Long-term use of liposomal nebulized amikacin and tedizolid for the treatment of disseminated nocardiosis after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

In vitro activity of tedizolid against 43 species of Nocardia species

The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the in vitro activity of tedizolid against several clinically significant species of Nocardia by comparing with that of linezolid. A total of 286 isolates of Nocardia species, including 236 clinical isolates recovered from patients in Japan and 50 strains (43 species) purchased from NITE Biological Resource Center, were studied. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using the broth microdilution method. For the 286 Nocardia isolates, the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC)50 and MIC90 values of tedizolid were 0.25 and 0.5 μg/ml, and those of linezolid were 2 and 2 μg/ml, respectively. The distribution of the linezolid/tedizolid ratios (MICs of linezolid/MICs of tedizolid) showed that tedizolid had four- to eight-fold higher activity than linezolid in 96.1% (275/286) of Nocardia isolates. Both the tedizolid and linezolid MIC90 values for Nocardia brasiliensis were two-fold higher than those for the other Nocardia species. Both tedizolid and linezolid had low MIC values, 0.25-1 μg/ml and 0.5-4 μg/ml, respectively, even against nine isolates (five species) that were resistant to trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole. One Nocardia sputorum isolate showed reduced susceptibility to tedizolid (4 μg/ml). Bioinformatics analysis suggests different resistance mechanisms than the oxazolidinone resistance seen in enterococci and staphylococci.

Epidemiology, drug resistance analysis and mortality risk factor prediction of gram-negative bacteria infections in patients with allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) is an effective treatment for many malignant and refractory diseases. However, infections, as the most common complication after transplantation, often lead to poor long-term prognosis of patients. In this study, we collected electronic medical records of allo-HSCT recipients with gram-negative bacteria (GNB) infections between January 2012 and September 2021, analyzed epidemiological characteristics and antibiotic sensitivity, and determined independent risk factors for carbapenem-resistant GNB (CR-GNB) infections and death by Logistic and Cox regression models. During the 9-year period, 183 of 968 patients developed GNB infections, of which 58 died. The most common pathogen was Klebsiella pneumoniae. CR-GNB, especially carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumonia (CRKP), carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli (CREC) had a high resistance rate to commonly used clinical antibiotics. Independent risk factors for CR-GNB infections were use of carbapenem antibiotics for >3 days one month before transplantation (OR = 3.244, 95% CI 1.428-7.369, P = 0.005), use of special immunosuppressants after transplantation (OR = 1.21, 95% CI 1.008-1.452, P = 0.041), and time of hematopoietic reconstruction >20 days (OR = 2.628, 95% CI 1.369-5.043, P = 0.004). Independent risk factors for mortality were interval between diagnosis and transplantation >180 days (HR = 2.039, 95% CI 1.05 to 3.963, P = 0.035), total bilirubin levels during infection >34.2 μmol/L (HR = 3.39, 95% CI 1.583-7.256, P = 0.002) and septic shock (HR = 5.345, 95% CI 2.655-10.761, P = 0.000). In conclusion, GNB has a high incidence and mortality in allo-HSCT recipients. Early transplantation for eligible patients, attention to liver function protection, timely identification and treatment of septic shock can help to improve the prognosis of patients.

Prognosis and factors associated with disseminated nocardiosis: a ten-year retrospective multicenter study

OBJECTIVES

Nocardiosis is a rare opportunistic infection that is frequently associated with dissemination (i.e. involvement of several body sites). Identifying the factors associated with Nocardia spp. dissemination may help improving the management of patients with nocardiosis.

METHODS

This 10-year (2010-2020) retrospective multicenter cohort study included adult patients with Nocardia-confirmed infections. The first objective was to determine the factors associated with disseminated nocardiosis. The secondary endpoints were to determine and compare the management and the 12-month overall mortality in patients with localized and disseminated nocardiosis. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used.

RESULTS

Nocardia spp. infection was confirmed in 110 patients, of whom 38 (34.5%) had disseminated nocardiosis. In univariate analysis, the factors associated with dissemination were immunosuppressive conditions: having an auto-immune disease and receiving high-dose corticosteroid (31.5% vs 8.3%, P=0.003 and 52.6% vs 26.3%, P=0.007, respectively). Absolute lymphocyte count <1G/L at diagnosis was the only biomarker associated with dissemination (57.2% vs 26.3%, P=0.007). Nocardia farcinica was not only the most frequent species identified in patient specimens (n=22, 20%) but was also associated with a higher rate of dissemination (36.8% vs 11.1%, P=0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed the association between auto-immune diseases, lymphopenia, N. farcinica species and the higher rate of dissemination. Even though patients with disseminated nocardiosis were treated longer and more often with an antibiotic combination therapy, their 12-month overall mortality was significantly higher than that of patients with localized nocardiosis (36.8% vs 18%).

CONCLUSIONS

Dissemination of Nocardia spp. is favoured by auto-immune diseases, lymphopenia, and infection with N. farcinica.

Long-term use of tedizolid for pulmonary nocardiosis

Nocardiosis usually occurs in immunocompromised patients and causes infections in various organs, including the lungs, skin, and organs of the central nervous system. Herein, we report the case of a patient with minimal change nephrotic syndrome who had been on immunosuppressive drugs and developed pulmonary nocardiosis due to Nocardia nova complex and Pneumocystis pneumonia. For pulmonary nocardiosis, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, linezolid, and clarithromycin were initiated sequentially, but were subsequently discontinued due to side effects; the treatment was completed with tedizolid. Tedizolid was used safely for 200 out of 286 days of antibiotic treatment, and clinical improvement was observed. Tedizolid is a bacteriostatic oxazolidine antibiotic that inhibits bacterial protein synthesis, the same mechanism as its predecessor, linezolid. Tedizolid is thought to cause less frequent myelosuppression than linezolid, at least for short-term use. In the future, tedizolid may be a promising alternative to linezolid in cases of nocardiosis that usually require long-term treatment.

Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Tedizolid

Tedizolid is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with high potency against Gram-positive bacteria and currently prescribed in bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. The aim of the review was to summarize and critically review the key pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of tedizolid. Tedizolid displays linear pharmacokinetics with good tissue penetration. In in vitro susceptibility studies, tedizolid exhibits activity against the majority of Gram-positive bacteria (minimal inhibitory concentration [MIC] of ≤ 0.5 mg/L), is four-fold more potent than linezolid, and has the potential to treat pathogens being less susceptible to linezolid. Area under the unbound concentration–time curve (fAUC) related to MIC (fAUC/MIC) was best correlated with efficacy. In neutropenic mice, fAUC/MIC of ~ 50 and ~ 20 induced bacteriostasis in thigh and pulmonary infection models, respectively, at 24 h. The presence of granulocytes augmented its antibacterial effect. Hence, tedizolid is currently not recommended for immunocompromised patients. Clinical investigations with daily doses of 200 mg for 6 days showed non-inferiority to twice-daily dosing of linezolid 600 mg for 10 days in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin-structure infections. In addition to its use in skin and skin-structure infections, the high pulmonary penetration makes it an attractive option for respiratory infections including Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Resistance against tedizolid is rare yet effective antimicrobial surveillance and defining pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for resistance suppression are needed to guide dosing strategies to suppress resistance development.