Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for a large gastrointestinal stromal tumor of the stomach

Hand-assisted laparoscopic resection versus total laparoscopic gastric surgery for primary gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs): an analysis from a high-volume institution

Background

Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) is technically feasible and associated with favorable outcomes. We compared the clinical efficacy of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HLS) and total laparoscopic surgery (TLS) for gastric GISTs.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 69 consecutive patients diagnosed with a gastric GIST in a tertiary referral teaching hospital from December 2016 to December 2020. Surgical outcomes were compared between two groups.

Results

Fifty-three patients (TLS group: n = 36; HLS group: n = 17) were included. The mean age was 56.9 and 58.1 years in the TLS and HLS groups, respectively. The maximum tumor margin was significantly shorter in the HLS group than in the TLS group (2.3 ± 0.9. vs. 3.0 ± 0.8 cm; P = 0.004). The operative time of the HLS group was significantly shorter than that of the TLS group (70.6 ± 19.1 min vs. 134.4 ± 53.7 min; P < 0.001). The HLS group had less intraoperative blood loss, a shorter time to first flatus, and a shorter time to fluid diet than the TLS group (P < 0.05). No significant difference was found between the groups in the incidence or severity of complications within 30 days after surgery. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in four cases (HLS group; n = 1; TLS group; n = 3).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that compared with TLS, HLS for gastric GISTs has the advantages of simpler operation, shorter operative time, and faster postoperative recovery.

Laparoscopic Surgery for Large Gastric Submucosal Tumors

BACKGROUND

In general, laparoscopic resection for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) >5 cm is not recommended. However, there is a lack of evidence to support this recommendation.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study included 108 patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery for gastric GISTs. Of the 108 patients, 23 had GISTs>5 cm. The aim of this study is to evaluate the oncological safety of laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GISTs. In addition, we performed a rapid systematic review of laparoscopic surgery for large gastric GISTs.

RESULTS

In our cases, all patients were performed R0 resection without capsular rupture and surgical margins were negative on pathologic examination. In all studies, en bloc resection was achieved without capsular rupture in all patients. The average positive surgical margins rate was 1.6% in total reports.

CONCLUSIONS

The laparoscopic approach for large gastric GISTs>5 cm has been proposed as safe when performed by experienced surgeons.

Hybrid NOTES: Combined Laparo-endoscopic Full-thickness Resection Techniques

Advances in laparoscopic surgery and therapeutic endoscopy have allowed these minimally destructive procedures to challenge conventional surgery. Because of its theoretic advantages and technical feasibility, laparoendoscopic full-thickness resection is considered to be the most appropriate option for subepithelial tumor removal. Furthermore, combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches for treatment of neoplasia can be important maneuvers for gastric cancer resection without contamination of the peritoneal cavity if the sentinel lymph node concept is established. We are certain that the use of laparoendoscopic full-thickness resection will provide valuable experience that will allow operators to safely develop endoscopic full-thickness resection skills.

Surgical strategy for the gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) larger than 5 cm: laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe, and oncologically acceptable

BACKGROUND

The efficacy and feasibility of laparoscopic surgery (LAP) for gastric GISTs >5 cm has not been adequately assessed. Here we investigated the clinical outcomes of these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven consecutive patients who underwent resection for gastric GISTs >5 cm were enrolled in this retrospective study. We assessed the tumor characteristics, surgical outcomes, tumor recurrence, and patient survival in the open surgery (OPEN) group and in the LAP group.

RESULTS

The tumor size in the OPEN group was larger than that in the LAP group, but there were no differences in the mitotic count. There were no differences in operative complications. Finally, there were no differences in the disease-free and no patients in the LAP group died.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with gastric GISTs >5 cm, LAP can be performed with outcomes equivalent to those of OPEN if patient selection and intraoperative judgment are appropriate.

Laparoscopic Wedge Resection of Gastric Stromal Tumor (GIST)

INTRODUCTION

Laparoscopic treatment in general, in recent age has proven that it is well associated with low morbidity, mortality, fast recovery, less pain and sound oncologic outcomes. Recent reports from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) GIST Task Force and the GIST Consensus Conference under the auspices of The European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) show that laparoscopic resection may be used for small gastric GISTs (< 2 cm in size).

CASE REPORT

We report, all the benefits of laparoscopic approach which include short hospitalization, less pain, better cosmetic effect and good oncological outcome, in this case report of 60 year old female patient with gastric GIST larger than 2 cm.

Laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) is a newly developed concept for tumor dissection of the gastrointestinal tract that was first investigated for local resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST). The first reported version of LECS for GIST has been named 'classical LECS' to distinguish it from other modified LECS procedures, such as inverted LECS, a combination of laparoscopic and endoscopic approaches to neoplasia with a non-exposure technique (CLEAN-NET), and non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery (NEWS). These modified LECS procedures were developed for dissection of malignant tumors which may seed tumor cells into the abdominal cavity. While these LECS-related procedures might prevent tumor seeding, their application is limited by several factors, such as tumor size, location and technical difficulty. Currently, classical LECS is a safe and useful procedure for gastric submucosal tumors without mucosal defects, independent of tumor location, such as proximity to the esophagogastric junction or pyloric ring. For future applications of LECS-related procedures for other malignant diseases with mucosal lesions such as GIST with mucosal defects and gastric cancer, some improvements in the techniques are needed.

Techniques of intragastric laparoscopic surgery

Benign or pre-cancerous lesions and foreign bodies of the stomach not amendable to endoscopic removal often require extensive surgery to address a process that does not necessitate lymph node sampling or formal gastrectomy. These lesions are particularly difficult to address endoscopically when located at the esophagogastric junction as a retroflexed view is needed. From its first description in 1995, intragastric laparoscopic surgery has evolved with respect to both technological advancements and tactical innovations. Here we report the development of four distinct techniques of laparoscopic intragastric surgery which we have developed over time and applied in 11 patients. These techniques consist of a (1) combined gastroscopic/laparoscopic approach when minimal manipulation of the lesion is needed, (2) multiport resection which provides optimal triangulation and allows for resection of more complex lesions, (3) stapled removal of broad-based lesions, and (4) single access technique with the device placed directly through the abdominal wall into the stomach. The techniques expand the surgeon's armamentarium to address more complex intragastric processes safely, while the typical postoperative benefits of minimal access surgery such as fast recovery time and less pain are preserved. As we gain greater experience with intragastric laparoscopic surgery, this technique holds the promise of becoming a standard surgical technique for benign lesions for which it is oncologically safe to perform a limited resection.

Totally laparoscopic resection of a very large gastric GIST

Laparoscopic approach was safely performed for the diagnosis and treatment of the submucosal tumors of the stomach because it is associated with low morbidity, mortality, and sound oncologic outcomes. However, no report on the long-term safety and efficacy of this surgery for large sized gastric GISTs has been published to date. We present a 63-year-old female case of a large gastric GIST of 19 cm removed by laparoscopic wedge resection.

A gasless laparoscopic technique of wide excision for gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumor versus open method

Background

Traditional open surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) requires a long incision. Moreover, the gas-filling laparoscopic technique used in GIST surgery still has its limitations. Therefore, we developed a gasless laparoscopic (GL) surgery for GIST and compared it with traditional open surgery.

Methods

Between October 2007 and September 2009, 62 GIST patients in the National Taiwan University Hospital received wide excisions. Of these 62 patients, 30 underwent the new procedure (GL group) and 32 had open surgery (OS group). Preoperative and postoperative clinicopathologic characteristics were compared between the groups.

Results

There were no significant differences in preoperative characteristics or blood loss. However, the days to first flatus, postoperative hospital stay, wound length, white blood cell count at postoperative day one, and peak daily body temperature were all significantly improved in the GL group. Usage of postoperative analgesia on postoperative days one to five was also significantly lower in the GL group.

Conclusions

Wide-excision laparoscopy for gastric GIST can be performed more safely, more effectively, and with faster postoperative recovery using the gasless technique as compared with the open method. We, therefore, recommend this new surgical technique, which hybridizes the advantages of both the traditional open method and pure laparoscopic surgery.

Laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors presenting as left adrenal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare gastrointestinal malignancies. They are rarely seen near the urinary tract. In a literature review, only one case of GIST presenting as a left adrenal tumor was reported. We report two documented cases of gastric GISTs mimicking left adrenal tumors which were successfully treated with pure laparoscopic adrenalectomy and wedge resection of the stomach by excising the tumor from the stomach with serial firing of endoscopic gastrointestinal staplers. The surgical margins were clear, and the patients recovered smoothly. No adjuvant therapy with imatinib was prescribed. During the surveillance for 9 mo and 44 mo respectively, no tumor recurrence and metastasis were documented. Laparoscopic tumor excision, when adhering to the principles of surgical oncology, seems feasible and the prognosis is favorable for such tumors.

Laparoscopic treatment for small intestinal bleeding: a report of 77 cases

BACKGROUND

Morbidity of small intestinal disease is rare and the associated lesion is hard to be detected due to lack of specific manifestations and effective diagnostic approaches. Hematochezia and melena are the most common symptoms in small intestinal diseases. Hence, small intestinal disease is an important differential diagnosis when hematochezia or melena occurs, especially when gastric and colonic diseases are excluded. As the small intestinal lesion is hard to be located preoperatively, laparotomy used to be performed without a preoperative location. This might lead to related postoperative complications. With the development of laparoscopic technique, laparoscopic operations are more frequently applied to surgical disease, despite their benign or malignant nature. Generally, almost all kinds of small intestinal disease can be treated with laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

Clinical data of 77 patients with small intestinal bleeding undergoing laparoscopic or laparoscopy-assisted operations from April 2003 to December 2008 were included, and their clinical information were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

No intraoperative complication or conversion was observed in all cases. The mean operative time, mean estimated blood loss, and mean size of incision were 78.3 +/- 30.5 minutes, 17.5 +/- 9.8 mL, and 3.3 +/- 1.9 cm, respectively. Postoperative complications occurred in 4 patients, including 2 cases of adhesive ileus, 1 case of gastric retention, and 1 case of anastomotic bleeding. All of them were cured by nonoperative management. The mean flatus time was 2 days after operation and the mean postoperative hospital stay was 7 days. There was 1 case of gastrointestinal stromal tumor with local recurrence and hepatic metastasis. Four patients died from metastasis of malignant tumors during the follow-up from 2 to 70 months after operations. No trocar site or wound recurrences were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic treatment in small intestinal bleeding is feasible, safe, and minimally invasive. It may be widely used in the future for its good therapeutic outcomes and improved diagnostic chance in small intestinal bleeding diseases.

Laparoscopic resection of gastric GIST and benign gastric tumours: evolution of a new technique

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) are a distinctive group of mesenchymal neoplasm of the gastrointestinal tract that are best treated by surgical excision without tumour disruption and with a clear resection margin to prevent disease recurrence. However, delivering a posterior gastric tumour through an anterior gastrotomy, laparoscopically, can sometimes risk tumour rupture. We have devised a new technique to avoid this complication.

METHOD

With the patient in supine position, under a general anaesthetic and using a standard three ports, an anterior gastrotomy was performed and posterior tumour identified. An endobag was introduced through a 10-mm port. The retractable metal ring in endobag was closed around the base of the tumour. The tumour was gently lifted, and an endoscopic linear stapler introduced through another 12-mm port was used to resect the tumour with a cuff of normal gastric tissue. Data were analysed on 22 consecutive patients with gastric GIST who were treated laparoscopically. Intra-operative endoscopy was performed in all cases to aid localisation.

RESULTS

There were 16 posterior tumours, of which 11 were operated by the new technique (using endobag and linear stapler) while 5 were dealt with using the old method (resection and suturing of defect). Median operating time for the new versus old technique was 70 versus 120 min (p < 0.002, Mann-Whitney test). There was no tumour disruption or incomplete resection margin using the new technique for posterior tumours. There were six anterior tumours treated by laparoscopic resection and suture closure of the defect. There was no significant difference in median operating time for anterior versus posterior tumours (80 vs. 75 min).

CONCLUSION

Gastric GIST can be safely and efficiently resected laparoscopically without rupture or disruption with an adequate resection margin with this technique.

Laparoscopic treatment of gastric GIST: report of 21 cases and literature's review

BACKGROUND

Although the feasibility of laparoscopic resection of gastric gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has been established, various aspects are debated. This paper describes the problems of minimally invasive resection of gastric GISTs and compares this experience with an extensive literature review.

STUDY DESIGN

Between August 2001 and December 2006, 21 consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopic resection of gastric GISTs were enrolled in a prospective study. A literature review of laparoscopic treatment was performed on Pubmed using keywords GIST and surgery. A comparison with authors' experience with open wedge-segmental resection of GISTs (25 cases from November 1995 to December 2000) was also carried out. Statistical analysis was based on chi-squared test and t Student evaluation.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients, mean age 50.1 years (range, 34-68 years), were submitted to laparoscopic wedge- segmental gastric resections. Mean tumor size was 4.5 cm (range, 2.0-8.5 cm). Mean operative time was 151 min (range, 52-310 min), the mean blood loss was 101 mL (range, 10-250 mL), and the mean hospital stay was 4.8 days (range 3-7 days). There were no major operative complications or mortalities. All lesions had negative resection margins. At a mean follow-up of 35 months, all patients were disease-free. Morbidity, mortality, length of stay, and oncologic outcomes were comparable to the open surgery retrospective evaluation (p=not significant).

CONCLUSIONS

As found also in the literature review, the laparoscopic resection is safe and effective in treating gastric GISTs. Given these findings as well as the advantages afforded by laparoscopic surgery, a minimally invasive approach should be the preferred surgical treatment in patients with small- and medium-sized gastric GISTs.

Laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery for gastrointestinal stromal tumor dissection

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic wedge resections are increasingly applied for gastric submucosal tumors such as gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Despite this, no defined strategy exists to guide the surgeon in choosing the appropriate laparoscopic technique for an individual case on the basis of tumor characteristics such as location or size. This study aimed to introduce a laparoscopic and endoscopic cooperative surgery (LECS) for gastric wedge resection that is applicable for submucosal tumor resection independent of tumor location and size.

METHODS

Seven patients underwent LECS for the resection of gastric submucosal tumors. Both mucosal and submucosal layers around the tumor were circumferentially dissected using endoscopic submucosal dissection via intraluminal endoscopy. Subsequently, the seromusclar layer was laparoscopically dissected on the exact three-fourths cut line around the tumor. The submucosal tumor then was exteriorized to the abdominal cavity and dissected with a standard endoscopic stapling device.

RESULTS

In all cases, the LECS procedure was successful for dissecting out the gastric submucosal tumor. In four of seven cases, the tumor was located in the upper gastric portion near the esophagogastric junction. The remaining three tumors were in the posterior gastric wall. In two cases, the tumors were more than 5 cm in diameter, and one was a GIST of the remnant stomach. The mean operation time was 169 +/- 17 min, and the estimated blood loss was 7 +/- 2 ml. The postoperative course was uneventful in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

The LECS procedure for dissection of gastric submucosal tumors such as GIST may be performed safely with reasonable operation times, less bleeding, and adequate cut lines. In addition, the success of the procedure does not depend on the tumor location such as the vicinity of the esophagogastric junction or pyloric ring.

Laparoscopic Management of Acutely Presenting Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumors: A Study of 9 Cases and Review of Literature

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are rare. Nevertheless, some may present with a life-threatening hemorrhage or intestinal obstruction. The aim of this study was to review the various modes of the presentation of GIST, especially hemorrhage and obstruction, and to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery in the management of acute cases and the correlation of such cases with malignant potential.

METHODS

Data were collected from the hospital in the patient records as well as a prospective database. Their presentation, management, histologic features, and follow-up periods were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine cases of GIST were collected. Five (56%) presented with hemorrhage, 3 (33%) with intestinal obstruction, and 1 (11%) with a tender epigastric mass. Six patients had a gastroscopy procedure, and 6 had a computed tomography scan of the abdomen and pelvis. Five (67%) patients underwent a partial gastrectomy (3 laparoscopic and 2 open procedures), 1 had a laparoscopic localized resection of a gastric GIST, and 3 (33%) had a resection and anastomosis of the bowel. All patients presented acutely, and 78% had emergency surgery performed. The laparoscopic approach was attempted in 6 patients (67%), and was successful in 4 (67%). All patients who had a laparoscopic treatment performed had less pain, a quicker recovery, and a shorter hospital stay, as compared to those patients who had open surgery. Five cases were malignant tumors. Immunohistochemistry revealed a positive c-kit and CD34 for all tumors. The median follow-up was 24 months with one recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience showed that GISTs can present acutely and may need immediate surgical intervention. A laparoscopic treatment is safe and practical in experienced hands. Tumor size and hemorrhage at presentation can predict a patient's malignant potential.

Laparoscopic resection of clinically suspected gastric stromal tumors

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) account for 5% of all gastric tumors. Preoperative diagnosis is relatively difficult because biopsy samples are rarely obtained during fibergastroscopy. Surgical radical resection is the gold standard treatment, allowing pathologic study for both diagnosis and prognosis. Laparoscopic resection has become an alternative to the open approach, but long-term results are not well known. The aim of this study is to report experience with laparoscopic resection, placing special emphasis on preoperative diagnosis and describing long-term results. A retrospective analysis was made of all patients undergoing a laparoscopic resection for clinically suspected gastrointestinal stromal tumors between November 1998 and August 2006 at 2 tertiary hospitals. The medical records of all participants were reviewed regarding surgical technique, clinicopathologic features, and postoperative long-term outcome. Laparoscopic gastric resection was attempted in 22 patients (13 women and 9 men) with a mean age of 66.7 years (range, 29-84 years). One patient had 2 gastric tumors. Tumor localization was upper gastric third in 6 patients, mid-gastric third in 7, and distal third in 10. Surgical techniques were transgastric submucosal excision (n = 1), wedge resection (n = 13), partial gastrectomy with Y-en-Roux reconstruction (n = 6), and total gastrectomy with Y-en-Roux reconstruction (n = 2). Two patients (9.1%) required conversion to the open procedure because of tumor size. Postoperative morbidity was delayed gastric emptying in 3 patients. Median postoperative stay was 6 days (range, 4-32 days). Pathologic and immunohistochemical study confirmed gastrointestinal stromal tumors in 18 cases. The other 4 cases were adenomyoma, hamartoma, plasmocytoma, and parasitic tumor (anisakis). Median tumor size was 5.6 cm (range, 2.5-12.5 cm) in cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors. Malignant risk of gastrointestinal stromal tumors assessed according to mitotic index and size was low (n = 8), intermediate (n = 6), or high (n = 4). After a median follow-up of 32 months (range, 1-72 months), there was 1 case of recurrence of GIST. Definitive preoperative diagnosis of gastric submucosal tumors is frequently difficult. The laparoscopic approach to surgical treatment of these tumors seems safe and is associated with acceptable intermediate-term results, especially in cases of gastrointestinal stromal tumors.