Overuse of brain CT scan for evaluating mild head trauma in adults

Overuse of CT for Minor Head Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Analysis from Poland and Lithuania Trauma Centres

Background and Objectives: Head trauma is one of many conditions that trauma centres deal with daily. This study aimed to analyse the utilisation of head CT scans for patients with minor head trauma in two major hospitals in Lithuania and Poland. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study of CT utilisation in minor head trauma patients presenting to the Level 1 trauma centre Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics (HLUHS KC) and Jan Biziel University Hospital in Bydgoszcz emergency departments (EDs), during the study period from 01 February to 30 April 2023. Results: During the study period, 1048 patients visited the HLUHS KC emergency department (ED) due to head trauma, and 388 patients visited the Jan Biziel University Hospital. Overall, 611 patients were included in the study. Most of the patients (92%) who suffered minimal trauma were younger than 65 years old. Eighty-two per cent of the patients older than 65 years old arrived at the ED after suffering a fall. Almost all the patients who were using antiplatelets (93%) or anticoagulants (91%) had CT scans. Non-emergency medicine (EM) physicians were more likely to order head CT scans than EM physicians (170 (83%) vs. 249 (62%), p < 0.001). There were 33 (5%) CT scans with traumatic features, and 8 (1%) of these were categorised as clinically significant. Patients who suffered clinically significant head trauma were more likely to be on anticoagulants and older than 65 when compared to normal/insignificant CT findings: 3 (38%) vs. 25 (6%), p < 0.001; and 6 (75%) vs. 146 (36%), p < 0.021. Conclusions: A significant number of head CT scans performed were not necessary according to existing head CT guidelines and risk calculators. However, even in minor head traumas, clinically significant head injuries may occur.

Performance of Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space Algorithm in Combination with Automatic Tube Current Modulation Compared to Filtered Back Projection in Brain CT Scan

Background

High-quality images with minimum radiation dose are considered a challenge in Computed Tomography (CT) scans.

Objective

The current study aimed to assess the efficacy of the Iterative Reconstruction in Image Space (IRIS) algorithm combined with Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) compared to Filtered Back Projection (FBP) in brain CT scans.

Material and Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 200 patients underwent to brain CT scan, and images were then reconstructed using both FBP and IRIS. The CT Number (CTN), noise, and Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR) were computed for different tissues from CT images. The performance of two algorithms under different exposure conditions was evaluated using a water phantom. Two experienced radiologists assessed the image quality. Volume CT Dose Index (CTDIvol) and Dose Length Product (DLP) were recorded for each scan.

Results

FBP reconstruction exhibited higher noise and lower SNR compared to IRIS, both with and without ATCM. Noise levels significantly increased for FBP combined with ATCM. Subjective analysis showed higher performance for IRIS without ATCM compared to other approaches. The mean CTDIvol with and without ATCM was 20.04±3.33 and 36.37±4.65 mGy, respectively. In the phantom study, the noise with IRIS remained lower than that with FBP even with a 42% dose reduction.

Conclusion

IRIS algorithm can preserve the image quality when radiation dose is significantly reduced by ATCM in brain CT scan. Implementation of IRIS combined with ATCM is recommended for brain CT examinations.

Overutilization of head computed tomography in cases of mild traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Head computed tomography (CT) is the preferred imaging modality for mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). The routine use of head CT in low-risk individuals with mild TBI offers no clinical benefit but also causes notable health and financial burden. Despite the availability of related guidelines, studies have reported considerable rate of non-indicated head CT requests. The objectives were to provide an overall estimate for the head CT overutilization rate and to identify the factors contributing to the overuse. A systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase databases was conducted up to November 2023, following PRISMA and MOOSE guidelines. Two reviewers independently selected eligible articles and extracted data. Quality assessment was performed using a bias risk tool, and a random-effects model was used for data synthesis. Fourteen studies, encompassing 28,612 patients, were included, with 27,809 undergoing head CT scans. Notably, 75% of the included studies exhibited a moderate to high risk of bias. The overutilization rate for pediatric and adult patients was 27% (95% CI: 5-50%) and 32% (95% CI: 21-44%), respectively. An alternative rate, focusing on low-risk pediatric patients, was 54% (95% CI: 20-89%). Overutilization rates showed no significant difference between teaching and non-teaching hospitals. Patients with mTBI from falls or assaults were less likely to receive non-indicated scans. There was no significant association between physician specialty or seniority and overuse, nor between patients' age or sex and the likelihood of receiving a non-indicated scan. Approximately one-third of head CT scans in mTBI cases are avoidable, underscoring the necessity for quality improvement programs to reduce unnecessary imaging and its associated burdens.

Evaluating the Utility of Repeat Computed Tomography Scans in Patients with Isolated Mild Traumatic Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

BACKGROUND

Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (tSAH) is a common consequence of head trauma. Treatment of patients with tSAH commonly involves serial computed tomography (CT) scans to assess for expansile hemorrhage. However, growing evidence suggests that these patients rarely deteriorate or require neurosurgical intervention. We assessed the utility of repeat CT scans in adult patients with isolated tSAH and an intact initial neurological examination.

METHODS

Patients presenting to Mass General Brigham hospitals with tSAH between 2000 and 2021 were eligible for inclusion in this retrospective cohort study. Patients were excluded if subarachnoid hemorrhage was nontraumatic, they experienced another form of intracerebral hemorrhage, or they had a documented Glasgow Coma Scale score of ≤12 and/or poor presenting neurological examination. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 405 patients were included (191 male). The most common mechanism of trauma was fall from standing (58%). The mean number of total CT scans for all patients was 2.3, with 329 patients (80%) receiving ≥2 scans. In 309 patients, no significant neurological symptoms were present. No patients developed acute neurological deterioration or required neurosurgical intervention related to their bleed, although 5 patients had mild hemorrhagic expansion on follow-up imaging.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, repeat imaging rarely demonstrated meaningful hemorrhagic expansion in this cohort of neurologically intact patients with isolated tSAH. In these patients with mild traumatic brain injury, excessive CT scans are perhaps unlikely to affect patient management and may present unnecessary burden to patients and hospital systems.

Overuse of computed tomography for mild head injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Computed tomography (CT) scan is a common imaging technique used to evaluate the severity of a head injury. The overuse of diagnostic interventions in the health system is a growing concern worldwide. Objectives: The aim of this systematic review is to investigate the rate of CT scan overuse in cases of mild head injury.

METHODS

Eligibility criteria: We encompassed observational studies-either designed as cohort, case-control, or cross-sectional investigations-that reported on CT scan overuse rates for mild head injuries. Studies had to be published in peer-reviewed, English-language sources and provide full content access Information sources: Web of Sciences, Scopus, Medline via PubMed, the Cochrane Library and Embase were searched from inception until April 1, 2023. Studies were included if reporting the overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries using validated criteria. Risk of bias: We used the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool to evaluate the risk bias assessment of included studies. Two independent reviewers evaluated the eligibility of studies, extracted data, and assessed study quality by using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Synthesis of results: Overuse estimates were calculated using a random-effects model. Subgroup analyses were performed to investigate any sources of heterogeneity. Point rate of overuse of CT scans for mild head injuries was the main outcome measured as percentage point estimates with corresponding 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Included studies: Of the 913 potentially relevant studies identified, eight studies were selected for the final analysis. Synthesis of results: The pooled rate of CT scan overuse in patients with mild head injury was found to be 27% [95% CI: 16-43; I2 = 99%]. The rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases varied depending on the criteria used. The rate of CT scan overuse was 37% [95% CI: 32-42; I2 = 0%] with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), 30% [95% CI: 16-49; I2 = 99%] with the Canadian computed tomography head rule, and 10% [95% CI: 8-14; I2 = 0%] with the Pediatric Emergency Care Applied Research Network criterion (PERCAN). Based on subgroup analyses, the rate of CT scan overuse in mild head injury cases was observed to be 30% with the Canadian computed tomography head rule criterion, 43% with the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence criterion, and 18% with the New Orleans criterion.

CONCLUSION

Limitations of evidence: The restricted number of included studies may impact generalizability. High heterogeneity was observed, leading to subgroup analyses based on age, assessment criteria, and study region. Absent data on overuse causes hinders drawing conclusions on contributing factors. Furthermore, this study solely addressed overuse rates, not associated harm or benefits. Interpretation: The overuse of CT scans in mild head injury patients is concerning, as it can result in unnecessary radiation exposure and higher healthcare costs. Clinicians and policymakers should prioritize the implementation of guidelines to reduce unnecessary radiation exposure, healthcare costs, and potential harm to patients.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The study protocol of this review was registered in PROSPERO under the identification code CRD42023416080. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42023416080.

Improving the Management of Adults With Mild Traumatic Brain Injury: An Initiative to Reduce Unnecessary Computed Tomographic Scans in the Emergency Department

The overuse of computed tomographic (CT) scans for patients who present to the emergency department (ED) after mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) has been well-documented. The Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule (CCHR) is a validated tool to guide ED providers in determining the need for emergent CT of mTBI patients. The purpose of this project was to reduce radiation exposure and ED length of stay by using the CCHR to decrease unnecessary CT scans in adults with TBI. Cost of care was also estimated. The CCHR implementation strategy included an education program for ED staff. The use of the CCHR was promoted throughout the intervention period. The outcomes measured were the number of CT scans ordered, ED length of stay, and the cost of avoidable CT scans. Data were collected through medical record reviews completed by the project leader and were evaluated using the independent samples t test. A total of 600 medical records were reviewed. There was a significant difference between adherence to the CCHR before (M = 64.6%) and after provider education (M = 74.3%). The percentage of CT scans that could have been avoided significantly decreased from baseline (M = 0.63) after provider education (M = 0.46). Length of stay for mTBI patients who were managed based on the CCHR (M = 184.9) was significantly less than the length of stay for those who were not (M = 260.1). The cost of avoidable scans was decreased by 37% over the course of the project. There were no incidents of missed diagnosis found. By increasing awareness of the CCHR and promoting its use, the number of head CT scans ordered, cost of care, and ED length of stay for patients who present after mTBI were significantly improved.

Applicability of machine learning technique in the screening of patients with mild traumatic brain injury

Even though the demand of head computed tomography (CT) in patients with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) has progressively increased worldwide, only a small number of individuals have intracranial lesions that require neurosurgical intervention. As such, this study aims to evaluate the applicability of a machine learning (ML) technique in the screening of patients with mild TBI in the Regional University Hospital of Maringá, Paraná state, Brazil. This is an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, and retrospective study using ML technique to develop a protocol that predicts which patients with an initial diagnosis of mild TBI should be recommended for a head CT. Among the tested models, he linear extreme gradient boosting was the best algorithm, with the highest sensitivity (0.70 ± 0.06). Our predictive model can assist in the screening of mild TBI patients, assisting health professionals to manage the resource utilization, and improve the quality and safety of patient care.

Clinical predictors of abnormal brain computed tomography findings in mild traumatic brain injury: A cross-sectional study

Mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI) is a health challenge world widely. Local evidence is essential to establish decision-making algorithms. According to the lack of sufficient evidence, the present study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of mTBI and predictive factors of abnormal brain computed tomography (CT) scans. The present analytical cross-sectional study was conducted between March 2021 to September 2022 on patients with the diagnosis of mTBI. Subjects were individuals who were diagnosed with mTBI in 2 Level I trauma centers located in Isfahan province, which serves as the referral center for the entire population of the province. Demographic and clinical data were recorded during a face-to-face interview. The brain CT scans were interpreted by an experienced radiologist. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Mac, Version 24.0. 498 patients were enrolled in the study, consisting of 393 (78.9%) men and 65 (13.1%) children younger than 10 years old. 100 (20%) of them had abnormal CT scan findings. The mean age of participants was 33.39 ± 19.69, which was significantly higher in patients who had abnormal CT scans (P value = .002). Despite the most common mechanism in both groups being motor accidents, the rate of motor accidents was higher in patients with abnormal findings of CT scan (P value = .048). Multiple logistic regression revealed that post-traumatic vomiting (PTV) (odd ratios [OR]: 3.736), post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) (OR:3.613), raccoon eyes (OR:47.878), and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) of 15 (OR:0.11) are predictive factors for abnormal findings. The present study suggested the presence of PTV, PTA, raccoon eyes and GCS of 13 or 14 as predictive factors for abnormal findings in mTBI populations.

Delirium, confusion, or altered mental status as a risk for abnormal head computed tomogram findings in older adults in the emergency department: A Geriatric Emergency Department Guidelines 2.0 systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Altered mental status (including delirium) is a common presentations among older adults to the emergency department (ED). We aimed to report the association between altered mental status in older ED patients and acute abnormal findings on head computed tomogram (CT).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted using Ovid Medline, Embase, Clinicaltrials.gov, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central from conception to April 8th, 2021. We included citations if they described patients aged 65 years or older who received head imaging at the time of ED assessment, and reported whether patients had delirium, confusion, or altered mental status. Screening, data extraction, and bias assessment were performed in duplicate. We estimated the odds ratios (OR) for abnormal neuroimaging in patients with altered mental status.

RESULTS

The search strategy identified 3031 unique citations, of which two studies reporting on 909 patients with delirium, confusion or altered mental status were included. No identified study formally assessed for delirium. The OR for abnormal head CT findings in patients with delirium, confusion or altered mental status was 0.35 (95% CI 0.031 to 3.97) compared to patients without delirium, confusion or altered mental status.

CONCLUSION

We did not find a statistically significant association between delirium, confusion or altered mental status and abnormal head CT findings in older ED patients.

Prevalence of Computed Tomography Overuse for Mild Head Injury in Adults

INTRODUCTION

The Canadian CT Head Rule (CCHR) is one of many established guidelines for assessing the need for computed tomography (CT) imaging in patients with minor head injuries. Adhering to such criteria would promote the appropriate use of CT imaging, lower healthcare expenses, and prevent harmful radiation exposure. There is no current literature assessing the overuse of CT imaging for minor head injuries in the Kingdom of Bahrain. This study aims to evaluate CT overuse in adult patients with minor head trauma.  Methods: The study was conducted at the Bahrain Defense Force Hospital over 12 months from January to December 2021. All adult patients (>14 years) who sustained a minor head injury and were referred to the emergency department for CT brain imaging were included in the study. Patients presenting for other reasons or suffering from moderate to severe head injuries were excluded. CT reports were retrieved for analysis. The CCHR was used as a reference.  Results: A total of 486 CT scans were performed. Loss of consciousness was the most common symptom on presentation (n = 74 cases). Only 12.1% of CT scans reported positive findings. The prevalence of CT overuse was highest in patients aged 21-30 years. Patients presenting with loss of consciousness showed a high overuse of CT imaging, accounting for 20.3% of all cases. Only 77.4% of cases met the CCHR criteria and 22.6% were defined as overuse, with 95% confidence interval (0.189, 0.266).  Conclusion: When referring to the CCHR, CT imaging for a minor head injury in adults was overused in 22.6% of cases. Further research will be required to reveal the underlying reasons for these findings along with interventions to reduce future overuse.

The Assessment of the Rationale for Urgent Head CT-Comparative Analysis of Referrals and Results of Examinations without and with Contrast Enhancement

The study analyzes the correlation between the indications and results of head CT examinations in search of evidence of the excessive use of this diagnostic method. In total, 1160 referrals for urgent head CT were analyzed retrospectively, including the following parameters: patients’ sex and age, type of scan (C−, C+, angio-CT), description of symptoms and presence of diagnostic target. Pathologies identified by the radiologist were assigned to four classes, regarding the severity of diagnosed conditions. The analysis of the CT results has shown that over half (55.22%) of the examinations revealed no deviations or showed chronic, asymptomatic lesions. As many as 73.71% referrals constituted group 0 in terms of the lack of a diagnostic target of a specific pathology. The presence of specific clinical targeting in a referral correlated significantly with a higher frequency of acute diagnosis. Contrast-enhanced follow-up examinations allowed the unequivocal classification of patients into extreme classes (I or IV) and accurate identification of patients requiring urgent or chronic treatment. Excessive use of diagnostic imaging is harmful, not only to patients, who often are unnecessarily exposed to radiation, but also to the quality of healthcare, since it increases the costs and radiologists’ workload.

The use of head computerized tomography in patients with GCS 15 following trauma: Less is more

INTRODUCTION

Computerized tomography (CT) imaging is a standard part of traumatic brain injury (TBI) evaluation but not all patients require it after mild head injury. Given the increasing incidence of TBI in the United States, there is an urgent need to better characterize CT head imaging utilization in evaluating trauma patients, especially patients at low risk of requiring intervention, such as those presenting with a normal GCS.

METHODS

We analyzed the 2017-2019 National Trauma Databank using ICD-10 codes to identify patients who received a head CT. We used Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scores to identify patients with a moderate to severe head injury defined as an AIS severity ≥ 3. Procedural TBI management was defined as having an intracranial monitor or operative decompression. We used a modified Poisson modeling to identify risk factors for a moderate/severe TBI and risk factors for undergoing procedural management among patients with head CT and GCS 15.

RESULTS

Of 2,850,036 patients, 1,502,039 (52.7%) had a head CT. Among patients who had a head CT, 1,078,093 patients (74.9%) had a GCS 15 on arrival. Of this group, only 16.6% (n = 176,431) had a moderate/severe head injury. For those with moderate/severe head injury, 6.0% (n = 10,544/176,431) of patients underwent procedural head injury management. Risk factors for undergoing procedural head injury management included: isolated head injury (RR 2.43, 95% CI 2.34, 2.53), male sex (RR 1.73, 95% CI 1.67, 1.80), age > 50 years (RR 1.39 95% CI 1.32, 1.47), falls (RR 1.28, 95% CI 1.22, 1.35), and the use of anti-coagulation (RR 1.16, 95% CI 1.11, 1.21).

CONCLUSION

Few patients had moderate/severe head injury when presenting with a GCS 15. However, patients ≥ 50 years, men, and those who suffered falls were at higher risk. Anti-coagulation use was not associated with moderate/severe head injury but did increase the risk of procedural TBI management. Given the cost and associated radiation, reducing CT utilization for younger patients while using a more liberal head CT strategy for high-risk patients may provide substantial patient value.

Emergency Medicine Physicians' Views on Providing Unnecessary Management in the Emergency Department

Purpose

To assess the views of emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) on the practice of providing unnecessary medical management in the emergency department.

Methods

All EMPs in Saudi Arabia were approached to participate in this cross-sectional study. A self-administered online survey that collected the participants' demographic information and opinions regarding the unnecessary management provided by EMPs in Saudi Arabia was conducted between December 2020 and February 2021. SPSS 22.0 was used to analyze the data.

Results

A total of 181 EMPs returned the questionnaire. More than 80% of the participants believed that EMPs order unnecessary tests or procedures at least a few times per week. The major reasons for ordering unnecessary medical tests or procedures were "concern about malpractice issues" (60.8%), "not having enough time with a patient for meaningful discussion" (47%), and "just to be safe" (46.4%). More than 55% of the respondents also believed that EMPs are in the best position to address the problem of unnecessary testing.

Conclusion

Most of the EMPs who participated in this study recognized that ordering unnecessary tests is a serious problem that happens on a daily basis. Many factors and reasons were described by the participants, and multiple possible solutions were suggested to help overcome the issue. Evaluating physicians' perspectives on the issue is a key step in addressing the problem and implementing appropriate interventions.

Characterizing and quantifying low-value diagnostic imaging internationally: a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources is a common problem, constituting 10-34% of health services spending in the western world. Even though diagnostic imaging is vital for identifying correct diagnoses and administrating the right treatment, low-value imaging-in which the diagnostic test confers little to no clinical benefit-is common and contributes to inappropriate and wasteful use of health care resources. There is a lack of knowledge on the types and extent of low-value imaging. Accordingly, the objective of this study was to identify, characterize, and quantify the extent of low-value diagnostic imaging examinations for adults and children.

METHODS

A scoping review of the published literature was performed. Medline-Ovid, Embase-Ovid, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were searched for studies published from 2010 to September 2020. The search strategy was built from medical subject headings (Mesh) for Diagnostic imaging/Radiology OR Health service misuse/Medical overuse OR Procedures and Techniques Utilization/Facilities and Services Utilization. Articles in English, German, Dutch, Swedish, Danish, or Norwegian were included.

RESULTS

A total of 39,986 records were identified and, of these, 370 studies were included in the final synthesis. Eighty-four low-value imaging examinations were identified. Imaging of atraumatic pain, routine imaging in minor head injury, trauma, thrombosis, urolithiasis, after thoracic interventions, fracture follow-up and cancer staging/follow-up were the most frequently identified low-value imaging examinations. The proportion of low-value imaging varied between 2 and 100% inappropriate or unnecessary examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

A comprehensive list of identified low-value radiological examinations for both adults and children are presented. Future research should focus on reasons for low-value imaging utilization and interventions to reduce the use of low-value imaging internationally.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO: CRD42020208072.

Association of regulatory body actions and subsequent media coverage with use of services in a fee-for-service system: a longitudinal cohort study of CT scanning in Australia

OBJECTIVE

The professional service review (PSR) is an Australian Government agency aiming to reduce inappropriate practices funded via Medicare, Australia's public insurer. Our objective was to examine changes in CT following the 2008-2009 PSR annual report, which noted excessive CT use.

DESIGN

Interrupted time series analysis examined trends in CT use following the 2008-2009 PSR report, estimating both change in the immediate rate of CT and the slope of the trend in usage postintervention.

SETTING

Medicare-funded imaging (most out-of-hospital imaging) in Australia.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients receiving Medicare-funded CT and other imaging.

INTERVENTION

The 2008-2009 PSR report highlighted concerns regarding excessive CT use. Two providers were financially penalised for CT overuse with these cases detailed in the PSR report and highlighted in an associated Report to the Professions, distributed to 50 000 providers. Media articles on radiation risks followed.

OUTCOMES

Quarterly rates of out-of-hospital CT, MRI (as a comparator), and all other Medicare-funded diagnostic imaging examinations 2001-2019.

RESULTS

CT scanning increased from 4663.5 per 100 000 person-years in 2001 to 14 506 in 2019 (211% increase), with substantial variation by type and anatomical region. The 2008-2009 PSR report was followed by an immediate reduction in CT scanning of 237.7 CTs per 100 000 people per quarter (95% CI -333.4 to -141.9) though growth in use soon continued at the preintervention rate. The degree of change in utilisation following the report differed between states/territories and by scan type, both in terms of the immediate change and the slope. For other diagnostic imaging modalities, there was an increase in the slope, while for MRI there was no change in either parameter.

CONCLUSION

Actions consisting of financial disincentives for service overtesting and provider/public education components may limit excessive use of diagnostic imaging in fee-for-service systems, however, effects observed here were only short lived.