Multidetector CT and three-dimensional CT angiography of upper extremity arterial injury

CT Angiography of the Upper Extremities: Review of Acute Arterial Entities

Historically, evaluation of the upper extremity vasculature was performed using digital subtraction angiography. With the advancement of cross-sectional imaging and submillimeter isotropic data acquisition, CT angiography (CTA) has become an excellent noninvasive diagnostic tool for evaluation of the vasculature of the upper extremities. CTA allows quick evaluation of vessel patency and irregularity and achievement of the anatomic detail needed in preoperative planning. When interpreting CTA of the upper extremities, radiologists must be familiar with the normal vascular anatomy, common vascular anomalies, and pitfalls or artifacts that may mimic or mask abnormality. In this review, the authors provide an overview of the utility of CTA of the upper extremities. Also discussed are CTA techniques and the use of several newer technologies including dual-energy and photon-counting detector CT. The utility of CTA in patients with upper extremity trauma is explored, with a focus on assessing vascular injury. Other vascular abnormalities including infection, acute limb ischemia, and vasculitis are discussed. It is imperative for radiologists to be accustomed to CTA of the upper extremities in diagnosing acute vascular abnormalities and to recognize common pitfalls and mimics of these abnormalities. ©RSNA, 2025 Supplemental material is available for this article.

The role of 3D cinematic rendering in the evaluation of upper extremity trauma

Traumatic upper extremity injuries are a common cause of emergency department visits, comprising between 10-30% of traumatic injury visits. Timely and accurate evaluation is important to prevent severe complications such as permanent deformities, ischemia, or even death. Computed tomography (CT) and CT angiography (CTA) are the favored non-invasive imaging techniques for assessing upper extremity trauma, playing a crucial role in both the treatment planning and decision-making processes for such injuries. In CT postprocessing, a novel 3D rendering method, cinematic rendering (CR), employs sophisticated lighting models that simulate the interaction of multiple photons with the volumetric dataset. This technique produces images with realistic shadows and improved surface detail, surpassing the capabilities of volume rendering (VR) or maximal intensity projection (MIP). Considering the benefits of CR, we demonstrate its use and ability to achieve photorealistic anatomic visualization in a series of 11 cases where patients presented with traumatic upper extremity injuries, including bone, vascular, and skin/soft tissue injuries, adding to diagnostic confidence and intervention planning.

Upper limb computed tomography (CT) angiography in the emergency department

A range of abnormalities may acutely affect the upper limb (UL) extremity vasculature including trauma, peripheral vascular disease, and inflammatory conditions. Significant technical advances in computed tomography angiography (CTA) have led to the widespread adoption of this noninvasive modality for rapid evaluation of UL arterial abnormalities in the emergency department setting. A key advantage of CTA over traditional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the ability to evaluate concurrent osseous and soft tissue injuries. Accurate identification of pathology requires knowledge of normal UL arterial anatomy in addition to a high-quality study, which may be achieved with a robust CTA protocol. We describe the spectrum of imaging findings on upper limb CTA associated with various acute presentations. Traumatic vascular injuries may occur secondary to penetrating and blunt aetiologies appearing on CTA as contrast extravasation, pooling, pseudoaneurysm, occlusion, and arteriovenous fistula. Peripheral vascular disease manifests as atherosclerotic plaques with thready downstream opacification, and these may precipitate acute thromboembolic events. Inflammatory conditions affecting the UL vasculature includes large and small vessel vasculitides characterised by arterial mural thickening. The use of modalities, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA), should be considered for further characterisation where appropriate.

CTA Imaging of Peripheral Arterial Injuries

Traumatic vascular injuries consist of direct or indirect damage to arteries and/or veins and account for 3% of all traumatic injuries. Typical consequences are hemorrhage and ischemia. Vascular injuries of the extremities can occur isolated or in association with major trauma and other organ injuries. They account for 1-2% of patients admitted to emergency departments and for approximately 50% of all arterial injuries. Lower extremities are more frequently injured than upper ones in the adult population. The outcome of vascular injuries is strictly correlated to the environment and the time background. Treatment can be challenging, notably in polytrauma because of the dilemma of which injury should be prioritized, and treatment delay can cause disability or even death, especially for limb vascular injury. Our purposes are to discuss the role of computed tomography angiography (CTA) in the diagnosis of vascular trauma and its optimized protocol to achieve a definitive diagnosis and to assess the radiological signs of vascular injuries and the possible pitfalls.

MR Imaging of Acute Knee Injuries: Systematic Evaluation and Reporting

Acute knee injury ranges among the most common joint injuries in professional and recreational athletes. Radiographs can detect joint effusion, fractures, deformities, and malalignment; however, MR imaging is most accurate for radiographically occult fractures, chondral injury, and soft tissue injuries. Using a structured checklist approach for systematic MR imaging evaluation and reporting, this article reviews the MR imaging appearances of the spectrum of traumatic knee injuries, including osteochondral injuries, cruciate ligament tears, meniscus tears and ramp lesions, anterolateral complex and collateral ligament injuries, patellofemoral translation, extensor mechanism tears, and nerve and vascular injuries.

Multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography in the evaluation of external carotid artery

BACKGROUND

Knowledge about anatomical variants of the external carotid artery is crucial in head and neck surgery and interventional technique. This work aimed to present the frequency of regular and another variant of the external carotid artery using 128 multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) angiography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 120 patients in our university hospital between April 2017 and October 2021. They were 65 men and 55 women (mean age, 45.6 years; range, 18-65 years). They were angiofibroma (10 patients), cerebral stroke (28 patients), partial glossectomy (13 patients), submandibular gland excision (12 patients), parotidectomy (17 patients), mandibulectomy (5 patients), and a thyroidectomy (35 patients). We retrospectively analyzed the level and branches of external carotid arteries on both sides of 120 patients.

RESULTS

According to the level of bifurcation; the external carotid artery originated at the level of the upper border of the thyroid cartilage in 164/240 cases (68.3%), and a higher level was detected in 76/ 240 cases (31.7%). The lower level of origin of the external carotid artery was not detected. The superior thyroid, facial, and lingual arteries originated from separate branches of external carotid arteries in 173/240 cases (72.1%). At the same time, the facial arteries originated with lingual arteries in a common trunk in 67/240 cases (27.9%).

CONCLUSION

MDCT angiography is a valuable noninvasive diagnostic tool for evaluating the external carotid artery and its branches.

Roles of Trauma CT and CTA in Salvaging the Threatened or Mangled Extremity

Extremity arterial injuries account for up to 50% of all arterial traumas. The speed, accuracy, reproducibility, and close proximity of modern CT scanners to the trauma bay have led to the liberal use of CT angiography (CTA) when a limb is in ischemic jeopardy or is a potential source of life-threatening hemorrhage. The radiologist plays a critical role in the rapid communication of findings related to vessel transection and occlusion. Another role of CT that is often overlooked involves adding value to surgical planning. The following are some of the key questions addressed in this review: How does CTA help determine whether a limb is salvageable? How do concurrent multisystem injuries affect decision making? Which arterial injuries can be safely managed with observation alone? What damage control techniques are used to address compartment syndrome and hemorrhage? What options are available for definitive revascularization? Ideally, the radiologist should be familiar with the widely used Gustilo-Anderson open-fracture classification system, which was developed to prognosticate the likelihood of a functional limb salvage on the basis of soft-tissue and bone loss. When functional salvage is feasible or urgent hemorrhage control is required, communication with trauma surgeon colleagues is augmented by an understanding of the unique surgical, endovascular, and hybrid approaches available for each anatomic region of the upper and lower extremities. The radiologist should also be familiar with the common postoperative appearances of staged vascular, orthopedic, and plastic reconstructions for efficient clinically relevant reporting of potential down-range complications. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ^©RSNA, 2022.

A Diagnostic Algorithm to Guide Operative Intervention of Zone 5 Flexor Injuries

Background: Given the importance of the neurovascular structures in the volar forearm, accurate diagnosis of zone 5 flexor injuries is critical. Purpose: We sought to test the hypothesis that tendinous injury would be more likely in the distal 50% of the forearm and muscle belly injury would be more likely in the proximal 50% of the forearm. Methods: From December 2015 to December 2016, we conducted a prospective clinical study of patients 18 years and older with zone 5 flexor lacerations. We excluded those with concomitant ipsilateral injuries in flexor zones 1 to 4, multiple lacerations in flexor zone 5, prior neurovascular injuries, crush injuries, patients who underwent operative exploration prior to transfer to our facility, and patients who were unable or unwilling to provide consent. Neurovascular and musculotendinous injuries on physical examination were recorded. All patients underwent operative exploration. Physical examination accuracy and the incidence of musculotendinous and neurovascular injury in the distal 50% of the forearm were compared with the proximal 50% of the forearm. Results: The distal 50% of the forearm (group 1, n = 14) had higher probability of tendon injury (64%), whereas lacerations of the proximal 50% of the forearm (group 2, n = 5) did not result in any tendinous injuries. Rather, all patients in group 2 had muscle belly injuries. There was no difference in the rate of neurovascular injury between groups. Physical examination alone was highly accurate in diagnosing nerve injuries (93%-100%) but less accurate in diagnosing arterial injuries (79%-80%) regardless of the location of injury. Conclusions: Due to the lack of tendinous injuries in proximal zone 5 lacerations, along with the accuracy of physical examination in determining the presence of neurovascular injuries, patients with lacerations in the proximal half of the forearm, without evidence of nerve or arterial injury, can likely be observed in lieu of immediate operative exploration.

CT angiography and MRI of hand vascular lesions: technical considerations and spectrum of imaging findings

Vascular lesions of the hand are common and are distinct from vascular lesions elsewhere because of the terminal vascular network in this region, the frequent hand exposure to trauma and microtrauma, and the superficial location of the lesions. Vascular lesions in the hand may be secondary to local pathology, a proximal source of emboli, or systemic diseases with vascular compromise. In most cases, ischaemic conditions are investigated with Doppler ultrasonography. However, computed tomography angiography (CTA) or dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is often necessary for treatment planning. MR imaging is frequently performed with MRA to distinguish between vascular malformations, vascular tumours, and perivascular tumours. Some vascular tumours preferentially affect the hand, such as pyogenic granulomas or spindle cell haemangiomas associated with Maffucci syndrome. Glomus tumours are the most frequent perivascular tumours of the hand. The purpose of this article is to describe the state-of-the-art acquisition protocols and illustrate the different patterns of vascular lesions and perivascular tumours of the hand.

MDCT angiography of emergent, non-traumatic, upper extremity vascular lesions

Timely, accurate diagnosis of upper extremity vascular pathology is critical for successful clinical and surgical management. Although the vast majority of upper extremity vascular injury is due to trauma, physicians in the emergency setting, including radiologists, must be familiar with vascular lesions from iatrogenic injury, thromboembolic disease, vascular malformations, and vasculitis. Non-invasive diagnostic imaging with multidetector CT (MDCT) angiography is often employed in the emergency department to evaluate patients with suspected vascular pathology of the upper extremity. Maximum intensity projection and volume rendering technique are two methods that are useful for evaluating vasculature. In addition, dual-energy MDCT is useful in that it allows for the generation of iodine-selective images and bone subtracted images. These techniques can be used to create images that simulate catheter angiograms. In this article, we will discuss the role of MDCT angiography in the diagnosis and management of emergent non-traumatic vascular lesions of the upper extremity.

Amini B, Beckmann NM, Beaman FD, Wessell DE, Bernard SA, Cassidy RC, Czuczman GJ, Demertzis JL, Greenspan BS, Khurana B, Lee KS, Lenchik L, Motamedi K, Sharma A, Walker EA, Kransdorf MJ. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Shoulder Pain-Traumatic

Traumatic shoulder pain is pain directly attributed to a traumatic event, either acute or chronic. This pain may be the result of either fracture (the clavicle, scapula, or proximal humerus) or soft-tissue injury (most commonly of the rotator cuff, acromioclavicular ligaments, or labroligamentous complex). Imaging assessment of traumatic shoulder pain begins with conventional radiography and, depending on physical examination findings, will require MRI or MR arthrography for assessment of soft-tissue injuries and CT for delineation of fracture planes. Ultrasound excels in assessment of rotator cuff injuries but has limited usefulness for assessment of the deep soft-tissues. CT angiography and conventional arteriography are helpful for assessment of vascular injury, and bone scintigraphy can be used in assessment of complex regional pain syndrome after traumatic shoulder injury. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Arterial Injury in the Upper Extremity: Evaluation, Strategies, and Anticoagulation Management

Trauma to the upper extremity can present with an associated arterial injury. After patient stabilization, thorough assessment with physical examination and various imaging modalities allows accurate diagnosis of the specific arterial injury. After diagnosis, efficient treatment is necessary to allow limb salvage. Treatment options include ligation, primary repair, graft reconstruction, endovascular repair, and amputation. The final treatment rendered is frequently dependent on injury location and mechanism. With any of the treatment options, complications may occur, including thrombosis. Currently, no validated anticoagulation protocol has been established for managing arterial injuries in the upper extremity.

Evaluation of the diagnostic value of a venous phase in CT angiography of the extremities in the setting of trauma: is vein imaging in vain?

PURPOSE

This study examined the value of including a venous phase in addition to the initial arterial phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma.

METHODS

CT studies from 157 patients (average age 38 years, age range 18-89 years, male 83%, female 17%) were obtained for trauma to the upper or lower extremity with both arterial and venous phases and retrospectively reviewed. The detection rate and type of vascular injury were evaluated by using the arterial phase alone and compared to the detection rate when interpreting the arterial and venous phases together.

RESULTS

Arterial injury was identified in 35 cases (22%), and venous injury was identified in seven cases (5%). Four cases of discrepant diagnoses were identified between image interpretation of the arterial phase alone and interpretation using both phases, all of which were venous injuries that were visible only on the venous phase. None of the four cases of venous injury required a change in surgical management. Overall, no significant difference in diagnosis between the two methods of image interpretation (arterial phase alone, arterial and venous phases) was discovered (p > 0.125; CI 95%).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a venous phase in the CT angiography evaluation of extremity trauma does not add significant arterial diagnostic or clinical management value despite its potential of increasing the diagnostic detection rate of venous injury.

Dual-phase CT for the assessment of acute vascular injuries in high-energy blunt trauma: the imaging findings and management implications

Acute vascular injuries are the second most common cause of fatalities in patients with multiple traumatic injuries; thus, prompt identification and management is essential for patient survival. Over the past few years, multidetector CT (MDCT) using dual-phase scanning protocol has become the imaging modality of choice in high-energy deceleration traumas. The objective of this article was to review the role of dual-phase MDCT in the identification and management of acute vascular injuries, particularly in the chest and abdomen following multiple traumatic injuries. In addition, this article will provide examples of MDCT features of acute vascular injuries with correlative surgical and interventional findings.

Upper Extremity Runoff: Pearls and Pitfalls in Computed Tomography Angiography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography

Upper extremity vasculature can be affected by various traumatic and nontraumatic pathologies; however, the evaluation of these arteries can be challenging for the radiologists as well as for the clinicians. After an accurate history and clinical examination, imaging plays a vital role in the diagnosis and treatment planning of these patients. Depending on the urgency and the indication, upper extremity arteries may be evaluated by ultrasonography with color Doppler, computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), or digital subtraction angiography. This review article discusses relevant imaging anatomy of the upper extremity arteries, presents CT and MRI protocols, briefly describes the state-of-the-art CT and MRI of various pathologies affecting the upper extremity arteries, and summarizes the important pearls needed for busy practicing radiologist.

CT-detected traumatic small artery extremity injuries: surgery, embolize, or watch? A 10-year experience

Advances in computed tomography (CT) angiography have increased the sensitivity and specificity of detecting small branch arterial injuries in the extremities of trauma patients. However, it is unclear whether these patients should undergo surgery, angioembolization, or conservative watchful waiting. We hypothesized that uncomplicated small arterial branch injuries can be managed successfully with watchful waiting. A 10-year retrospective review of extremity CT angiograms with search findings of arterial "active extravasation" or "pseudoaneurysm" was performed at a level 1 county trauma center. Subgroup analysis was performed on those with isolated extremity injury and those with concurrent injuries. A total of 31 patients had CT-detected active extravasation (84 %) or pseudoaneurysm (16 %), 71 % of which were isolated vascular injuries. Of the patients evaluated, 71 % (n = 22) were managed with watchful waiting, 19 % (n = 6) with angioembolization, and 10 % (n = 3) with surgery. Watchful waiting complications included progression to alternative treatment (n = 1) and blood transfusions (n = 2). Complications of surgery included the inability to find active bleeding (n = 1) and postoperative psychosis (n = 1). Complications of angioembolization were limited to a postprocedure blood transfusion (n = 1). Patients with isolated vascular injuries had an average length of stay of 2.9 days, with management averages of the following: 2.7 days with watchful waiting (n = 16), 3.3 days with angioembolization (n = 3), and 3.7 days with surgery (n = 3). CT angiography has greatly increased the reported incidence of traumatic arterial injury in the extremity. We propose that small branch arterial injuries in the extremities can be managed successfully with watchful waiting and do not often require immediate embolization.