Intraoperative neurophysiologic monitoring in spinal intradural extramedullary tumors: only a prognostic tool?

Transcranial Corticospinal Motor-Evoked Potentials in Cases of Ventral and Ventrolateral Intradural Extramedullary Cervical Spinal Cord Tumors

Background and Objectives: We studied the clinical significance of an amplitude decrement and disappearance alarm criteria in transcranial motor-evoked potential (MEP) monitoring during surgeries on extramedullary tumors at the cervical spine with reference to postoperative morbidity. Material and Methods: We diagnosed and surgically treated fourteen patients with intradural extramedullary ventral or ventrolateral lesions to the cervical spinal cord in the Clinic of Neurosurgery at the University Hospital St Ivan Rilski from January 2018 to July 2022. Eight cases were diagnosed with schwannoma, and the remaining six had meningiomas. The follow-up period for neurological assessment was six months. Results: A decrease in the intraoperative transcranial MEPs of 50% or more compared to baseline in two cases (14.3%) resulted in an immediate postoperative motor deficit. One patient demonstrated full neurological recovery within six months, while the other exhibited only partial improvement. In six cases (42.9%) with preoperative motor deficits, tumor resection and decompression of the cervical spinal cord led directly to an increment of the transcranial MEPs by more than 20%. Postoperatively and at the 6-month follow-up, these patients showed recovery from the preoperative deficits. In the remaining cases, MEPs were stable during surgery with no clinical deterioration of the motor function. Conclusions: The decremented MEP criteria corresponded to postoperative motor deficit, whereas the improvement of the same parameters after decompression implied future recovery of preoperative motor deficits. The combination of different MEP criteria is likely to be helpful when tailored to a specific case of ventral or ventrolateral extramedullary lesions in the cervical spine.

Poor derivation of Tc-MEP baseline waveforms in surgery for ventral thoracic intradural extramedullary tumor: Efficacy of use of the abductor hallucis in cases with a preoperative non-ambulatory status

Most thoracic intradural extramedullary tumors (IDEMT) are benign lesions that are treated by gross total resection and spinal cord decompression. Intraoperative transcranial-motor evoked potential (Tc-MEP) monitoring is important for reducing postoperative neurological complications. The purpose of this study is to examine the characteristics of Tc-MEP waveforms in surgery for thoracic IDEMT resection based on location of the tumor relative to the spinal cord. The subjects were 56 patients who underwent surgery for thoracic IDEMT from 2010 to 2018. The waveform derivation rate for each lower muscle was examined at baseline and intraoperatively. 56 patients had a mean age of 61.7 years, and 21 (38%) were non-ambulatory before surgery. The tumors were schwannoma (n = 28, 50%), meningioma (n = 25, 45%), and neurofibroma (n = 3, 5%); and the lesions were dorsal (n = 29, 53%) and ventral (n = 27, 47%). There was a significantly higher rate of undetectable waveforms in all lower limb muscles in the ventral group compared to the dorsal group (15% vs. 3%, p < 0.05). In non-ambulatory cases, the derivation rate at baseline was significantly lower for ventral thoracic IDMETs (47% vs. 68%, p < 0.05). The abductor hallucis (AH) had the highest waveform derivation rate of all lower limb muscles in non-ambulatory cases with a ventral thoracic IDMET. Spinal cord compression by a ventral lesion may be increased, and this may be reflected in greater waveform deterioration. Of all lower limb muscles, the AH had the highest derivation rate, even in non-ambulatory cases with a ventral IDEMT, which suggests the efficacy of multichannel monitoring including the AH.

Intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring for intradural extramedullary spinal tumors: predictive value and relevance of D-wave amplitude on surgical outcome during a 10-year experience

OBJECTIVEThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the technical feasibility, accuracy, and relevance on surgical outcome of D-wave monitoring combined with somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) and motor evoked potentials (MEPs) during resection of intradural extramedullary (IDEM) spinal tumors.METHODSClinical and intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) data obtained in 108 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for IDEM tumors at the Institute for Scientific and Care Research "ASMN" of Reggio Emilia, Italy, were prospectively entered into a database and retrospectively analyzed. The IONM included SSEPs, MEPs, and-whenever possible-D-waves. All patients were evaluated using the modified McCormick Scale at admission and at 3, 6, and 12 months of follow-up .RESULTSA total of 108 patients were included in this study. A monitorable D-wave was achieved in 71 of the 77 patients harboring cervical and thoracic IDEM tumors (92.2%). Recording of D-waves in IDEM tumors was significantly associated only with a preoperative deeply compromised neurological status evaluated using the modified McCormick Scale (p = 0.04). Overall, significant IONM changes were registered in 14 (12.96%) of 108 patients and 9 of these patients (8.33%) had permanent loss of at least one of the 3 evoked potentials. In 7 patients (6.48%), the presence of an s18278 caudal D-wave was predictive of a favorable long-term motor outcome even when the MEPs and/or SSEPs were lost during IDEM tumor resection. However, in 2 cases (1.85%) the D-wave permanently decreased by approximately 50%, and surgery was definitively abandoned to prevent permanent paraplegia. Cumulatively, SSEP, MEP, and D-wave monitoring significantly predicted postoperative deficits (p = 0.0001; AUC = 0.905), with a sensitivity of 85.7% and a specificity of 97%. Comparing the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves of these tests, D-waves appeared to have a significantly greater predictive value than MEPs and especially SSEPs alone (0.992 vs 0.798 vs 0.653; p = 0.023 and p < 0.001, respectively). On multiple logistic regression, the independent risk factors associated with significant IONM changes in the entire population were age older than 65 years and an anterolateral location of the tumor (p < 0.0001).CONCLUSIONSD-wave monitoring was feasible in all patients without severe preoperative motor deficits. D-waves demonstrated a statistically significant higher ability to predict postoperative deficits compared with SSEPs and MEPs alone and allowed us to proceed with IDEM tumor resection, even in cases of SSEP and/or MEP loss. Patients older than 65 years and with anterolateral IDEM tumors can benefit most from the use of IONM.