Image-guided resection of glioblastoma in eloquent brain areas facilitated by laser surface thermal therapy: clinical outcomes and long-term results

Preoperative assessment of eloquence in neurosurgery: a systematic review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Tumor location and eloquence are two crucial preoperative factors when deciding on the optimal treatment choice in glioma management. Consensus is currently lacking regarding the preoperative assessment and definition of eloquent areas. This systematic review aims to evaluate the existing definitions and assessment methods of eloquent areas that are used in current clinical practice.

METHODS

A computer-aided search of Embase, Medline (OvidSP), and Google Scholar was performed to identify relevant studies. This review includes articles describing preoperative definitions of eloquence in the study's Methods section. These definitions were compared and categorized by anatomical structure. Additionally, various techniques to preoperatively assess tumor eloquence were extracted, along with their benefits, drawbacks and ease of use.

RESULTS

This review covers 98 articles including 12,714 participants. Evaluation of these studies indicated considerable variability in defining eloquence. Categorization of these definitions yielded a list of 32 brain regions that were considered eloquent. The most commonly used methods to preoperatively determine tumor eloquence were anatomical classification systems and structural MRI, followed by DTI-FT, functional MRI and nTMS.

CONCLUSIONS

There were major differences in the definitions and assessment methods of eloquence, and none of them proved to be satisfactory to express eloquence as an objective, quantifiable, preoperative factor to use in glioma decision making. Therefore, we propose the development of a novel, objective, reliable, preoperative classification system to assess eloquence. This should in the future aid neurosurgeons in their preoperative decision making to facilitate personalized treatment paradigms and to improve surgical outcomes.

Survival times of patients with glioblastoma in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Little is known about the survivorship of glioblastoma (GBM) patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). We hypothesize that this would be lower than published figures for high-income countries due to cancer health disparities. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to estimate the median overall survival (OS) of GBM in LMICs and determine factors affecting OS. A systematic review of 12 electronic databases was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines to identify studies of newly diagnosed adult GBM patients done in countries classified as LMIC by the World Bank (WB) from inception to December 2020. Random effects meta-analysis of collected median overall survival data was done. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were done to determine if WB income classification (WBIC), start year of recruitment (pre- or post-popularization of the standard Stupp protocol), and treatment modality affected OS. The 24 articles (n = 2,552) that met the inclusion criteria were from 8 low-middle income and upper-middle income countries, with 0 articles from low-income countries. Random effects analysis of 24 studies showed a pooled median OS of 14.17 months (95% CI 12.90-15.43, I² = 79). Subgroup analysis showed a significant difference (p < 0.05) in the pooled median OS of studies predating Stupp protocol (12.54 mo, 95% CI 11.13-13.96, I² = 80%; n = 1027) and studies postdating Stupp protocol (15.64 mo, 95% CI 13.58-17.69, I² = 77; n = 1412). Subgroup analysis of WBIC and treatment modalities did not show significant differences. Published data on the survivorship of GBM patients in LMICs is sparse, highlighting the need for good quality pragmatic studies from LMICs. The limited evidence suggests improving survivorship after introduction of the Stupp protocol.

Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guidelines update on the role of emerging developments in the management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma

TARGET POPULATION

These recommendations apply to adult patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

IMAGING

Question What imaging modalities are in development that may be able to provide improvements in diagnosis, and therapeutic guidance for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: It is suggested that techniques utilizing magnetic resonance imaging for diffusion weighted imaging, and to measure cerebral blood and magnetic spectroscopic resonance imaging of N-acetyl aspartate, choline and the choline to N-acetyl aspartate index to assist in diagnosis and treatment planning in patients with newly diagnosed or suspected glioblastoma.

SURGERY

Question What new surgical techniques can be used to provide improved tumor definition and resectability to yield better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastoma?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve extent of tumor resection in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma. Level II: The use of 5-aminolevulinic acid is recommended to improve median survival and 2 year survival in newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with clinical characteristics suggesting poor prognosis. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials assessing the value of diffusion tensor imaging in improving the safety of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergoing surgery.

NEUROPATHOLOGY

Question What new pathology techniques and measurement of biomarkers in tumor tissue can be used to provide improved diagnostic ability, and determination of therapeutic responsiveness and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: Assessment of tumor MGMT promoter methylation status is recommended as a significant predictor of a longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level II: Measurement of tumor expression of neuron-glia-2, neurofilament protein, glutamine synthetase and phosphorylated STAT3 is recommended as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Assessment of tumor IDH1 mutation status is suggested as a predictor of longer progression free survival and overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma. Level III: Evaluation of tumor expression of Phosphorylated Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase protein, EGFR protein, and Insulin-like Growth Factor-Binding Protein-3 is suggested as a predictor of overall survival in patients with newly diagnosed with glioblastoma.

RADIATION

Question What radiation therapy techniques are in development that may be used to provide improved tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level III: It is suggested that patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma undergo pretreatment radio-labeled amino acid tracer positron emission tomography to assess areas at risk for tumor recurrence to assist in radiation treatment planning. Level III: It is suggested that, when available, patients be with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of radiation dose escalation, altered fractionation, or new radiation delivery techniques.

CHEMOTHERAPY

Question What emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no emerging chemotherapeutic agents or techniques were identified in this review that improved tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of chemotherapy.

MOLECULAR AND TARGETED THERAPY

Question What new targeted therapy agents are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no new molecular and targeted therapies have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of molecular and targeted therapies IMMUNOTHERAPY: Question What emerging immunotherapeutic agents or techniques are available to provide better tumor control and prognosis for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATION

Level III: As no immunotherapeutic agents have clearly provided better tumor control and prognosis it is suggested that, when available, patients with newly diagnosed glioblastomas be enrolled in properly designed clinical trials of immunologically-based therapies.

NOVEL THERAPIES

Question What novel therapies or techniques are in development to provide better tumor control and prognosis for individuals with newly diagnosed glioblastomas?

RECOMMENDATIONS

Level II: The use of tumor-treating fields is recommended for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma who have undergone surgical debulking and completed concurrent chemoradiation without progression of disease at the time of tumor-treating field therapy initiation. Level II: It is suggested that, when available, enrollment in properly designed studies of vector containing herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene and prodrug therapies be considered in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Hyperthermia treatment advances for brain tumors

Hyperthermia therapy (HT) of cancer is a well-known treatment approach. With the advent of new technologies, HT approaches are now important for the treatment of brain tumors. We review current clinical applications of HT in neuro-oncology and ongoing preclinical research aiming to advance HT approaches to clinical practice. Laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) is currently the most widely utilized thermal ablation approach in clinical practice mainly for the treatment of recurrent or deep-seated tumors in the brain. Magnetic hyperthermia therapy (MHT), which relies on the use of magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and alternating magnetic fields (AMFs), is a new quite promising HT treatment approach for brain tumors. Initial MHT clinical studies in combination with fractionated radiation therapy (RT) in patients have been completed in Europe with encouraging results. Another combination treatment with HT that warrants further investigation is immunotherapy. HT approaches for brain tumors will continue to a play an important role in neuro-oncology.

T2 Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Resection for Glioblastoma Involving Eloquent Brain Areas Facilitated Through Awake Craniotomy and Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Despite evidence that a greater extent of resection (EOR) improves survival, the role of extended resection based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) in the prognosis of glioblastoma (GBM) remains controversial. This study aims to investigate the role of additional resection of FLAIR-detected abnormalities and its influence on clinical outcomes of patients with GBM.

METHODS

Forty-six patients with newly diagnosed GBM involving eloquent brain areas were included. Surgeries were performed using awake craniotomy (AC) or AC combined with sodium fluorescein (SF) guidance. Following total removal of the contrast-enhancing tumor area, the EOR of FLAIR abnormalities was dichotomized to identify the best separation threshold for progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and 30-day postoperative neurologic function of patients with GBM.

RESULTS

The threshold for removal of FLAIR abnormalities affecting survival was determined to be 25%. The median OS and PFS were shorter in the group with FLAIR resection <25% compared with the group with FLAIR resection ≥25% (12 months vs. 26 months; P = 0.001 and 6 months vs. 15 months; P = 0.016, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses identified tumor location within or near the eloquent brain areas and the 25% threshold for FLAIR EOR as independent factors affecting OS and PFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Identifying a feasible threshold for the resection of FLAIR abnormalities is valuable in improving the survival of patients with GBM. Extended resection of GBM involving eloquent brain areas was safe when using a combination of AC and SF-guided surgery.