Exploratory subgroup analysis of patients with prior trastuzumab use in the ATTRACTION-2 trial: a randomized phase III clinical trial investigating the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in patients with advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer

Treatment strategy for HER2-negative advanced gastric cancer: salvage-line strategy for advanced gastric cancer

After immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) comes into third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer, the therapeutic strategy has been dramatically changed. Recent first-line regimen, which consists of ICI and chemotherapeutic agents, prolonged progression-free survival, and subsequent treatment options enabled continuous treatment beyond second-line therapy. Moreover, the advent of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted agents including angiogenesis inhibitors and TKIs provides an opportunity of considering the interaction between ICI and anti-VEGF agents, and facilitating novel treatment proposal. Although clinical benefit of prolonged VEGF blockade after disease progression has not been confirmed in gastric cancer, combination therapy of cytotoxic agents and anti-VEGF agent, such as irinotecan plus ramucirumab demonstrated favorable objective response rate and progression-free survival in third- or later-line setting. In this review, we discuss recent progress and future directions of later-line treatments of HER2-negative advancer gastric cancer.

Significant effect of posterior line treatment of HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer: A case report

At present, there are few options for third line and above treatment of advanced gastric cancer and the single drug effect is poor. HER2 positive gastric cancer is an important subtype of gastric cancer and has certain immune characteristics. The combination of HER2 inhibitor and PD-1 inhibitor has a synergistic effect, and anti-tumor drugs targeting HER2 can play an anti-angiogenesis role by downregulating VEGF. We report a patient with HER2-positive gastric cancer who developed post-operative tumor recurrence and metastasis after adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Trastuzumab combined with albumin paclitaxel was used as second-line treatment with progression-free survival for 9 months. In third line treatment, we retained trastuzumab and combined it with camrelizumab and apatinib. During the treatment period, although the patient stopped taking the drugs due to the side effects of camrelizumab and apatinib, he achieved a PFS of 10.4 months. Considering the good effect of the third line treatment, we added another PD-1 inhibitor and continued to combine trastuzumab treatment. We found that the patient still benefited from the treatment and continued to survive for another 4 months. At present, the patient is treated with DisitamabVedotin (HER2-ADC) combined with PD-1 inhibitor, and no overall survival outcome has been observed.

Evaluation of clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and safety of PD-1 inhibitors combined with chemotherapy when treating advanced gastric cancer

OBJECTIVE

This paper aimed to assess the clinical efficacy, adverse reactions, and safety of employing PD-1 inhibitors in conjunction with chemotherapy as a treatment strategy for advanced gastric cancer (GC).

METHODS

Ninety patients with advanced GC from January 2020 to December 2021 were divided into the research group (n = 45) and the control group (n = 45). The control group was treated with apatinib and tigio. The study group was treated with PD-1 inhibitor combined with apatinib and tigio. The remission rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), Eastern Oncology Collaborative Group Physical Status Assessment (ECOG-PS) score, EORTCQLQ-C30 (v3.0) score, and incidence of adverse reactions were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

The research group exhibited improved outcomes in several key metrics relative to the control group. Specifically, the RR, DCR, and OS were notably higher in the research group. Additionally, the ECOG-PS score was significantly reduced, indicating better performance. At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the research group's functional and total health scores on the EORTC QLQ-C30 (v3.0) scale had seen significant improvement compared to their initial scores and were also superior to the control group's scores. Importantly, both groups demonstrated comparable incidence rates for adverse reactions, with no significant difference observed (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PD-1 inhibitor combined with chemotherapy was more effective when treating patients with advanced GC. It was more beneficial to enhance the patient's condition, promote survival time, and improve physical status and life quality. In addition, the adverse reactions could be controlled.

Immunology and immunotherapy in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is the fifth leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. As the diagnosis of early gastric cancer is difficult, most patients are at a late stage of cancer progression when diagnosed. The current therapeutic approaches based on surgical or endoscopic resection and chemotherapy indeed improve patients' outcomes. Immunotherapy based on immune checkpoint inhibitors has opened a new era for cancer treatment, and the immune system of the host is reshaped to combat tumor cells and the strategy differs according to the patient's immune system. Thus, an in-depth understanding of the roles of various immune cells in the progression of gastric cancer is beneficial to application for immunotherapy and the discovery of new therapeutic targets. This review describes the functions of different immune cells in gastric cancer development, mainly focusing on T cells, B cells, macrophages, natural killer cells, dendritic cells, neutrophils as well as chemokines or cytokines secreted by tumor cells. And this review also discusses the latest advances in immune-related therapeutic approaches such as immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T or vaccine, to reveal potential and promising strategies for gastric cancer treatment.

Efficacy and Safety of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan and Nivolumab as Third- or Later-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Single-Institution Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Determination of optimal treatment strategies for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer (AGC) in randomized trials is necessary despite difficulties in direct comparison between trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and nivolumab as third or later-line treatments.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This single-institution, retrospective study aimed to describe the real-world efficacy and safety of T-DXd and nivolumab as ≥ third line treatments for HER2-positive AGC between March 2016 and May 2022. Overall, 58 patients (median age, 64 years; 69% male) were eligible for the study (T-DXd group, n=20; nivolumab group, n=38).

RESULTS

Most patients exhibited a HER2 3+ status (72%) and presented metastatic disease at diagnosis (66%). The response rates of 41 patients with measurable lesions in the T-DXd and nivolumab groups were 50% and 15%, respectively. The T-DXd and nivolumab groups had a median progression-free survival of 4.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.3, 7.0) and 2.3 months (95% CI, 1.5, 3.5), median overall survival (OS) of 10.8 months (95% CI, 6.9, 23.8) and 11.7 months (95% CI, 7.6, 17.1), and grade 3 or greater adverse event rates of 50% and 2%, respectively. Overall, 64% patients received subsequent treatment. Among 23 patients who received both regimens, the T-DXd-nivolumab and nivolumab-T-DXd groups had a median OS of 14.0 months (95% CI, 5.0, not reached) and 19.3 months (95% CI, 9.5, 25.1), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

T-DXd and nivolumab showed distinct efficacy and toxicity profiles as ≥ third line treatments for HER2-positive AGC. Considering the distinct features of each regimen, they may help clinicians personalize optimal treatment approaches for these patients.

Effects of prior therapies on outcomes with trifluridine/tipiracil in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer in a randomized phase III trial (TAGS)

BACKGROUND

In the phase III TAGS trial, trifluridine/tipiracil showed survival benefit versus placebo in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and ≥ 2 prior chemotherapies. This post hoc exploratory analysis assessed the impact of prior therapy type on outcomes.

METHODS

Based on prior treatment, patients in TAGS (N = 507) were categorized into overlapping subgroups: ramucirumab ± other agents (n = 169), no ramucirumab (n = 338), paclitaxel but no ramucirumab (n = 136), ramucirumab + paclitaxel sequentially or in combination (n = 154), neither paclitaxel nor ramucirumab (n = 202), irinotecan (n = 281), and no irinotecan (n = 226). Overall and progression-free survival, time to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) ≥ 2, and safety were assessed.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics and prior therapy patterns were generally well balanced between trifluridine/tipiracil and placebo arms across subgroups. Trifluridine/tipiracil was associated with survival benefits versus placebo regardless of prior treatment: across subgroups, median overall survival was 4.6-6.1 versus 3.0-3.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.47-0.88), median progression-free survival was 1.9-2.3 versus 1.7-1.8 months (hazard ratios, 0.49-0.67), and median time to ECOG PS ≥ 2 was 4.0-4.7 versus 1.9-2.5 months (hazard ratios, 0.56-0.88). Among trifluridine/tipiracil-randomized patients, median overall and progression-free survival trended longer in those who had not received ramucirumab, paclitaxel and ramucirumab, or irinotecan (6.0-6.1 and 2.1-2.3 months, respectively) than in those who previously received these agents (4.6-5.7 and 1.9 months). The trifluridine/tipiracil safety profile was consistent across subgroups, with similar overall incidences of grade ≥ 3 adverse events. Minor variations in hematologic toxicities were noted.

CONCLUSIONS

In TAGS, third- or later-line trifluridine/tipiracil treatment demonstrated overall and progression-free survival and functioning benefits versus placebo and a consistent safety profile in patients with metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer, regardless of prior treatment type.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

clinicaltrials.gov NCT02500043.

Efficacy and survival of anti-PD-1 antibody in combination with trastuzumab and chemotherapy versus trastuzumab and chemotherapy as first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastasis gastric adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study

Background

The KEYNOTE-811 study exhibited promising preliminary results for HER2-positive metastasis gastric adenocarcinoma; however, long-term survival benefit remains to be determined.

Methods

In this single-center, controlled, retrospective study, patients with histologically confirmed HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma received either anti-PD-1 antibody combined with trastuzumab and chemotherapy (cohort A) or trastuzumab and chemotherapy treatment (cohort B). The primary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary end points were objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and duration of response (DoR).

Results

A total of 56 patients were eligible to join the study, with 30 patients in cohort A and 26 patients in cohort B. The median PFS (mPFS) was 16.2 months (95% CI, 15.093-17.307) in cohort A versus 14.5 months (95% CI, 9.491-19.509) in cohort B (p = 0.58). The median OS in cohort A was 28.1 months (95% CI, 17.625-38.575) versus 31.6 months (95% CI, 13.757-49.443) in cohort B (p = 0.534). ORRs were 66.7% and 50% in the two groups, respectively. DCRs were 90% and 84.6% in the two groups. Median DoR was not reached in cohort A and it was 16.3 (95% CI, 8.453-24.207) months in cohort B (p = 0.141). The most common irAEs were grade 1 hypothyroidism (33.3%) in cohort A. No treatment-related deaths occurred in this study.

Conclusions

This retrospective cohort study provided a preliminary picture on the long-term follow-up of combining anti-PD-1 antibody with trastuzumab and chemotherapy in HER2-positive GC, and a trend with longer DoR and ORR was identified. Further studies with larger sample sizes and more in-depth molecular investigation are needed.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments for advanced gastric cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

Many options for third-line treatment of advanced gastric cancer (GC) or gastroesophageal junction carcinoma (GEJC) have been developed. Therapies including immunotherapy (nivolumab), chemotherapy (irinotecan, FTD/TPI), targeted therapy (apatinib), and antibody drug conjugates (ADC) have shown to increase the survival rates in patients, but few studies have compared the relative efficacy of these treatments. Here, we compared the efficacies of these regimens using network meta-analysis (NMA) to provide guides in selecting the best regimen and formulating a precise individualized treatment plan.

Methods

The published RCTs of phase II/III in PubMed, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Embase were searched. The median overall survival (mOS) was the primary outcome of NMA, and the other outcomes were median progression-free survival (mPFS), disease control rate (DCR) (proportion of patients with confirmed CR, PR, or stable disease (SD)) and incidence of grade 3 or above adverse events (≥3AEs).

Results

Five phase II/III RCTs involving 1674 patients and 7 treatment regimens were analyzed. It showed that Trastuzumab Deruxtecan (DS-8201) prolonged the OS of patients significantly comparing with chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.89) for the overall population. DS-8201 (HR: 0.27; 95% CI: 0.17-0.42) and chemotherapy (HR: 0.57; 95% CI: 0.47-0.7) improved the PFS significantly over nivolumab. Apatinib (RR: 3.04; 95% CI: 1.65-5.95) and DS-8201 (RR: 2.67; 95% CI: 1.51-4.83) were more effective than nivolumab in improving DCR. DS-8201 achieved greater OS benefits compared to chemotherapy (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.39-0.88) for patients who were HER2-positive. We ranked the Bayesian surface under the cumulative ranking curve according to OS benefit, and showed that ADC ranked first for the general patient population and for patients with a HER2-positive diagnosis, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. For patients with GEJC, nivolumab ranked first.

Conclusions

Nivolumab, apatinib, chemotherapy, and ADC all improved the OS of GC/GEJC patients significantly. ADC may be the best option for the overall population of GC, as well as for patients with HER2-overexpression, intestinal histopathology, previous gastrectomy history, gastric origination cancer, ages over 65 and ECOG PS=0/1, followed by nivolumab and apatinib. Nivolumab may be the first treatment option for GEJC patients.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero, identifier CRD42022364714.

Incidence rate and treatment strategy of immune checkpoint inhibitor mediated hepatotoxicity: A systematic review

Background

A hepatic adverse event (HAE) is defined as a liver injury that occurs following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) administration in oncology Patients. Immune-mediated hepatotoxicity (IMH) is a type of HAE directly caused by ICI and is associated with immune system hyperactivation. HAE incidence varies across different clinical studies. This study aimed to explore the risk factors of HAE and establish a personalized IMH treatment strategy.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on ICIs and case reports related to IMH were collected and summarized separately. Meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager (version 5.0), whereas correlation analysis and linear regression were performed using SPSS (version 24.0) to evaluate any correlations between the two variables.

Results

Overall, 36 RCTs containing 18,515 patients and 39 case reports met our inclusion criteria. The ICI administration increased the HAE risk (risk ratio [RR] ​= ​1.40) as well as severe HAE (RR ​= ​2.55). The overall HAE incidence and severe incidence were about 15.3% and 4.3%, respectively. Cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) inhibitors have a higher incidence of HAE than programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors. Finally, we found a positive correlation between the onset time of IMH and the recovery time of liver injury.

Conclusions

ICI administration increased the incidence risk of HAE, especially in patients treated with CTLA-4 inhibitors. Regarding IMH treatment, the glucocorticoid dosage must be individually reduced according to the severity and onset time of HAE.

Predictive value of PD-L1 expression in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors for esophageal cancer treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Programmed death-ligand-1 (PD-L1) molecule is a well-known predictive biomarker for the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in several cancers. Present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at investigating the role of PD-L1 in predicting the effectiveness of programmed death-1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 inhibitors in patients suffering from esophageal cancer.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases as of March 25, 2022, for retrieving the potential relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The pooled hazard ratios (HR) and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95%CIs) were calculated for the outcomes of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The primary objective was to investigate the association between PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors vs. control agents and treatment efficacy in terms of OS in patients with esophageal tumor expressing different values of PD-L1 based on combined-positive score (CPS) and tumor proportion score (TPS). The secondary outcome was the pooled risk of PFS.

Results

Eleven studies with a total of 5,418 participants were included. While there was no difference in the OS of CPS<1 patients in the intervention and the control group, patients bearing esophageal tumors with a CPS≥1 (HR 0.65, 0.56-0.74) treated by ICIs showed a significant improvement in OS relative to the control agents. Accordingly, patients with CPS<5 (HR 0.75, 0.58-0.98), CPS≥5 (HR 0.64, 0.53-0.77), CPS<10 (HR 0.86, 0.76-0.98), and CPS≥10 (HR 0.65, 0.56-0.75) had improved OS; however, a significant longer OS was observed in cases who expressed higher values of CPS=10 (p=0.018). In terms of TPS, a significant greater benefit in prolonging the OS came from TPS≥1% PD-L1 expressing tumors in comparison to TPS<1% tumors, suggesting this cut-off as another predictor of PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors efficacy. Notably, in the subgroup analysis when the cut-off value of CPS=10 or TPS=1% was selected, Nivolumab was the best ICI that improved the survival of PD-L1 positive patients. In patients with negative PD-L1 expression, Toripalimib is the only ICI which could prolong the OS of patients with the cut-off value of CPS=10.

Conclusion

Among patients suffering from esophageal cancer, PD-L1 CPS=10 and TPS=1% expression thresholds seem to be predictive of a lower rate of mortality when PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors are administrated; however, further large-scale trials are required for confirming the findings of the present study.

Treatment- and immune-related adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors in esophageal or gastroesophageal junction cancer: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objective

To systematically evaluate the safety and adverse event profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with esophageal cancer (EPC) or gastroesophageal junction cancer (GEJC).

Methods

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and major conference proceedings were systematically searched for all phase II or phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in EPC or GEJC using ICIs. Safety outcomes including treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), immune-related adverse events (irAEs), and serious trAEs were evaluated by network meta-analysis or dichotomous meta-analysis based on the random-effects model.

Results

Eleven RCTs involving EPC (five RCTs) and GEJC (six RCTs) were included in the final meta-analysis. NMA showed that placebo was associated with the best safety ranking for grade 3-5 trAEs (SUCRA = 96.0%), followed by avelumab (78.6%), nivolumab (73.9%), ipilimumab (57.0%), and pembrolizumab (56.6%). Conventional pairwise meta-analysis (CPM) showed that ICIs have similar grade 3-5 trAE risk compared with chemotherapy (RR = 0.764, 95% CI: 0.574 to 1.016, I ² = 95.7%, Z = 1.85, P = 0.065). NMA showed that the general safety of grade 3-5 irAEs ranked from high to low is as follows: ChT (85.1%), placebo (76.5%), ipilimumab (56.0%), nivolumab (48.5%), avelumab (48.4%), camrelizumab (41.8%), pembrolizumab (36.4%), and nivolumab + ipilimumab (21.6%). CPM showed that the rates of grade 3-5 irAEs in the ICI group and the chemotherapy group were 7.35% (154/2,095, 95% CI: [6.23%, 8.47%]) versus 2.25% (42/1,869, 95% CI: [1.58%, 2.92%]), with statistical significance (RR = 3.151, 95% CI = 2.175 to 4.563, Z = 6.07, P = 0.000). The most common irAEs in the ICI group were skin reaction (15.76%, 95% CI: [13.67%, 17.84%]), followed by hypothyroidism (9.73%, 95% CI: [8.07%, 11.39%]), infusion-related reactions (5.93%, 95% CI: [4.29%, 7.58%]), hepatitis (5.25%, 95% CI: [4.28%, 6.22%]), and pneumonitis (4.45%, 95% CI: [3.5%, 5.4%]).

Conclusion

Different ICIs had different toxicity manifestations and should not be considered as an entity. Compared with chemotherapy, ICIs were more prone to irAEs, but the overall rates remained low and acceptable. For clinicians, it is important to recognize and monitor the adverse events caused by ICIs for patients with EPC or GEJC.

Adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with digestive system cancers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To study the incidence and distribution of adverse events in immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for digestive system cancers and to provide a reference for the safe, rational, and effective use of immune detection site inhibitors.

Methods

We searched for articles published in English between January 1, 2010, and May 18, 2022. All clinical trials of ICI-based therapies for digestive system cancers were investigated, including only randomized controlled trials that reported data on the overall incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) or immune-related adverse reactions (irAEs) or tables.

Results

We searched 2048 records, of which 21 studies (7108 patients) were eligible for inclusion. The incidence of ICI trAEs of any grade was 82.7% (95% CI 73.9-90.0), and the incidence of grade 3 or higher trAEs was 27.5% (95% CI 21.3-34.1). The pooled rate of ICI irAEs of any grade was 26.3% (95% CI 11.8-44.0), and the incidence of grade 3 or higher irAEs was 9.4% (95% CI 1.1-24.6). In multivariate analysis, the incidence, characteristics, and distribution of AEs varied by cancer type, combination therapy modality (single/two-drug), and different agent types.

Conclusion

Our meta-analysis summarizes AEs associated with ICI in digestive system cancers. The incidence, characteristics, and distribution of AEs vary by cancer type, combination therapy modality, and different agent types. These findings can be considered for the early identification of AEs and provide effective interventions to reduce the severity of these patients. It can provide a clinical reference and may contribute to clinical practice.

Apatinib as a Third-Line Treatment for HER2-Positive Metastatic Gastric Cancer: A Multi-Center Single-Arm Cohort Study

PURPOSE

Treatment options are limited after the failure of first-and second-line treatments in patients with HER2⁺ metastatic gastric cancer (mGC). The present study aimed to explore the efficacy, safety, and prognostic factors of apatinib efficacy as a third-line therapy for patients with human epithelial growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2⁺) mGC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 59 HER2⁺ mGC patients who received apatinib as third-line therapy were retrospectively enrolled in this two-center, single-arm, cohort study; the clinical response, survival data, and adverse events were retrieved.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.9-6.5), and the median overall survival (OS) was 8.2 months (95% CI, 6.6-9.8) Furthermore, forward stepwise multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that a higher Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score and multiple metastases were independently correlated with decreased PFS and OS (both P<0.05). The main adverse events were leukopenia (45.8%), hypertension (44.1%), thrombocytopenia (39.0%), hand-foot syndrome (37.3%), and elevated transaminase (33.9%). Grade 3 adverse events mainly included hypertension (5.1%) and neutropenia (5.1%); grade 4 adverse events did not occur.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib is efficient and well tolerated in patients with HER2⁺ mGC as a third-line treatment, suggesting that it may be a candidate of choice for these patients.

HER2-targeted advanced metastatic gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma: treatment landscape and future perspectives

Recently, the global incidence of gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer has remained high. China is also a large country with a high gastric cancer (GC) incidence rate, where the cases of GC account for 40% of all cases worldwide. More than 90% of GEJ cancers are the adenocarcinoma pathological type. Patients with early-stage G/GEJ adenocarcinoma may have a better prognosis after surgery. In contrast, patients with advanced metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma usually choose comprehensive treatment based on systemic pharmacotherapy, but the subsequent long-term survival is not optimistic. The discovery of various biomarkers, especially microsatellite instability (MSI), programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1), human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), tumor mutational burden (TMB) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), has led to the identification of an increasing number of targeted populations and has greatly improved the clinical efficacy of treatments for G/GEJ adenocarcinoma. The ToGA trial added trastuzumab to standard chemotherapy, showed improved survival of patients with HER2-positive advanced G/GEJ adenocarcinoma and brought these patients into a new era of HER2-targeted therapy. Moreover, many HER2-targeted agents have been developed and studied in patients with advanced HER2-positive G/GEJ adenocarcinoma who have demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes. However, many patients experience disease progression with HER2-targeted therapy; hence, new anti-HER2 drugs keep being developed, significantly reducing HER2 resistance. This paper reviews HER2-targeted drugs for advanced metastatic G/GEJ adenocarcinoma, potential resistance mechanisms and future directions.

Difference in Cost-Effectiveness between First-Line and Third-Line or Later Nivolumab Therapy in Patients with HER2-Negative, Unresectable, Advanced or Recurrent Gastric or Gastro-Esophageal Junction Cancer in Japan

A model-based, cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted to evaluate the difference in cost-effectiveness of nivolumab (NIVO), between first-line therapy in combination with chemotherapy and third-line or later monotherapy for patients with unresectable, advanced or recurrent gastric or gastro-esophageal junction cancer, with the aim of supporting the economic evaluation of healthcare in Japan. Data on overall survival and progression-free survival were obtained from the phase 3 clinical trials, ATTRACTION-4 and ATTRACTION-2. A partitioned survival model was developed to predict costs and outcomes. Direct medical costs were considered from the perspective of the Japanese national health insurance (NHI) payer. The model time horizon was set to 10 years. Health outcomes were defined as life years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of NIVO compared to the control group was estimated. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the uncertainty of parameter setting. A willingness-to-pay threshold of 15 million JPY (Japanese yen) was used. Compared to each control group, the ICERs for NIVO treatment per 1 LY gained were 65745714 JPY for first-line treatment, 7420202 JPY for third-line or later treatment, and 74750097 JPY and 10496602 JPY per QALY gained, respectively. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses estimated that the probability of NIVO treatment being cost-effective for first-line and third-line treatment was 23.5 and 74.3%, respectively. From the perspective of the Japanese NHI payer, NIVO was cost-effective as third-line or later monotherapy for patients with advanced gastric cancer, but not in combination with first-line chemotherapy.

Apoptosis-Related Gene-Mediated Cell Death Pattern Induces Immunosuppression and Immunotherapy Resistance in Gastric Cancer

Background: Apoptosis is a type of cell death, which can produce abundant mediators to modify the tumor microenvironment. However, relationships between apoptosis, immunosuppression, and immunotherapy resistance of gastric cancer (GC) remain unclear.

Methods: Gene expression data and matching clinical information were extracted from TCGA-STAD, GSE84437, GSE34942, GSE15459, GSE57303, ACRG/GSE62254, GSE29272, GSE26253, and IMvigor210 datasets. A consensus clustering analysis based on six apoptosis-related genes (ARGs) was performed to determine the molecular subtypes, and then an apoptosisScore was constructed based on differentially expressed and prognostic genes between molecular subtypes. Estimate R package was utilized to calculate the tumor microenvironment condition. Kaplan-Meier analysis and ROC curves were performed to further confirm the apoptosisScore efficacy.

Results: Based on six ARGs, two molecular subgroups with significantly distinct survival and immune cell infiltration were identified. Then, an apoptosisScore was built to quantify the apoptosis index of each GC patient. Next, we investigated the correlations between the clinical characteristics and apoptosisScore using logistic regression. Multivariate Cox analysis shows that low apoptosisScore was an independent predictor of poor overall survival in TCGA and ACRG datasets, and was associated with the higher pathological stage. Meanwhile, low apoptosisScore was associated with higher immune cell, higher ESTIMATEScore, higher immuneScore, higher stromalScore, higher immune checkpoint, and lower tumorpurity, which was consistent with the “immunity tidal model theory”. Importantly, low apoptosisScore was sensitive to immunotherapy. In addition, GSEA indicated that several gene ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes items associated with apoptosis, several immune-related pathways, and JAK–STAT signal pathway were considerably enriched in the low apoptosisScore phenotype pathway.

Conclusion: Our findings propose that low apoptosisScore is a prognostic biomarker, correlated with immune infiltrates, and sensitivity to immunotherapy in GC.

Real-world effectiveness of third- or later-line treatment in Japanese patients with HER2-positive, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer: a retrospective observational study

Background

Real-world evidence on the preference for and effectiveness of third- or later-line (3L +) monotherapy for HER2-positive gastric cancer is limited in Japan. This study evaluated the utility of nivolumab, irinotecan, and trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) monotherapy as 3L + treatment in Japanese patients with HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer who were previously treated with trastuzumab.

Methods

In this multicenter, retrospective, observational study (20 centers), data of eligible patients were extracted from medical records (September 22, 2017–March 31, 2020), with follow-up until June 30, 2020. Outcomes included overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), objective response rate (ORR; complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]), and disease control rate (DCR).

Results

Of 127 enrolled patients, the overall analysis population comprised 117 patients (median [range] age, 71 [38–89] years). The most commonly prescribed 3L + monotherapy was nivolumab (n = 100), followed by irinotecan (n = 12) and FTD/TPI (n = 5). The median (95% confidence interval [CI]) OS, rwPFS, and TTF were 6.2 (4.5–8.0), 1.9 (1.5–2.3), and 1.8 (1.5–2.2) months, respectively, at median (range) 150 (25–1007) days of follow-up. The ORR (CR + PR) and DCR were 9.0% (1% + 8%) and 32.0%, respectively. Factors such as higher neutrophil–lymphocyte ratio (≥ 2.54), Glasgow prognostic score (≥ 1), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS; ≥ 2), and hepatic metastasis significantly impacted OS.

Conclusions

The observed OS in this study for HER2-positive G/GEJ cancer was shorter than that reported previously, suggesting that the effectiveness of nivolumab, irinotecan, or FTD/TPI as 3L + therapy may be limited.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10147-022-02162-4.

Improving ovarian cancer treatment decision using a novel risk predictive tool

BACKGROUND

As a major component of the tumor tissue, the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been proven to associate with tumor progression and immunotherapy. Ovarian cancer accounts for the highest mortality rate among gynecologic malignancies. Its clinical treatment decision is highly correlated with the prognosis, underscoring the need to evaluate the prognosis and choose the proper clinical treatment through TME information.

METHOD

This study constructs a score with TME information obtained by the CIBERSORT algorithm, which classifies the patients into high and low TMEscore groups with quantified TME infiltration patterns through the PCA algorithm. TMEscore was constructed by TCGA cohort and validated in GEO cohort. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards model analyses were used to demonstrate prognostic value of TMEscore in overall and stratified analysis.

RESULT

TMEscore is highly correlated with survival and high TMEscore group has a better prognosis. In order to improve treatment decision, the expression of immune checkpoints, immunophenoscore (IPS) and ESTIMATE score showed a high TMEscore have a better immune microenvironment and respond better to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Meanwhile, the mutation landscape between TMEscore groups was profiled, and 13 genes were found mutated differently between the two groups. Among them, BRCA1 has more mutations in the high TMEscore group and speculated that high TMEscore patients might be a beneficiary population of PARP inhibitors combined with immunotherapy.

CONCLUSION

TMEscore based on TME with prognostic value and clinical value is proposed for the identification of targets treatment and immunotherapy strategies for ovarian cancer.

Recent insights into the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer

Gastric cancer (GC) is the fifth most incident and the fourth deadliest cancer worldwide. GC is a heterogeneous disease from the histological and molecular standpoints. This malignancy is mostly diagnosed at advanced stages of the disease, where the available therapeutic interventions are not effective. The emergence of immunotherapy has transformed the landscape of cancer treatment, including GC, and currently immune checkpoint inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of patients with recurrent/metastatic GC. This review summarizes the main clinical trials evaluating the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in GC. It also highlights the potential of biomarkers for patient selection for GC immune checkpoint inhibition therapy, including programmed cell death ligand 1 expression and tumor mutational burden, and characteristics of the GC molecular classification, such as microsatellite instability status and Epstein-Barr virus infection, as predictors of response to blockade of the programmed cell death 1/programmed cell death ligand 1 axis.

Current status and future perspectives in HER2 positive advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancy worldwide with a prognosis less than 1 year in unresectable or metastatic disease. HER2 expression is the main biomarker to lead the addition of trastuzumab to first line systemic chemotherapy improving the overall survival in advanced HER2-positivegastric adenocarcinoma. The inevitable development of resistance to trastuzumab remains a great problem inasmuch several treatment strategies that have proven effective in breast cancer failed to show clinical benefit in advanced gastric cancer. In this review, we summarize the available data on the mechanisms underlying primary and secondary resistance toHER2-targeted therapy and current challenges in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer refractory to trastuzumab. Further, we describe the prognostic value of new non-invasive screening techniques, the current development of novel agents such us HER2 antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies, and the strategies with antitumor activity on going.

Clinical features as potential prognostic factors in patients treated with nivolumab for highly pretreated metastatic gastric cancer: a multicenter retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Although nivolumab (anti-programmed cell death-1 antibody) is a promising approach for advanced gastric cancer (AGC), the response rate remains limited. The aim of this multicenter retrospective study was to determine if clinical features could serve as prognostic factors of the efficacy of nivolumab in patients with AGC.

METHODS

Fifty-eight patients with AGC who were treated with nivolumab as a third or later line from October 2017 to December 2018 at any of five clinical sites were enrolled in the study. The correlation between the best overall response and clinical features was investigated. Overall survival and progression-free survival after initiation of nivolumab were calculated and clinical features that could be predictors of the prognosis were sought.

RESULTS

The disease control rate (DCR) for nivolumab was 36.2% and was significantly correlated with performance status (p = 0.021), metastasis to one organ (p = 0.006), and grade 2 or higher immune-related adverse events (p = 0.027). There was also a significant association between response to nivolumab and ability to receive subsequent chemotherapy (p = 0.022). In the analysis of overall survival, the following variables were identified as being significantly associated with a poor outcome: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≥1, prior treatment with trastuzumab, no immune-related adverse events, lack of a response to nivolumab, and inability to receive subsequent chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

The findings of this study suggest that nivolumab may be ineffective for AGC in patients with poor performance status and those with a history of treatment with trastuzumab.

OUP accepted manuscript

Background

In the past decade, several successful clinical trials provided new therapeutic agents approved for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This study evaluated whether these practice-changing results actually altered the clinical practice.

Patients and Methods

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of treatment-naive AGC patients who received combination chemotherapy of fluoropyrimidine and platinum between 2007 and 2018 and divided them into three groups: Groups A (2007-10), B (2011-14), and C (2015-2018), respectively. We compared the clinicopathological features, treatment details, and clinical outcomes among the three groups.

Results

In total, 1004 consecutive patients were enrolled (A; n = 254, B; n = 300, and C; n = 450). The number of patients with poor performance status, older age, esophagogastric junction adenocarcinoma, and primary tumor increased during the study period. All groups had similar median overall survival (OS); ~16 months) without any statistical difference but steady prolongation of survival was observed in the adjusted with imbalance prognostic factors among groups (B/A; hazard ratio, HR 0.82, 95% C.I 0.68-0.98, C/A; HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.60-0.86); OS of HER2-positive AGC patients was clearly improved (HER2-positive vs HER2-negative in Group B, HR 0.80, 95% CI 0.60-1.06; Group C, HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51-0.90) but that of diffuse-type AGC patients remained dismal.

Conclusions

The increasing availability of chemotherapy options potentially contributed to improved survival of AGC patients, but expanded chemotherapeutic indications made the survival benefit inconspicuous in the whole population. Future therapeutic development for the AGC subset not adequately receiving benefit from previous clinical trials is warranted.

Prognostic factors to predict the survival in patients with advanced gastric cancer who receive later-line nivolumab monotherapy-The Asahikawa Gastric Cancer Cohort Study (AGCC)

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer is recommended in the guidelines; however, later-line treatment remains controversial. Since immune checkpoint inhibitors have been used for the treatment of various malignancies, trials have been performed for gastric cancer. A phase 3 trial indicated the survival benefit of nivolumab monotherapy for gastric cancer patients treated with prior chemotherapy regimens.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A regional cohort study was undertaken to determine the real-world data of nivolumab treatment for patients with advanced or recurrent gastric cancer. The patients were enrolled for 2 years from October 2017 to October 2019 and were prospectively followed for 1 year to examine the overall survival (OS). The patient characteristics were analyzed in a multivariate analysis and a nomogram to predict the probability of survival was generated.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients who received nivolumab as ≥third-line chemotherapy were included in the Asahikawa Gastric Cancer Cohort. The median OS was 7.5 (95% CI, 4.8-10.2) months and the response rate was 18.6%. Diffuse type classification, bone metastasis, high neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, and high CRP were associated with poor OS/prognosis in the multivariate analysis. A nomogram was developed based on these clinical parameters and the concordance index was 0.80 (95% CI, 0.68-0.91). The responders were aged and were frequently diagnosed with intestinal type gastric cancer, including patients with a HER2-positive status (27.3%) or microsatellite instability-high (27.3%) status.

CONCLUSIONS

The regional cohort study of nivolumab monotherapy for gastric cancer patients revealed prognostic factors and a nomogram was developed that could predict the probability of survival.

Randomized, open-label, phase 2 study of andecaliximab plus nivolumab versus nivolumab alone in advanced gastric cancer identifies biomarkers associated with survival

Background

Matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP9) selectively cleaves extracellular matrix proteins contributing to tumor growth and an immunosuppressive microenvironment. This study evaluated andecaliximab (ADX), an inhibitor of MMP9, in combination with nivolumab (NIVO), for the treatment of advanced gastric cancer.

Methods

Phase 2, open-label, randomized multicenter study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and pharmacodynamics of ADX+NIVO versus NIVO in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric or gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) adenocarcinoma. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs). We explored the correlation of efficacy outcomes with biomarkers.

Results

144 patients were randomized; 141 were treated: 81% white, 69% male, median age was 61 years in the ADX+NIVO group and 62 years in the NIVO-alone group. The ORR was 10% (95% CI 4 to 19) in the ADX+NIVO group and 7% (95% CI 2 to 16) in the NIVO-alone group (OR: 1.5 (95% CI 0.4 to 6.1; p=0.8)). There was no response or survival benefit associated with adding ADX. AE rates were comparable in both treatment groups; the most common AEs were fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, and vomiting. Programmed cell death ligand 1, interferon-γ (IFN), and intratumoral CD8+ cell density were not associated with treatment response or survival. The gene signature most correlated with shorter survival was the epithelial-to-mesenchymal gene signature; high transforming growth factor (TGF)-β fibrosis score was negatively associated with OS (p=0.036). Gene expression analysis of baseline tumors comparing long-(1+ years) and short-term (<1 year) survivors showed that GRB7 was associated with survival beyond 1 year. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive disease was associated with significantly longer survival (p=0.0077). Median tumor mutation burden (TMB) was 2.01; patients with TMB ≥median had longer survival (p=0.0025) and improved PFS (p=0.016). Based on a model accounting for TMB, TGF-β fibrosis, and HER2, TMB was the main driver of survival in this patient population.

Conclusion

Combination of ADX+NIVO had a favorable safety profile but did not improve efficacy compared with NIVO alone in patients with pretreated metastatic gastric or GEJ adenocarcinoma. HER2 positivity, higher TMB or GRB7, and lower TGF-β were associated with improved outcomes.

Trial registration number

NCT02864381 or GS-US-296–-2013.

PD-1 antibody camrelizumab for Epstein-Barr virus-positive metastatic gastric cancer: a single-arm, open-label, phase 2 trial

Gastric cancer (GC) patients with Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) positivity have demonstrated promising response with immunotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of camrelizumab as salvage treatment in EBV-positive mGC. In this single-arm, phase 2 prospective clinical trial (NCT03755440), stage IV EBV-positive GC patients who failed/could not tolerate previous lines of chemotherapy were given intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response, and toxicity. Exploratory analysis included the associations between treatment response and tumor mutation burden (TMB), programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression. Six eligible patients were enrolled in the first stage of the study. No patient achieved an objective response; thus, the study did not proceed to the second stage. The DCR was 67% (4/6). The median PFS rate was 2.2 months (95% CI: 1.5-not reached [NR]) and median OS was 6.8 months (95% CI: 1.7-NR). All treatment-related adverse events were grade 1-2, with reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (n=4 [67%]) being the most commonly observed event. The only patient with PD-L1 combined positive score >1 had disease progression. Two stable disease and one disease progression were observed in three patients with TMB >10 Mut/Mb. EBV positivity may not be a good predictor for response to camrelizumab in mGC. Newer biomarkers are needed to identify EBV-positive mGC respondents who might benefit from immunotherapy.

Toward a Treatment Sequencing Strategy: A Systematic Review of Treatment Regimens in Advanced Gastric Cancer/Gastroesophageal Junction Adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Platinum and fluoropyrimidine combinations typically comprise first-line (1L) therapy in advanced gastric cancer or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (G/GEA), although controversy exists regarding the use of 5doublet versus triplet cytotoxic regimens. Historically, second-line (2L) and third-line or later (3L+) therapy has been fragmented. Recent trials have increased the need for optimal treatment sequencing in advanced G/GEA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of peer-reviewed manuscripts of randomized clinical trials examining 1L, 2L, and 3L+ therapy for advanced G/GEA published from 2009 through November 19, 2019. When available, overall survival, progression-free survival, time to progression, overall response rate, and toxicity were extracted from each and compared descriptively.

RESULTS

In 1L therapy, chemotherapy triplets demonstrated variable efficacy improvements with invariable increased toxicity compared with platinum/fluoropyrimidine doublets. Currently, the only published report of positive outcomes using biologics in 1L describes adding trastuzumab in HER2-overexpressing advanced G/GEA. In 2L, doublet chemotherapy regimens are not uniformly more efficacious than single-agent taxanes or irinotecan, and ramucirumab has demonstrated improved outcomes both as monotherapy and in combination.

CONCLUSION

For advanced G/GEA, review of trial results from 2009-2019 support 1L therapy with platinum and fluoropyrimidine and sequencing with taxanes or irinotecan in combination with biologics as effective 2L options. Escalating to a triplet may add some efficacy at the expense of added toxicity.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

The rapidly changing treatment landscape for advanced gastric cancer includes increasing options for refractory disease. With multiple first-line platinum-based regimens, identification of those with the best benefit-to-risk ratio may provide guidance on treatment sequencing strategies. This article presents findings from the published literature of randomized controlled trials that included a first-line platinum/fluoropyrimidine combination and, for second-line trials, patients with platinum/fluoropyrimidine-refractory disease. This guiding summary could be a tool for clinicians to identify the optimal first-line regimen(s) followed by a strategy for subsequent regimens.

Research status on immunotherapy trials of gastric cancer

The breakthrough of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has created extensive opportunities for cancer immunotherapy. Especially, the block of programmed death-1/programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) axis using ICIs has become a new therapeutic strategy to treat advanced gastric cancer (GC). However, in the past decade, single-arm and randomized trials for single-drug ICI therapy showed that the therapeutic effect was not satisfactory, including clinical trials for advanced GC. However, after selecting suitable predictive biomarkers and developing a combination of anti-angiogenic targeted drugs and other chemotherapeutic drugs, the objective response rate and progression-free survival of patients with gastric cancer were improved significantly. The United States Food and Drug Administration has approved treatment with pembrolizumab for patients with advanced GC with PD-L1 expression or microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair deficiency. In this review, the updated data from the latest trial results of combination immunotherapy for GC are presented. Based on the outcome of combination therapy, we discuss its possible molecular mechanism and summarize effective predictive biomarkers. We also discuss possible problems stemming from results of other clinical trials of ICI treatment and propose other directions for ICI therapy.

Current status and future potential of predictive biomarkers for immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer

Immunotherapy is revolutionising cancer treatment and has already emerged as standard treatment for patients with recurrent or metastatic gastric cancer (GC). Recent research has been focused on identifying robust predictive biomarkers for GC treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The expression of programmed cell death protein-ligand-1 (PD-L1) is considered a manifestation of immune response evasion, and several studies have already reported the potential of PD-L1 expression as a predictive parameter for various human malignancies. Meanwhile, based on comprehensive molecular characterisation of GC, testing for Epstein-Barr virus and microsatellite instability is a potential predictive biomarker. Culminating evidence suggests that novel biomarkers, such as the tumour mutational burden and gene expression signature, could indicate the success of treatment with ICIs. However, the exact roles of these biomarkers in GC treated with ICIs remain unclear. Therefore, this study reviews recent scientific data on current and emerging biomarkers for ICIs in GC, which have potential to improve treatment outcomes.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in advanced gastric cancer: where do we stand?

Gastric cancer is one of the most common malignancy worldwide. In unresectable or metastatic disease, the prognosis is poor and in generally less than a year. HER2 expression remains an important biomarker to lead the addition of trastuzumab to first-line systemic chemotherapy in unresectable or metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. To date, a major issue is represented by resistance to trastuzumab developed during treatment, considering the not improved outcomes in this molecular subtype of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma to other HER2 target strategies. In this review, we summarize the available data on the mechanisms underlying primary and secondary resistance to HER2-targeted therapy and current challenges in the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer refractory to trastuzumab. Furthermore, we describe the prognostic value of new non-invasive screening methods, under development novel agents (e.g., HER2 antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies) and strategies with antitumor activity in early studies.

Assessment of Systemic Inflammatory Response and Nutritional Markers in Patients With Trastuzumab-treated Unresectable Advanced Gastric Cancer

AIM

To determine whether markers of systemic inflammatory response and nutrition are a predictor of treatment response in patients with trastuzumab-treated unresectable advanced gastric cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twenty-one patients who received chemotherapy for unresectable advanced gastric cancer at Kochi Medical School from 2013 to 2020 were enrolled. Clinicopathological information and systemic inflammatory response data were obtained retrospectively to investigate associations between baseline cancer-related prognostic variables and survival outcomes.

RESULTS

The median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) for the whole cohort were 24.5 (range=1.9-88.4) months and 7.0 (range=2.0-23.4) months, respectively. The objective response rate and disease control rate were 52.4% and 81.0%, respectively. The median PFS for patients with a neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) <2.8 was significantly longer than that for those with NLR ≥2.8 (8.9 vs. 6.0 months; p=0.048). Although the median OS also tended to be longer for patients with NLR <2.8, the difference was not statistically significant. No significant differences in median OS and PFS were observed between patients with a prognostic nutrition index (PNI) <41.6 and those with PNI ≥41.6.

CONCLUSION

An NLR ≥2.8 is a predictor of poorer prognosis in patients receiving systemic treatment with trastuzumab and chemotherapy for unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer.

Evolving treatment paradigms in esophageal cancer

A heterogenous disease with a dismal prognosis, esophageal cancer poses a major health challenge worldwide. In recent years, the treatment landscape for esophageal adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) has undergone major evolution, with the elucidation of underlying biologic pathways and predispositions. Neoadjuvant chemoradiation has emerged as a leading approach for the management of locoregional esophageal cancer, while perioperative chemotherapy has shown promising outcomes specifically in adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ). Studies also explore the implementation of chemoradiation in various sequential preoperative strategies, as well as in the adjuvant setting. Definitive chemoradiation is considered a valid alternative for non-surgical candidates with SCC. Clinical trials currently evaluating the potential benefits of different approaches may shed light on existing controversies regarding optimal management of locoregional disease. For patients with metastatic cancer, chemotherapy remains the backbone of antineoplastic treatment alongside palliative care, moreover the discovery of novel biological targets has led to the initiation of targeted and immune therapy for specific subpopulations. Taken together, an era of burgeoning clinical trials and changing paradigms has evolved in esophageal oncology. Multidisciplinary collaboration is key to effective combination and sequencing of treatment modalities tailored per patient and per tumor histology. This work aims to provide a comprehensive overview of state-of-the-art oncological management of esophageal cancer, with consideration of new challenges and obstacles to be overcome.

Trastuzumab deruxtecan for the treatment of HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer: a clinical perspective

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive gastric cancer is a subtype for which new drugs and specific treatment strategies should be developed. Trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) is a novel HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate containing topoisomerase I inhibitor as a payload. In the randomized phase 2 study (DESTINY-Gastric01) for HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (AGC), patients treated with T-DXd showed a significantly higher response rate compared with the chemotherapy of physician's choice, associated with remarkably prolonged progression-free and overall survival. T-DXd also exhibits anti-tumor activity to HER2-negative tumor cells close to HER2-positive cells (so-called bystander killing effect). T-DXd was effective even for HER2-low expressing breast and gastric cancer in several clinical studies. Taking advantage of these strong points and synergism with other cytotoxic, molecular-targeted and immunological agents, it is expected that T-DXd will bring further progression in treatment both for strongly and weakly HER2 positive AGC in various treatment settings including perioperative chemotherapy.

Pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score as a predictor of outcomes in nivolumab-treated patients with advanced gastric cancer

In Japan, South Korea, and Taiwan, nivolumab might provide overall survival benefits for patients with advanced gastric cancer. However, it is effective only in a limited number of patients. The Glasgow prognostic score is an indicator of the systematic inflammatory response and nutritional status. This study aimed to investigate the ability of the Glasgow prognostic score and other markers to predict the outcomes of patients treated with nivolumab. We reviewed the medical records of patients treated for advanced gastric cancer and who received nivolumab between February 2015 and June 2019 at Hyogo Cancer Center. The patients were categorized into two groups according to their Glasgow prognostic scores. Overall, 53.3% and 46.7% of the patients were assigned to groups with Glasgow prognostic scores of 0 and 1/2, respectively. The median durations of progression-free and overall survival of the participants were 2.3 and 5.7 months, respectively. The patients with a Glasgow prognostic score of 0 had significantly higher median overall survival than those with scores of 1 or 2 (16.4 vs. 4.2 months; p = 0.0006). This observation suggests that a pretreatment Glasgow prognostic score of 0 is associated with better outcomes, and this scoring system may be used as a predictor of outcomes in patients with advanced gastric cancer treated with nivolumab.

Multicenter Phase I/II Study of Nivolumab Combined with Paclitaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Second-line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

We conducted a phase I/II study to investigate the safety and efficacy of nivolumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) refractory to first-line chemotherapy were included. Patients received nivolumab (3 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) combined with paclitaxel (80 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15) and ramucirumab (8 mg/kg on days 1 and 15) every 4 weeks. After feasibility evaluation in six patients (phase I), 37 additional patients were enrolled in the phase II part with the primary endpoint of 6-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate with two-sided 80% confidence interval (CI). The combined positive score (CPS) was defined as the number of programmed death-ligand 1-positive cells divided by the total number of viable tumor cells multiplied by 100.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were enrolled. Of these, 60.5% had CPS ≥ 1. Dose-limiting toxicities were observed in two patients, and the recommended dose was determined as level 1. Thirty-nine (90.7%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (AEs) grade ≥3 and 14 (32.6%) patients experienced immune-related AEs grade ≥3. The overall response rate was 37.2% (95% CI, 23.0%-53.5%) and the 6-month PFS rate was 46.5% (80% CI, 36.4%-55.8%; P = 0.067). Median survival time was 13.1 months (95% CI, 8.0-16.6 months): 13.8 months (95% CI, 8.0-19.5 months) in patients with CPS ≥ 1 and 8.0 months (95% CI, 4.8-24.1 months) in patients with CPS < 1.

CONCLUSIONS

Nivolumab with paclitaxel plus ramucirumab demonstrated promising antitumor activity with manageable toxicities as second-line treatment for AGC.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in gastric cancer: a network meta-analysis of well-designed randomized controlled trials

Background

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that inhibit the programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4) interactions have shown promising prospects as treatment options for advanced gastric cancer (AGC). This manuscript analyzed well designed clinical trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy in AGC.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Medline were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of AGC treatments that were published before April 2020. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were evaluated to determine the efficacy and safety of ICIs. Network meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model under the Bayesian framework. The ability of each treatment was ranked using the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curve.

Results

Our analysis included five studies having seven immunotherapy regimens and 1,730 patients. The network meta-analysis showed that nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (88.369%) was the regimen most likely to improve PFS. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (84.563%) and nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks (84.556%) were similarly best for OS outcome with excellent tolerance. The regimen of avelumab 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks (91.167%) had the lowest TRAEs. All immunotherapies had similar response rates.

Conclusions

We recommend nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks or nivolumab 1 mg/kg every 3 weeks plus ipilimumab 3 mg/kg every 3 weeks as the preferred regimen due to their high efficacies.

Evolving therapies in advanced oesophago-gastric cancers and the increasing role of immunotherapy

INTRODUCTION

Esophagogastric cancers remain a considerable health burden and among the top causes of global cancer-related deaths. Chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for patients with advanced disease. Doublet platinum/fluoropyrimidine therapy is established as first-line treatment with the option of adding a taxane in selected patients. Irinotecan, taxanes, and ramucirumab are approved as second-line treatments. Results from the trials KEYNOTE-059, ATTRACTION-2, and TAGS have established the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors and trifluridine/tipiracil as a third-line treatment. High PD-L1 expression, microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and Epstein-Barr virus status may also be used to enrich for responses to immunotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, we discuss the outcome of recent trials in the later lines of therapy for esophagogastric cancer and place these in the context of current treatment paradigms. We also discuss the biology of esophagogastric cancers and how this might inform the development of new treatments. Finally, we comment on promising new drugs in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Recent advances in the treatment of chemo-refractory esophagogastric cancer add to the improving survival of patients with this disease. Further research is needed to improve patient selection to therapies and the earlier incorporation of these agents in the treatment journey.

Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Current Knowledge and Future Perspectives

The discovery of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) overexpression in 15-20% of gastric adenocarcinomas has been a key advance in the global care of this disease. Validated by the ToGA trial in the first-line setting of advanced HER2-positive (+) gastric cancer (GC), trastuzumab, an anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody (mAb), was the first therapeutic agent to significantly improve the prognosis of these patients. Since these results, many attempts have been made to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with HER2+ GC. However, all the other HER2-targeting molecules have failed to show a survival benefit in large phase III studies. The value of continuing trastuzumab after disease progression has been suggested by several retrospective studies. However, recent results of a randomized phase II trial showed no benefit from this strategy. On the other hand, novel therapeutic methods, such as immunotherapy, are emerging as new tools in the strategy of care of advanced GC, even if their benefit in the specific HER2+ population remains undetermined. Furthermore, substantial progress has been made in the understanding of the mechanisms leading to resistance to anti-HER2 therapies, and in the screening methods to detect them, thus opening new perspectives. The aim of this review was firstly to summarize the existing data on the specific strategy of care of HER2+ advanced GC, and secondly, to describe current knowledge regarding the potential mechanisms of resistance to HER2-targeting therapies. Lastly, we report the prospects for overcoming these potential obstacles, from future therapeutic strategies to new detection methods.

Clinical and molecular factors for selection of nivolumab or irinotecan as third-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer

BACKGROUND

The use of nivolumab or irinotecan as the third-line treatment for patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) remains controversial.

METHODS

This study analyzed patients with AGC treated with nivolumab or irinotecan (nivolumab group or irinotecan group, respectively) from May 2016 to April 2019 following two or more previous lines of chemotherapy. Univariate survival analysis was conducted to identify the clinical and molecular factors associated with progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

A total of 156 patients (74 treated with nivolumab and 82 treated with irinotecan) were analyzed. The median PFS was 1.9 months in both treatment groups. The median overall survival (OS) was 7.2 and 6.2 months in the nivolumab and irinotecan groups, respectively. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 1 or more, liver metastasis, a large tumor size at baseline, and HER2-positive status were associated with a worse PFS in the nivolumab group compared with the irinotecan group. The nivolumab group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 3.1 versus 2.0 months) and OS (median 12.9 versus 7.8 months) than the irinotecan group in patients with 0 or 1 of these factors, whereas the irinotecan group showed a significantly longer PFS (median 1.0 versus 1.8 months) and a trend of longer OS (median 3.9 versus 6.1 months) in patients with ⩾2 of these factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Some clinical and molecular factors were associated with outcomes following nivolumab or irinotecan as the third- or later-line treatment in patients with AGC. These factors must be considered while selecting an optimal treatment option.

Current Molecular Targeted Agents for Advanced Gastric Cancer

Gastric cancer is the third leading cause of malignant tumor-related mortality worldwide. Traditional cytotoxic agents prolong the overall survival and progression-free survival of patients with advanced gastric cancer (AGC) compared to that with best supportive care. Due to the occurrence of serious adverse drug reactions that result in discontinued treatment, the survival benefit in AGC remains unsatisfactory. Systemic chemotherapy regimens have changed greatly, especially since the introduction of trastuzumab. Nevertheless, HER2 positivity is present in only approximately 20% of tumors. Due to the genetic heterogeneity and complexity of patients, there are many studies in progress that are exploring novel targeted drugs as an alternative to chemotherapy or adjuvant treatment in early-stage, progressive, and advanced gastric cancer. On the basis of the differences in gene expression profiles among patients, searching for specific and sensitive predictive biomarkers is important for identifying patients who will benefit from a specific targeted drug. With the development of targeted therapies and available chemotherapeutic drugs, there is no doubt that, over time, more patients will achieve better survival outcomes. Recently, immune checkpoint blockade has been well developed as a promising anticancer strategy. This review outlines the currently available information on clinically tested molecular targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors for AGC to provide support for decision-making in clinical practice.

The Impact of Molecular Subtype on Efficacy of Chemotherapy and Checkpoint Inhibition in Advanced Gastric Cancer

PURPOSE

We evaluated the association between molecular subtypes of advanced gastric cancer (AGC) and the efficacy of standard chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitors.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Patients with AGC who received systemic chemotherapy from October 2015 to July 2018 with available molecular features were analyzed. We investigated the efficacy of standard first- (fluoropyrimidine + platinum ± trastuzumab) and second-line (taxanes ± ramucirumab) chemotherapy, and subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with four molecular subtypes: MMR-D (mismatch repair deficient), EBV⁺, HER2⁺, and all negative.

RESULTS

410 patients were analyzed: MMR-D 5.9%, EBV⁺ 4.1%, HER2⁺ 13.7%, and all negative 76.3%. In 285 patients who received standard first-line chemotherapy, the median progression-free survival (PFS) times were 4.2, 6.0, 7.5, and 7.6 months and the objective response rates (ORR) were 31%, 62%, 60%, and 49% in MMR-D, EBV⁺, HER2⁺, and all-negative subtypes, respectively. Multivariate analysis showed shorter PFS in MMR-D versus all-negative patients [HR, 1.97; 95% CIs, 1.09-3.53; P = 0.022]. In second-line setting, there were no significant differences in efficacy. In 110 patients who received anti-PD-1 therapy, median PFS times were 13.0, 3.7, 1.6, and 1.9 months and the ORRs were 58%, 33%, 7%, and 13%, respectively. Twelve patients with MMR-D received subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy and showed longer PFS compared with that in 10 (83%) patients who received earlier-line chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

MMR-D might result in shorter PFS with first-line chemotherapy for AGC. Subsequent anti-PD-1 therapy achieved higher ORR and longer PFS than prior chemotherapy in most patients with MMR-D, supporting the earlier use of immune checkpoint inhibitors.