Salvage chemotherapy with the combination of oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric cancer refractory or intolerant to fluoropyrimidines, platinum, taxanes, and irinotecan

The efficacy and safety of FOLFOX therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Cisplatin-based chemotherapy is the standard advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) treatment. However, the 5-fluorouracil plus L-leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimen is available in Japan as an alternative to cisplatin-based chemotherapy, but its efficacy and safety remain unclear. Hence, we aimed to evaluate patients with advanced ESCC who received FOLFOX therapy retrospectively. Patients with advanced ESCC who received FOLFOX therapy at 18 institutions between April 2019 and October 2020 were included. Fifty-two patients received first-line FOLFOX treatment, while 39 received later-line FOLFOX treatment. The median progression-free survival, median overall survival, and objective response rate were 3.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.0-5.0), 13.9 months (95% CI: 10.3-17.9 months), and 35% in the first-line group and 2.4 months (95% CI: 2.1-3.8 months), 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.3-9.8 months), and 4% in the later-line group, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (23%) and anemia (12%) in the first-line group and neutropenia (18%), anorexia (13%), anemia (10%), and nausea (10%) in the later-line group. First-line FOLFOX treatment is suitable for patients with advanced ESCC. However, FOLFOX has shown limited efficacy as a later-line treatment.

Chemotherapy after nivolumab for advanced gastric cancer (REVIVE): a prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

Nivolumab therapy is a standard-of-care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC). Previous studies have reported improvement in the objective response rate to chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for other types of cancer. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy in AGC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study in pretreated patients with nivolumab-refractory or -intolerant AGC. Patients received irinotecan, oxaliplatin-containing regimens, or trifluridine/tipiracil. The primary endpoint was overall survival.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were included (median age: 69 years; male: 70%; female: 30%). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were 7.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 6.7-9.7 months] and 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.2-3.5 months), respectively. Objective response and disease control rates were 16.8% (95% CI: 11.6% to 23.6%) and 18.9% (95% CI: 38.9% to 54.6%), respectively. A prognostic index using alkaline phosphatase and the Glasgow Prognostic Score was generated to classify patients into three risk groups (good, moderate, and poor). The hazard ratios of the moderate and poor groups to the good group were 1.88 (95% CI: 1.22-2.92) and 3.29 (95% CI: 1.92-5.63), respectively. At the initiation of chemotherapy, 42 patients had experienced immune-related adverse events due to prior nivolumab therapy. The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia (7.5%), anemia (8.0%), and anorexia (7.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

The administration of cytotoxic chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy may give rise to a synergistic antitumor effect in AGC. Further investigation is warranted to confirm these findings.

The Heterogeneous Impact of Prediagnostic Folate Intake for Fluorouracil-Containing Induction Chemotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer

Fluorouracil (FU) exerts its antitumor activity by inhibiting folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism. Evidence that folate may play a role in the carcinogenic process via folate-mediated one-carbon metabolism has given rise to the hypothesis that pre-diagnostic folate intake may induce heterogeneous chemosensitivity to FU-containing induction chemotherapy (IC) in head and neck cancer. To assess this hypothesis, we conducted a cohort study to investigate whether the association between prediagnostic dietary folate intake and cancer survival differed between treatment regimens with and without FU-containing IC in 504 cases of locally advanced (stage III/IV) HNSCC, using an epidemiologic database combined with clinical data. In total, 240 patients were treated with FU-containing IC followed by definitive treatment, and 264 patients were treated with definitive treatment alone. Definitive treatment is defined as (1) the surgical excision of a tumor with clear margins, with or without neck lymph node dissection; or (2) radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy. In the overall cohort of the FU-containing IC group, a higher folate intake was significantly associated with better overall survival (adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) for the highest compared to the lowest folate tertiles (HRT3-T1) = 0.42, 95%CI, 0.25-0.76, Ptrend = 0.003). Conversely, no apparent association between prediagnostic folate intake and survival was observed with definitive treatment alone (HRT3-T1: 0.83, 95%CI, 0.49-1.42, Ptrend = 0.491)). A consideration of the cumulative dose of FU-containing IC showed that the survival impact of prediagnostic folate intake differed statistically significantly by treatment regimen (Pinteraction = 0.012). In conclusion, an association between prediagnostic folate intake and HNSCC survival significantly differed by FU-containing IC. This finding indicates that in the carcinogenic process, folate status causes HNSCC to be heterogenous in terms of one-carbon metabolism.

Application of Approved Cisplatin Derivatives in Combination Therapy against Different Cancer Diseases

The problems with anticancer therapy are resistance and toxicity. From 3000 Cisplatin derivatives tested as antitumor agents, most of them have been rejected, due to toxicity. The aim of current study is the comparison of therapeutic combinations of the currently applied in clinical practice: Cisplatin, Carboplatin, Oxaliplatin, Nedaplatin, Lobaplatin, Heptaplatin, and Satraplatin. The literature data show that the strategies for the development of platinum anticancer agents and bypassing of resistance to Cisplatin derivatives and their toxicity are: combination therapy, Pt IV prodrugs, the targeted nanocarriers. The very important strategy for the improvement of the antitumor effect against different cancers is synergistic combination of Cisplatin derivatives with: (1) anticancer agents-Fluorouracil, Gemcitabine, Cytarabine, Fludarabine, Pemetrexed, Ifosfamide, Irinotecan, Topotecan, Etoposide, Amrubicin, Doxorubicin, Epirubicin, Vinorelbine, Docetaxel, Paclitaxel, Nab-Paclitaxel; (2) modulators of resistant mechanisms; (3) signaling protein inhibitors-Erlotinib; Bortezomib; Everolimus; (4) and immunotherapeutic drugs-Atezolizumab, Avelumab, Bevacizumab, Cemiplimab, Cetuximab, Durvalumab, Erlotinib, Imatinib, Necitumumab, Nimotuzumab, Nivolumab, Onartuzumab, Panitumumab, Pembrolizumab, Rilotumumab, Trastuzumab, Tremelimumab, and Sintilimab. An important approach for overcoming the drug resistance and reduction of toxicity of Cisplatin derivatives is the application of nanocarriers (polymers and liposomes), which provide improved targeted delivery, increased intracellular penetration, selective accumulation in tumor tissue, and enhanced therapeutic efficacy. The advantages of combination therapy are maximum removal of tumor cells in different phases; prevention of resistance; inhibition of the adaptation of tumor cells and their mutations; and reduction of toxicity.

Neutropenic Diet Cannot Reduce the Risk of Infection and Mortality in Oncology Patients With Neutropenia

Background

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effect of a neutropenic diet and a control diet on infection and mortality rates in oncology patients with neutropenia.

Methods

We searched the following English electronic databases: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Google Scholar Engine. Published studies involving neutropenic diets (study group) and control diets (control group) in oncology patients with neutropenia were searched. The focus of the meta-analysis was on the outcomes of infection and mortality rates. A subgroup analysis was also performed.

Results

A total of 6 studies were included, with a total sample size of 1114 patients. The patients in the study group had a similar infection rate compared with the patients in the control group (P = 0.11). The patients in the study group had a similar mortality rate compared with the patients in the control group (P = 0.74). Another subgroup analysis showed that the incidence of infection was also similar for pediatric (P = 0.74) and adult (P = 0.11) oncology patients between the study and control groups.

Conclusions

Based on the current evidence, this meta-analysis showed that the application of a neutropenic diet cannot reduce the risk of infection and mortality in oncology patients with neutropenia. However, more rigorous randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm this conclusion in the future.

Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio Is a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Treatment with Nivolumab for Gastric Cancer

INTRODUCTION

Patients with unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer who have an objective response (OR) to nivolumab monotherapy are expected to have a good long-term prognosis. However, the OR rate for nivolumab treatment is low at 11%, and there is a need for biomarkers to predict the treatment response. This study aimed to analyze the significance of systemic inflammation-related variables and clinicopathologic characteristics as predictive markers of response to nivolumab monotherapy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we enrolled 71 consecutive patients who received nivolumab monotherapy for unresectable or recurrent gastric cancer. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to determine the cutoff values of systemic inflammation-related variables, predictors of treatment response, and other prognostic factors related to nivolumab therapy. We focused on systemic inflammation-related variables measured before nivolumab induction and 2 weeks after its first administration and performed multivariate analysis to assess whether they could be used as prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis revealed that a lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) of ≤3.28 after 2 weeks of initial nivolumab treatment (2wLMR) is a statistically significant predictor of treatment response (p = 0.012). The progression-free survival (PFS) rate of patients with liver metastasis was significantly worse than that of the other patients (1-year PFS: 0.0 vs. 24.4%, respectively; p = 0.005). The overall survival (OS) of patients with a low 2wLMR was significantly longer than that in patients with a high 2wLMR (1-year OS: 37.4 vs. 18.9%, respectively; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the 2wLMR could be a useful biomarker to predict response to nivolumab treatment and the prognosis of unresectable and recurrent gastric cancer.

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts the benefit of gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy

Pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be associated with the prognosis of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy. However, no consensus on the association has been reached. In this study, we mainly evaluated whether pretreatment NLR predicted the benefit of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy and immunotherapy. PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched from inception up to September 16th, 2020. A total of 36 studies including 8614 patients were involved in the meta-analysis. Pooled data revealed that high pretreatment NLR was significantly associated with poor outcomes of OS (HR = 1.78, 95% CI = [1.59, 1.99]) and PFS (HR = 1.63, 95% CI = [1.39, 1.91]) in gastric cancer. Subgroup analyses stratified by country, study type, case load, analysis of HR, cutoff of pretreatment NLR, or treatment types arrived at the same conclusion. Pooled data based on different effect models and sensitivity analyses did not change the conclusion. Overall, high pretreatment NLR predicts the poor prognosis of inoperable gastric cancer patients with systemic therapy. Measurement of pretreatment NLR will assist clinicians with patient counseling and clinical treatment guiding accordingly.

A Phase I study of pevonedistat plus capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to platinum (NCCH-1811)

Based on synergistic anti-tumor effects between blockades of NEDD8 activating enzyme and a platinum in preclinical studies, this Phase I study is designed to investigate the safety and tolerability of pevonedistat in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin as third-line or later treatment in patients with unresectable advanced/recurrent gastric cancer who were previously treated with fluoropyrimidines and platinum (cisplatin or oxaliplatin) as the first-line treatment and paclitaxel (including nab-paclitaxel) as the second-line treatment. The aim of this trial is to determine the recommended dose of pevonedistat and to see its pharmacokinetics in combination with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin in the dose-finding part and explore its efficacy and safety in the expansion part. Trial registration number: jRCT2031190020 (jRCTs: the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials).

REVIVE study: a prospective observational study in chemotherapy after nivolumab therapy for advanced gastric cancer

Nivolumab is an increasingly used standard care treatment for heavily pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer, with increasing clinical use in Japan. Data from retrospective studies on various tumors have shown the objective response rate to cytotoxic chemotherapy potentially improves after an exposure to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Based on these data, we conducted the multicenter observational REVIVE study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cytotoxic chemotherapy in nivolumab-refractory or nivolumab-intolerant patients with advanced gastric cancer. Patients who are refractory or intolerant to nivolumab and scheduled to receive irinotecan monotherapy, oxaliplatin combination treatment or oral trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy will be included. The primary end point is overall survival of nivolumab-pretreated patients with advanced gastric cancer after the cytotoxic chemotherapy. Clinical trial registration: UMIN000032182 (umin.ac.jp).

Systemic inflammatory response and nutritional biomarkers as predictors of nivolumab efficacy for gastric cancer

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of clinicopathological systemic inflammatory response and nutritional biomarkers for predicting the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were 29 patients who received nivolumab treatment for advanced gastric cancer at the Kochi Medical School between 2017 and 2019. Clinicopathological information, including systemic inflammatory response data, were obtained to investigate the associations between baseline cancer-related prognostic variables and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of any grade were identified in 34.5% (10/29) of the patients. The median progression-free survival of patients with irAEs was significantly greater than that of patients without irAEs (5.8 months vs. 1.2 months, respectively; P = 0.028). The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) after 4 weeks of treatment in the complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) group was significantly lower than that in the stable disease (SD) or progression disease (PD) group (2.2 vs. 2.9, respectively; P = 0.044). The prognostic nutrition index (PNI) before treatment in the CR or PR group was significantly higher than that in the SD or PD group (37.1 vs. 32.1, respectively; P = 0.011). The PNI 8 weeks after treatment and the Glasgow prognostic score (GPS) before treatment were significantly associated with a poor outcome.

CONCLUSION

The irAE, NLR, PNI, and GPS may be useful predictive markers for nivolumab efficacy in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Outcomes of 596 Advanced Gastric Cancer Patients with Different Numbers of Chemotherapy Lines: The More Chemotherapy Lines, the Better Survival

Objective

Many large-sample prospective randomized clinical trials investigating advanced gastric cancer (AGC) have confirmed the survival advantages of first-line, second-line, or third-line chemotherapy compared with their respective control groups. However, due to the ethical concerns of prospective clinical trials, it is impossible to conduct a randomized comparative study of patients who do not receive chemotherapy and those who receive a second-line or above chemotherapy. Few research reports have addressed the relationship between the number of chemotherapy lines and overall survival (OS) in patients with AGC. In the present study, we analyzed the impact of the number of chemotherapy lines on OS in AGC patients using real-world data.

Patients and Methods

This study collected the medical records of patients with AGC diagnosed at Shandong Cancer Hospital from December 2007 to December 2017. According to the treatment received, AGC patients were divided into groups that did not receive chemotherapy, those who received only 1 line, 2 lines, or 3 lines and above. Kaplan–Meier analysis was used to assess patient survival.

Results

A total of 596 AGC patients were included in this study. The following patients were enrolled: 0 lines (did not receive chemotherapy), 77 (12.9%); 1 line, 235 (39.4%) patients; 2 lines, 185 (31.1%) patients; and ≥3 lines 99 (16.6%) patients. OS was significantly correlated with the number of chemotherapy lines (P<0.001), with a median OS from diagnosis of 3.3, 8.6, 15.6, and 21.0 months for patients receiving 0, 1, 2, ≥3 lines of chemotherapy, respectively.

Conclusion

This study showed that the more chemotherapy lines AGC patients received, the longer the OS. This study not only confirmed the impact of chemotherapy lines on OS but it also supplements the results of prospective clinical trials that cannot be completed due to the ethical implications.

A Phase II Study of Modified FOLFOX6 for Advanced Gastric Cancer Refractory to Standard Therapies

INTRODUCTION

In patients with advanced gastric cancer refractory to chemotherapy, the treatment options are limited. Via this phase II study, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil and l-leucovorin (modified FOLFOX6).

METHODS

Patients who had histologically confirmed metastatic gastric cancer refractory to ≥ two previous chemotherapy regimens were included. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR) by an independent central review. According to an assumption of a threshold ORR of 10% and expected ORR of 25%, with α = 0.05 and β = 0.20, at least 33 patients were required. The secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), quality of life measured by EQ-5D, and safety.

RESULTS

Among the 35 enrolled patients, 33 were included in the primary analysis. All patients previously received fluoropyrimidines, cisplatin, and taxanes, and 24 (73%) were pretreated with irinotecan. The confirmed ORR was 27% [95% confidence interval (CI) 13-46]. The median PFS and OS were 2.2 (95% CI 1.2-3.2) and 5.6 (95% CI 4.1-7.0) months, respectively. In the multivariate analyses, immunotherapy within 90 days and a Glasgow Prognostic Score of 0 were associated with better treatment outcomes. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse event was neutropenia (36%), and no febrile neutropenia was observed. The median EQ-5D scores did not change from baseline at 2, 4, and 8 weeks (p value = 0.38, 0.79, and 0.98, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Modified FOLFOX6 (mFOLFOX6) showed substantial activity and acceptable toxicity for chemotherapy-refractory advanced gastric cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN000016416).

Effect of Yiqi Huayu Jiedu decoction on stages II and III gastric cancer: A multicenter, prospective, cohort study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the effect of YHJD (Yiqi Huayu Jiedu decoction) in patients with stages II and III gastric cancer.

METHODS

A multicenter, prospective, cohort study was conducted in Jiangsu Province Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Jiangsu Cancer Hospital, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, People's Liberation Army Bayi Hospital, Changzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Changzhou Tumor Hospital, Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital of Kunshan, Yangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, and Yixing Tumor Hospital. A total of 489 patients with stage II or III gastric cancer were enrolled after radical gastrectomy. Among them, 238 were included in the chemotherapy group (received chemotherapy alone) and 251 in the YHJD group (received chemotherapy combined with YHJD). The DFS (disease-free survival) rate, 5-year survival rate, quality of life, and traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) symptoms of the 2 groups were compared.

RESULTS

The DFS curve of the YHJD group was higher than that of the chemotherapy group (P = .0042). The HR (hazard ratio) was 0.672, and its corresponding 95% CI (confidence interval) was 0.511 to 0.884. For stage II patients, the P value was .8323, which indicated that the difference was not significant. The risk HR was 0.938, and the corresponding 95% CI was 0.521 to 1.689. For stage III patients, the P value was .0072, indicating a statistically significant difference. The HR was 0.653, and the corresponding 95% CI was 0.477 to 0.893. The 5-year survival rate of the YHJD group was 85.29%, which was higher than that of the chemotherapy group (71.05%). Compared with the chemotherapy group, the YHJD group had better quality of life and lower TCM symptom scores.

CONCLUSION

YHJD decoction is effective in improving DFS rate in patients with gastric cancer stage III after radical gastrectomy. Moreover, it can reduce the risk of recurrence and metastasis and improve the quality of life in patients with gastric cancer stage II or III after radical gastrectomy.

Combination of Oxaliplatin and 5-Fluorouracil/Leucovorin for Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Refractory or Intolerant to Standard Therapies

Here, we report the four cases with metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma pretreated with standard chemotherapy who then received salvage-line chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and 5-fluorouracil plus l-leucovorin (FOLFOX) at our institution. We identified four men following the mentioned regimen; their median age was 68.5 years (range, 65-76 years). All patients developed disease progression on 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and taxanes. Two patients achieved partial response; the other two achieved stable disease on receiving cisplatin-containing regimens as first-line therapy. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses were 1 in three patients and 2 in one patient. The best response was partial response in one patient, stable disease in one, and progressive disease in two. For the two patients who achieved partial response or stable disease, the times to progression were 5.7 and 5.2 months and the overall survival times were 8.1 and 9.5 months, respectively. A grade 3 encephalopathy in one patient improved soon after chemotherapy discontinuation and supportive therapies. There was no treatment-related death. This is the first report suggesting the potential effectiveness of FOLFOX as salvage chemotherapy for metastatic esophageal cancer.