A systematic review of the comparison between needling (RF-needling, meso-needling, and micro-needling) and ablative fractional lasers (CO2, erbium YAG) in the treatment of atrophic and hypertrophic scars

Linear Scar Face Re-orientation vs Resurfacing: Reviving old paradigm

The study highlights the comparative effectiveness of surgical scar re-orientation combined with fractional laser resurfacing versus isolated laser treatment for linear facial scars. The results demonstrated that patients who underwent the combined approach achieved superior outcomes in terms of scar appearance and psychological satisfaction. This study can encourage the re-evaluation of addressing scars and further emphasizes the need for treatment plans that combine surgical and non-surgical modalities to optimize patient outcomes and their quality of life. Future studies with larger sample sizes and randomized controlled trials are recommended to further validate these findings.

Treatment of Surgical Scars with Fractional Carbon Dioxide (CO2) Laser: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Object: The aim of this study was to compare the long-term effects of fractional carbon dioxide (CO2) laser treatment with traditional therapy on surgical scars by analyzing and comparing observational indicators. Approach: A randomized controlled trial was conducted on 116 patients who received scar treatment in our hospital, of which 58 patients received fractional CO2 laser treatment, and 58 patients received injection treatment. The outcome measures comprised the Vancouver Scar Scale (VSS) and the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). The observation intervals occur at specific times. Evaluated at 6 months of follow-up, the outcome was blinded, on-site evaluation using the dermatological appearance scale (DAS) and visual analog scale (VAS). Results: Patients in the fractional carbon-dioxide laser (CO2FL) group rated better than those in the injection group in the POSAS, VSS, DAS, and VAS scores (p < 0.05). The therapeutic efficacy and patients' satisfaction of the research group were superior to those in the control group. Innovation: Scars following surgical procedures can be treated in a variety of methods, but there is no consensus on the best method. CO2FL has exhibited safety and is more effective than traditional injection treatments for surgical scars. It is a worthwhile approach to consider in clinical treatment. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that CO2FL achieves more significant long-term results in surgical scars, including improved scar appearance, safety, and patient satisfaction.

The Predictive Factors of Acne Scarring and Post-Inflammatory Hyperpigmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Introduction

Acne vulgaris, a prevalent dermatological condition, often results in long-term complications such as scarring and hyperpigmentation. While extensive research has focused on treatment modalities, there is a notable gap in understanding the factors contributing to the development of acne scarring and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).

Purpose

This study was conducted to identify the factors contributing to the development of acne scarring and post-inflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH).

Patients and Methods

This retrospective cohort study, conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, analyzed data from patients with acne vulgaris between 2016 and 2023 using the hospital's health information system, BESTCare. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio (R version 4.3.1). We constructed a multivariable, multinomial logistic regression model to assess the independent predictors of four acne complication groups; no scarring/PIH, scarring alone, PIH alone, and acne scarring with PIH.

Results

Among 417 analyzed participants, 95 participants had acne scarring (22.8%), 93 participants had PIH alone (22.3%), and 151 participants had both acne scarring with PIH (36.2%), and only 78 participants did not develop scarring or PIH (18.7%). Isotretinoin use and papules acne were associated with increased risk of acne complications. While adapalene gel was protective against acne scarring only.

Conclusion

This retrospective study sheds light on factors influencing acne scarring and PIH among Acne Vulgaris patients. Our findings provide valuable insights for tailoring interventions and advancing our understanding of acne vulgaris complications in the future.

Effectiveness and safety of the modified multiple mode procedures versus traditional multiple mode procedures on treating facial atrophic acne scars: a propensity score matching retrospective cohort study

Multiple mode procedures (MMP) of fractional CO2 laser provide higher efficacy and shorter downtime in treating acne scars, compared to traditional fractional CO2 laser therapy. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of modified MMP integrated with fractional microneedle radiofrequency (FMR), ultra-pulse CO2 laser and fractional CO2 laser in treating acne scars. A retrospective analysis of 162 acne scar patients treated with MMP or modified MMP was conducted. Acne scars were evaluated using the Echelle d'Evaluation Clinique des Cicatrices d'Acné (ECCA) grading scale, modified Manchester Scar Scale (mMSS), and Global Assessment Scale (GAS). Baseline variables were balanced with propensity score matching (PSM) to improve the comparability of treatment effectiveness and safety between groups. Among 162 patients with facial acne scars, 68 were treated with modified MMP and 94 with traditional MMP. After PSM, both groups had 55 patients with comparable baseline characteristics (P > 0.05). The ECCA score decreased more significantly in the modified MMP group (60%±11%) than in the MMP group (45%±16.6%, P < 0.001). The modified MMP group also had higher mMSS color score (2.6 ± 0.7 vs. 2.1 ± 0.9, P = 0.005), greater reduction in pore size and skin laxity (P < 0.001), shorter postoperative erythema duration (22.2 ± 4.0 vs. 31.3 ± 3.7 days, P < 0.001), but higher pain scores (Visual Analogue Scale, VAS: 6.7 ± 1.6 vs. 3.8 ± 0.8, P < 0.001). Modified MMP is more effective than traditional MMP in treating acne scars, especially for patients with large pores and skin laxity.

NIR-II light based combinatorial management of hypertrophic scar by inducing autophagy in fibroblasts

The hypertrophic scar (HS) is a prevalent cutaneous fibrotic disorder that impacts both the aesthetic and functional aspects of the skin, there is an urgent need for a highly safe and effective approach to address the challenge of HS with thick and deep types. Inspired by the superior deep tissue penetrative ability of near-infrared-II (NIR-II) light and potential mitochondria ROS inducing effect of Chinese medicine lycorine (LYC), we fabricated a Cu2Se@LYC (CL) composite by encapsulating LYC on polyvinyl pyrrolidone (PVP) modified Cu2Se nanoparticles. After NIR-II irradiation, CL could induce the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and mitochondrial damage in hypertrophic scar fibroblasts (HSFs). The subsequent release of cytochrome C (cyt-c) from mitochondria into the cytoplasm and upregulation of beclin1 leads to the activation of endogenous apoptosis and autophagy-mediated cell death. The CL + NIR-II treatment exhibited a pronounced anti-scarring effect in both in vitro and in vivo rabbit ear scar models, leading to a significant reduction in the fibrotic markers including Collagen I/III and α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA). This study comprehensively investigated the crucial role of HSFs' autophagy in scar management and proposed a safe and effective therapy based on NIR-II laser for clinical application.

Advances in the Management of Localized Scleroderma: A Systematic Review of Laser Therapy and Injectable Filler Approaches

Localized scleroderma (LS), commonly known as morphea, presents a significant clinical challenge due to its chronic, inflammatory nature affecting the skin and potentially underlying tissues. This systematic review explores the innovative approach of combining laser therapy and injectable fillers, specifically hyaluronic acid, for the treatment of LS. We conducted a comprehensive literature review following PRISMA guidelines, examining articles from MEDLINE/PubMed to assess the combined efficacy of these treatments in improving both esthetic and functional outcomes for LS patients. The search yielded 64 articles, with six selected for in-depth analysis for a total of nine patients, covering a range of patient demographics and treatment types. Our review highlights cases where fractional CO2 laser therapy promoted long-term tissue remodeling and instances where hyaluronic acid fillers effectively addressed skin atrophy and volume loss, enhancing both immediate and long-lasting esthetic improvements. The synergy between these treatments suggests a promising dual approach, aiming to maximize esthetic outcomes and to improve the quality of life for LS patients. This review underscores the necessity of further research to establish a comprehensive, evidence-based clinical pathway integrating both treatments for managing LS, thereby enhancing patient satisfaction and addressing the multifaceted nature of this challenging dermatological condition.

Physical Treatments and Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia

Androgenetic alopecia, the most common cause of hair loss affecting both men and women, is typically treated using pharmaceutical options, such as minoxidil and finasteride. While these medications work for many individuals, they are not suitable options for all. To date, the only non-pharmaceutical option that the United States Food and Drug Administration has cleared as a treatment for androgenetic alopecia is low-level laser therapy (LLLT). Numerous clinical trials utilizing LLLT devices of various types are available. However, a myriad of other physical treatments for this form of hair loss have been reported in the literature. This review evaluated the effectiveness of microneedling, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) therapy, low-level laser therapy (LLLT), fractional laser therapy, and nonablative laser therapy for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). It also explores the potential of multimodal treatments combining these physical therapies. The majority of evidence in the literature supports LLLT as a physical therapy for androgenetic alopecia. However, other physical treatments, such as nonablative laser treatments, and multimodal approaches, such as PEMF-LLLT, seem to have the potential to be equally or more promising and merit further exploration.

Evaluation and comparison of the efficacy and safety of the combination of topical phenytoin and microneedling with microneedling alone in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: A controlled blinded randomized clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Severe acne breakouts often lead to atrophic acne scars, which affect millions of people worldwide and can significantly affect a person's self-confidence and self-image. Given the difficulty in treating atrophic acne scars, this study aims to investigate the efficacy of topical phenytoin in the treatment of atrophic acne scars.

METHOD

This split face clinical trial on 25 patients between the ages of 18 and 40 involved the application of microneedling on one side of the face, with three sessions taking place over the course of a month. On the other side, a 1% phenytoin cream was administered three times daily for 1 week following the microneedling procedure. Baseline information was collected for all patients, and follow-up assessments were conducted during the treatment sessions and 2 months after the last session. The assessments included evaluating the number and area of pores and spots, determining scar severity, assessing patient satisfaction, and recording any potential complications.

RESULTS

Among patients, 20 individuals (80%) were females, and the average age of the participants was 35.96 ± 9.23. In terms of the fine pore area, despite the fine pore count, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.03 vs. 0.06). Also, regarding large pore count and area, and the count and area of spots, both groups showed improvement over time (p: 0.001). However, there were no significant differences between the two groups (p > 0.05). On the other hand, when it comes to acne scar grade and patients' satisfaction, the phenytoin group outperformed the control group in all follow-up sessions and this difference was found to be significant (p: 0.001). It is worth noting that no complications were observed among any of the patients.

CONCLUSION

It appears that combining phenytoin cream with microneedling has a more effective therapeutic outcome in enhancing atrophic acne scars, when compared to microneedling alone, and this method can be regarded as a viable alternative in treating these types of scars.

Atrophic Postacne Scar Treatment: Narrative Review

Acne scarring is a frequent complication of acne. Scars negatively impact psychosocial and physical well-being. Optimal treatments significantly improve the appearance, quality of life, and self-esteem of people with scarring. A wide range of interventions have been proposed for acne scars. This narrative review aimed to focus on facial atrophic scarring interventions. The management of acne scarring includes various types of resurfacing (chemical peels, lasers, and dermabrasion); the use of injectable fillers; and surgical methods, such as needling, punch excision, punch elevation, or subcision. Since the scarred tissue has impaired regeneration abilities, the future implementation of stem or progenitor regenerative medical techniques is likely to add considerable value. There are limited randomized controlled trials that aimed to determine which treatment options should be considered the gold standard. Combining interventions would likely produce more benefit compared to the implementation of a single method.

Microneedling in Abdominal Scarring after DIEP-flap Breast Reconstruction to Improve Scar Quality: A Randomized Controlled Split Scar Trial

Background

Deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap breast reconstruction leads to large scars in the breast and abdominal region. Common symptoms related to abdominal scarring include changes in color, stiffness, thickness, and irregularity of the skin. The aim of this study was to examine whether microneedling improves the abdominal scar quality after DIEP-flap breast reconstruction.

Methods

A prospective randomized controlled within subject comparison design (N = 30) was used to study the effect of microneedling treatments on the abdominal scar, versus no treatment. Three electrically powered microneedling sessions were performed every 4 weeks on one side of the abdominal scar. Abdominal scar assessment was performed at baseline and 3-, 6-, and 9-month follow-up using the Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS). Treated and untreated sides were compared using a t test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test in case the data were not normally distributed.

Results

Twenty-seven women completed the study. Microneedling treatment led to lower POSAS scores compared with the untreated scar side after the 3- and 9-month follow-up. At the 9-month follow-up, the POSAS total score (Mdn = 17, interquartile range = 18.3 versus Mdn = 21.4, interquartile range = 17.5) was statistically lower for the treated side compared with the untreated side, implying a better-appraised scar quality. The observer POSAS total score was statistically lower for the treated side compared with the untreated side.

Conclusions

Based on patient and observer ratings, overall abdominal scars after DIEP-flap surgery improve significantly after microneedling treatment. Scar symptoms reduce faster under the influence of microneedling treatment compared with no treatment.