Demographics, presentation, and clinical outcomes after traumatic bifrontal contusions: a systematic review

Navigating the Role of Surgery in Optimizing Patient Outcomes in Traumatic Brain Injuries (TBIs): A Comprehensive Review

Traumatic brain injuries (TBIs) present with symptoms ranging from a mildly altered level of consciousness to irreversible coma and death. The most severe stage of TBIs is diffuse axonal injury and swelling affecting the whole brain. Management strategies are based on the classification of TBIs by severity and type and range from cognitive therapy sessions to complex surgeries. Neuroimaging modalities, predominantly magnetic resonance imaging, and the clinical Glasgow Coma Scale are principal indicators to diagnose and assess a patient's condition and neurological status and decide optimal treatment modality. In this review, we have summarized the indications and patient outcomes based on neurological and functional status, post-surgical complications, and mortality rates for various life-saving interventional procedures including surgery for brain contusions, intracranial hematomas and penetrating injuries, and craniectomy and ventriculostomy for elevated intracranial pressure and hydrocephalus. Cranioplasty performed for aesthetic purposes has also been explored. Overall quality evidence presented advocates surgery as needed for improved patient outcomes resulting in early recovery and decreased mortality, especially with the emergence of minimally invasive techniques. However, there is still an increased risk of certain complications like infections and bleeding and severe disabilities leading to a vegetative state with surgery. Some guidelines have been formed to provide indications for optimal management of TBI patients including surgeries, although their effectiveness in each individual case is debatable. It is imperative to explore certain key areas like the timing of the surgery and the role of intensive patient monitoring pre- and post-procedure in future studies and lay down guidelines also applicable to resource-limited areas. Also, a deeper understanding of physiological and pathological mechanisms of functional outcomes post-surgery will help clinicians predict the patient's course of recovery.

Contusion expansion, low platelet count and bifrontal contusions are associated with worse patient outcome following traumatic brain injury-a retrospective single-center study

BACKGROUND

Cortical contusions are common in moderate-severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Cortical contusions often expand, potentially causing neuro-worsening several hours to days post-trauma. While contusion expansion (CE) may affect outcome, potential clinical and radiological markers that can predict CE have been insufficiently explored. In the present single-center retrospective observational cohort study, we evaluated clinical outcome by the Glasgow Outcome Scale extended (GOSE) scale and evaluated risk factor for CE.

METHOD

Adult TBI patients > 18 years of age, and of all injury severities, were included. Main variables of interest were low platelet count, defined as < 150 × 109/L, presence of bifrontal contusions and CE, defined as absolute contusion volume increase in cm3. Factors associated with CE and clinical outcome according to GOSE were analyzed.

RESULTS

Between 2012-2022, 272 patients were included. Contusion size on admission correlated positively with CE, as did the Marshall and Rotterdam radiological classification scores. Bifrontal contusions were significantly larger at admission, experienced larger CE, and had a worse outcome than contusions in other locations. Patients with a platelet count < 150 × 109/L experienced a greater volume CE and had a worse outcome when compared to patients with a normal platelet count. In a multivariate analysis, CE remained significantly associated with a poor outcome six months post- injury.

CONCLUSION

Contusion volume at admission, Marshall CT classification and Rotterdam CT score, positively correlated to CE. Bifrontal contusions and a platelet count < 150 × 109/L were associated with CE, and a poor clinical outcome. Large CE volumes were associated with a worse clinical outcome, and CE was per se associated with outcome in a multivariate analysis. Management of these risk factors for CE in the acute post-injury setting may be needed to attenuate contusion expansion and to improve clinical outcome in TBI patients suffering from cortical contusion injuries.

Factors determining the requirement of surgical intervention and prognosis in cases of traumatic bifrontal contusions: A prospective observational study

Background

Traumatic brain injury, being a notorious cause of mortality and morbidity across the globe, presents with a variety of lesions. One of the distinct patterns of injury is characterized by contusions of both frontal lobes, labeled "traumatic bifrontal contusions" (TBCs). TBC is often associated with the presence of significant edema and mass effect leading to rapid clinical deterioration after a usually benign presentation at the time of first evaluation. Formulating a management plan in a patient with TBC is often more difficult than in a patient with a major intracranial hematoma.

Methods

A prospective observational study with aims and objectives to identify predictors of an unfavorable outcome, analysis of the evolution of TBC, evaluation of the specific indications for surgery, and determination of the prognosis. All head trauma patients harboring bifrontal contusions were included in the study. Patients with other associated operable injuries involving blunt trauma abdomen and orthopedic injuries, counter-coupe injuries, and obvious open fractures noted over calvaria were excluded from the study. Glasgow coma scale (GCS) was recorded during the first assessment, followed by non-contrast computerized tomography (NCCT) Head.

Results

A total of 53 patients satisfying inclusion and exclusion criteria were included in the study. The average GCS score recorded before surgical intervention was 9. The mean and median best motor response noted was M5. The interval from the time of injury to the first NCCT of the brain at the study hospital ranged from 3 h to 163 h, averaging 17.66 h. The median category w.r.t Marshall's CT classification observed was "Diffuse Injury IV." The volume of the contusions in each scan was estimated, and the average anterior cranial fossa volume observed was 125 mL. "Upfront surgery" ("Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy" or "unilateral Fronto-Temporo-Parietal [FTP] decompressive hemicraniectomy") was carried out on the day of admission based on the findings on the first NCCT brain. About 49% of patients at presentation needed surgical intervention as per existing protocols. The duration of observation for patients who were initially observed but eventually had to undergo surgery ranged from 1 to 5 days, with an average observation period of 2 days. The duration of observation in those who did not subsequently need surgery ranged from 7 to 10 days, with an average duration of 9 days.

Conclusion

What leads to the poorly predictable, delayed, and rapid deterioration that sets TBCs apart from other traumatic brain injuries is still unclear. Our study finds that having a low threshold for repeat CT imaging of the patient led to earlier identification of progression, and a low threshold for surgical intervention led to favorable outcomes.

Chinese Admission Warning Strategy for Predicting the Hospital Discharge Outcome in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Objective: To develop and validate an admission warning strategy that incorporates the general emergency department indicators for predicting the hospital discharge outcome of patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) in China. Methods: This admission warning strategy was developed in a primary cohort that consisted of 605 patients with TBI who were admitted within 6 h of injury. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to develop the early warning strategy of selected indicators. Two sub-cohorts consisting of 180 and 107 patients with TBI were used for the external validation. Results: Indicators of the strategy included three categories: baseline characteristics, imaging and laboratory indicators. This strategy displayed good calibration and good discrimination. A high C-index was reached in the internal validation. The multicenter external validation cohort still showed good discrimination C-indices. Decision curve analysis (DCA) showed the actual needs of this strategy when the possibility threshold was 0.01 for the primary cohort, and at thresholds of 0.02–0.83 and 0.01–0.88 for the two sub-cohorts, respectively. In addition, this strategy exhibited a significant prognostic capacity compared to the traditional single predictors, and this optimization was also observed in two external validation cohorts. Conclusions: We developed and validated an admission warning strategy that can be quickly deployed in the emergency department. This strategy can be used as an ideal tool for predicting hospital discharge outcomes and providing objective evidence for early informed consent of the hospital discharge outcome to the family members of TBI patients.