Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in elderly patients with colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

SEOM-GEMCAD-TTD clinical guidelines for the adjuvant treatment of colon cancer (2023)

Colorectal cancer (CRC) has a 5-year overall survival rate of over 60%. The decrease in the rate of metastatic disease is due to screening programs and the population's awareness of healthy lifestyle. Similarly, advancements in surgical methods and the use of adjuvant chemotherapy have contributed to a decrease in the recurrence of resected disease. Before evaluating a patient's treatment, it is recommended to be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board. In stage II tumors, the pathologic characteristics of poor prognosis must be known (T4, number of lymph nodes analyzed less than 12, lymphovascular or perineural invasion, obstruction or perforation, poor histologic grade, presence of tumor budding) and it is mandatory to determine the MSI/MMR status for avoiding administering fluoropyridimidines in monotherapy to patients with MSI-H/dMMR tumors. In stage III tumors, the standard treatment consists of a combination of fluoropyrimidine (oral or intravenous) with oxaliplatin for 6 months although the administration of CAPOX can be considered for 3 months in low-risk tumors. Neoadjuvant treatment is not consolidated yet although immunotherapy is achieving very good preliminary results in MSI-H patients. The use of ctDNA to define the treatment and monitoring of resected tumors is only recommended within studies. These guidelines are intended to help decision-making to offer the best management of patients with non-metastatic colon cancer.

Frailty Assessed by the Clinical Frailty Scale is Associated with Prognosis After Esophagectomy

BACKGROUND

The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple and validated tool for assessing frailty, and higher CFS scores are correlated with worse perioperative outcomes after cardiovascular surgery. However, the relationship between the CFS scores and postoperative outcomes after esophagectomy remain unclear.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 561 patients with esophageal cancer (EC) who underwent resection from August 2010 to August 2020. We defined a CFS score of ≥4 as indicative of frailty; thus, patients were classified into frail patients (CFS scores of ≥4) and non-frail patients (CFS scores of ≤3). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to describe the overall survival (OS) distributions with the log-rank test.

RESULTS

Of the 561 patients, 90 (16%) had frailty and 471 (84%) did not. Frail patients had a significantly older age, lower body mass index, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and greater cancer progression than non-frail patients. The 5-year survival rate was 68% in non-frail patients and 52% in frail patients. OS was significantly shorter in frail than non-frail patients (p = 0.017 by log-rank test). In particular, OS was significantly shorter in frail patients with clinical stage I-II EC (p = 0.0024 by log-rank test) but was not correlated with frailty in patients with clinical stage III-IV EC (p = 0.87 by log-rank test).

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative frailty was associated with shorter OS after resection of EC. The CFS score may be a prognostic biomarker for patients with EC, especially early-stage EC.

Effects of deficient mismatch repair on the prognosis of patients with stage II and stage III colon cancer during different postoperative periods

Background

We evaluated the prognostic role of deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) systems in stage II and stage III colon cancer patients during different postoperative periods. We also assessed whether patients aged ≥75 could benefit from chemotherapy.

Methods

This retrospective study was conducted across three medical centers in China. Kaplan–Meier survival methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the differences in overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates. Propensity score matching was performed to reduce imbalances in the baseline characteristics of the patients. Landmark analysis was performed to evaluate the role of dMMR during different postoperative periods.

Results

The median follow-up time for all patients was 45.0 months (25–75 IQR: 38.0–82.5). There was no significant OS (p = 0.350) or DFS (p = 0.752) benefit associated with dMMR for stage II and III patients during the first postoperative year. However, significant OS (p < 0.001) and DFS (p < 0.001) benefits were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. These differences remained after propensity score matching. Moreover, chemotherapy produced no OS (HR = 0.761, 95% CI: 0.43–1.34, p = 0.341) or DFS (HR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.51–1.88, p = 0.961) benefit for patients aged ≥75 years.

Conclusion

The benefits of dMMR in stage III patients were observed from the second postoperative year until the end of follow-up. However, the prognosis of patients with dMMR is not different from that of patients with proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) during the first postoperative year. In addition, elderly patients aged ≥75 years obtained no significant survival benefits from postoperative chemotherapy.

Does adjuvant chemotherapy improve outcomes in elderly patients with colorectal cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world studies

BACKGROUND

Elderly patients are frequently excluded from randomized trials. It is unclear if adjuvant chemotherapy improves outcomes of colorectal cancer in such patients. The current study aimed to review evidence on the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in elderly patients with stage II/III colorectal cancer by pooling data from real-world studies.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, ScienceDirect, CENTRAL, and Google Scholar databases were searched for observational studies reporting adjusted data on OS and DFS in elderly (≥70 years) colorectal cancer patients based on receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies included. The meta-analysis demonstrated statistically significant improved OS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.00001). Results were similar for sub-group analysis based on cancer stage and definition of elderly. Improvement in OS was noted in only Western population studies with no difference in Asian patients. The meta-analysis also revealed no statistically significant difference in DFS in elderly patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy vs surgery alone (p = 0.14).

CONCLUSION

Real-world evidence indicates that adjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved OS but not DFS in elderly colorectal cancer patients. Scarce evidence suggests a limited role of adjuvant chemotherapy in Asian patients which needs confirmation by further studies.

Oncologic outcomes in elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer: a multi-institutional survey in Kinki District, Japan

BACKGROUND

The goal of this study is to assess the oncologic outcomes of elderly patients who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer across three variables: hysterectomy approach, lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy.

METHODS

Hospital records of patients aged ≥ 70 years who underwent hysterectomy for endometrial cancer were obtained from 19 institutions. Patients were categorized into three risk groups: low, intermediate, and high. In each group, disease-free survival and overall survival were compared according to hysterectomy approach, lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy using Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis with a 95% confidence interval was performed to estimate relative risk (RR) of death.

RESULTS

A total of 1246 patients were included. In the low-risk group, the adjusted RR for death for minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus laparotomy and lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection were 0.64 (0.24-1.72) and 0.52 (0.24-1.12), respectively. In the intermediate-risk group, the adjusted RR for death for MIS versus laparotomy, lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection, and adjuvant therapy versus no adjuvant therapy were 0.80 (0.36-1.77), 0.60 (0.37-0.98), and 0.89 (0.55-1.46), respectively. In the high-risk group, the adjusted RRs for death for lymph node resection versus no lymph node resection and adjuvant therapy versus no adjuvant therapy were 0.56 (0.37-0.86) and 0.60 (0.38-0.96), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MIS is not inferior to laparotomy in uterine-confined diseases. Lymph node resection improved the outcome for all disease stages and histological types. In contrast, adjuvant therapy improved the outcomes only in high-risk patients.

Frailty is associated with poor prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer

BACKGROUND

With population aging, the number of frail patients with pancreatic cancer has increased. The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) is a simple and validated tool to assess frailty, and higher scores predict worse clinical outcomes after cardiovascular surgery. In this retrospective study, we aimed to examine the association of preoperative frailty with prognosis after resection for pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 142 consecutive patients undergoing resection for pancreatic cancer between April 2010 and December 2018. We used the CFS: 1 (very fit) to 9 (terminally ill) to assess frailty and examined associations of the CFS scores with recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to calculate hazard ratios (HRs), controlling for potential confounders.

RESULTS

Of the 142 patients, 113 (80%) had CFS scores of ≤ 3, 13 (9.2%) scores of 4, and 16 (11%) scores of ≥ 5. Scores of ≥ 5 on the CFS were associated with worse CSS (univariable HR: 2.62, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.19-5.18, P = 0.019; multivariable HR: 2.49, 95% CI 1.05-5.34, P = 0.039) and OS (univariable HR: 2.42, 95% CI 1.19-4.46, P = 0.016; multivariable HR: 2.25, 95% CI 1.05-4.43, P = 0.038). The association between CFS scores and RFS was not significant in multivariable analysis (univariable HR: 2.11, 95% CI 1.08-3.79, P = 0.030; multivariable HR: 1.47, 95% CI 0.71-2.83, P = 0.29).

CONCLUSION

Higher scores on the CFS are associated with worse CSS and OS after resection for pancreatic cancer. Preoperative measurement of frailty may improve risk assessment among patients with pancreatic cancer.