1
|
Terayama M, Ohashi M, Yamaguchi K, Takahari D, Makuuchi R, Hayami M, Ida S, Kumagai K, Sano T, Nunobe S. Feasibility and predictive factors on the completion of docetaxel plus S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy in pathological stage III gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2025; 9:60-68. [PMID: 39759998 PMCID: PMC11693541 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2024] [Revised: 06/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/18/2024] [Indexed: 01/07/2025] Open
Abstract
Background The standard adjuvant chemotherapy regimen for stage III gastric cancer is docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) based on the results of the START-II trials. However, in clinical practice some patients could not continue this intensive doublet chemotherapy because of limited tolerability. This study aimed to assess the practical feasibility of DS and elucidate the predictive factors for the completion of adjuvant DS therapy. Methods Data from consecutive patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2018 and 2021 and were diagnosed with histopathologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer were retrospectively collected. First, the completion rate and adverse effects of DS were assessed. Second, the association between DS incompletion and patient backgrounds including body weight, skeletal muscle index (SMI), and intramuscular adipose content (IMAC) were examined. Results Of 87 patients, 59 patients (67.8%) completed DS and dose reduction was required in 18 patients (20.6%). Neutropenia of grade 3 or higher was the most common hematological toxicity observed (17.2%). The most frequent nonhematological toxicity of grade 3 or higher was fatigue (6.9%), followed by diarrhea (5.7%), nausea (4.5%), and anorexia (4.5%). In a multivariate analysis, low SMI (p = 0.005) and high IMAC (p = 0.004) were significant risk factors for DS incompletion. Conclusions DS adjuvant chemotherapy after radical gastrectomy for pathological stage III gastric cancer is acceptable, even in clinical practice, with respect to completion and toxicity. Additionally, the body composition factors such as SMI and IMAC might be useful in predicting incompletion of DS. These findings will help us to preoperatively select patients for DS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masayoshi Terayama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Manabu Ohashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Kensei Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Gastroenterological CenterCancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Daisuke Takahari
- Department of Gastroenterological Chemotherapy, Gastroenterological CenterCancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Rie Makuuchi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Masaru Hayami
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Satoshi Ida
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Koshi Kumagai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Takeshi Sano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| | - Souya Nunobe
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute HospitalJapanese Foundation for Cancer ResearchTokyoJapan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zheng H, Zheng H, Wei L, Xue Z, Xu B, Hu M, Yu J, Xie R, Zhang L, Zheng Z, Xie J, Zheng C, Huang C, Lin J, Li P. Risk stratification models incorporating oxidative stress factors to predict survival and recurrence in patients with gastric cancer after radical gastrectomy: A real-world multicenter study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108658. [PMID: 39244978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108658] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 08/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/10/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oxidative stress significantly influences the development and progression of gastric cancer (GC). It remains unreported whether incorporating oxidative stress factors into nomograms can improve the predictive accuracy for survival and recurrence risk in GC patients. METHODS 3498 GC patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 2009 and 2017 were enrolled and randomly divided into training cohort (TC) and internal validation cohort (IVC). Cox regression analysis model was used to evaluate six preoperative oxidative stress indicators to formulate the Systemic oxidative stress Score (SOSS). Two nomograms based on SOSS was constructed by multivariate Cox regression and validated using 322 patients from another two hospitals. RESULTS A total of 3820 patients were included. The SOSS, composed of three preoperative indicators-fibrinogen, albumin, and cholesterol-was an independent prognostic factor for both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). The two nomograms based on SOSS showed a significantly higher AUC than the pTNM stage (OS: 0.830 vs. 0.778, DFS: 0.824 vs. 0.775, all P < 0.001) and were validated in the IVC and EVC (all P < 0.001). The local recurrence rate, peritoneal recurrence rate, distant recurrence rate and multiple recurrence rate in high-risk group were significantly higher than those in low-risk group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The two novel nomograms based on SOSS which was a combination score of three preoperative blood indicators, demonstrated outstanding predictive abilities for both survival and recurrence in GC patients with different risk groups, which may potentially improve survival through perioperatively active intervention strategies and individualized postoperatively close surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Honghong Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Hualong Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Linghua Wei
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Zhen Xue
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Binbin Xu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Minggao Hu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, The PLA Navy Anqing Hospital, Anqing, 246000, China
| | - Junhua Yu
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou, 324000, China
| | - Rongzhen Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Department of General Surgery, First Affiliated Hospital of Gannan Medical University, Ganzhou, 321000, China
| | - Lingkang Zhang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Zhiwei Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Jianwei Xie
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - Chaohui Zheng
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China
| | - ChangMing Huang
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| | - Jianxian Lin
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| | - Ping Li
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education of Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, 350000, China; Fujian Province Minimally Invasive Medical Center, Fuzhou, 350000, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kimura Y, Kawakami H, Tamura S, Fujitani K, Matsuyama J, Imamura H, Iijima S, Sakai D, Kurokawa Y, Shimokawa T, Tsujinaka T, Furukawa H, Satoh T. Effect of the number of cycles of docetaxel + S-1 therapy on long-term survival in adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer. A pooled analysis of the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials. Gastric Cancer 2023; 26:788-797. [PMID: 37335367 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-023-01408-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND S-1 plus docetaxel (DS) therapy followed by S-1 is the standard of care in Japan in postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer, but long-term survival and the number of DS cycles required are unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of the number of cycles of DS therapy on the 5-year survival in stage III gastric cancer in a pooled analysis of two phase II trials (OGSG0604 and OGSG1002). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were enrolled in this pooled analysis. They received DS therapy for four or eight cycles, followed by S-1 until 1 year postgastrectomy. The 5-year overall survival (OS) and the 5-year disease free survival (DFS) by the landmark analysis was evaluated. RESULTS In total, 113 patients from the OGSG0604 and OGSG1002 trials were enrolled in this study. The landmark analysis showed a 5-year OS that was better with four to eight cycles of DS therapy than with one to three cycles of DS therapy, with the best 5-year OS of 77.4% (95% confidence interval, 66.5-90.1%) for eight cycles. The 5-year DFS was approximately 66% when four or eight cycles of DS therapy were given. CONCLUSION Although eight cycles of DS therapy may prolong prognosis, the present study did not provide a clear conclusion as to how many DS therapy cycles are needed to improve prognosis after D2 gastrectomy for stage III gastric cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION Registration number: UMIN00000714 and UMIN000004440.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Kimura
- Department of Surgery, Kindai University Nara Hospital, 1248-1 Otoda-Cho, Ikoma, Nara, 630-0293, Japan.
| | - Hisato Kawakami
- Department of Medical Oncology, Kindai University, Faculty of Medicine, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | | | - Kazumasa Fujitani
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Jin Matsuyama
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Higashiosaka City Medical Center, Higashiosaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Imamura
- Department of Surgery, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan
| | - Shohei Iijima
- Department of Nutritional Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daisuke Sakai
- Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Yukinori Kurokawa
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Toshio Shimokawa
- Clinical Study Support Center, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | | | - Hiroshi Furukawa
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osaka-Sayama, Japan
| | - Taroh Satoh
- Frontier Science for Cancer and Chemotherapy, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Three-year outcomes of a randomized phase III trial comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with S-1 plus docetaxel versus S-1 alone in stage III gastric cancer: JACCRO GC-07. Gastric Cancer 2022; 25:188-196. [PMID: 34351555 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-021-01224-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Accepted: 07/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The second planned interim analysis (median follow-up 12.5 months) in a phase III trial of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III gastric cancer revealed significant improvement in relapse-free survival (RFS) for S-1 plus docetaxel over S-1 alone. Although enrollment was terminated on the recommendation of the independent data and safety monitoring committee, we continued follow-up and herein report on 3-year RFS, the primary endpoint. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients with histologically confirmed stage III gastric cancer who underwent gastrectomy with D2 lymphadenectomy were randomly assigned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy with either S-1 plus docetaxel or S-1 alone. In the S-1 plus docetaxel group, S-1 was given orally for 2 weeks followed by 1 week of rest for seven courses, and docetaxel was given intravenously on day 1 of the second to seventh courses. The combination therapy was followed by S-1 monotherapy for up to 1 year. RESULTS The 3-year RFS rate of the S-1 plus docetaxel group was 67.7%. This was significantly superior to that of 57.4% in the S-1 group (hazard ratio [HR] 0.715, 95% CI 0.587-0.871, P = 0.0008). This translated into a significant benefit in the 3-year overall survival (OS) rate in the S-1 plus docetaxel group (77.7% versus 71.2%, HR 0.742, 95% CI 0.596-0.925, P = 0.0076). CONCLUSION On 3-year follow-up data, postoperative adjuvant therapy with S-1 plus docetaxel was confirmed to improve both RFS and OS and can be recommended as a standard of care for patients with stage III gastric cancer treated by D2 dissection.
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhai Z, Zhu ZY, Cong XL, Han BL, Gao JL, Yin X, Zhang Y, Lou SH, Fang TY, Wang YM, Li CF, Yu XF, Ma Y, Xue YW. Changing trends of clinicopathologic features and survival duration after surgery for gastric cancer in Northeast China. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 12:1119-1132. [PMID: 33133381 PMCID: PMC7579733 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v12.i10.1119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 07/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Through analyzing the data from a single institution in Northeast China, this study revealed the possible clinicopathologic characteristics that influence the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer (GC).
AIM To evaluate the changing trends of clinicopathologic features and survival duration after surgery in patients with GC in Northeast China, which is a high-prevalence area of GC.
METHODS The study analyzed the difference in clinicopathologic features and survival duration after surgery of 5887 patients who were histologically diagnosed with GC at the Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital. The study mainly analyzed the data in three periods, 2000 to 2004 (Phase 1), 2005 to 2009 (Phase 2), and 2010 to 2014 (Phase 3).
RESULTS Over time, the postoperative survival rate significantly increased from 2000 to 2014. In the past 15 years, compared with Phases 1 and 2, the tumor size was smaller in Phase 3 (P < 0.001), but the proportion of high-medium differentiated tumors increased (P < 0.001). The proportion of early GC gradually increased from 3.9% to 14.4% (P < 0.001). A surprising improvement was observed in the mean number of retrieved lymph nodes, ranging from 11.4 to 27.5 (P < 0.001). The overall 5-year survival rate increased from 24% in Phase 1 to 43.8% in Phase 3. Through multivariate analysis, it was found that age, tumor size, histologic type, tumor-node-metastasis stage, depth of invasion, lymph node metastasis, surgical approach, local infiltration, radical extent, number of retrieved lymph nodes, and age group were independent risk factors that influenced the prognosis of patients with GC.
CONCLUSION The clinical features of GC in Northeast China changed during the observation period. The increasing detection of early GC and more standardized surgical treatment effectively prolonged lifetimes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhao Zhai
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Zi-Yu Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Xi-Liang Cong
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Bang-Ling Han
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Jia-Liang Gao
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Xin Yin
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Sheng-Han Lou
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Tian-Yi Fang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Yi-Min Wang
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Chun-Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Xue-Feng Yu
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Yan Ma
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| | - Ying-Wei Xue
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital, Harbin 150081, Heilongjiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Huang C, Zhao J, Luo C, Zhu Z. Overexpression of DGKI in Gastric Cancer Predicts Poor Prognosis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2020; 7:320. [PMID: 32733904 PMCID: PMC7358307 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2020.00320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Diacylglycerol kinase iota (DGKI) is overexpressed in a variety of cancers and is associated with poor prognosis in colon cancer. This study evaluated the prognostic value of DGKI in gastric cancer (GC) using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Methods: RNA sequencing results and clinical data of gastric adenoma and adenocarcinoma samples were obtained from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov). The Wilcoxon or Kruskal-Wallis test and logistic regression were used to analyze the relationship between DGKI and the clinicopathological characteristics of GC patients. Univariate Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analysis were used to analyze the clinicopathological characteristics of GC patients and the relationship between DGKI and overall survival time, and multivariate Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent risk factors affecting the prognosis of GC patients. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) was performed using the TCGA dataset. Results: DGKI was overexpressed in gastric tumors and was related to poor prognosis (p = 0.003). Overexpression of DGKI in GC was significantly correlated with high grade (OR = 1.71 for G3 vs. G2), stage (OR = 2.08 for II vs. I) and T classification (OR = 4.64 for T4 vs. T1; OR = 3.99 for T3 vs. T1; OR = 3.37 for T2 vs. T1) (all p <0.05). DGKI (OR = 7.34; p = 0.000) was an independent risk factor affecting the survival of GC patients. The MAPK signaling pathway was differentially enriched with DGKI overexpression. Conclusion: DGKI overexpression may be a potential molecular marker for poor prognosis in GC. The MAPK signaling pathway may be one of the key pathways related to DGKI regulation in GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Zhengming Zhu
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Qiu MZ, He CY, Yang DJ, Zhou DL, Zhao BW, Wang XJ, Yang LQ, Lu SX, Wang FH, Xu RH. Observational cohort study of clinical outcome in Epstein-Barr virus associated gastric cancer patients. Ther Adv Med Oncol 2020; 12:1758835920937434. [PMID: 32670421 PMCID: PMC7338646 DOI: 10.1177/1758835920937434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/27/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Epstein–Barr virus-associated gastric cancer (EBVaGC) has unique
clinicopathologic features and our present understanding of its treatment
outcome is limited. Here, we investigated the clinical outcomes of
resectable and metastatic EBVaGC cases with regards to their respective
treatment. Methods: We retrieved the data of EBVaGC patients treated at our center from October
2014 to June 2019. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary
endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS) for stage I–III patients,
progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) for stage
IV patients. Results: Patients classified as stage I–III accounted for 83.7% of the total 197 cases
analyzed. Two patients had mismatched repair-deficiency. The 5-year OS rate
of the entire cohort was 63.51% [95% (confidence interval (CI):
52.31–72.76%]. Tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage and gastric stump cancer
were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS. The 3- and 5-year
DFS rate for stage I–III patients were 83.72% (95% CI: 75.86–89.19%) and
73.83% (95% CI: 60.39–83.32%), respectively. TNM stage III, neural invasion,
lymphovascular invasion, and baseline plasma EBV-DNA positive were
correlated with shorter DFS. The ORR and disease control rate (DCR) for
metastatic EBVaGC patients to first-line therapy were 29.0% and 90.3%
(median PFS: 9.8 months), respectively, and to second-line therapy were
25.0% and 75.0%, respectively. Seven patients received anti-PD1 therapy and
had an ORR of 28.5% and a median PFS of 2.8 months. Conclusions: EBVaGC patients have few metastases, long DFS, and high DCR. TNM stage and
gastric stump cancer were independent prognostic factors for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miao-Zhen Qiu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Cai-Yun He
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Da-Jun Yang
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Da-Lei Zhou
- Department of Molecular Diagnostics, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Bai-Wei Zhao
- Department of Gastric Surgery, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Xiao-Jian Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Li-Qiong Yang
- Department of Experimental Research, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Shi-Xun Lu
- Department of Pathology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Feng-Hua Wang
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, P. R. China
| | - Rui-Hua Xu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center; State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China; Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, 651 Dongfeng Road East, Guangzhou, 510060, P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sasako M. Progress in the treatment of gastric cancer in Japan over the last 50 years. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2020; 4:21-29. [PMID: 32021955 PMCID: PMC6992673 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/27/2019] [Accepted: 12/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
There have been remarkable changes in gastric cancer treatments in Japan, resulting in superb improvement of prognosis in patients with this disease. In this paper, the last 50 years have been divided into three eras: before 1990; the 1990s; and the era of evidence, which means after 2000. Changes of treatments and prognosis were analyzed by several factors, such as surgery, chemotherapy, informed consent, clinical trials, and others, as improvement of prognosis is not due to one factor but several ones influencing each other.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuru Sasako
- Yodogawa Christian HospitalOsakaJapan
- Hyogo College of MedicineHyogoJapan
| |
Collapse
|