Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 for scirrhous gastric cancer: a pilot study

Impact of S-1 plus Cisplatin Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Scirrhous Gastric Cancer

OBJECTIVE

This retrospective study aimed to address the therapeutic outcome for scirrhous gastric cancer patients by evaluating the effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to gastrectomy.

METHODS

Two cycles of a 3-week regimen of fluoropyrimidine S-1 (40 mg/m(2), orally, twice daily), together with cisplatin (60 mg/m(2), intravenously, day 8), were administered to patients, separated by a 2-week rest period. Surgery was performed 3 weeks later in the neoadjuvant group (n = 27). We retrospectively evaluated overall survival and prognostic factors in these patients.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis showed that positive lavage cytology indicated significantly worse prognoses. In the 15 patients who also underwent curative gastrectomies after S-1 plus cisplatin chemotherapy, the pathological response grade was a significant prognostic factor for 5-year survival. Additionally, lymph node metastasis tended to be an adverse prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

After S-1 plus cisplatin neoadjuvant chemotherapy, a grade 2-3 pathological response may predict favorable outcomes in scirrhous gastric cancer patients receiving curative gastrectomy, but further studies are needed to confirm these results.

The impact of preoperative lymph node size on long-term outcome following curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) is widely used to predict pathological nodal status. However, an appropriate nodal size cutoff value to predict pathological nodal status has not been determined, and the impact of preoperative lymph node size on long-term outcomes is unclear.

METHODS

This study included 137 gastric cancer patients with nodal involvement who underwent R0 gastrectomy between September 2002 and December 2006. Lymph nodes with a short-axis diameter of 10 mm or more as measured by MDCT were regarded as metastasized. An appropriate cutoff value with a high positive predictive value (PPV) and high specificity also was identified, and the subsequent clinicopathological characteristics and long-term outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

A cutoff value of 15 mm was found to be appropriate for grouping patients into large (≥15 mm) and small (<15 mm) lymph node metastasis (LLNM and SLNM) groups, with a high PPV (98.6 %) and specificity (99.8 %). There were no differences in clinicopathological characteristics between the groups except for pathological nodal status. In the LLNM group, the 5-year survival rate was 55 %, which was significantly lower than in the SLNM group (73.2 %; P = 0.008). After stratification by tumor depth, the same trend was observed in patients with pT3 disease (46.8 % vs. 72.7 %; P = 0.015) and those with pT4 disease (14.3 % vs. 64.8 %; P = 0.035).

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer patients with lymph nodes measuring 15 mm or more preoperatively have worse long-term outcomes. These patients would therefore be suitable candidates for future clinical trials investigating the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapies.

S-1 for the treatment of gastrointestinal cancer

INTRODUCTION

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU)-based regimens are used worldwide as the standard treatment in chemotherapy for gastric cancer. S-1 , a fourth-generation oral fluoropyrimidine that combines tegafur and two biochemical modulators: gimeracil and oteracil potassium, is now attracting considerable interest.

AREAS COVERED

This review addresses the clinical evidence of S-1 in gastrointestinal malignancies, such as gastric, colorectal, pancreatic and biliary tract cancers. S-1 has demonstrated advantages over standard therapies, in both advanced and postoperative settings, in large Phase III studies. S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin is recommended in the 2010 Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines, by the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association. Results from Phase III studies have demonstrated that S-1 in combination with chemotherapies, such as cisplatin in gastric cancer, and irinotecan and oxaliplatin in colorectal cancers, is non-inferior to conventional 5-FU-based standard regimens, with the benefit of convenience and reduced toxicity.

EXPERT OPINION

The excellent design of S-1 aimed to reduce toxicity by avoiding certain routes of degradation, and to enhance activity by reducing catabolism. This has provided not only a suitable alternative to 5-FU, but also higher efficacy.

An Insufficient Preoperative Diagnosis of Borrmann Type 4 Gastric Cancer in Spite of EMR

Borrmann type 4 gastric cancers are notorious for the difficulty of finding cancer cells in the biopsy samples obtained from gastrofiberscopy. It is important to obtain the biopsy results for making surgical decisions. In cases with Borrmann type 4 gastric cancer, even though the radiological findings (such as an upper gastrointestinal series, abdominal computed tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography) or the macroscopic findings of a gastrofiberscopy examination imply a high suspicion of cancer, there can be difficulty in getting the definite pathologic results despite multiple biopsies. In these cases, we have performed endoscopic mucosal resection under gastrofiberscopy as an alternative to simple biopsies. Here we report on a case in which no cancer cells were found even in the endoscopic mucosal resection specimen, but the radiologic evidence and clinical findings were highly suspicious for gastric cancer. The patient finally underwent total gastrectomy with lymph node resection, and she was pathologically diagnosed as having stage IV gastric cancer postoperatively.

S-1: a promising new oral fluoropyrimidine derivative

S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is designed to improve the antitumor activity of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) concomitantly with an intent to reduce its toxicity. S-1 consists of tegafur, a prodrug of 5-FU combined with two 5-FU biochemical modulators:5-chloro-2,4-dihydroxypyridine (gimeracil or CDHP), a competitive inhibitor of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and oteracil potassium which inhibits phosphorylation of 5-FU in the gastrointestinal tract decreasing serious gastrointestinal toxicities,including nausea, vomiting, stomatitis and diarrhea. Being an oral agent, S-1 offers convenience of administration and prevents complications of central venous access such as infection, thrombosis and bleeding. S-1 has shown efficacy in both gastrointestinal as well non-gastrointestinal malignancies. The authors review the current literature and provide their expert opinion on the incorporation of S-1 in the treatment of solid malignancies [corrected].

Phase II trial of S-1 for neoadjuvant chemotherapy against scirrhous gastric cancer (JCOG 0002)

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of scirrhous gastric cancer remains poor despite extended surgery or adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy. A pilot study of S-1 (TS-1; Taiho Pharmaceutical, Tokyo, Japan), an oral 5-fluorouracil derivative, for neoadjuvant chemotherapy unexpectedly showed good response and a promising effect on survival. Therefore, the Japan Clinical Oncology Group conducted a phase II trial to confirm the efficacy of S-1 for neoadjuvant chemotherapy against resectable scirrhous gastric cancer.

METHODS

Patients were eligible if they had typical scirrhous gastric cancer invading more than half of the stomach, and resectable disease confirmed by laparoscopic staging. The treatment schedule consisted of two courses (each, 4-week administration and 2-week withdrawal) of S-1 (100-120 mg/body per day), followed by radical surgery.

RESULTS

Fifty-five eligible patients were registered. Three completed only one course of the neoadjuvant chemotherapy, whereas 52 completed two courses. Toxicity was acceptable, with a few grade 3 (5.5%) events, but no grade 4 adverse events. The response rate was 32.6% in 43 evaluable patients. Of the 55 patients, 2 refused operation, 1 developed lung metastasis, and 52 underwent laparotomy. The curative resection rate was 80.8%, with acceptable morbidity and no mortality. The survival curve at 2 years' follow up showed a better survival rate than that of the historical controls, but did not reach the expected survival rate.

CONCLUSION

S-1 neoadjuvant chemotherapy appeared feasible and showed positive effects against scirrhous gastric cancer; however, the survival rate with S-1 did not reach the expected rate required when selecting an agent for a phase III trial to confirm the effectiveness of neoadjuvant chemotherapy against scirrhous gastric cancer.

Recent results of therapy for scirrhous gastric cancer

The prognosis of patients with scirrhous gastric cancer (SGC) is extremely poor. However, recent advances in therapeutic strategies against SGC, using effective anticancer drugs, have prolonged the survival of patients with SGC. This paper reviews the recent therapeutic outcomes of this type of gastric cancer and introduces a new treatment protocol for SGC.

Does tumor size have an impact on gastric cancer? A single institute experience

PURPOSE

The present study investigated the prognostic significance of tumor size in gastric carcinoma patients.

METHODS

Nine hundred seventy-three gastric carcinoma patients who underwent curative gastrectomy were included and hospital records were reviewed to determine the relationship between tumor size and survival.

RESULTS

First, the patients were divided based on the mean value of the tumor size in respective stages to control selection bias. Only in stages I and III was tumor size a significant independent prognostic factor. Second, we analyzed the appropriate cutoff value for the large tumor. The minimum criterion for a large tumor, which was determined by the receiver-operating characteristic curve for cancer-related death, was 3.5 cm. There were significant differences between patients with large and small tumors with respect to depth of invasion, number of lymph node metastasis, and stage of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Tumor size serves as an indicator of prognosis in gastric cancer patients and a tumor size of 3.5 cm can be used as a significant lower limit of standard size criterion.

Retrospective analysis of prognosis for scirrhous-type gastric cancer: one institution's experience

BACKGROUND

Scirrhous gastric cancer is biologically aggressive, and the prognosis is poor even with curative surgery. We compared outcomes with different therapies in order to identify prognostic factors.

METHODS

Records for 83 patients, who were treated between 1991 and 2004, were evaluated for survival and stage, treatment, and clinicopathological factors.

RESULTS

Cumulative 5-year overall survival was 10.2% for all 83 patients, including 27 (32.5%) patients with stage II/III disease and 56 (67.4%) with stage IV disease. The 5-year overall survival rate and median survival time for patients with stage II/III disease after curative surgery were 24.3% and 1150 days. For patients with stage IV disease, 2-year and 5-year survival rates after initial surgery were 13.7% and 0% and median survival was 250 days. In contrast, preoperative chemotherapy for advanced, unresectable disease produced 2-year and 3-year overall survival rates of 53.6% and 26.8% and medican survival was 910 days.

CONCLUSION

Aggressive surgery alone does not seem to improve outcome, but preoperative chemotherapy might be beneficial and should be investigated further.

TS-1 as first-line therapy for gastric linitis plastica: historical control study

Gastric linitis plastica (LP) is usually found as an advanced gastric cancer and has a poor prognosis. No sufficiently effective chemotherapy has been reported. In recent years, TS-1 has yielded a high response rate for advanced gastric cancers and favorable treatment results have also been suggested for gastric LP. We retrospectively compared and discussed anti-tumor effects and survival time for 62 consecutive patients with unresectable gastric LP who underwent chemotherapy at Kitasato University East Hospital between November 1995 and December 2002. They were divided into two groups: 19 patients given chemotherapy including TS-1 as first-line therapy (TS-1 group), and 43 patients given chemotherapy mainly with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, methotrexate and mitomycin C (non-TS-1 group). The overall response was 57.9% [95% confidence interval (CI) 35.7-80.1%] in the TS-1 group, which was significantly greater than the 27.9% (95% CI 14.5-41.3%) of the non-TS-1 group (P < 0.01). The median survival time was 402 days (95% CI 251-553 days) in the TS-1 group, which was also significantly longer than the non-TS-1 group (213 days, 95% CI 165-261 days, P < 0.01). Neutropenia and febrile neutropenia of grade 3 or higher were observed in 21.1 and 5.2%, respectively, in the TS-1 group, which were lower than the values of 37.2 and 20.9% in the non-TS-1 group. We conclude that greater anti-tumor effects and longer survival time can be expected from chemotherapy including TS-1 for gastric LP compared with conventional chemotherapy.

The efficacy of gastrectomy for large gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Large gastric cancer (LGC) is frequently associated with extended disease, and the role of surgical resection has been debated. We investigated the efficacy of surgical treatment for LGC.

METHODS

The size of LGC was defined as 8 cm or greater. Four hundred and fifteen patients with LGC who underwent gastrectomy were included. The clinicopathological features, the status of the residual tumor, the incidence and patterns of relapse, and the survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

Macroscopically, diffuse-type tumors were dominant (60%). The numbers of patients with tumors of T3 or greater, lymph node involvement, and peritoneal metastases were 356 (86%), 359 (87%), and 126 (30%), respectively. One hundred and eighty-eight patients (45%) underwent incomplete tumor resection (R2). The R2/R0 (no residual tumor) ratio was greater than 1 in patients with type 4 tumors and N1 or greater metastasis and in those with type 3 tumors and N2 or greater metastasis. In contrast, T2, type 2, and type 5 tumors were more likely to be completely resected. The 5-year survival for all 415 patients was 26%. The survival rates were inversely related to the tumor type, size, and lymph node metastasis. In the 216 patients with R0, the 5-year survivals of those with pN (International Union Against Cancer [UICC] classification) 0, 1, 2, and 3 were 66%, 56%, 36%, and 5%, respectively (P = 0.001). In 96 of these 216 patients (44%) the tumor recurred, and peritoneal metastasis was the most frequent mode of recurrence (48%). By Cox's proportional hazard model, the tumor size was an independent prognostic factor.

CONCLUSION

The chance of achieving R0 resection for LGC is low, except for T2, type 2, or type 5 tumors. Primary resection should be avoided for other types of LGC.