Meropenem alone and in combination with vancomycin in experimental meningitis caused by a penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain

Meropenem versus Cefotaxime and Ampicillin as Empirical Antibiotic Treatment in Adult Bacterial Meningitis: a Quality Registry Study, 2008 to 2016

Cefotaxime, alone or with ampicillin, is frequently used in empirical treatment of acute bacterial meningitis (ABM). Meropenem is a less extensively investigated alternative. The aim of the study was to investigate the effects of empirical treatment with meropenem compared to cefotaxime plus ampicillin on outcome in ABM. The study was based on data from the Swedish quality register for ABM collected between January 2008 and December 2016. Propensity score matching was performed to adjust for baseline differences between the groups. Mortality within 30 days was the primary outcome. The treatment regimens of interest were administered to 623 patients; 328 were given cefotaxime plus ampicillin whereas 295 received meropenem. Using propensity score matching, the 30-day mortality rates were 3.2% in the cefotaxime plus ampicillin group and 3.6% in the meropenem group. For matched cases, the odds ratio (OR) for 30-day mortality for meropenem versus cefotaxime plus ampicillin was 1.15 (confidence interval [CI], 0.41 to 3.22; P = 0.79). The OR for 90-day mortality was 1.47 (CI, 0.62 to 3.52; P = 0.38) and for unfavorable outcome was 1.10 (CI, 0.75 to 1.63; P = 0.62). The findings of our study indicate that meropenem is an effective empirical treatment option for adults with community-acquired ABM. However, to spare carbapenems, guidelines should continue to recommend third-generation cephalosporins as an empirical treatment for the majority of patients with ABM.

Efficacy of ceftaroline fosamil against penicillin-sensitive and -resistant streptococcus pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model

Ceftaroline is a new cephalosporin with bactericidal activity against resistant Gram-positive organisms, including methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae, as well as common Gram-negative organisms. This study tested the prodrug, ceftaroline fosamil, against a penicillin-sensitive and a penicillin-resistant strain of S. pneumoniae in an experimental rabbit meningitis model. The penetration of ceftaroline into inflamed meninges was approximately 14%. Ceftaroline fosamil was slightly superior to ceftriaxone against the penicillin-sensitive strain and significantly superior to the combination of ceftriaxone and vancomycin against the penicillin-resistant strain.

Treatment of bacterial meningitis: an update

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of protein conjugate vaccines for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), Streptococcus pneumoniae (S. pneumoniae) and Neisseria meningitidis (N. menigitidis) has changed the epidemiology of bacterial meningitis. Bacterial meningitis continues to be an important cause of mortality and morbidity, and our incomplete knowledge of its pathogenesis and emergence of antimicrobial resistant bacteria contribute to such mortality and morbidity. An early empiric antibiotic treatment is critical for the management of patients with bacterial meningitis.

AREAS COVERED

This article gives an overview on optimal treatment strategies of bacterial meningitis, along with considerations of new insights on epidemiology, clinical and laboratory findings supportive of bacterial meningitis, chemoprophylaxis, selection of initial antimicrobial agents for suspected bacterial meningitis, antimicrobial resistance and utility of new antibiotics, status on anti-inflammatory agents and adjunctive therapy, and pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Prompt treatment of bacterial meningitis with an appropriate antibiotic is essential. Optimal antimicrobial treatment of bacterial meningitis requires bactericidal agents able to penetrate the blood-brain barrier (BBB), with efficacy in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Several new antibiotics have been introduced for the treatment of meningitis caused by resistant bacteria, but their use in human studies has been limited. More complete understanding of the microbial and host interactions that are involved in the pathogenesis of bacterial meningitis and associated neurologic sequelae is likely to help in developing new strategies for the prevention and therapy of bacterial meningitis.

Acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children

Bacterial meningitis continues to be an important cause of mortality and morbidity in neonates and children throughout the world. The introduction of the protein conjugate vaccines against Haemophilus influenzae type b, Streptococcus pneumoniae, and Neisseria meningitidis has changed the epidemiology of bacterial meningitis. Suspected bacterial meningitis is a medical emergency and needs empirical antimicrobial treatment without delay, but recognition of pathogens with increasing resistance to antimicrobial drugs is an important factor in the selection of empirical antimicrobial regimens. At present, strategies to prevent and treat bacterial meningitis are compromised by incomplete understanding of the pathogenesis. Further research on meningitis pathogenesis is thus needed. This Review summarises information on the epidemiology, pathogenesis, new diagnostic methods, empirical antimicrobial regimens, and adjunctive treatment of acute bacterial meningitis in infants and children.

[Presumptive bacterial meningitis in adults: initial antimicrobial therapy]

CSF sterilization should be obtained very rapidly to reduce both mortality and morbidity due to bacterial meningitis. Thus, antibiotic treatment should be adapted to the suspected bacterium and administered as early as possible at high dosage with - if necessary - a loading dose and continuous perfusion. The rates of abnormal susceptibility to penicillin of Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitis and Haemophilus influenzae are 37%, 30% and 12% respectively. Thus, ceftriaxone or cefotaxim must be used as empirical treatment. Listeria monocytogenes remains fully susceptible to aminopenicillin, so, the combination aminopenicillin and aminoglycoside is the first-line treatment. Antibiotic resistance, allergy or contra-indications, are in fact rare but in these cases, antibiotic combinations are often needed. The latter are more or less complex and clinically validated; they include molecules such as vancomycine, fosfomycin, fluoroquinolone or linezolid.

[Antibiotic management of presumptive bacterial meningitis in adults (rational, methods, course, and follow-up)]

The annual incidence of community acquired meningitis ranges between 0.6 and four per 100,000 adults in industrialized countries. The most common causative bacteria are Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Listeria monocytogenes. The emergence of resistance to antibiotics, especially for S. pneumoniae, could explain the clinical failure of third generation cephalosporins used to treat adults with S. pneumoniae meningitis. The present therapeutic suggestions are more based on the extrapolation of an experimental model than on relevant clinical trials.

[Treatment of community acquired bacterial meningitis, after microbiological identification]

INTRODUCTION

Are the 1996 SPILF consensus conference recommendations on bacterial meningitis (BM) still adequate?

OBJECTIVE

The literature published after 1996 was analyzed and the reviewers summarized the available data on antibiotic treatment once BM microbiological diagnosis made or strongly suspected.

METHOD

A review was made using PubMed, 10,015 references were examined. Only articles published after 1997 were analyzed.

RESULTS

No study allowed to recommend other regimens than those previously recommended in 1996, in case of meningococcal or pneumococcal infection: 3rd generation cephalosporin or amoxicillin, combined with vancomycin in case of penicillin-intermediate or resistant pneumococcus. In some cases, alternatives are possible, in case of pneumococcal infection: meropenem or antipneumococcal fluoroquinolone were recommended by US guidelines. New antibiotics available on the market were tested using experimental pneumococcal meningitis models: daptomycin and ertapenem seemed to be useful but linezolid was not. Among the antibiotic combinations tested, ceftriaxone+rifampicine demonstrated a better efficacy than ceftriaxone+vancomycin. There was not contributive published data on the length of treatment for bacterial meningitis.

CONCLUSION

No assessed arguments could be found to modify previous guidelines. In case of problem with penicillin-resistant pneumococci, penem or a combination using ceftriaxone and rifampicin may be used.

Evaluation of meropenem alone and combined with rifampin in the guinea pig model of pneumococcal meningitis

Meropenem is a broad-spectrum carbapenem antibiotic that is highly active against the pathogens causing meningitis. The aims of this study was to determine the efficacies of meropenem alone and combined with rifampin against two Streptococcus pneumoniae strains with different susceptibility to beta-lactams using the guinea pig meningitis model and compare them with the standard ceftriaxone plus vancomycin therapy. All treatments except rifampin were bactericidal from 6 h. The addition of rifampin did not improve the activity of meropenem alone. Our results provide good evidence of the efficacy of meropenem in the treatment of penicillin- and cephalosporin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal meningitis similar to that of ceftriaxone plus vancomycin, suggesting that meropenem might be a good option in the management of this infection.

[Summary of the GEIPC-SEIMC and GTEI-SEMICYUC recommendations for the treatment of infections caused by gram positive cocci in critical patients]

OBJECTIVE

In recent years there has been an increase in infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critical patients, together with a rapid development of resistance to the antibiotics which are normally used to treat them. The objective is to prepare an antibiotic treatment guide for the most common infections caused by gram positive cocci in critical patients. This guide will help in the decision-making process regarding the care of such patients.

METHOD

Experts from two scientific societies worked together to prepare a consensus document. They were members of the Study Group on Infections in Critical Patients (GEIPC), which is part of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC), and the Infectious Diseases Working Group (GTEI), belonging to the Spanish Society of Intensive Care Medicine and Coronary Units (SEMICYUC). There was a systematic review of the literature published up to September 2006 regarding this type of infections and the antibiotic treatments marketed to that date. An evidence grading system was applied according to the strength of the recommendation (categories A, B or C) and the level of evidence (categories I, II or III). Recommendations were given if there was consensus among the experts from both societies.

RESULTS

The antibiotic regimens recommended for treating infections caused by gram-positive cocci were presented in the form of tables, showing the recommendation grade. Alternatives were given for allergic patients. The scientific basis supporting the aforementioned recommendations is explained within the text and the references upon which they are based are cited.

CONCLUSIONS

A summary of an evidence-based practical guide for the treatment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critical patients is presented.

Experimental study of meropenem in the therapy of cephalosporin-susceptible and -resistant pneumococcal meningitis

Meropenem is a carbapenem antibiotic that is highly active against the pathogens causing meningitis. Results with meropenem in the experimental rabbit model of penumococcal meningitis have been controversial, and the possible role of renal dehydropeptidase I in meropenem efficacy has been suggested. The aim of this study was to determine the efficacy of meropenem in two meningitis models and the possible influence of the animal model over results. Two strains of Streptococcus pneumoniae with different susceptibility to beta-lactams have been used in a guinea pig model and the classical rabbit meningitis model. Meropenem was bactericidal at 6 h in the guinea pig model against both strains with a reduction of >4 log ufc/ml. In the rabbit model it was bactericidal at 6 h against the susceptible strain, but against the resistant 3/8 therapeutical failures were recorded at 6 h, being bactericidal at 24 h. In conclusion, meropenem has shown bactericidal activity in both experimental models. This work emphasises the importance of an adequate election of the animal model for the appropriate development of studies of antimicrobial efficacy. We believe that guinea pig should be considered the best choice among laboratory animal species when assessing meropenem efficacy.

[GEIPC-SEIMC (Study Group for Infections in the Critically Ill Patient of the Spanish Society for Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology) and GTEI-SEMICYUC ( Working Group on Infectious Diseases of the Spanish Society of Intensive Medicine, Critical Care, and Coronary Units) recommendations for antibiotic treatment of gram-positive cocci infections in the critical patient]

In recent years, an increment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci has been documented in nosocomial and hospital-acquired-infections. In diverse countries, a rapid development of resistance to common antibiotics against gram-positive cocci has been observed. This situation is exceptional in Spain but our country might be affected in the near future. New antimicrobials active against these multi-drug resistant pathogens are nowadays available. It is essential to improve our current knowledge about pharmacokinetic properties of traditional and new antimicrobials to maximize its effectiveness and to minimize toxicity. These issues are even more important in critically ill patients because inadequate empirical therapy is associated with therapeutic failure and a poor outcome. Experts representing two scientific societies (Grupo de estudio de Infecciones en el Paciente Crítico de la SEIMC and Grupo de trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la SEMICYUC) have elaborated a consensus document based on the current scientific evidence to summarize recommendations for the treatment of serious infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critically ill patients.

Recomendaciones GEIPC-SEIMC y GTEI-SEMICYUC para el tratamiento antibiótico de infecciones por cocos grampositivos en el paciente crítico

In recent years, an increment of infections caused by gram-positive cocci has been documented in nosocomial and hospital-acquired infections. In diverse countries, a rapid development of resistance to common antibiotics against gram-positive cocci has been observed. This situation is exceptional in Spain but our country might be affected in the near future. New antimicrobials active against these multi-drug resistant pathogens are nowadays available. It is essential to improve our current knowledge about pharmacokinetic properties of traditional and new antimicrobials to maximize its effectiveness and to minimize toxicity. These issues are even more important in critically ill patients because inadequate empirical therapy is associated with therapeutic failure and a poor outcome. Experts representing two scientific societies (Grupo de estudio de Infecciones en el Paciente Critico de la SEIMC and Grupo de trabajo de Enfermedades Infecciosas de la SEMICYUC) have elaborated a consensus document based on the current scientific evidence to summarize recommendations for the treatment of serious infections caused by gram-positive cocci in critically ill patients.

Early vancomycin therapy and adverse outcomes in children with pneumococcal meningitis

BACKGROUND

Experts recommend that children with suspected pneumococcal meningitis should empirically receive combination therapy with vancomycin plus either ceftriaxone or cefotaxime. The relationship between timing of the first dose of vancomycin relative to other antibiotics and outcome in these children, however, has not been addressed.

METHODS

Medical records of children with pneumococcal meningitis at a single institution from 1991-2001 were retrospectively reviewed. Vancomycin start time was defined as the number of hours from initiation of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone therapy until the administration of vancomycin therapy. Outcome variables were death, sensorineural hearing loss, and other neurologic deficits at discharge. Associations between independent variables and outcome variables were assessed in univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Of 114 subjects, 109 received empiric vancomycin therapy in combination with cefotaxime or ceftriaxone. Ten subjects (9%) died, whereas 37 (55%) of 67 survivors who underwent audiometry had documented hearing loss, and 14 (13%) of 104 survivors were discharged with other neurologic deficits. Subjects with hearing loss had a significantly shorter median vancomycin start time than did those with normal hearing (<1 vs 4 hours). Vancomycin start time was not significantly associated with death or other neurologic deficits in univariate or multivariate analyses. Multiple logistic regression revealed that hearing loss was independently associated with vancomycin start time <2 hours, blood leukocyte count <15000/microL, and cerebrospinal fluid glucose concentration <30 mg/dL.

CONCLUSIONS

Early empiric vancomycin therapy was not clinically beneficial in children with pneumococcal meningitis but was associated with a substantially increased risk of hearing loss. It may be prudent to consider delaying the first dose of vancomycin therapy until > or =2 hours after the first dose of parenteral cephalosporin in children beginning therapy for suspected or confirmed pneumococcal meningitis.

Efficacy of telavancin against penicillin-resistant pneumococci and Staphylococcus aureus in a rabbit meningitis model and determination of kinetic parameters

The penetration of telavancin was 2% into inflamed meninges and ca. 1 per thousand into noninflamed meninges after two intravenous injections (30 mg/kg of body weight). In experimental meningitis, telavancin was significantly superior to vancomycin combined with ceftriaxone against a penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain. Against a methicillin-sensitive staphylococcal strain, telavancin was slightly but not significantly superior to vancomycin.

Daptomycin is more efficacious than vancomycin against a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus in experimental meningitis

OBJECTIVES

To test the efficacy of daptomycin, a cyclic lipopeptide antibiotic, against a methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus strain in experimental rabbit meningitis and to determine its penetration into non-inflamed and inflamed meninges

RESULTS

Over a treatment period of 8 h, daptomycin (15 mg/kg) was significantly superior to the comparator regimen vancomycin (-4.54 +/- 1.12 log(10)/mL for daptomycin versus -3.43 +/- 1.17 log(10)/mL for vancomycin). Daptomycin managed to sterilize 6 out of 10 CSFs compared with 4 out of 10 for vancomycin. The penetration of daptomycin into inflamed meninges was approximately 5% and approximately 2% into non-inflamed meninges.

CONCLUSIONS

The superior bactericidal activity of daptomycin was confirmed in vivo and in time-killing assays in vitro.

New therapies for pneumococcal meningitis

The treatment of pneumococcal meningitis remains a major challenge, as reflected by the continued high morbidity and case fatality of the disease. The worldwide increase of penicillin-resistant pneumococci and more recently cephalosporin- and vancomycin-tolerant pneumococci has jeopardised the efficacy of standard treatments based on extended spectrum cephalosporins alone or in combination with vancomycin. This review provides a summary of newly developed antibiotics tested in the rabbit meningitis model. In particular, newer beta-lactam monotherapies (cefepime, meropenem, ertapenem), recently developed quinolones (garenoxacin, gemifloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin) and a lipopeptide antibiotic (daptomycin) are discussed. A special emphasis is placed on the potential role of combination treatments with some of the new compounds, which are of interest based on the background of increasing resistance problems due to their often synergistic activity in the rabbit model of pneumococcal meningitis.

Therapeutic efficacy of meropenem for treatment of experimental penicillin-resistant pneumococcal meningitis

With the widespread emergence of antimicrobial resistance, combination regimens of ceftriaxone and vancomycin (C+V) or ceftriaxone and rifampin (C+R) are recommended for empirical treatment of pneumococcal meningitis. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of meropenem (M), we compared various treatment regimens in a rabbit model of meningitis caused by penicillin-resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae (PRSP). Therapeutic efficacy was also evaluated by the final bacterial concentration in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) at 24 hr. Each group consisted of six rabbits. C+V cleared the CSF at 10 hr, but regrowth was noted in 3 rabbits at 24 hr. Meropenem monotherapy resulted in sterilization at 10 hr, but regrowth was observed in all 6 rabbits at 24 hr. M+V also resulted in sterilization at 10 hr, but regrowth was observed in 2 rabbits at 24 hr. M+V was superior to the meropenem monotherapy at 24 hr (reduction of 4.8 vs. 1.8 log10 cfu/mL, respectively; p=0.003). The therapeutic efficacy of M+V was comparable to that of C+V (reduction of 4.8 vs. 4.0 log10 cfu/mL, respectively; p=0.054). The meropenem monotherapy may not be a suitable choice for PRSP meningitis, while combination of meropenem and vancomycin could be a possible alternative in the treatment of PRSP meningitis.

Meropenem prevents levofloxacin-induced resistance in penicillin-resistant pneumococci and acts synergistically with levofloxacin in experimental meningitis

The aim of the present study was to investigate the potential synergy between meropenem and levofloxacin in vitro and in experimental meningitis and to determine the effect of meropenem on levofloxacin-induced resistance in vitro. Meropenem increased the efficacy of levofloxacin against the penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain KR4 in time-killing assays in vitro and acted synergistically against a second penicillin-resistant strain WB4. In the checkerboard, only an additive effect (FIC indices: 1.0) was observed for both strains. In cycling experiments in vitro, levofloxacin alone led to a 64-fold increase in the MIC for both strains after 12 cycles. Addition of meropenem in sub-MIC concentrations (0.25 x MIC) completely inhibited the selection of levofloxacin-resistant mutants in WB4 after 12 cycles. In KR4, the addition of meropenem led to just a twofold increase in the MIC for levofloxacin after 12 cycles. Mutations detected in the genes encoding for topoisomerase IV (parC) and gyrase (gyrA) confirmed the levofloxacin-induced resistance in both strains. Addition of meropenem was able to completely suppress levofloxacin-induced mutations in WB4 and led to only one mutation in parE in KR4. In experimental meningitis, meropenem, given in two doses (2 x 125 mg/kg), produced a good bactericidal activity (-0.45 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) comparable to one dose (1 x 10 mg/kg) of levofloxacin (-0.44 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h) against the penicillin-resistant strain WB4. Meropenem combined with levofloxacin acted synergistically (-0.93 Deltalog10 cfu/ml.h), sterilizing the CSF of all rabbits.

Activities of ertapenem, a new long-acting carbapenem, against penicillin-sensitive or -resistant pneumococci in experimental meningitis

The penetration of ertapenem, a new carbapenem with a long half-life, reached 7.1 and 2.4% into inflamed and noninflamed meninges, respectively. Ertapenem had excellent antibacterial activity in the treatment of experimental meningitis due to penicillin-sensitive and -resistant pneumococci, leading to a decrease of 0.69 +/- 0.17 and 0.59 +/- 0.22 log(10) CFU/ml x h, respectively, in the viable cell counts in the cerebrospinal fluid. The efficacy of ertapenem was comparable to that of standard regimens (ceftriaxone monotherapy against the penicillin-sensitive strain and ceftriaxone combined with vancomycin against the penicillin-resistant strain). In vitro, ertapenem in concentrations above the MIC was highly bactericidal against both strains. Even against a penicillin- and quinolone-resistant mutant, ertapenem had similar bactericidal activity in vitro.

[Pneumococcal meningitis and resistant bacteria]

The emergence of resistance has imposed a modification of the protocols for the treatment of Streptococcus pneumoniae (S pneumoniae) bacterial meningitis. Amoxicillin is no longer adapted. As resistance to C3G appeared, a synergistic effect of an association C3G + vancomycine was demonstrated. Thus currently this association should be recommended in any case of meningitis supposedly due to S pneumoniae. The treatment is then modified according to the evolution and the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) of the bacteria. The strains carrying a high level of resistance to cephalosporin (MIC > or = 4 micrograms ml-1) or tolerant to vancomycine may cause a therapeutic failure despite an increase of the dosage of cephalosporin. Rifampicin, fosfomycine, or imipenem (despite its risk of convulsions), may represent alternative options, as long as we do not have safe quinolones active on resistant strains of S. pneumoniae. Dexamethasone has been formerly implicated in the relapse of pneumococcal meningitis. Furthermore, its use is questionable since no evidence of a therapeutic benefit has been clearly demonstrated. As a consequence of the resistance phenomenon the management of S. pneumoniae meningitis must include particular measures: at least resistance to penicillin must be checked by the oxacilline disk and the MIC to C3G must be measured by E test; aCSF sample should be obtained between 36 and 48 hours following the beginning of the treatment to check its sterilization. All recent studies have shown a similar prognosis of meningitis due to resistant S. pneumoniae as compared to those due to sensitive strains. However, these data should be interpreted with caution since in these studies, pneumococcus resistant to cephalosporin (the real problem) are not separated from those only resistant to penicillin. Furthermore, presently, the incidence of strains highly resistant to cephalosporin is still low. The new conjugated vaccine against pneumococcus should change the situation if its ability to prevent the circulation of resistant strains is confirmed.

Management of pneumococcal meningitis

During the past decade antibiotic resistance among Streptococcus pneumoniae isolates has complicated the empiric approach to and treatment of pneumococcal meningitis. Standard empiric therapy for suspected bacterial meningitis for infants and children older than 1 month of age is the combination of cefotaxime or ceftriaxone and vancomycin. Treatment is modified after antimicrobial susceptibilities are available. The optimal treatment of pneumococcal meningitis caused by strains with a cefotaxime/ceftriaxone MIC >2 microg/ml is unknown, although the addition of rifampin to the initial combination is generally recommended. The role of newer agents including quinolones is under investigation. Dexamethasone remains the only adjunctive antiinflammatory therapy to consider. The empiric approach to the child with suspected bacterial meningitis who has received the pneumococcal conjugate vaccine currently remains unchanged.

Current pharmacotherapy of pneumococcal meningitis

Streptococcus pneumoniae is the leading cause of bacterial meningitis for people of all age groups after infancy. Prior to the emergence of penicillin-resistant pneumococci as the cause of meningitis, penicillin was the traditional therapy for this life-threatening infection. Treatment guidelines for both suspected and confirmed cases of pneumococcal meningitis (PM) have had to evolve in response to the phenomenon of increasing antibiotic resistance. In addition, research efforts have attempted to clarify the role of dexamethasone and the importance of prompt antibiotic therapy in the management of patients with PM. This article provides a review of general therapeutic principles, current treatment guidelines and alternative therapeutic choices for patients with PM.

Synergy between trovafloxacin and ceftriaxone against penicillin-resistant pneumococci in the rabbit meningitis model and in vitro

The bactericidal activities of monotherapy with trovafloxacin (-0.37 +/- 0.15 Delta log(10) CFU/ml. h), vancomycin (-0.32 +/- 0.12 Delta log(10) CFU/ml. h), and ceftriaxone (-0.36 +/- 0.19 Delta log(10) CFU/ml. h) for the treatment of experimental meningitis in rabbits due to a clinical penicillin-resistant pneumococcal strain (MIC, 4 mg/liter) were similar. The combination of ceftriaxone with trovafloxacin considerably improved the killing rates (-0.67 +/- 0.16 Delta log(10) CFU/ml. h) and was slightly superior to ceftriaxone with vancomycin (killing rate, -0.53 +/- 0. 22 Delta log(10) CFU/ml. h), the regimen most commonly used in clinical practice. In vitro, synergy was demonstrated between ceftriaxone and trovafloxacin by the checkerboard method (fractional inhibitory concentration index, 0.5) and by time-killing assays over 8 h.