LED phototherapy in full-thickness burns induced by CO2 laser in rats skin

Photobiological response of mast cells to green and red light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in cutaneous burns

This study assessed the effects of red and green LEDs on mast cells (MCs) in third-degree burns in 75 Wistar rats, divided into control, red LED (RED), and green LED (GREEN) groups. Animals were irradiated daily with RED (630 nm, 300 mW, 0.779 W/cm2, 9 J/cm2, 30 s) and GREEN (520 nm, 180 mW, 0.467 W/cm2, 60 J/cm2, 30 s). Histological sections stained with toluidine blue were analyzed for total and subtype MCs. Standardized MC counting was performed across the viable lesion area, considering lesion margins, through intact connective tissue and the integrity of skin appendages. No statistically significant differences in MCs 2 (with released granules and intact cell border) were found between groups. Irradiated groups showed increased total MCs at 7, 14, and 21 days (p < 0.05), with a decrease in MCs 1 (intact MCs) at all time points compared to control (p < 0.05). Significant changes in MCs 3 (with massive degranulation and partial or complete disintegration of the cell border) degranulation were noted in RED at 7, 14, and 21 days (p < 0.009) and in GREEN at 14 (p < 0.009) and 32 days (p < 0.028). Results suggest red and green LEDs modulate MC recruitment and degranulation in third-degree burns.

Photobiomodulation in Burn Wounds: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical and Preclinical Studies

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis main goal was to evaluate the efficacy of photobiomodulation as burn wounds treatment. Methods: Systematic review of literature available in databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS), and The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) and gray literature in Google Scholar, Livivi, and Open Gray. SYRCLE's RoB tool was applied to determine methodological quality and risk of bias, and meta-analysis was performed using the software Review Manager. Results: Fifty-one studies, gathering more than three thousand animals were included in this systematic review, and four studies were selected to the meta-analysis due to their suitability. The results indicated that photobiomodulation was not effective to improve, statistical significantly, wound retraction (SMD = -0.22; 95% CI = -4.19, 3.75; p = 0.91; I2 = 92%) or collagen deposition (SMD = -0.02; 95% CI = -2.17, 2.13; p = 0.99; I2 = 78%). Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that photobiomodulation, applied in burn wounds, accordingly to the protocols presented by the selected studies, was not effective over analyzed outcomes. However, this conclusion could be further discussed and verified in more homogeneous animal models and human clinical trials.

Effects of photobiomodulation with blue Light Emitting Diode (LED) on the healing of skin burns

The management of skin burns is still challenging. Among the therapeutic methods used, there are topical treatments with pharmacological and herbal agents, low-intensity therapeutic ultrasound, use of biomaterials, reconstructive techniques and photobiomodulation therapy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of photobiomodulation with blue Light Emitting Diode (LED) on burn healing. Fifty Wistar rats were divided into control (CTRL) (n = 25) and blue LED (LED) (n = 25), with subgroups (n = 5) for each time of euthanasia (7, 14, 21, 28 and 32 days). Treated animals were daily irradiated (470 nm, 1W, 0.44 W/cm2, 50 J/cm2). Clinical evaluations were performed and the Wound Retraction Index (WRI) was determined. Histological sections were submitted to hematoxylin-eosin, toluidine blue and the immunohistochemical technique, with anti-α-SMA and anti-TGF-β1 antibodies. All data were directly collected by previously calibrated evaluators in a blind manner. The values were included in a statistical program. For all statistical tests used, 5% significance level (p < 0.05) was considered. No statistically significant differences in WRI between groups were observed (p > 0.05). Re-epithelialization was higher using LED at 7 and 14 days (p < 0.05) and greater amount of inflammatory cells was observed at 7 days (p = 0.01). With LED at 21 and 32 days, greater number of mast cells were observed (p < 0.05), as well as smaller number of myofibroblasts at 14, 21, 28 and 32 days (p < 0.05) and lower percentage of TGF-β1 positive cells in the conjunctiva at 7, 14 and 21 days (p < 0.05). Negative correlations were observed in LED between the percentage of TGF-β1 in the epithelium and the mean number of inflammatory cells and number of myofibroblasts (p < 0.05). The results suggest that, depending on the period, blue LED can modulate the healing processes of third-degree skin burns, such as re-epithelialization, inflammatory response, mast cell concentration, myofibroblast differentiation and TGF-β1 immunoexpression. Despite these effects, this therapy does not seem to have significant influence on the retraction of these wounds. Future studies, using different protocols, should be carried out to expand the knowledge about the photobiomodulatory mechanisms of this type of light in the healing process.

Effects of photobiomodulation therapy with red LED on inflammatory cells during the healing of skin burns

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of red light emitting diode (LED) photobiomodulation therapy protocol on inflammatory cells during the healing of third-degree skin burns. Fifty Wistar rats were randomly divided into control group (CTRL) (n = 25) and red group (RED) (n = 25), with subgroups (n = 5) for each time of euthanasia (7, 14, 21, 28, and 32 days). Treatment animals were daily irradiated (630 nm ± 10 nm, 300 mW, 9 J/cm² per point, 30 s, continuous emission mode) at the 4 angles of the wound (total: 36 J/cm²). After specimen removal, histological sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin for quantitative analysis of the inflammatory infiltrate (neutrophils and lymphocytes) under light microscopy. Greater number of inflammatory cells was observed in irradiated groups when compared to CTRL at 7, 14, 21, and 28 days, but with statistically significant difference only at 14 days (p = 0.02). At 32 days, higher inflammatory cell value was observed in CTRL when compared to RED, but with no statistically significant difference (p = 0.91). The results suggest that red LED, according to the protocol used, modulates the number of inflammatory cells in the early stages of the healing of third-degree skin burns. Nevertheless, this low-intensity light therapy may not, be efficient in reducing the number of neutrophils and lymphocytes in advanced stages of the repair process of skin burns. Further studies with other therapy protocols are needed to assess the effects of this type of light on the inflammatory response of skin burns.