Comparison of treatment results between surgery alone, preoperative short-course radiotherapy, or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

Efficacies of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision or other types of surgery: an updated meta-analysis

Background

An updated meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of radiotherapy in rectal cancer patients treated with total mesorectal excision (TME) or other types of surgery (non-TME-only).

Methods

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases were searched. Data on overall survival (OS) were extracted.

Results

Hazard ratios (HRs) for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (LCCRT), preoperative radiotherapy alone, and postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with TME were 1.02 [95% CI: 0.92-1.14, P = 0.65], 1.04 [95% CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.47], 0.87 [95% CI: 0.61-1.25, P = 0.46], and 1.18 [95% CI: 0.91-1.52, P = 0.20], respectively. HRs for OS associated with preoperative radiotherapy, preoperative LCCRT, preoperative radiotherapy alone, preoperative long-course RT (LCRT), and preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery were 0.85 [95% CI: 0.79-0.90, P < 0.00001], 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94, P = 0.009], 0.86 [95% CI: 0.80-0.92, P < 0.0001], 0.83 [95% CI: 0.73-0.95, P = 0.005], and 0.84 [95% CI: 0.77-0.91, P= <0.0001], respectively. The HR for postoperative radiotherapy in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery was 1.08 [95% CI: 0.84-1.39, P = 0.57].

Conclusion

Preoperative radiotherapy, regardless of the regimen, improves the OS in patients treated with non-TME-only surgery, but not in those treated with TME. Postoperative radiotherapy does not improve OS.

Advances in knowledge

This meta-analysis will serve as a reference for decision-making in multidisciplinary approaches for rectal cancer patients.

Short-term outcomes of short- and long-course chemoradiotherapy before total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal tumors: A single-center study in Taiwan utilizing propensity score matching

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced rectal tumors are typically treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Short-course chemoradiotherapy (SCRT, 2500 cGy in five fractions) is a convenient alternative to concurrent chemoradiotherapy with long-course radiotherapy (CCRT, 4500 cGy in 25 fractions) without sacrificing efficacy. We aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of SCRT and CCRT in patients with mid- and low- rectal tumors who underwent total mesorectal excision using real-world data.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent radical resection after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from 2011 to 2022. We analyzed the clinicopathological findings and prognostic factors for disease-free and overall survival in the SCRT and CCRT groups and compared the outcomes using propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Among the 66 patients in the two groups, no disparities were noted in the demographic features, pathological remission, or downstaging rates. Nonetheless, the SCRT group exhibited superior 3-year disease-free survival (81.8% vs 62.1%, p = 0.011), whereas the overall survival did not differ significantly between the two groups. The initial carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels and neoadjuvant SCRT were associated with the recurrence rates [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.13-4.10; HR = 0.19-0.74], but the harvested lymph node count was not (HR = 0.51-1.97).

CONCLUSION

Among patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, SCRT combined with four cycles of FOLFOX was shown to enhance short-term disease-free survival. Factors impacting recurrence include the initial CEA level and SCRT, but not the harvested lymph node count.

Prognostic Significance of Neoadjuvant Rectal Scores in Preoperative Short-Course Radiotherapy and Long-Course Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy for Patients with Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the prognostic factors and the utility of the neoadjuvant rectal (NAR) score for patients who have locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) treated with preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SRT) or long-course concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT).

METHODS

Of 314 consecutive stage 2 or 3 rectal cancer patients enrolled from January 2006 to December 2017, 205 underwent preoperative SRT (2500 cGy/5 fractions), and 109 underwent preoperative CRT (4200-5080 cGy/21-28 fractions) after total mesorectal excision (TME). The study calculated NAR scores using the following equation: [5 pN - 3(cT - pT) + 12]²/9.61.

RESULTS

The multivariate analysis showed that age above 65 years, pT4, pN2, NAR scores higher than 16, and distance from anal verges (< 8 cm) were significant prognostic factors for overall survival (OS), whereas, pN2, NAR scores lower than 16, and distance from anal verges (< 8 cm) were significant prognostic factors for disease-free survival (DFS) and distant metastasis (DM). The patients with an NAR score higher than 16, had a 5-year OS rate of 67.6%, a DFS rate of 56.9%, a locoregional recurrence (LRR) rate of 7.7%, and a DM rate of 35% compared with corresponding rates of 87.6%, 76.7%, 5.4%, and 7.2% for the patients with an NAR score of 16 or lower (p < 0.001 for OS, < 0.001 for DFS, 0.25 for LRR, and < 0.001 for DM).

CONCLUSIONS

For patients who undergo SRT or CRT for LARC, a higher NAR score is associated with worse OS and DFS and higher DM rates at 5 years. The NAR score could be used as a short-term surrogate end point after neoadjuvant therapy for LARC.

Comparison of long course and short course preoperative radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

rectal cancer (RC) is one of the most prevalent malignancies worldwide and different preoperative radiotherapies may lead to different outcomes. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of long-course (LC) and short-course radiotherapy (SC), with or without chemotherapy, for locally advanced rectal cancer.

METHODS

studies published up to March 31st 2018 were retrieved from PubMed, Medline, Cochrane and EMABSE. Randomized control or consort control trials that reported the outcomes of short or long course radiotherapy were eligible. Either a fixed or random effects model was used to access the overall combined risk estimates.

RESULTS

sixteen studies with a total of 2,773 RC patients were included in the analysis. There were no significant differences between LC and SC therapies with regard to the following: pathological complete response (PCR) (I2 = 78%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.26-1.10); tumor downstaging (I2 = 79%, p < 0.05, RR = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.58-1.17); local recurrences (I2 = 22%, p = 0.27, RR = 0.55, 95% CI: 0.26-1.16); distant metastases (I2 = 29%, p = 0.22, RR = 1.03, 95% CI: 0.77-1.37); mortality (I2 = 0%, p = 0.78, RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.78-1.15) and serious late toxicity (I2 = 74%, p = 0.01, RR = 1.10, 95% CI: 0.37-3.26). In the subgroup analysis, LC had a better PCR and tumor downstaging rate compared with SC in the RCT subgroup. Besides, LC also presented a better PCR rate compared with SC without chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

LC and SC are both effective in the preoperative treatment of RC with regard to PCR, tumor downstaging, local recurrences, distant metastases, mortality and serious late toxicity. Furthermore, chemotherapy may enhance the efficacy of preoperative treatment.

Chemo-Radiation After Upfront Rectal Resections-a Clinical Dilemma

To compare the impact of adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy (ACRT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) alone on recurrence and survival in patients with stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma undergoing upfront curative resection. Prospective observational review of colorectal database at Tata Memorial Hospital from July 2010 to March 2015 identified 84 patients who underwent upfront curative resection for stage II or III rectal cancer. None of the patient received preoperative chemo-radiation. Of these, adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy was administered to 29 patients (ACRT group) and 55 patients received CAPEOX/FOLFOX-based adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT group) alone. At a median follow-up of 20 months, there were 10 recurrences (3 local recurrence) in the ACRT group and 15 (2 local recurrence) in ACT group. The estimated disease-free survival at 3 years in the ACRT group was 62.7% and in ACT group was 49.7% (p = 0.417) with an estimated 3-year overall survival of 74 and 78% in the ACRT and ACT group, respectively (p = 0.241). Subgroup analysis was performed after risk stratifying prognostic features (pT4, pN2, poor differentiation, involved resection margin). Our study does not show any benefit of ACRT over ACT on local control, disease-free and overall survival after upfront rectal cancer resection for low-risk stage II-III. In the subgroup analysis, local recurrence did not occur in patients who did not have poor prognostic features irrespective whether they received ACRT or ACT. Adjuvant chemo-radiation can be avoided in low-risk stage II-III rectal cancer after upfront resection.

Lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

With neoadjuvant therapy increasingly used in advanced rectal cancer, the lymph node ratio (LNR) has been strongly considered to indicate cancer-specific survival in recent years, and a comprehensive evaluation of a large number of studies is deficient. The objective of our study is to pool enough eligible studies to assess the relationship between LNR and prognosis of advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A systematic search was done in the PubMed and EmBase databases (through 1 March 2017) that reported LNR in colorectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. The first two authors independently conducted the study selection and data extraction. All statistical analyses were conducted using STATA 13.0 (College Station, Texas).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 4023 participants were included in the meta-analysis, and all were published after 2011. A high LNR was assessed to be a predictor of poor overall survival in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy (HR: 2.94, 95% CI:1.97 to 3.91, P < 0.001). Similarly, a high LNR was related to poor disease-free survival (HR: 2.83, 95% CI: 1.82 to 3.85, P < 0.001). With respect to recurrence, the HRs of 3.25, 1.93, and 2.11 also showed a strong relationship between high LNR and poor local, distant, and total recurrences.

CONCLUSIONS

Our present study demonstrates that a high LNR can predict poor survival in advanced rectal cancer. We suggest well-designed clinical trials to prospectively assess LNR as an independent predictor of rectal cancer survival.

Preoperative short-course radiotherapy and long-course radiochemotherapy for locally advanced rectal cancer: Meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis of long-term survival data

Background and purpose

The role of preoperative short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) in rectal cancer treatment, when compared to long-course radiochemotherapy (LCRT), is still controversial. Thus the meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis (TSA) was performed to evaluate the long-term survival of SCRT and LCRT as therapeutic regimens for locally advanced rectal cancer.

Material and methods

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched up to August 2017 for eligible studies. Hazard ratios (HRs) or odds ratios (ORs) of overall survival (OS), disease free survival (DFS) and local recurrence (LR) with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and TSA was applied.

Results

11 studies with 1984 patients were included. There was no significant difference in OS (HR = 0.92, 95% CI: 0.75–1.13, p = 0.44), DFS (HR = 0.94, 95% CI: 0.79–1.12, p = 0.50) and LR (OR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.49–1.08, p = 0.11) between SCRT and LCRT groups. TSA suggested firm evidence for lacking on average a -10% relative risk reduction (RRR) in 4-year OS but no statistical significance in 4-year DFS.

Conclusions

Preoperative SCRT is as effective as LCRT for locally advanced colorectal cancer in long-term survival. SCRT could be preferential while facing long waiting lists or lacking medical resource.

Are We Predicting Disease Progress of the Rectal Cancer Patients without Surgery after Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy?

Purpose

There are patients who do not undergo surgery, regardless of tumor response for neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) in rectal cancer. However, there have been few reports focused on how oncologic outcomes are worse in these patients. We sought to investigate oncologic outcomes for these non-operated patients with rectal cancer after nCRT.

Materials and Methods

A total of 1,063 records of patients with rectal cancer who were treated with nCRT from January 2002 to December 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. We categorized patients into the non-operated group (n=77), transanal local excision (TLE) group (n=54), ortotal mesorectal excision (TME) group (n=932) and compared each group using propensity score matching.

Results

In the non-operated group, the most common reason for no surgery was patient refusal (n=64). Eleven patients were considered to have achieve clinical complete response (cCR), which was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival (p=0.045). In patients with disease progression in the non-operated group, the overall survival did not improved according to salvage treatments (p=0.451). The non-operated group showed worse survivals compared to the TLE or TME group before and after matching (p < 0.001). This finding was also noted in the analysis of survival only in patients with cCR.

Conclusion

In this study, non-operated patients did not secure oncologic safety regardless of cCR after nCRT. Our results suggest that a non-operative management must be carefully considered even if cCR is achieved.

Long Term Outcomes of Preoperative versus Postoperative Concurrent Chemoradiation for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Experience from Ramathibodi Medical School in Thailand

OBJECTIVES

The study analyzed and compared the long term outcome in locally advanced rectal cancer treated with preoperative and postoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of 105 patients with stage T3-T4 or regional lymph node positive adenocarcinoma of rectum treated with preoperative or postoperative CCRT at Ramathibodi Hospital during 2005 to 2010 was performed. The results of treatment were reported with 5-year overall survival (OS), 5- year locoregional recurrence free survival (LRFS), and toxicity according to preoperative versus postoperative concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) groups.

RESULTS

Among 105 patients, 34 (32%) were treated with preoperative CCRT and 71 (68%) with postoperative CCRT. At the median follow-up time of 50.5 months (range 2-114 months), five-year OS and LRFS of all patients were 87% and 91.6%, respectively. The study found no difference in 5-year OS (81.7% vs 89.2 %) or LRFS (83.4% vs 95.1%) between preoperative versus postoperative CCRT. Seven cases of loco-regional recurrence were diagnosed, 4 (11.8%) after preoperative CCRT and 3 (4.2%) after postoperative CCRT. The recurrent sites were anastomosis in all patients. There was no significant factor associated with outcome after univariate and multivariate testing. Grade 3 or 4 acute and late complications were low in both preoperative and postoperative CCRT groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Locally advanced rectum cancer patients experience good results with surgery and adjuvant concurrent chemoradiation.

Copy number alterations and allelic ratio in relation to recurrence of rectal cancer

Background

In rectal cancer, total mesorectal excision surgery combined with preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy reduces local recurrence rates but does not improve overall patient survival, a result that may be due to the harmful side effects and/or co-morbidity of preoperative treatment. New biomarkers are needed to facilitate identification of rectal cancer patients at high risk for local recurrent disease. This would allow for preoperative (chemo)radiotherapy to be restricted to high-risk patients, thereby reducing overtreatment and allowing personalized treatment protocols. We analyzed genome-wide DNA copy number (CN) and allelic alterations in 112 tumors from preoperatively untreated rectal cancer patients. Sixty-six patients with local and/or distant recurrent disease were compared to matched controls without recurrence. Results were validated in a second cohort of tumors from 95 matched rectal cancer patients. Additionally, we performed a meta-analysis that included 42 studies reporting on CN alterations in colorectal cancer and compared results to our own data.

Results

The genomic profiles in our study were comparable to other rectal cancer studies. Results of the meta-analysis supported the hypothesis that colon cancer and rectal cancer may be distinct disease entities. In our discovery patient study cohort, allelic retention of chromosome 7 was significantly associated with local recurrent disease. Data from the validation cohort were supportive, albeit not statistically significant, of this finding.

Conclusions

We showed that retention of heterozygosity on chromosome 7 may be associated with local recurrence in rectal cancer. Further research is warranted to elucidate the mechanisms and effect of retention of chromosome 7 on the development of local recurrent disease in rectal cancer.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1550-0) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.