Early detection of nonperitoneal recurrence may contribute to survival benefit after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer

A scoring model for predicting early recurrence of gastric cancer with normal preoperative tumor markers: A multicenter study

INTRODUCTION

Prognostic factors for postoperative early recurrence (ER) of gastric cancer (GC) in patients with normal or abnormal preoperative tumor markers (pre-TMs) remain unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

2875 consecutive patients with GC who underwent radical gastrectomy (RG) between January 2010 and December 2016 were enrolled and randomly divided into training and internal validation groups. ER was defined as recurrence within two years of gastrectomy. Normal pre-TMs were defined as CEA≤5 ng/mL and CA199 ≤ 37 U/mL. Least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression analysis was used to screen ER predictors. The scoring model was validated using 546 patients from another hospital.

RESULTS

A total of 3421 patients were included. Multivariate Cox analysis showed that pre-TMs was an independent prognostic factor for ER. Survival after ER was equally poor in the normal and abnormal pre-TMs groups (P = 0.160). Based on LASSO Cox regression, the ER of patients with abnormal pre-TMs was only associated with the pT and pN stages; however, in patients with normal pre-TMs, it was also associated with tumor size, perineural invasion, and prognostic nutritional index. Scoring model constructed for patients with normal pre-TMs had better predictive performance than TNM staging (concordance-index:0.826 vs. 0.807, P < 0.001) and good reproducibility in both validation sets. Moreover, through risk stratification, the scoring model could not only identify the risk of ER but also distinguish ER patterns and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit subgroups.

CONCLUSION

pre-TMs is an independent prognostic factor for ER in GC after RG. The established scoring model demonstrates excellent predictive performance and clinical utility.

Knowledge, attitude, and practice of monitoring early gastric cancer after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

Early gastric cancer (EGC) is typically treated with endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). However, recurrence may occur after ESD, requiring surveillance.

AIM

To examine the knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of EGC survivors following ESD regarding gastric cancer recurrence.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted between June 1, 2022 and October 1, 2022 in Zhejiang, China. A total of 400 EGC survivors who underwent ESD at the Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine participated in this study. A self-administered questionnaire was developed to assess KAP monitoring gastric cancer after ESD.

RESULTS

The average scores for KAP were 3.34, 23.76, and 5.75 out of 5, 30, and 11, respectively. Pearson correlation analysis revealed positive and significant correlations between knowledge and attitude, knowledge and practice, and attitude and practice (r = 0.405, 0.511, and 0.458, respectively; all P < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that knowledge, attitude, 13-24 mo since the last ESD (vs ≤ 12 mo since the last ESD), and ≥ 25 mo since the last ESD (vs ≤ 12 mo since the last ESD) were independent predictors of proactive practice (odds ratio = 1.916, 1.253, 3.296, and 5.768, respectively, all P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

EGC survivors showed inadequate knowledge, positive attitude, and poor practices in monitoring recurrences after ESD. Adequate knowledge, positive attitude, and a longer time since the last ESD were associated with practice.

An application of raman spectroscopy in combination with machine learning to determine gastric cancer spectroscopy marker

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Globally, gastric carcinoma (Gca) ranks fifth in terms of incidence and third in terms of mortality. Higher serum tumor markers (TMs) than those from healthy individuals, led to TMs clinical application as diagnostic biomarkers for Gca. Actually, there is no accurate blood test to diagnose Gca.

METHODS

Raman spectroscopy is applied as an efficient, credible, minimally invasive technique to evaluate the serum TMs levels in blood samples. After curative gastrectomy, serum TMs levels are important in predicting the recurrence of gastric cancer, which must be detected early. The experimentally assesed TMs levels using Raman measurements and ELİSA test were used to develop a prediction model based on machine learning techniques. A total of 70 participants diagnosed with gastric cancer after surgery (n = 26) and healthy (n = 44) were comrpised in this study.

RESULTS

In the Raman spectra of gastric cancer patients, an additional peak at 1182 cm^-1 was observed and, the Raman intensity of amide III, II, I, and CH₂ proteins as well as lipids functional group was higher. Furthermore, Principal Component Analysis (PCA) showed, that it is possible to distinguish between the control and Gca groups using the Raman range between 800 and 1800 cm^-1, as well as between 2700 and 3000 cm^-1. The analysis of Raman spectra dynamics in gastric cancer and healthy patients showed, that the vibrations at 1302 and 1306 cm^-1 were characteristic for cancer patients. In addition, the selected machine learning methods showed classification accuracy of more than 95%, while obtaining an AUROC of 0.98. Such results were obtained using Deep Neural Networks and the XGBoost algorithm.

CONCLUSIONS

The obtained results suggest, that Raman shifts at 1302 and 1306 cm^-1 could be spectroscopic markers of gastric cancer.

Recurrence patterns after curative gastrectomy for pStage II/III gastric cancer: Exploratory analysis of the randomized controlled JCOG1001 trial

BACKGROUND

Peritoneal, lymph node, and hematogenous recurrence patterns are common after potentially curative surgery for gastric cancer. However, clinicopathological characteristics associated with each recurrence type have rarely been comprehensively reported among patients who received a unified treatment strategy and follow-up protocol. Understanding these recurrence patterns would help with early detection of recurrence and a personalized follow-up plan. We investigated the initial recurrence patterns after curative gastrectomy using data from the randomized clinical JCOG1001 trial.

METHODS

Of 1204 patients enrolled in JCOG1001, 932 pStage II/III patients were included. Initial recurrence dates and patterns were recorded by attending physicians according to the protocol. Risk factors for hematogenous, lymph node, and peritoneal recurrence were determined by univariable and multivariable analyses using the Fine-Gray model.

RESULTS

Overall, 253 patients developed recurrence. Hematogenous recurrence was the most frequent pattern (n = 115), followed by peritoneal (n = 104) and lymph node recurrence (n = 70). Differentiated type (p = 0.0028), pT4 (p = 0.0466), and pN3 (p < 0.0001) were associated with hematogenous recurrence; however, D2+ lymphadenectomy reduced it (p = 0.0161). Patients with large (≥5 cm) tumors (p = 0.0312), pT4 (p < 0.0001), pN3 (p = 0.0013), and undifferentiated histologic type (p = 0.0001) had significantly higher rates of peritoneal recurrence. Extended lymph node metastasis (pN3) was the only risk factor (p < 0.0001) for lymph node recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicopathological features differed according to the recurrence patterns. Vigilant follow-up with an understanding of recurrence patterns might be beneficial for some high-risk patients.

Detection of asymptomatic recurrence following curative surgery improves survival in patients with gastric cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

To date, there is no evidence that intensive follow-up provides survival benefit in gastric cancer patients undergoing curative gastrectomy. The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of detection of asymptomatic recurrence using intensive surveillance strategy in long-term survival after curative gastric cancer surgery.

Methods

A systematic review of electronic databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Library and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Clinical Trials Registry and Google Scholar was performed up to April 2022. The primary outcomes were survival outcomes: overall survival, recurrence-free survival and post-recurrence survival. The secondary endpoints were clinicopathological features, recurrence patterns and treatment after recurrence. The registration number of this protocol is PROSPERO CRD42022327370.

Results

A total of 11 studies including 1898 participants were included. In the pooled analysis, the detection of asymptomatic recurrence was significantly associated with an improved overall survival compared to patients showing symptoms of recurrence (HR=0.67; 95%CI: 0.57-0.79; P<0.001), which was primarily driven by the prolongation of post-recurrence survival (HR=0.51; 95%CI: 0.42-0.61; P<0.001), since there was no significant difference observed in recurrence-free survival (HR=1.12; 95%CI: 0.81-1.55; P=0.48) between the two groups. Meanwhile, male sex and advanced T stage were more frequently observed in the symptomatic recurrence group. Furthermore, patients in the symptomatic recurrence group had a higher proportion of peritoneal relapse but lower proportion of distant lymph node metastasis. Additionally, patients in the symptomatic recurrence group were less likely to receive surgery treatment and post-recurrence chemotherapy.

Conclusion

The detection of asymptomatic recurrence using intensive follow-up was associated with an appreciable improvement in overall survival. However, more robust data from high-quality studies are still required to verify this issue.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=327370, identifier CRD42022327370.

Comparison of CEA and CA19-9 as a predictive factor for recurrence after curative gastrectomy in gastric cancer

Background

Our aim of was to compare importance of the tumor markers (TMs) serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen (CA) 19-9 in prediction of recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Methods

We reviewed retrospectively the clinical records of 149 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for stage I–III gastric cancer and whose CEA and CA19-9 levels were determined once preoperatively and for more than 3 years postoperatively. We investigated whether the clinicopathological characteristics of patients including age, sex, pathological disease stage, operative approach, type of gastrectomy, and degree of lymph node dissection as well as preoperative positivity of CEA and CA19-9 were risk factors for recurrence in univariate and multivariate analyses. Rate of recurrence was compared between patients positive and negative for postoperative CEA or CA19-9. We also calculated sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictable values of postoperative positivity of CEA and CA19-9 for recurrence. The lead time was compared between CEA and CA19-9 that was defined as the time of the first detection of increases in tumor markers and confirmation of recurrence on imaging modalities.

Results

The number of patients positive for preoperative CEA was 25 (17%) and for CA19-9 was 11 (7%). Recurrence was confirmed in 29 (19%) patients. Stage III disease, preoperative positivity for CA19-9 but not CEA, and total gastrectomy were risk factors for recurrence in univariate analysis, but stage III disease was the only risk factor for recurrence in multivariate analysis. Forty and 15 patients were positive for postoperative CEA and CA19-9, respectively. The recurrence rate of 47% (7/15) in patients positive for postoperative CA19-9 was greater than that in negative patients (22/134 = 16%), but it did not differ between patients who were positive or negative for postoperative CEA. Specificity for CA19-9 was greater than that for CEA (P < 0.05). The lead time of CEA (3.9 ± 4.7 months) was not different from that of CA19-9 (6.1 ± 7.1 months).

Conclusions

These results indicate that CA19-9 rather than CEA is likely to be more useful for the detection of recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Symptomatic Recurrence and Survival Outcomes After Curative Treatment of Gastric Cancer: Does Intensive Follow-up Evaluation Improve Survival?

BACKGROUND

Intensive surveillance after treatment of gastric cancer patients with curative intent may lead to an earlier diagnosis of disease recurrence, but its impact on survival is uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate whether early diagnosis of disease recurrence among asymptomatic patients was associated with long-term survival.

METHODS

This retrospective study analyzed patients with stages 1 to 3C gastric adenocarcinoma treated between 1999 and 2018. All recurrence events were classified as symptomatic or asymptomatic (detected by follow-up tests), and their clinicopathologic characteristics, patterns of recurrence, and survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cohort consisted of 669 patients treated with a total gastrectomy in 48.6% and a D2-lymphadenectomy in 88.8% of the cases. Most of the tumors were pT3-4 (46.5%), with 45.5% involving lymph node metastases and 42.3% manifesting a diffuse histology. During a median follow-up period of 80.1 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 75.3-84.8 months), 166 patients had recurrences (24.8%), 65.7% of which were symptomatic. The peritoneum was the main site of recurrence (37.2%), and peritoneal recurrence was associated with worse overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio, 1.69; 95%CI, 1.2-2.37). The median disease-free, post-recurrence survival, and OS periods in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups were respectively 13.4 versus 17.2 months (p = 0.04), 11.9 versus 4.7 months (p < 0.001), and 29.9 versus 26.4 months (p = 0.21). When OS was analyzed among the patients with non-peritoneal recurrence, no difference was observed between the two groups (31.3 vs 31.1 months; p = 0.46).

CONCLUSION

Early diagnosis of asymptomatic disease recurrence did not affect the OS of the gastric cancer patients treated with curative intent. The use of intensive surveillance strategies in this scenario still requires further evidence.

Duration of Postoperative Fever as a Simple and Useful Prognostic Indicator in Gastric Cancer Patients

Background

Postoperative inflammation is associated with cancer progression in several cancers. However, the prognostic significance of postoperative fever remains unclear in gastric cancer patients.

Methods

We enrolled 442 patients with a histopathological diagnosis of gastric adenocarcinoma who underwent curative surgery.

Results

The mean duration of postoperative fever ≥ 37°C was 8.7 days (range: 0-186 days) and significantly longer in patients with advanced gastric cancer, venous invasion, and open or total gastrectomy vs. patients with early gastric cancer (P = 0.0072), no venous invasion (P = 0.025), laparoscopic gastrectomy (P = 0.027), and either proximal or distal partial gastrectomy (P = 0.0015). Five-year overall survival rates were 69.5% vs. 83.6% in the prolonged postoperative fever group (≥ 6 days of ≥ 37°C) vs. the nonprolonged group (< 6 days of ≥ 37°C), respectively (P = 0.0008). In patients without Clavien-Dindo classification postoperative infectious complications grade ≥ 2, 5-year overall survival was 69.7% vs. 84.0% in patients with prolonged postoperative fever vs. those without, respectively (P = 0.0067). Five-year disease-specific survival was 85.9% vs. 93.1% in patients with prolonged fever vs. those without, respectively (P = 0.041). Multivariate analysis indicated that postoperative fever was an independent prognostic indicator.

Conclusion

Postoperative fever ≥ 37°C duration may be useful in predicting prognosis in gastric cancer patients.

MAGEA10 expression is a predictive marker of early hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer

BACKGROUND

Resection for hepatic recurrence after gastrectomy in patients with gastric cancer may be curative; however, the prediction of hepatic recurrence remains intractable. Therefore, we aimed to explore predictive markers for hepatic recurrence in gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer based on genetic information.

METHODS

This study recruited 154 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for pathological stage II or III primary gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Genes associated with hepatic recurrence were comprehensively analyzed using whole-exome sequencing and gene expression profiling (GEP), followed by immunohistochemistry analysis for MAGEA10. The cumulative incidences of hepatic recurrence, relapse-free survival, and overall survival were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 12 patients with early hepatic recurrences were found within 2 years of surgery. Although there were no distinct gene mutations in recurrent patients, upregulation of MAGEA10 was identified in patients with early hepatic recurrence using GEP analysis. Immunostaining for MAGEA10 stained the cell nuclei in 29 (18.8%) of 154 samples. Furthermore, protein expression of MAGEA10 on immunohistochemistry was significantly related to a high MAGEA10 mRNA expression, high cumulative incidences of hepatic recurrence, and poor relapse-free survival. Overall survival did not differ significantly between positive and negative immunohistochemical staining for MAGEA10. The sensitivity and specificity of MAGEA10 staining for early hepatic recurrence were 58.3% and 84.5%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MAGEA10 represents a promising predictive marker for early hepatic recurrence after curative gastrectomy for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer.

Prognostic Value of Restaging F-18 Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography to Predict 3-Year Post-Recurrence Survival in Patients with Recurrent Gastric Cancer after Curative Resection

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic value of the maximum standardized uptake value (SUV_max) measured while restaging with F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (¹⁸F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) to predict the 3-year post-recurrence survival (PRS) in patients with recurrent gastric cancer after curative surgical resection.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 47 patients with recurrent gastric cancer after curative resection who underwent restaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT were included. For the semiquantitative analysis, SUV_max was measured over the visually discernable ¹⁸F-FDG-avid recurrent lesions. Cox proportional-hazards regression models were used to predict the 3-year PRS. Differences in 3-year PRS were assessed with the Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine of the 47 patients (83%) expired within 3 years after recurrence in the median follow-up period of 30.3 months. In the multivariate analysis, SUV_max (p = 0.012), weight loss (p = 0.025), and neutrophil count (p = 0.006) were significant prognostic factors for 3-year PRS. The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significantly poor 3-year PRS in patients with SUV_max > 5.1 than in those with SUV_max ≤ 5.1 (3-year PRS rate, 3.5% vs. 38.9%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

High SUV_max on restaging with ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT is a poor prognostic factor for 3-year PRS. It may strengthen the role of ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT in further stratifying the prognosis of recurrent gastric cancer.

Demographic factors associated with missed follow-up among solid tumor patients treated at a large multi-site academic institution

Aim: To identify demographic predictors of patients who miss oncology follow-up, considering that missed follow-up has not been well studies in cancer patients. Methods: Patients with solid tumors diagnosed from 2007 to 2016 were analyzed (n = 16,080). Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to examine predictors of missed follow-up. Results: Our study revealed that 21.2% of patients missed ≥1 follow-up appointment. African-American race (odds ratio [OR] 1.33; 95% CI: 1.17-1.51), Medicaid insurance (OR 1.59; 1.36-1.87), no insurance (OR 1.66; 1.32-2.10) and rural residence (OR 1.78; 1.49-2.13) were associated with missed follow-up. Conclusion: Many cancer patients miss follow-up, and inadequate follow-up may influence cancer outcomes. Further research is needed on how to address disparities in follow-up care in high-risk patients.

The Risk of Developing Multiple Primary Cancers among Long-Term Survivors Five Years or More after Stomach Carcinoma Resection

Recently, the number of long-term survivors of ≥ 5 years after stomach carcinoma resection is increasing in Japan. The clinical courses of 4,883 patients who underwent stomach carcinoma resection were retrospectively reviewed to investigate the cause of death including multiple primary cancers (MPC) and delayed stomach carcinoma recurrence among long-term survivors of ≥ 5 years. Of 3,061 patients who survived for ≥ 5 years, 1,203 patients (39.3%) were dead after 5 years survival, including 299 patients (24.9%) who died of MPC. Of 84 patients (7.0%) who died of recurrent stomach carcinoma, 25 patients were newly diagnosed ≥ 5 years postoperative. The most common site of MPC was lung in 124 patients, and 347 patients (44.7%) had a smoking-related MPC, including 124 lung, 63 esophagus, 62 head and neck, and 98 other cancers. We examined the prognostic differences in 527 patients with MPC according to the diagnosis time. In 325 patients of long-term survivors in whom MPC was diagnosed ≥ 5 years postoperative, 5-year survival rate and the median survival time after diagnosis were 35.1% and 17.7 months, respectively. This outcome was significantly poorer than that of 160 patients in whom MPC was diagnosed within 5 years postoperative (58.5% and 62.7 months, P < 0.0001). In conclusion, MPC accounted for approximately a quarter of the cause of death in long-term survivors. Lifestyle instructions including smoking cessation are important. Periodical cancer screening allows the early asymptomatic diagnosis and may contribute to a decrease in cancer mortality of MPC in long-term cancer survivors.

Blood parameters score predicts long-term outcomes in stage II-III gastric cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Increasing numbers of laboratory blood parameters (BPM) have been reported to greatly affect the long-term outcomes of gastric cancer (GC) patients. However, the existing prognostic models do not comprehensively analyze these predictors.

AIM

To construct a new prognostic tool, based on all the prognostic BPM, to achieve more accurate prognosis prediction for GC.

METHODS

We retrospectively assessed 850 consecutive patients who underwent curative resection for stage II-III GC from January 2010 to April 2013. The patients were classified into developing (n = 567) and validation (n = 283) cohorts using computer-generated random numbers. A scoring system, namely BPM score, was then constructed using least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression model in the developing cohort, and validated in the validation cohort. A nomogram consisting of BPM score and tumor-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) stage was further created. The discrimination and calibration of the nomogram were evaluated via Harrell’s C-statistic and the Hosmer-Lemeshow test.

RESULTS

Using the LASSO model, we established the BPM score based on five BPM: Albumin, lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, carcinoembryonic antigen, and carbohydrate antigen 19-9. The BPM scores were divided into high- and low-BPM groups based on a cut-off value of -0.93. High-BPM patients were significantly older and had more advanced, larger tumors. In the developing cohort, significant differences were found in 5-year overall survival (OS) and 5-year disease-specific survival between the high-BPM and low-BPM patients. Similar results were found in the validation group. Multivariable analysis showed that the BPM score was an independent predictor of OS. High-BPM patients had a poorer 5-year OS for each subgroup. Furthermore, a nomogram that combined the BPM score and TNM stage had significantly better prognostic value compared with TNM stage alone.

CONCLUSION

The BPM score provides more accurate prognosis prediction in stage II-III GC patients and is an effective complement to the TNM staging system.

Stage-specific difference in timing and pattern of initial recurrence after curative surgery for gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

Gastric cancer (GC) follow-up schedule after curative surgery is universally recommended based on the pathologic stage, but their details, including intervals and modalities of surveillance have not yet been standardised. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristics of GC recurrence by stage to establish optimal postoperative surveillance strategies.

METHODS

Medical information on 5095 patients with GC who underwent curative intent gastrectomy in our institution between January 1989 and December 2013 was reviewed retrospectively. Moreover, 656 patients who had recurrences after radical surgery were identified. Clinicopathologic characteristics, timing and pattern of recurrence, and survival data of these patients were analysed.

RESULTS

Among the 656 patients, 50 (7.6%), 123 (18.8%), and 483 (73.6%) had stages I, II, and III GC, respectively. The median times to initial recurrence in patients with stages I, II, and III GC were 23.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 13.0-33.0 months), 13.0 months (IQR, 9.0-25.0 months), and 12.0 months (IQR, 7.0-21.0 months), respectively. In patients with stage I GC, more than half (58%) of them had distant organ metastasis; otherwise, peritoneal dissemination (39%) was the most common pattern in patients with stage III GC.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the low incidence, the time of initial recurrence in stage I GC was longer than those in stage II and III GC. Moreover, the pattern of initial recurrence was also different according to the pathologic stage. Therefore, clinicians should consider stage-specific differences of recurrence in setting up surveillance strategies after curative surgery for GC patients.

Score of the preoperative absolute number of lymphocytes, monocytes, and neutrophils as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer

PURPOSE

The association between the preoperative absolute neutrophil count (NC), lymphocyte count (LC), and monocyte count (MC) in the peripheral blood and the prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients has not been investigated widely.

METHODS

We enrolled 445 patients who underwent surgery for GC between January, 2005 and April, 2013 to analyze the correlations among NC, LC, and MC and their prognoses.

RESULTS

Based on cut-off values calculated by ROC analysis, patients were sub grouped as having: NC ≥ 4477 (NC^High), NC < 4477 (NC^Low); and as LC ≥ 1447 (LC^High), LC < 1447 (LC^Low); and as MC ≥ 658.5 (MC^High), MC < 658.5 (MC^Low). Each group was assigned as follows; NC^High group = 1, NC^Low group = 0, LC^High group = 0, LC^Low group = 1, MC^High group = 1, MC^Low group = 0, and the sum of each score was defined as the lymphocyte-monocyte-neutrophil score (LMN score). The overall 5-year survival rates were 89%, 74%, 57.8%, and 53.3% for LMN scores of 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively (P = 0.0004). Multivariate analysis indicated that the LMN score was an independent prognostic indicator.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of preoperative NC, LC, and MC appears to be a useful indicator of GC prognosis.

Postoperative ratio of the maximum C-reactive protein level to the minimum peripheral lymphocyte count as a prognostic indicator for gastric cancer patients

PURPOSE

Inflammation, together with immune and nutritional status, are associated with the progression of various cancer types. We evaluated the prognostic significance of the postoperative ratio (post-CLR) of the maximum C-reactive protein value (post-CRP^Max) to the minimum peripheral lymphocyte count (post-LC^Min) in patients with gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

The subjects of this retrospective study were 227 patients who underwent curative surgery for histopathologically diagnosed gastric adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates differed significantly between the post-CLR^High (≥ 152.6) group and the post-CLR^Low (< 152.6) group for all patients (45.0% vs. 68.4%, respectively; P < 0.001). The 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were also significantly related to post-CLR for all patients, (80.6% vs. 64.3% for the post-CLR^Low and the post-CLR^High groups, respectively; P = 0.002). Among patients without infectious complications, the CLR affected both the 5-year OS rate (48.4% vs. 69.2% for the post-CLR^High and the post-CLR^Low groups, respectively; P = 0.006) and the 5-year DSS rate (80.2% vs. 67.0% for the post-CLR^Low and the post-CLR^High groups, respectively; P = 0.027). Multivariate analysis revealed that post-CLR was an independent prognostic indicator for both the OS and DSS of all patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Our finding show that the post-CLR can help predict the prognosis of GC patients.

Follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer: Is it time to tailor it?

There is still no consensus on the follow-up frequency and regimen after curative resection for gastric cancer. Moreover, controversy exists regarding the utility of follow-up in improving survival, and the recommendations of experts and societies vary considerably. The main reason to establish surveillance programs is to diagnose tumor recurrence or metachronous cancers early and to thereby provide prompt treatment and prolong survival. In the setting of gastric malignancies, other reasons have been put forth: (1) the detection of adverse effects of a previous surgery, such as malnutrition or digestive sequelae; (2) the collection of data; and (3) the identification of psychological and/or social problems and provision of appropriate support to the patients. No randomized controlled trials on the role of follow-up after curative resection of gastric carcinoma have been published. Herein, the primary retrospective series and systematic reviews on this subject are analyzed and discussed. Furthermore, the guidelines from international and national scientific societies are discussed. Follow-up is recommended by the majority of institutions; however, there is no real evidence that follow-up can improve long-term survival rates. Several studies have demonstrated that it is possible to stratify patients submitted to curative gastrectomy into different classes according to the risk of recurrence. Furthermore, promising studies have identified several molecular markers that are related to the risk of relapse and to prognosis. Based on these premises, a promising strategy will be to tailor follow-up in relation to the patient and tumor characteristics, molecular marker status, and individual risk of recurrence.