Potential for local resection with sentinel node basin dissection for early gastric cancer based on the distribution of primary sites

Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer: A Narrative Review

Early gastric cancer (EGC) refers to malignant tumor lesions that are limited to the mucosa and submucosa layers, regardless of the presence of lymph node metastasis. Typically, EGC has a low rate of perigastric lymph node metastasis, and long-term survival outcomes are good after radical surgical treatment. The primary objective of surgical treatment for EGC is to achieve functional preservation while ensuring a radical cure. Sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) is a surgical technique used in the treatment of EGC. This approach achieves functional preservation by limiting lymph node dissection and performing restrictive gastrectomy guided by intraoperative negative sentinel node (SN) biopsy. Despite the apparent improvement in the detection rate of SN with the emergence of various tracing dyes and laparoscopic fluorescence systems, the oncological safety of SNNS remains a controversial research topic. SNNS, as a true form of stomach preservation surgery that enhances the quality of life, has become a topic of interest in the EGC field. In recent years, scholars from Japan and South Korea have conducted extensive research on the feasibility and safety of SNNS in the treatment of EGC. This article aims to provide reference choices for surgeons treating EGC by reviewing relevant research on SNNS for EGC in recent years.

Recent Advances in Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery for Early Gastric Cancer

Maintaining the postoperative quality of life (QOL) while ensuring curability without overtreatment is important in the treatment of early gastric cancer. Postoperative QOL is anticipated to be maintained through minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy in early gastric cancer. The concept of the sentinel lymph node (SN) basin is essential to maintain the curability of early gastric cancer using minimally invasive function-preserving gastrectomy. However, additional resection after surgery is difficult to perform in gastric cancer. Thus, the SN basin theory is important. Recently, a multicenter randomized phase III trial in South Korea (SENORITA trial) proved that laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (LSNNS) for stomach preservation results in better postoperative QOL compared with standard gastrectomy in patients with early gastric cancer. LSNNS contributes to patients' QOL based on the concept that curability is not impaired. A multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial is ongoing in Japan, and oncologic safety is expected to be demonstrated. LSNNS has been established as a treatment option for selected patients with early gastric cancer, and its application will become widespread in the future.

Clinicopathological difference between gastric cancer in the lesser curvature and gastric cancer in the greater curvature

Gastric cancer (GC) is a heterogeneous disease; the tumor distribution and molecular subtype could affect the prognosis of patients with GC. However, the clinicopathological difference between GC in the lesser and that in the greater curvature remains unknown. In this study, we aimed to investigate the difference and provide new clues for the treatment of GC. Between January 2010 and August 2014, 1249 consecutive patients with GC in the lesser or greater curvature were treated in our surgery department; data related to the demographic characteristics, pathological type, tumor grade, tumor size, TNM stage, tumor markers, operative methods, complications, and follow-up were retrospectively analyzed using a univariate analysis and the Kaplan-Meier method. The tumor size in lesser curvature was larger than that in the greater curvature (4.95 ± 2.57 vs 4.43 ± 2.62 cm, P = .034); patients with GC in the lesser curvature had a higher incidence of total gastrectomy and a lower incidence of distal gastrectomy than those with GC in the greater curvature (60.2% vs 43.2%, and 34.8% vs 49.2%, P = .002). No significant differences were found in the 5-year survival rate between patients with GC in the greater curvature and those with GC in the lesser curvature (62.6% vs 66.1%, P = .496). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) expression rate of tumors in the lesser curvature was 40.55%, which was significantly higher than that of tumors in the greater curvature (25.92%, P = .024), while the 5-year survival rate of patients with EGFR-positive expression was 50.8%, which was significantly lower than that of patients with EGFR-negative expression (64.8%, P = .021). Significant differences were observed in the clinicopathological features between GC in the lesser curvature and that in the greater curvature. These differences contribute to the improvement in the treatment outcome.

Potential Applicability of Local Resection With Prophylactic Left Gastric Artery Basin Dissection for Early-Stage Gastric Cancer in the Upper Third of the Stomach

PURPOSE

Total or proximal gastrectomy of the upper-third early gastric cancer (u-EGC) often causes severe post-gastrectomy syndrome, suggesting that these procedures are extremely invasive for patients without pathologically positive lymph node (LN) metastasis. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical applicability of a stomach function-preserving surgery, local resection (LR), with prophylactic left gastric artery (LGA)-basin dissection (LGA-BD).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The data of patients with u-EGC (pathologically diagnosed as T1) were retrospectively analyzed. Total gastrectomy was performed in 30 patients, proximal gastrectomy in 45, and subtotal gastrectomy in 6; the LN status was evaluated assuming that the patients had already underwent LR + LGA-BD. This procedure was considered feasible in patients without LN metastases or in patients with cancer in the LGA basin. The reproducibility of the results was also evaluated using an external validation dataset.

RESULTS

Of the 82 eligible patients, 79 (96.3%) were cured after undergoing LR + LGA-BD, 74 (90.2%) were pathologically negative for LN metastases, and 5 (6.1%) had LN metastases, but these findings were only observed in the LGA basin. Similarly, of the 406 eligible tumors in the validation dataset, 396 (97.5%) were potentially curative. Tumors in the lesser curvature, post-endoscopic resection status, and small tumors (<20 mm) were considered to be stronger indicators of LR + LGA-BD as all subpopulation cases met our feasibility criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

More than 95% of the patients with u-EGC might be eligible for LR + LGA-BD. This function-preserving procedure may contribute to the development of u-EGC without pathological LN metastases, especially for tumors located at the lesser curvature.

Current status and challenges in sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer

As an optimal surgical procedure to accurately evaluate lymph node (LN) metastasis during surgery with minimal surgical resection, we have been developing sentinel node (SN) biopsy for early gastric cancer since the 1990s. Twelve institutions from the Japanese Society of Sentinel Node Navigation Surgery (SNNS), including Keio University Hospital, conducted a multicenter prospective trial to validate the SN concept using the dual-tracer method with blue dye and a radioisotope. According to the results, 397 patients were included in the final analysis, and the overall accuracy in detecting LN metastasis using SN biopsy was 99% (383 of 387). Based on the validation study, we are targeting cT1N0 with a primary tumor of ≤4 cm in diameter as an indication for SN biopsy for gastric cancer. We are currently running a multicenter nonrandomized phase III trial to assess the safety and efficacy of SN navigation surgery. The Korean group has reported the result of a multicenter randomized phase III trial. Since meticulous gastric cancer in the remnant stomach was rescued by subsequent gastrectomy, the disease-specific survival was comparable between the two techniques, implying that SN navigation surgery can be an alternative to standard gastrectomy. With the development of SN biopsy procedure and treatment modalities, the application of SN biopsy will be expanded to achieve an individualized minimally invasive surgery.

Survival outcomes of elderly patients with pathological stages II and III gastric cancer following curative gastrectomy

AIM

Survival outcomes in elderly patients with pathological stages (pStages) II and III gastric cancer remain inadequately elucidated. We retrospectively analyzed outcomes of elderly and nonelderly patients who underwent curative gastrectomy for this cancer and considered clinical results of the Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS) scoring system for prediction.

METHODS

Among 1041 patients who underwent gastrectomy for pStages II and III gastric cancer between 2008 and 2013 consecutively, 898 patients were enrolled. Of these, 158 patients (17.6%) were elderly and 740 patients (82.4%) were nonelderly.

RESULTS

Disease-specific survival (DSS) in the elderly group with pStage III cancer was significantly worse than that in the same stage nonelderly group (P = .001), while there was no difference in DSS for pStage II cancer between the groups (P = .45). Overall survival (OS) was significantly worse in elderly patients for both pStages II and III. Elderly patients with pStage II cancer had larger survival gaps between OS and DSS compared with those with pStage III cancer. OS for elderly patients with comprehensive risk score (CRS) > 0.159 was significantly worse than that for elderly patients with CRS ≤ 0.159 in pStage II cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with nonelderly patients, different characteristics were observed in the survival outcomes of elderly patients between pStages II and III gastric cancer. The survival gap between OS and DSS of elderly patients was larger in pStage II cancer than in pStage III cancer. The E-PASS scoring system could be a relatively useful predictor in elderly patients.

Sentinel node mapping for post-endoscopic resection gastric cancer: multicenter retrospective cohort study in Japan

BACKGROUND

Standard gastrectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy as an additional surgery after endoscopic resection (ER) causes a deterioration in long-term quality of life. If the sentinel lymph node (SN) basin concept can be applied in post-ER gastric cancer, minimal surgery can be applied without reducing the curability. This retrospective multicenter cohort study aimed to verify the validity of the SN basin concept in post-ER gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Individual data of 132 patients who underwent SN mapping after ER were collected from 8 university hospitals in Japan from 2001 to 2016. Tracers were injected endoscopically in the submucosal layer at four sites around the post-ER scar. We compared the SN basin distribution of post-ER gastric cancer with that of 275 patients with non-ER gastric cancer.

RESULTS

Two cases of SN were unidentified, both involving a single tracer (SN detection rate: 98.5%). Nine cases (6.8%) of lymph node metastasis were found, of which eight had a metastatic lymph node within the SNs and one had a non-SN metastasis within the SN basin. The diagnostic sensitivity of SN mapping for lymph node metastasis was 88.9% in post-ER group and 95.7% in non-ER group (P = 0.490); the accuracy was 99.2% and 99.6% (P = 0.539), respectively. Regarding the SN basin, no significant intergroup differences were found regardless of the primary tumor location.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings clarified the feasibility of SN mapping based on the SN basin concept in patients with gastric cancer who previously underwent ER.

Poor nutritional status and sarcopenia influences survival outcomes in gastric carcinoma patients undergoing radical surgery

BACKGROUND

The survival impacts of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) and sarcopenia have been separately investigated in patients with gastric carcinoma (GC), while the prognostic impact of the combination of them remains to be addressed.

METHODS

In total, 1166 GC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy were retrospectively reviewed. A new prognostic score (PNIS) was developed based on preoperative PNI and sarcopenia; patients with both low PNI (≤44.8) and sarcopenia were allocated a score of 2, and those with only one or neither of these abnormalities were assigned a score of 1 or 0, respectively.

RESULTS

A lower PNI was independently associated with sarcopenia (P = 0.007). There were 704 (60.4%), 356 (30.5%) and 106 (9.1%) patients in the PNIS 0, 1 and 2 groups, respectively. A higher PNIS was associated with advanced age (P < 0.001) and a higher incidence of postoperative complications (P = 0.01). Patients with PNIS 2 showed significantly poorer overall survival (OS) than those with PNIS 1 or 0 (5-year OS; 57.8% vs. 79.2% vs. 91.6%, P < 0.001). Multivariate Cox hazards analysis showed PNIS 2 to be a powerful predictor of poor OS (HR 5.73, P < 0.001) in patients with pStage I disease, while not being independently associated with OS in those with pStage II/III disease. Patients with PNIS 2 had a markedly higher prevalence of non-GC-related death than those with scores of 0-1.

CONCLUSION

The scoring system combining PNI and sarcopenia is useful for predicting survival outcomes, especially non-GC-related death, in patients with early GC, a population with basically good oncological outcomes.

Pre- and post-operative low prognostic nutritional index influences survival in older patients with gastric carcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The survival impact of the preoperative prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been investigated in older patients with gastric carcinoma (GC), while that of the postoperative PNI has yet to be addressed. We evaluated the significance of PNI before and after surgery in older GC patients (≥75 years).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total, 309 older GC patients undergoing radical gastrectomy between 2006 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The PNI was evaluated before and at six months after gastrectomy. Patients were divided into low (<45) and high (≥45) PNI groups. The impact of low PNI on overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and non-GC-related death were investigated.

RESULTS

Low PNI was present in 134 patients (43.4%) preoperatively and 121 (39.2%) postoperatively. Low pre-PNI was independently associated with poor overall survival (P < .001). Similarly, OS was significantly stratified by post-PNI (P < .001). The significant survival difference according to post-PNI was present only in pStage I disease (P < .001). Low post-PNI independently increased the risk of non-GC-related death in a multivariable analysis (P = .002). In contrast, CSS was not stratified by post-PNI (P = .45). In the high pre-PNI group, total gastrectomy and super-older age (≥80 years) independently increased the risk of low post-PNI, which was significantly associated with poor survival outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Pre- and post-operative PNI are useful for predicting long-term outcomes in older patients with GC. Low postoperative PNI is a powerful determinant of mortality due to other diseases. Optimal perioperative management is required for those at high risk of malnutrition postoperatively.

History and future perspectives in Japanese guidelines for endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer

Japanese guidelines for gastric cancer treatment were first published in 2001 for the purpose of showing the appropriate indication for each treatment method, thereby reducing differences in the therapeutic approach among institutions, and so on. With the accumulation of evidence and the development and prevalence of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), the criteria for the indication and curability of endoscopic resection (ER) for early gastric cancer (EGC) have expanded. However, several problems still remain. Although a risk-scoring system (eCura system) for predicting lymph node metastasis (LNM) may help treatment decision in patients who do not meet the curative criteria for ER of EGC, which is referred to as eCura C-2 in the latest guidelines, additional gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy may be excessive for many patients, even those at high risk for LNM. Less-invasive function-preserving surgery, such as non-exposed endoscopic wall-inversion surgery with laparoscopic sentinel node sampling, may overcome this problem. In addition, further less-invasive treatment, such as ER with chemotherapy, should be established for patients who prefer not to undergo additional gastrectomy.

Gastric lymphatic flows may change before and after endoscopic submucosal dissection: in vivo porcine survival models

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

Standard gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy is recommended following endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) due to the risk of lymph-node metastasis for resected cancers. However, when lymphatic flows remain unchanged after ESD, a minimally invasive function-preserving surgery based on the sentinel node (SN) concept may be applicable. In this study, using porcine survival models, we aimed to investigate whether gastric lymphatic flows were modified following ESD.

METHODS

Twelve pigs, each with one simulating lesion 3 cm in size, were used. Indocyanine green (ICG) fluid was endoscopically injected into the submucosa in four quadrants surrounding the lesion. Following laparoscopic observation of lymphatic flows, the lesions were resected by ESD. After 4 weeks, ICG fluid was injected in four quadrants surrounding the scar and lymphatic flows were observed in the same manner as the initial procedure. The distribution of lymphatic flows, including stained SNs, was compared.

RESULTS

In ten lesions (83.3%), the distribution of flows remained unchanged. However, in one lesion, the flow along the right gastric epiploic artery (R-GEA) disappeared on the lesser curvature of the middle stomach. In addition, in one lesion, the flow along R-GEA emerged on the lesser curvature of the lower stomach.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed that, despite ESD, lymphatic flows remained unchanged in most parts of the stomach. The SN concept may be applied after ESD, except for lesions on the lesser curvature. However, in the case of the lesser curvature, special care must be given to the SN concept.

Interplay between STAT3, Cell Adhesion Molecules and Angiogenesis-Related Parameters in Gastric Carcinoma. Does STAT3 Really Have a Prognostic Value?

Background and objectives: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the deadliest malignancies, with the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms still not completely understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) moleculeconnection with the pathological features of GCs, and the expression of cell adhesive molecules (E-cadherin and β-catenin) and angiogenesis-related factors (vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), HIF1α, and CD31)). Materials and Methods: This study comprised 136 cases of GCs with data related to the patients’ demographic characteristics (age, gender) and pathological features (tumor location, gross type, Laurens’ type of GC, histological differentiation, invasion depth, lymphovascular invasion and the presence of metastases) which were correlated with STAT3 expression. Additionally, STAT3 expression and the expression of adhesive molecules and angiogenesis-related factors were studied by immunohistochemical methods. Results: The expression of STAT3 was found to be significantly associated with the occurrence of poorly differentiated GCs in the lower portion of the stomach and with the presence of distant metastases. Interestingly, none of the investigated parameters related to cell adhesion or to angiogenesis were found to be related to the expression of STAT3. Conclusions: The lack of significant differences between the studied STAT3 expression and some of the molecules associated with different cancer features might be due to the characteristics of the studied population sample associated with the origin, heterogeneity, and cancer pathophysiological background. Nonetheless, the results of our study suggest that STAT3 could be a useful marker for the presence of distant GC metastases, which further indicates that STAT3 action might involve some other signaling molecules/pathways that warrant further elucidation.

Prognostic Significance of Solitary Lymphnode Metastasis and Micrometastasis in Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) used to be one of the most common malignancies in the world and still is the second leading cause of malignancy-related death in the Far East. The most significant factors that were found to be associated with the clinical outcome in patients with non-metastatic (M₀) gastric cancer is tumor's depth of invasion, the presence and the extend of lymphnode involvement, as well as the histological type according to Lauren (intestinal or diffuse). Although it is generally accepted that D2 gastrectomy is the procedure of choice to achieve adequate oncologic excision, there are quite many concerns for its use in patients with early gastric cancer (EGC), where N_o or N₁ specimens are frequently reported. The last two decades, with the evolvement of cancer cell detection techniques, the attend of the medical community is focused on GC patients with solitary lymphnode metastasis (SLN) or micrometastasis (mM). There is a discussion whether SLN should be attributed as the “real” sentinel node (SN) and its projection on patients' survival. The aim of this study is to review the recent literature and attempt to clarify the clinical significance of SLN in gastric cancer.