ACO2 and ANPEP as novel prognostic markers for gallbladder squamous cell/adenosquamous carcinomas and adenocarcinomas

Combining tissue biomarkers with mpMRI to diagnose clinically significant prostate cancer. Analysis of 21 biomarkers in the PICTURE study

BACKGROUND

Serum PSA and digital rectal examination remain the key diagnostic tools for detecting prostate cancer. However, due to the limited specificity of serum PSA, the applicability of this marker continues to be controversial. Recent use of image-guided biopsy along with pathological assessment and the use of biomarkers has dramatically improved the diagnosis of clinically significant cancer. Despite the two modalities working together for diagnosis biomarker research often fails to correlate findings with imaging.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We looked at 21 prostate cancer biomarkers correlating our results with mpMRI data to investigate the hypothesis that biomarkers along with mpMRI data make a powerful tool to detect clinically significant prostate cancer. Biomarkers were selected based on the existing literature. Using a tissue microarray comprised of samples from the PICTURE study, with biopsies at 5 mm intervals and mpMRI data we analysed which biomarkers could differentiate benign and malignant tissue. Biomarker data were also correlated with pathological grading, mpMRI, serum PSA, age and family history. AGR2, CD10 and EGR protein expression was significantly different in both matched malignant and benign tissues. AMACR, ANPEP, GDF15, MSMB, PSMA, PTEN, TBL1XR1, TP63, VPS13A and VPS28 showed significantly different expression between Gleason grades in malignant tissue. The majority of the biomarkers tested did not correlate with mpMRI data. However, CD10, KHDRBS3, PCLAF, PSMA, SIK2 and GDF15 were differentially expressed with prostate cancer progression. AMACR and PTEN were identified in both pathological and image data evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high demand to develop biomarkers that would help the diagnosis and prognosis of prostate cancer. Tissue biomarkers are of particular interest since immunohistochemistry remains a cheap, reliable method that is widely available in pathology departments. These results demonstrate that testing biomarkers in a cohort consistent with the current diagnostic pathway is crucial to identifying biomarker with potential clinical utility.

Protein Biomarker Discovery Studies on Urinary sEV Fractions Separated with UF-SEC for the First Diagnosis and Detection of Recurrence in Bladder Cancer Patients

Urinary extracellular vesicles (EVs) are an attractive source of bladder cancer biomarkers. Here, a protein biomarker discovery study was performed on the protein content of small urinary EVs (sEVs) to identify possible biomarkers for the primary diagnosis and recurrence of non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). The sEVs were isolated by ultrafiltration (UF) in combination with size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). The first part of the study compared healthy individuals with NMIBC patients with a primary diagnosis. The second part compared tumor-free patients with patients with a recurrent NMIBC diagnosis. The separated sEVs were in the size range of 40 to 200 nm. Based on manually curated high quality mass spectrometry (MS) data, the statistical analysis revealed 69 proteins that were differentially expressed in these sEV fractions of patients with a first bladder cancer tumor vs. an age- and gender-matched healthy control group. When the discriminating power between healthy individuals and first diagnosis patients is taken into account, the biomarkers with the most potential are MASP2, C3, A2M, CHMP2A and NHE-RF1. Additionally, two proteins (HBB and HBA1) were differentially expressed between bladder cancer patients with a recurrent diagnosis vs. tumor-free samples of bladder cancer patients, but their biological relevance is very limited.

Kinetic and Regulatory Properties of Yarrowia lipolytica Aconitate Hydratase as a Model-Indicator of Cell Redox State under pH Stress

This paper presents an analysis of the regulation activity of the partially purified preparations of cellular aconitate hydratase (AH) on the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica cultivated at extreme pH. As a result of purification, enzyme preparations were obtained from cells grown on media at pH 4.0, 5.5, and 9.0, purified by 48-, 46-, and 51-fold and having a specific activity of 0.43, 0.55 and 0.36 E/mg protein, respectively. The kinetic parameters of preparations from cells cultured at extreme pH demonstrated: (1) an increase in the affinity for citrate and isocitrate; and (2) a shift in the pH optima to the acidic and alkaline side in accordance with the modulation of the medium pH. The regulatory properties of the enzyme from cells subjected to alkaline stress showed increased sensitivity to Fe²⁺ ions and high peroxide resistance. Reduced glutathione (GSH) stimulated AH, while oxidized glutathione (GSSG) inhibited AH. A more pronounced effect of both GSH and GSSG was noted for the enzyme obtained from cells grown at pH 5.5. The data obtained provide new approaches to the use of Y. lipolytica as a model of eukaryotic cells demonstrating the development of a stress-induced pathology and to conducting a detailed analysis of enzymatic activity for its correction.

Identification of 9-Gene Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition Related Signature of Osteosarcoma by Integrating Multi Cohorts

BACKGROUND

The prognosis of patients with osteosarcoma is still poor due to the lack of effective prognostic markers. The EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) serves as a promoter in the progression of osteosarcoma. This study systematically analyzed EMT-related genes to explore new markers for predicting the prognosis of osteosarcoma.

METHODS

RNA-Seq data and clinical information were obtained from the GEO database; GSVA and GSEA analysis were used to enrich pathways related to osteosarcoma progression; LASSO method analysis was used to construct the prognosis risk signature. The "Nomogram" package generated the risk prediction nomogram, and its clinical applicability was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

GSVA and GSEA analysis showed that the EMT signaling pathway was closely related to osteosarcoma progression. A 9-genes signature (LAMA3, LGALS1, SGCG, VEGFA, WNT5A, MATN3, ANPEP, FUCA1, and FLNA) was constructed. The overall survival (OS) of the high-risk scores group was significantly lower than the low-risk scores group. The 9-gene signature demonstrated good predictive accuracy. Cox regression analysis showed that the 9-gene signature provided independent prognostic factors for osteosarcoma patients. In addition, the predictive nomogram model could effectively predict the prognosis of osteosarcoma patients.

CONCLUSION

This study constructed a 9-gene signature as a new prognostic marker to predict osteosarcoma patients' survival.