Surgical treatment of cerebral abscess with the use of a mobile ultralow-field MRI

Low-Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Its History and Renaissance

ABSTRACT

Low-field magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) systems have seen a renaissance recently due to improvements in technology (both hardware and software). Originally, the performance of low-field MRI systems was rated lower than their actual clinical usefulness, and they were viewed as low-cost but poorly performing systems. However, various applications similar to high-field MRI systems (1.5 T and 3 T) have gradually become possible, culminating with high-performance low-field MRI systems and their adaptations now being proposed that have unique advantages over high-field MRI systems in various aspects. This review article describes the physical characteristics of low-field MRI systems and presents both their advantages and disadvantages for clinical use (past to present), along with their cutting-edge clinical applications.

Feasibility of cervical intramedullary diffuse glioma resection using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging

Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iopMRI) actually has an important role in the surgery of brain tumors, especially gliomas and pituitary adenomas. The aim of our work was to describe the advantages and drawbacks of this tool for the surgical treatment of cervical intramedullary gliomas. We describe two explicative cases including the setup, positioning, and the complete workflow of the surgical approach with intraoperative imaging. Even if the configuration of iopMRI equipment was originally designed for cranial surgery, we have demonstrated the feasibility of cervical intramedullary glioma resection with the aid of high-field iopMRI. This tool was extremely useful to evaluate the extent of tumor removal and to obtain a higher resection rate, but still need some enhancement in the configuration of the headrest coil and surgical table to allow better patient positioning.

The safety and effectiveness of low field intraoperative MRI guidance in frameless stereotactic biopsies of brain tumours-design and interim analysis of a prospective randomized trial

The aim of the study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of stereotactic brain tumour biopsy (STx biopsy) guided by low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) in comparison with its frameless classic analogue based on a prospective randomized trial. A pilot group of 42 brain tumour patients was prospectively randomized into a low-field iMRI group and a control group that underwent a frameless STx biopsy. The primary endpoints of the analysis were postoperative complication rate and diagnostic yield, and the secondary endpoints were length of hospital stay and duration of operation. The iMRI group (21 patients) and the control group (21 patients) did not differ significantly according to demographic and epidemiological data. No major postoperative complications were noted in either group. In addition, no significant differences in the diagnostic yield (p = 1.00) and length of hospital stay (p = 0.16) were observed. The mean total OR time was 111 ± 24 min in iMRI and 78 ± 29 min in the control group (p = 0.0001). Usage of iMRI may prolong the time of the procedure but seems to be comparable in safety and effectiveness to the standard frameless STx biopsy.

Prospective study on the efficacy of low-field intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging in neurosurgical operations

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The application of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI) is related to a series of challenges of both a technical and an organizational nature. We present our experience in the application of low-field iMRI in everyday neurosurgical practice.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A group of 58 patients operated on using low-field iMRI was subject to prospective controlled observation. The significance of differences in the range of preparation time, duration and direct operation results between the iMRI group and controls was analysed. The influence of epidemiological and demographic factors and technical aspects related to iMRI application on direct outcome of the surgery was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight tumour resections using craniotomy, 17 transsphenoidal resections of pituitary adenomas and 13 stereotactic procedures were conducted in the group of 24 men and 34 women operated on using iMRI. The control group was not significantly different in terms of epidemiological and demographic factors. The preparation and operation times were significantly longer in the iMRI group (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). Longer duration of the surgery was not related to an increased frequency of complications. A higher percentage of postoperative improvement in neurological status (31% vs. 14%, p = 0.045), lower complication percentage (10% vs. 28%, p = 0.03) and a similar time of hospitalization (13 ± 7 vs. 12 ± 4 days, p = 0.33) were noted in the iMRI group.

CONCLUSIONS

The application of low-field iMRI prolongs the duration of neurosurgical procedures but does not negatively influence their safety. It is associated with above-average functional results and a lower percentage of total complications.

Influence of iMRI-Guidance on the Extent of Resection and Survival of Patients with Glioblastoma Multiforme

Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) is used in glioma surgery mainly to determine the extent of resection, allowing surgeons to immediately continue resection in case of residual tumor tissue. The aim of this study is to report on the influence of the use of iMRI on the extent of resection and survival of patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

We analyzed our prospectively collected database of patients with GBM operated upon during the initial period after installation of an iMRI; between July 2004 and December 2005, all patients with GBM undergoing intended complete tumor resection were included in this study, while patients undergoing mere tumor biopsy or intended incomplete resection were not.

In total, 43 Patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 patients (23.3%) were operated upon with the help of iMRI while 33 underwent conventional tumor resection. All patients underwent postoperative high-field MR imaging at 1.5 Tesla to determine the extent of resection. Subsequently, all patients received adjuvant treatment. Median patient age was 60.0 years; median overall survival was 70.7 weeks. Radiologically complete tumor resection (P < 0.001) and the administration of temozolomide chemotherapy (P < 0.01) were statistically significant prognostic factors in a multivariate analysis. The rate of complete tumor resections was significantly higher in the iMRI group than in the conventional surgery group (P < 0.05). Patient age was not a prognostic factor in our series of patients (P = 0.22). Intraoperative MRI is a helpful tool to increase the extent of resection in GBM surgery and thereby improve patient survival.

The combination of semi-sitting position and intraoperative MRI--first report on feasibility

INTRODUCTION

Intraoperative MRI (iMRI) has been established as a routine imaging modality with a remarkable impact on specific neurosurgical procedures. The technological advancement continuously extends the spectrum of iMRI, leading to an increasing number of installations. Yet, procedures in which a semi-sitting position would be advantageous were beyond the reach of iMRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed an iMRI-guided surgical procedure in a patient with a cystic lesion of the inferior parieto-occipital lobe while the patient was placed in a semi-sitting position, employing a mobile 0.15-T intraoperative MRI system. For that purpose, we adapted a standard OR table according to the needs of iMRI.

FINDINGS

Patient positioning could be accomplished easily. For intraoperative scanning, the OR table was tilted backwards so as to position the patient's head in the magnet's aperture. Obtained images were used for neuronavigated cyst evacuation via burr hole trephination after repositioning the OR table. Subsequent intraoperative imaging documented collapse of the cyst at the end of the procedure. There were no adverse effects resulting from the combination of semi-sitting position and iMRI guidance.

CONCLUSION

This report demonstrates for the first time that the combination of iMRI and the semi-sitting position is feasible and that this procedure bears specific benefits. Issues such as brain shift due to table tilting warrant further investigations in order to expand this technique to posterior fossa craniotomies.