Safety and efficacy of S-1 monotherapy in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

Translation Potential and Challenges of In Vitro and Murine Models in Cancer Clinic

As one of the leading causes of death from disease, cancer continues to pose a serious threat to human health globally. Despite the development of novel therapeutic regimens and drugs, the long-term survival of cancer patients is still very low, especially for those whose diagnosis is not caught early enough. Meanwhile, our understanding of tumorigenesis is still limited. Suitable research models are essential tools for exploring cancer mechanisms and treatments. Herein we review and compare several widely used in vitro and in vivo murine cancer models, including syngeneic tumor models, genetically engineered mouse models (GEMM), cell line-derived xenografts (CDX), patient-derived xenografts (PDX), conditionally reprogrammed (CR) cells, organoids, and MiniPDX. We will summarize the methodology and feasibility of various models in terms of their advantages and limitations in the application prospects for drug discovery and development and precision medicine.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus oxaliplatin plus S-1 as first-line treatment in advanced gastric cancer: results of a multicenter, randomized, phase III trial (GAPSO study)

Background:

This study aimed to investigate the superiority of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) over oxaliplatin plus S-1 (SOX) in patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC).

Methods:

In this multicenter, randomized, phase III superiority trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced gastric adenocarcinoma were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 260 mg/m² on day 1 or 130 mg/m² on days 1 and 8; oral S-1 40–60 mg twice daily for 14 days) or SOX (130 mg/m² oxaliplatin on day 1; oral S-1 40–60 mg twice daily for 14 days) every 3 weeks for up to six cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival, objective response rate, and safety.

Results:

Owing to slow enrolment, an unplanned interim analysis was performed, resulting in the early termination of the study on 31 December 2021 (data cutoff). Between March 2019 and March 2021, 97 patients (AS, n = 48; SOX, n = 49) were treated and evaluated for efficacy and safety of AS and SOX. As of the data cutoff, the median follow-up was 23.13 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 13.39–32.87]. The median PFS was 9.03 months (95% CI, 6.50–11.56) in the AS group and 5.07 months (95% CI, 4.33–5.81) in the SOX group, demonstrating a better PFS tendency following AS treatment than SOX treatment (hazard ratio = 0.59; 95% CI, 0.37–0.94; p = 0.03). The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were anemia, neutropenia, and leukopenia in both groups, with a higher incidence of thrombocytopenia in the SOX group.

Conclusion:

Although this study was terminated early, the results demonstrated a better PFS tendency in patients with AGC who were treated with AS than in those treated with SOX, with controllable toxicities.

Trial registration:

Clinical Trials.gov identifiers: NCT03801668. Registered January 11, 2019.

Real-World Therapeutic Outcomes of S-1 Adjuvant Chemotherapy for pStage II/III Gastric Cancer in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

The predictive factors for discontinuation of S-1 administration and prognostic factors in elderly patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer receiving S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy remain unclear.

METHODS

Between January 2004 and December 2016, 80 elderly gastric cancer patients (≥70 years) undergoing curative D2 gastrectomy were enrolled in this study. Predictive factors for completion of S-1 administration over 1 year, adverse events due to S-1 administration, and prognostic factors for overall survival (OS) and relapse-free survival (RFS) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (35%) completed 8 courses of S-1. The median relative dose intensity was 82.1% (IQR 31.1-100%). The incidence rates of hematological and nonhematological adverse events were acceptable. Distal gastrectomy was an independent predictive factor for completion of S-1 administration (odds ratio [OR] 0.364; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.141-0.939; p = 0.037). Higher postoperative neutrophil count/lymphocyte count (N/L) ratio and more advanced stage adversely influenced OS. Multivariate analysis revealed that a higher postoperative N/L ratio and more advanced stage adversely affected RFS.

CONCLUSION

To complete adjuvant S-1 administration to elderly patients with pStage II/III gastric cancer, total gastrectomy should be avoided if possible. A new regimen for elderly gastric cancer patients with higher postoperative N/L ratios and more advanced stage should be established.

Activity and Safety of Tegafur, Gimeracil, and Oteracil Potassium for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

In clinical practice, tegafur, gimeracil, and oteracil potassium (S-1) therapy is commonly administered to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). However, its efficacy and safety remain controversial in both randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-RCTs. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 treatment for NPC. We searched PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wanfang Database, and VIP databases for RCTs of chemotherapy with or without S-1 for NPC, from 2001 to 2020. A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan5.3 and Stata15. Randomized controlled trials published in journals were included irrespective of blinding and language used. Patients were diagnosed with NPC through a clinicopathological examination; patients of all cancer stages and ages were included. Overall, 25 trials and 1858 patients were included. There were significant differences in the complete remission (OR = 2.42, 95% CI (1.88–3.10), P < 0.05) and overall response rate (OR = 2.68, 95% CI (2.08–3.45), P < 0.05) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. However, there was no significant difference in partial remission (OR = 1.10, 95% CI (0.87–1.39), P=0.42) and seven adverse reactions (leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, nausea and vomiting, diarrhea, dermatitis, oral mucositis, and anemia) between the S-1 and non-S-1 groups. Additionally, statistical analyses with six subgroups were performed. S-1 was found to be a satisfactory chemotherapeutic agent combined with radiotherapy, intravenous chemotherapy, or chemoradiotherapy for NPC. As an oral medicine, the adverse reactions of S-1, especially gastrointestinal reactions, can be tolerated by patients, thereby optimizing their quality of life. S-1 may be a better choice for the treatment of NPC. This trial is registered with CRD42019122041.

Neoadjuvant therapy strategies for advanced gastric cancer: Current innovations and future challenges

Gastric cancer, which has a high incidence and poor prognosis, remains a therapeutic challenge. Recently, neoadjuvant therapy has attracted increasing attention due to high recurrence rate and low survival rate after resection in most patients with advanced stage. Clinical trials show that neoadjuvant approaches confer a significant survival advantage for resectable locally advanced gastric cancer. The specific advantages of chemoradiotherapy compared with chemotherapy have not been clarified; optimal regimens and cycles, particularly in the preoperative setting, should be studied further; and trials aimed at determining the role of targeted and immunological therapies should be conducted.

Proposal of a Scoring Scale to Estimate Risk of the Discontinuation of S-1 Adjuvant Monotherapy in Patients with Stage II to III Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Institutional Dataset Analysis

BACKGROUND

Discontinuation of postoperative S-1 adjuvant monotherapy is a frequent problem in the management of patients with gastric cancer.

METHODS

A total of 355 stage II/III gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy and adjuvant S-1 were retrospectively analyzed using a multicenter dataset. We randomly assigned patients into either discovery or validation cohort in a 2:1 ratio. In the discovery cohort, 29 parameters were assessed as candidate factors to predict discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant within 6 months. A scoring system was designed using independent risk factors identified by the multivariate analysis. Reproducibility was tested in the validation cohort.

RESULTS

Overall, 92 patients (25.9%) discontinued the treatment within 6 months because of adverse effects. Age, preoperative urea nitrogen (UN) and the preoperative albumin-to-bilirubin index (ALBI) showed the highest area under the curve (AUC) for the discontinuation of S-1 adjuvant within 6 months in each category: body status, blood tests and indices. In the multivariate analysis, age ≥ 64 years, preoperative UN ≥ 15.2 mg/dl and preoperative ALBI ≥ -0.265 were identified as independent risk factors. A scoring scale consisting of these three factors was developed for the prediction of drug discontinuation and demonstrated a greater AUC (0.728) than that of each of the three constituents. The time to treatment discontinuation decreased incrementally as the risk score increased. The reproducible findings were confirmed in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified risk factors and developed a scoring scale to predict S-1 adjuvant monotherapy discontinuation in patients with stage II/III gastric cancer.

Retrospective study of unplanned hospital admission for metastatic cancer patients visiting the emergency department

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to identify factors that predict unplanned admission for metastatic cancer patients visiting the emergency department (ED).

METHODS

Patients visiting the ED of a general hospital from April 2012 to March 2013 were investigated retrospectively. Data including demographics, vital signs, and laboratory measurements were collected from a chart review for each patient. Factors related to emergency admission were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 15,716 individuals visiting the ED during the study period included 1244 (7.9%) patients with cancer. Among the 491 cancer patients with metastasis, univariate analysis revealed that emergency admission was significantly associated with an age of ≥76 years; an altered mental status; fever (≥38 °C); a blood oxygen saturation of <90%; a white blood cell (WBC) count of ≤2000 or ≥10,000/μL; hypoalbuminemia (≤2.5 g/dL); and elevated levels of aspartate aminotransferase (≥100 IU/L), blood urea nitrogen (≥25 mg/dL), and C-reactive protein (CRP, ≥10 mg/dL). Multivariate analysis identified age, an altered mental status, hypoxemia, an abnormal WBC count, and elevated CRP as putative independent predictive factors for emergency admission. The number of these five factors present was also correlated with 30-day mortality (c-statistic = 0.72).

CONCLUSIONS

Age, unconsciousness, hypoxemia, an abnormal WBC count, and elevated CRP were found to be associated with emergency admission and 30-day mortality for metastatic cancer patients. Prospective validation of a predictive scoring system based on these findings is warranted.

Nomogram for 5-year relapse-free survival of a patient with advanced gastric cancer after surgery

BACKGROUND

Prognoses vary substantially among patients with advanced gastric cancer following curative surgery. The aim of the current study was to develop and verify the validity of a novel nomogram that predicts the probability of 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) in patients who underwent curative resection for stage II/III gastric cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A nomogram to predict 5-year RFS following surgical resection of gastric cancer was constructed based on the data of patients who underwent surgery for primary gastric carcinoma at three institutions in Japan in January 2001-December 2006. Multivariate analysis using a Cox proportional hazards regression model was performed, and the nomogram's predictive accuracy (discrimination) and the agreement between observed outcomes and predictions (calibration) were evaluated by internal validation.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses revealed that age at operation, depth of tumor, tumor location, lymph node classification, and presence of combined resection were significant prognostic factors for RFS. In the internal validation, discrimination of the developed nomogram for 5-year RFS was superior to that of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM classification (concordance indices of 0.80 versus 0.67; P < 0.001). Moreover, calibration appeared to be accurate. Based on these results, we have created free software to more easily predict 5-year RFS.

CONCLUSION

We developed and validated a nomogram to predict 5-year RFS after curative surgery for stage II/III gastric cancer. This tool will be useful for the assessing a patient's individual recurrence risk when considering additional therapy in clinical practice.

Short- and Long-Term Outcomes After Gastrectomy in Elderly Gastric Cancer Patients

BACKGROUND

The number of elderly patients undergoing gastric cancer surgery has recently increased. We therefore evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients after curative gastrectomy.

METHODS

Overall, 824 patients were included in this retrospective study, which comprised of a non-elderly group (60-64 years; n = 558), an early-elderly group (75-79 years; n = 198), and a late-elderly group (≥80 years; n = 68) who underwent curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2009. Postoperative complications, according to the Clavien-Dindo classification, and survival of both elderly groups were compared with the non-elderly group. Postoperative life expectancy of the late-elderly group was compared with the corresponding aged general population.

RESULTS

Overall and severe (grade III or higher) complications in the early-elderly group were comparable with the non-elderly group; however, those in the late-elderly group were significantly more common than in the non-elderly group (p = 0.013 and p = 0.043, respectively). Multivariable analysis revealed that age ≥80 years was an independent risk factor for severe complications (hazard ratio 3.02, 95 % confidence interval 1.12-8.17; p = 0.029), and the disease-specific survivals of both elderly groups were comparable with the non-elderly group in all TNM stages. Postoperative life expectancy of late-elderly patients eliminating death from recurrence was comparable with the corresponding aged general population eliminating death from gastric cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Gastric cancer surgery in elderly patients aged ≥80 years achieves reasonable long-term survival despite the increased risk of severe complications.

Treatment of advanced oesophagogastric cancer with FOLFOX-4 regimen followed by leucovorin/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU as maintenance chemotherapy in patients aged ≥ 75 years with impaired performance status

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of FOLFOX-4 combination chemotherapy, followed by leucovorin (LV)/bolus and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) as maintenance chemotherapy in elderly (≥ 75 years) patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer with impaired performance status (PS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with a PS score >1 were included in this study. PS evaluations were performed by a geriatrician and two medical oncologists. FOLFOX-4 consisted of oxaliplatin concurrently with LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU every 2 weeks. After a maximum of six FOLFOX-4 cycles, patients with no evidence of disease progression received maintenance treatment with LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, 32 (84.2%) patients had a PS score of 2 and six (15.7%) patients had a PS score of 3. After completion of FOLFOX-4, 18 (47.3%) patients achieved a partial response and 14 (36.8%) patients had stable disease. Thirty-two patients (84.2%) received maintenance chemotherapy for a median of eight cycles (range one to 26 cycles). The 6-month disease-control rate was 47.3% [95% confidence interval (CI) 30.9-64.1]. The median progression-free survival was 5.9 months (95% CI 4.7-6.8) and the median overall survival was 9.6 months (95% CI 8.1-11.7). Grade 3 neutropenia occurred in six patients (15.7%), and Grade 3 anaemia and thrombocytopenia occurred in two patients (5.2%).

CONCLUSION

FOLFOX-4 followed by LV/bolus and continuous infusion 5-FU as maintenance chemotherapy seems to be an active and well-tolerated first-line treatment strategy for elderly patients with advanced oesophagogastric cancer and impaired PS.

Safety and feasibility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of administering S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer has not yet been fully evaluated in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study selected patients who underwent curative surgery for pancreatic cancer, were diagnosed with stage II disease or lower or stage III disease with combined resection of the celiac artery, and received adjuvant S-1 at our institution. The patients were categorized into two groups: non-elderly patients (<70 years of age: group A) and elderly patients (>70 years of age: group B). The toxicity and S-1 continuation rates were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were evaluated in the present study. There were no grade 4 toxicities. The incidences of grade 3 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were <5 % in both groups, and the differences were not significantly different. The continuation rate at 6 months was 60.5 % in group A and 72.7 % in group B, which was also not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer is safe and feasible, regardless of the age of the patient, especially for elderly patients who may be candidates for clinical trials.

Impact of adding cisplatin to S-1 in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer

PURPOSE

We retrospectively examined the efficacy and safety of S-1 alone or S-1 plus cisplatin (SP) for elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer because the benefit of adding cisplatin in these patients still remains unclear.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Among 175 patients aged 70 years or older who received S-1 alone or SP as a first-line therapy between April 2000 and November 2010 at our institution, 104 patients who met eligibility criteria were examined. We investigated safety and efficacy of S-1 and SP.

RESULTS

Among these 104 patients, 73 patients received S-1 and 31 patients received SP. The median age was 75 years in the S-1 group and 74 years in the SP group. The response rate was 26.3 % in the S-1 group and 44.0 % in the SP group. Major grade 3 or higher adverse events were observed as follows (S-1 vs. SP): nausea (1.4 vs. 16.1 %), anorexia (16.4 vs. 41.9 %), neutropenia (4.1 vs. 35.5 %), and febrile neutropenia (0 vs. 9.7 %). The median overall survival (OS) was 10.4 months in the S-1 group and 17.8 months in the SP group. Treatment of SP and histology of intestinal type were detected as independent, good prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

SP might improve OS with some added toxicity compared to S-1 alone in elderly patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Role of S-1 in treatment of advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fourth most common malignancy worldwide. More than 50% of gastric cancer patients have unresectable disease at diagnosis, and there is a high rate of local or distant recurrence, even in patients with an operable tumor. Chemotherapy is regarded as a significant and basic treatment that can provide a longer symptom-free period and improve quality of life. S-1 is a novel oral derivative of 5-FU. Compared with 5-FU, S-1 is more tolerable and effective, and will be more convenient to use for patients with advanced gastric cancer. Recent phase II randomized trials of S-1 based chemotherapy have achieved encouraging results with regard to objective response rate and overall survival. This paper aims to review the efficacy of S-1 in treating advanced gastric cancer, molecular markers that can predict efficacy, and the prospect for therapy with S-1 in combination with new chemotherapeutic drugs or molecularly targeted drugs.

Advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in elderly patients: clinicopathological, prognostic factors and treatments

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinicopathological features, prognostic factors, treatment efficacy and safety among elderly patients with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer.

METHODS

Three hundred and nineteen patients aged 65 years and older, diagnosed with advanced or metastatic gastric cancer, were followed and data were retrospectively collected, reviewed and analyzed.

RESULTS

The elderly patients carried specific clinicopathological characteristics. Body mass index (BMI), number of metastatic lesions, ascites, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), tumor differentiation grade, lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) level, local treatment, and chemotherapy were the independent prognostic factors. Serum LDH level was superior to the serum CEA level in the prognosis of advanced or metastatic gastric cancer in older patients. Cisplatin-based regimen, chemotherapy cycles, metastatic lesions, LDH level, and supraclavicular lymph node metastasis were the independent prognostic factors in 220 patients receiving chemotherapy. The toxicity was mild and tolerable.

CONCLUSION

KPS, BMI and a well-differentiated histopathology were factors favoring longer survival, whereas elevated serum LDH and a greater number of metastatic lesions were associated with poor prognosis among those elderly patients. Cisplatin-based chemotherapy provided survival benefits and mild toxicity.

Feasibility of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 consisting of a 4-week administration and a two-week rest period in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer

The efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 in patients with completely resected non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has yet to be clarified, and the appropriate schedule for the adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 remains unknown. A phase II study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1. Patients enrolled in this study were 20-75 years old, had pathological stage IB-IIIA NSCLC, and had received complete resection of NSCLC. S-1 (80 mg/m²) was administered orally to the patients for four weeks followed by a two-week rest period (conventional schedule), for a maximum of eight cycles. The primary endpoint was relative dose intensity (RDI), while the secondary endpoints were safety and 1 year of disease-free survival (1y-DFS). Between May 2007 and October 2009, 28 patients were enrolled. The RDI was 63.1% (95% CI, 48.6-77.7). No grade 3 or worse hematological toxicity was observed. Grade 3 non-hematological toxicities were observed in four patients. No grade 4 or worse hematological toxicity was detected. The probability of 1y-DFS was 85.7% (95% CI, 72.8-98.6). In the subgroup analysis, the median RDI of patients over 65 years old was lower compared to the other patients (44.8 vs. 100%; P=0.013; Mann-Whitney U test). Creatinine clearance (CCr) was lower in the older group, with more grade 2 or 3 non-hematological toxicities in the elderly patients. These results suggest that the conventional schedule of adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 is not likely to be feasible in older patients with completely resected NSCLC.

First-line single-agent chemotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer with poor performance status

Combination chemotherapy is a standard treatment approach in advanced gastric cancer. However, combination chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is often associated with severe treatment-related toxicities and most oncologists are reluctant to perform combination chemotherapy in patients with a poor clinical condition. We retrospectively investigated the efficacy and tolerability of single-agent chemotherapy in patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer with poor performance status (PS). We reviewed advanced gastric adenocarcinoma patients who received first-line single-agent palliative chemotherapy due to poor PS between June 2006 and December 2010. A total of 125 patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) PS 2-3, whose general condition did not allow combination chemotherapy, were enrolled. Four single agents were used: TS-1 (n=63), paclitaxel (n=42), irinotecan (n=15) and capecitabine (n=5). The median age was 66 years, with a range of 25-81 years. The percent response rate and rate of stable disease (SD) were 19.2 and 35.2%, respectively, giving a disease control rate of 54.4%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.9 months (95% CI, 2.73-5.06). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.1 months (95% CI, 7.70-10.56) with a 1-year survival rate of 31.2%. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the independent prognostic factors for OS were chemotherapy regimen (capecitabine) [reference: TS-1, hazard ratio (HR), 5.00; 95% CI, 1.81-13.81; P=0.002], no second-line chemotherapy (HR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.48-3.57; P=0.001), bone metastasis (HR, 2.73; 95% CI, 1.22-6.09; P=0.014), ECOG PS 3 (HR, 38.10; 95% CI, 13.72-105.78; P=0.001), Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) ≥1 (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.24-2.85; P=0.003) and chemotherapy response [SD + progressive disease (PD) + not evaluable (NE); HR, 2.37; 95% CI, 1.39-4.05; P=0.002)]. First-line single-agent palliative chemotherapy demonstrated a relatively good clinical efficacy for recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer patients with poor PS.

Safety and feasibility of S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of administering S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer has not been fully evaluated in elderly patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study selected patients who underwent curative D2 surgery for gastric cancer, were diagnosed with stage II or III disease, and received adjuvant S-1 at our institution. Patients were categorized into two groups; non-elderly patients (age <70 years: group A) and elderly patients (age ≥70 years: group B). The toxicity and S-1 continuation rates in the two groups were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 75 patients were evaluated in the study. There were no grade 4 toxicities. The incidences of grade 3 hematological and non-hematological toxicities were <5% in both groups, and the differences were not significant. The continuation rate at 6 months was 69% in group A and 70% in group B, and this difference was also not significant.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer is safe and feasible, regardless of the age of the patient; especially for elderly patients who could be candidates for clinical trials.