Awake surgery for glioma resection during pregnancy: a systematic review

Efficacy and safety of anesthetic agents in awake craniotomy using monitored anesthesia care protocol: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Awake craniotomy (AC) facilitates real-time brain mapping, maximizing tumor resection while preserving critical neurological functions. This study systematically reviews the efficacy of several anesthetic protocols under Monitored Anesthesia Care (MAC) during AC, focusing on clinical outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted using data from observational studies and randomized trials involving AC under MAC. Databases searched included PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. The analysis employed mixed-effects models to assess both the overall rate of the outcomes and the impact of anesthetic agents on clinical outcomes. The primary outcome was the rate of postoperative neurological deficits. Of 468 studies initially identified, 26 met the inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event rate was 23.7%. The pooled proportion of patients with postoperative neurological deficits and intraoperative seizures was 10.45% and 8.8%, respectively. Remifentanil use was associated with a lower risk of neurological deficits in mixed effects meta-analysis (6.9% vs 16.5%), while intraoperative seizure rate was slightly lower with propofol use (7.1% vs. 11.8%). Midazolam use was also associated with lower agitation (5.5% vs. 10.9%). The rate of secondary adverse outcomes other than hypertension (10.2%) and tense brain (10%) were below 10% and comparable to the previous literature. The findings highlight the variability in anesthetic protocols used in MAC for AC. Despite limited evidence regarding safety concerns and potential confounders, Remifentanil, Propofol, and Midazolam appear to be superior to other agents evaluated in these procedures. However, further research is required to draw definitive conclusions.

Awake microsurgical management of brain aneurysms: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis on rationale, safety and clinical outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Awake microsurgery for brain aneurysm treatment has emerged as a tool for real-time intraoperative monitoring, opportune detection of ischemic complications, and reduction of surgical morbidity. Herein, we aimed to explore the current state of the procedure's rationale, safety and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

In accordance with PRISMA guidelines, five databases were queried for articles reporting awake microsurgical management of brain aneurysms. Aggregate study results were combined using random-effects meta-analyses. Publication bias was evaluated through funnel plot analysis and Egger's regression test.

RESULTS

Out of 847 articles, 11 records satisfied the inclusion criteria. Seventy-five patients (68% female) with 75 brain aneurysms (68% unruptured) were analyzed. Clipping was the predominant technique (58%), followed by bypass (17%). Monitored anesthesia care was the principal anesthesia protocol (60%). The incidence of anesthesia-related complications was 1% [95%CI, 0.00-0.05, I2 = 19%], and the conversion rate from an awake-induced anesthesia protocol to general anesthesia was 1% [95%CI, 0.00-0.05, I2 = 0%]. No permanent anesthesia-related morbidity and mortality was reported. Complete aneurysm repair, occlusion and bypass patency rate was 100% [95%CI, 0.96-1.00, I2 = 0%]. The transient postoperative symptomatic event rate was 34% [95%CI, 0.06-0.81, I2 = 77%]. The overall morbidity rate was 4% [95%CI, 0.00-0.09, I2 = 0%], and the overall mortality rate was 0% [95%CI, 0.00-0.03, I2 = 0%].

CONCLUSION

Awake microsurgery of brain aneurysms is feasible, yet current evidence stems from observational studies. This procedure can reduce surgical morbidity by providing accurate and real-time neurological monitoring during aneurysm repair. While this technique appears to be tolerated, higher level evidence is needed to evaluate judiciously its safety and preference over existing practices for intraoperative neurological monitoring.