Evaluation of the E test for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida glabrata

Current status of antifungal susceptibility testing methods

Antifungal susceptibility testing is a very dynamic field of medical mycology. Standardization of in vitro susceptibility tests by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST), and current availability of reference methods constituted the major remarkable steps in the field. Based on the established minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) breakpoints, it is now possible to determine the susceptibilities of Candida strains to fluconazole, itraconazole, voriconazole, and flucytosine. Moreover, utility of fluconazole antifungal susceptibility tests as an adjunct in optimizing treatment of candidiasis has now been validated. While the MIC breakpoints and clinical significance of susceptibility testing for the remaining fungi and antifungal drugs remain yet unclear, modifications of the available methods as well as other methodologies are being intensively studied to overcome the present drawbacks and limitations. Among the other methods under investigation are Etest, colorimetric microdilution, agar dilution, determination of fungicidal activity, flow cytometry, and ergosterol quantitation. Etest offers the advantage of practical application and favorable agreement rates with the reference methods that are frequently above acceptable limits. However, MIC breakpoints for Etest remain to be evaluated and established. Development of commercially available, standardized colorimetric panels that are based on CLSI method parameters has added more to the antifungal susceptibility testing armamentarium. Flow cytometry, on the other hand, appears to offer rapid susceptibility testing but requires specified equipment and further evaluation for reproducibility and standardization. Ergosterol quantitation is another novel approach, which appears potentially beneficial particularly in discrimination of azole-resistant isolates from heavy trailers. The method is yet investigational and requires to be further studied. Developments in methodology and applications of antifungal susceptibility testing will hopefully provide enhanced utility in clinical guidance of antifungal therapy. However, and particularly in immunosuppressed host, in vitro susceptibility is and will remain only one of several factors that influence clinical outcome.

Comparison of the Etest and the sensititre colorimetric methods with the NCCLS proposed standard for antifungal susceptibility testing of Aspergillus species

The susceptibilities of 25 clinical isolates of Aspergillus fumigatus, A. flavus, A. terreus, A. nidulans, and A. ustus to itraconazole and amphotericin B were determined by an agar diffusion-dilution method (the Etest method) and a colorimetric broth microdilution method (the Sensititre method); and the results were compared with those obtained by the NCCLS proposed standard M-38P method for antifungal susceptibility testing of filamentous fungi. Various MIC endpoints for the three methods were determined visually by four different observers in three blinded experiments, and the reproducibilities among the observers (interobserver agreement) and among the replicates (interexperimental agreement) as well as the levels of agreement between the NCCLS, the Etest, and the Sensititre methods were calculated. High levels of reproducibility (within 1 twofold dilution) were found for the NCCLS method (>95%) with the MIC-0 endpoint (complete inhibition of growth) for both drugs and with the MIC-1 endpoint (slight growth) for itraconazole and for the Sensititre method (>90%) with all MIC endpoints, although for the latter the interexperimental agreement for itraconazole was comparatively lower (83 to 93%). The Etest method was less reproducible (67 to 87%) for both drugs. Using the recommended MIC endpoints, high levels of agreement (within one twofold dilution) between the NCCLS and the Sensititre methods for all species were found for amphotericin B (>77%) but not for itraconazole (<66%), for which the MICs by the Sensititre method were up to 3 twofold dilutions lower than the corresponding MICs by the NCCLS method. The use of the first blue well as an endpoint for the Sensititre method and 48 h of incubation improved the levels of agreement with the NCCLS method. Low levels of agreement between the NCCLS and the Etest methods using the recommended MIC endpoints were found for most species, especially after 48 h of incubation (<50%), when the MICs obtained by the Etest method were up to 9 twofold dilutions higher than the corresponding MICs obtained by the NCCLS method. Relatively better agreement was found after 24 h, although it was species dependent, with the highest levels of agreement (>82%) found for A. terreus and A. ustus for amphotericin B and A. fumigatus for both drugs. Overall, better agreement was found when MIC-0 was used as the MIC endpoint for the NCCLS method for both drugs and when the MICs by the Etest method were determined after 48 h of incubation for itraconazole and after 24 h of incubation for amphotericin B.

Susceptibility testing of fluconazole by the NCCLS broth macrodilution method, E-test, and disk diffusion for application in the routine laboratory

Antifungal susceptibility testing may be an important aid in the treatment of patients with life-threatening yeast infections. In order to establish the suitability of different susceptibility test methods for fluconazole with yeasts, the Rosco tablet and the E-test were compared with the gold standard NCCLS broth macrodilution method for 106 yeast strains. These included 102 clinical isolates of Candida spp., including Candida glabrata (n = 30), Candida albicans (n = 20), Candida tropicalis (n = 13), Candida parapsilosis (n = 10), Candida krusei (n = 8), plus Cryptococcus neoformans (n = 3), Saccharomyces cerevisiae (n = 2), and 16 strains belonging to other Candida spp. Four American Type Culture Collection strains of Candida were included as quality controls. The NCCLS method was found to be too complex and labor-intensive for routine testing. The E-test is an accurate alternative, but experience in determining MICs and careful attention to procedural details are critically important. The Rosco tablet showed the best agreement with the NCCLS reference method, especially when newly established breakpoints of R < or = 10 mm and S > or = 21 mm were used.