiology in the Americas

The worldwide spread of carbapenem- and polymyxin-resistant Enterobacterales represents an urgent public-health threat. However, for most countries in the Americas, the available data are limited, although Latin America has been suggested as a silent spreading reservoir for isolates carrying plasmid-mediated polymyxin resistance mechanisms. This work provides an overall update on polymyxin and polymyxin resistance and focuses on uses, availability and susceptibility testing. Moreover, a comprehensive review of the current polymyxin resistance epidemiology in the Americas is provided. We found that reports in the English and Spanish literature show widespread carbapenemase-producing and colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in the Americas determined by the clonal expansion of the pandemic clone ST258 and mgrB-mediated colistin resistance. In addition, widespread IncI2 and IncX4 plasmids carrying mcr-1 in Escherichia coli come mainly from human sources; however, plasmid-mediated colistin resistance in the Americas is underreported in the veterinary sector. These findings demonstrate the urgent need for the implementation of polymyxin resistance surveillance in Enterobacterales as well as appropriate regulatory measures for antimicrobial use in veterinary medicine.

Nebulized Colistin in Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia and Tracheobronchitis: Historical Background, Pharmacokinetics and Perspectives

Clinical evidence suggests that nebulized colistimethate sodium (CMS) has benefits for treating lower respiratory tract infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (GNB). Colistin is positively charged, while CMS is negatively charged, and both have a high molecular mass and are hydrophilic. These physico-chemical characteristics impair crossing of the alveolo-capillary membrane but enable the disruption of the bacterial wall of GNB and the aggregation of the circulating lipopolysaccharide. Intravenous CMS is rapidly cleared by glomerular filtration and tubular excretion, and 20-25% is spontaneously hydrolyzed to colistin. Urine colistin is substantially reabsorbed by tubular cells and eliminated by biliary excretion. Colistin is a concentration-dependent antibiotic with post-antibiotic and inoculum effects. As CMS conversion to colistin is slower than its renal clearance, intravenous administration can lead to low plasma and lung colistin concentrations that risk treatment failure. Following nebulization of high doses, colistin (200,000 international units/24h) lung tissue concentrations are > five times minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of GNB in regions with multiple foci of bronchopneumonia and in the range of MIC breakpoints in regions with confluent pneumonia. Future research should include: (1) experimental studies using lung microdialysis to assess the PK/PD in the interstitial fluid of the lung following nebulization of high doses of colistin; (2) superiority multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing nebulized and intravenous CMS in patients with pandrug-resistant GNB ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis; (3) non-inferiority multicenter randomized controlled trials comparing nebulized CMS to intravenous new cephalosporines/ß-lactamase inhibitors in patients with extensive drug-resistant GNB ventilator-associated pneumonia and ventilator-associated tracheobronchitis.

Clinical outcomes of ceftazidime-avibactam versus meropenem in Indian patients with nosocomial pneumonia: Subset analysis from the REPROVE study

The efficacy and safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam (CAZ-AVI) as compared to meropenem for nosocomial pneumonia was established in a randomized, phase-III, non-inferiority trial REPROVE, which included Indian patients. We determined if the results for the Indian patients were in-line with the results of overall population. Descriptive analysis of efficacy and safety demonstrated ceftazidime-avibactam was comparable to meropenem in the management of nosocomial pneumonia in Indian patients and it may be a useful addition to the armamentarium of antibiotics for management of such infections with Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas.