The value of lymphadenectomy in surgical resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Lymphadenectomy for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: therapeutic benefit of lymph node number and station

BACKGROUND

We sought to characterize the benefit of lymphadenectomy among patients undergoing curative-intent surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) utilizing the therapeutic index.

METHODS

Data on patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pCCA were obtained from 8 high-volume international hepatobiliary centers. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to assess clinicopathological factors associated with overall survival (OS). The therapeutic index was determined to assess the therapeutic benefit of lymphadenectomy.

RESULTS

Among 341 patients, median number of lymph nodes (LNs) evaluated was 7 (IQR: 4-11). A total of 127 (37.2 %) patients underwent lymphadenectomy of station 12 only, while 146 (42.8 %) patients had LNs from stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 harvested. On multivariable analysis, lymphadenectomy of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 was associated with improved OS (referent, station 12 only: HR 0.51, 95%CI 0.32-0.80). The therapeutic index was highest among patients who underwent LN evaluation of stations 12 plus 8 ± 13 (33.1) and had ≥6 LNs harvested (26.3).

CONCLUSION

At the time of surgery of pCCA, lymphadenectomy should include station 12, as well as stations 8 and 13, with the goal to evaluate ≥6 LNs to ensure optimal staging and maximize the therapeutic benefit for patients.

Prognostic Significance of Lymph Node Ratio in Intrahepatic and Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinomas

Background/Objectives. Lymph Node Ratio (LNR) is increasingly recognized as an important prognostic factor in various cancer types, with the potential to enhance patient stratification for intrahepatic (ICC) and extrahepatic (ECC) cholangiocarcinoma. The study aimed to assess the impact of LNR on survival in surgically resected patients with ICC and ECC. Methods. This was a retrospective analysis of National Cancer Database (2004-2020) included ICC and ECC (excluding distal bile duct) patients who underwent primary site resection with adequate lymphadenectomy (≥4 LNs excised). Exclusions comprised age < 18 years, distant metastasis, or incomplete key data. LNR was calculated as the ratio of positive LNs to total examined LNs. Survival probabilities were estimated using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Results. The inclusion criteria were met by 954 patients with ICC and 1607 patients with ECC. In patients with ICC, the median OS time was 62.7 months in LNR0 group, 40.8 months in LNR < 30%, and 25.2 months in LNR ≥ 30% (p < 0.001). In ICC, 3-year OS was 69.3%, 54.6%, and 34% for LNR 0, LNR < 30%, and LNR ≥ 30%, respectively (p < 0.05). When adjusted for age, sex, Charlson-Deyo score, histology, surgical margins, chemo- and radiotherapy using Cox regression, LNR < 30% and LNR ≥ 30% were associated with worse OS in patients with ICC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.6-2.7) and HR 2.94 (95% CI 2.3-3.8)) and ECC (HR 2.1 (95% CI 1.8-2.5) and HR 3 (95% CI 2.4-3.7)). Conclusions. It is well-known that LN-negative patients have significantly better survival than LN-positive patients with ICC and ECC. This study strongly demonstrates that survival prognosis can be further stratified based on LNR for ICC and ECC patients and that it is not simply a binary factor.

National guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma

A consensus meeting of national experts from all major national hepatobiliary centres in the country was held on May 26, 2023, at the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute & Research Centre (PKLI & RC) after initial consultations with the experts. The Pakistan Society for the Study of Liver Diseases (PSSLD) and PKLI & RC jointly organised this meeting. This effort was based on a comprehensive literature review to establish national practice guidelines for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (hCCA). The consensus was that hCCA is a complex disease and requires a multidisciplinary team approach to best manage these patients. This coordinated effort can minimise delays and give patients a chance for curative treatment and effective palliation. The diagnostic and staging workup includes high-quality computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography. Brush cytology or biopsy utilizing endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography is a mainstay for diagnosis. However, histopathologic confirmation is not always required before resection. Endoscopic ultrasound with fine needle aspiration of regional lymph nodes and positron emission tomography scan are valuable adjuncts for staging. The only curative treatment is the surgical resection of the biliary tree based on the Bismuth-Corlette classification. Selected patients with unresectable hCCA can be considered for liver transplantation. Adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered to patients with a high risk of recurrence. The use of preoperative biliary drainage and the need for portal vein embolisation should be based on local multidisciplinary discussions. Patients with acute cholangitis can be drained with endoscopic or percutaneous biliary drainage. Palliative chemotherapy with cisplatin and gemcitabine has shown improved survival in patients with irresectable and recurrent hCCA.

Risk Factors for Negative Emotions in Patients Undergoing Radical Resection of Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma and Their Influence on Prognosis

Background

Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA) is a common malignant tumor of the biliary system. Factors such as limited physical function, intractability, and high mortality caused by the tumor lead to negative emotions, such as anxiety and depression in patients. In this study, we investigated the risk factors for negative emotions in patients undergoing radical resection of HCCA during the perioperative period and its effect on prognosis to provide strategies for alleviating the negative emotional disorders of patients and improving prognosis.

Methods

From September 2016 to August 2021, we retrospectively examined 205 patients with HCCA who underwent radical resection in our hospital. The incidence of negative emotions and the clinical parameters of patients were compared using Chi-square tests and t-tests. The independent risk factors for unfavorable feelings in patients during the perioperative period were determined using binary logistic regression. The key variables influencing the postoperative survival status of HCCA patients were identified using the log-rank univariate analysis and Cox proportional risk regression analysis.

Results

The results of the binary logistic regression analysis showed that perioperative negative emotions were independently influenced by family monthly income (OR = 0.069), medical insurance (OR = 0.089), family care (OR = 0.013), sleep quality (OR = 0.071), TNF-α (OR = 5.851), and bile leakage (OR = 29.412) (P < 0.05). The age of the patient (OR = 2.003), preoperative CA19-9 (OR = 2.038), lymph node metastases (OR = 2.327), and negative mood (OR = 3.054) were independent risk variables that affected the survival status of patients, as determined by the results of Cox regression analysis (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

In this study, we found that anxiety and depression in patients undergoing radical operation of HCCA are related to family monthly income, medical insurance, sleep quality, family care, TNF-α, and bile leakage; also, negative emotions have adverse effects on prognosis.

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Laparoscopic and Open Radical Resection for Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma-A Propensity Score-Matching Analysis

BACKGROUND

Radical resection remains the most effective treatment for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, due to the complex anatomy of the hilar region, the tumor is prone to invade portal vein and hepatic arteries, making the surgical treatment of HCCA particularly difficult. Successful laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA(IIIA, IIIB) requires excellent surgical skills and rich experience. Furthermore, the safety and effectiveness of this operation are still controversial.

AIM

To retrospectively analyze and compare the efficacy and safety of laparoscopic and open surgery for patients with HCCA.

METHODS

Clinical imaging and postoperative pathological data of 89 patients diagnosed with HCCA (IIIA, IIIB) and undergoing radical resection in our center from January 2018 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 6 patients (4 were lost to follow-up and 2 were pathologically confirmed to have other diseases after surgery) were ruled out, and clinical data was collected from the remaining 83 patients for statistical analysis. These patients were divided into an open surgery group (n=62) and a laparoscopic surgery group (n=21) according to the surgical methods used, and after 1:2 propensity score matching (PSM), 32 and 16 patients respectively in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group were remained. The demographic data, Bismuth type, perioperative data, intraoperative data, postoperative complications, pathological findings, and long-term survivals were compared between these two groups.

RESULTS

After 1:2 PSM, 32 patients in the open surgery group and 16 patients in the laparoscopic surgery group were included for further analysis. Baseline characteristics and pathological outcomes were comparable between the two groups. Statistically significant differences between the two groups were observed in intraoperative blood loss and operative time, as it were 400-800 mL vs 200-400 mL (P=0.012) and (407.97 ± 76.06) min vs (489.69 ± 79.17) min (P=0.001) in the open surgery group and laparoscopic surgery group, respectively. The R0 resection rate of the open group was 28 cases (87.5%), and the R0 resection rate of the laparoscopic group was 15 cases (93.75%). The two groups showed no significant difference in terms of surgical approach, intraoperative blood transfusion, incidence of postoperative complications, and short- and long-term efficacy (P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic radical resection of HCCA has comparable perioperative safety compared to open surgery group, as it has less bleeding and shorter operation time. Although it is a promising procedure with the improvement of surgical skills and further accumulation of experience, further investigations are warranted before its wider application.

Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry

Background: Lymph node metastasis and positive resection margins have been reported to be major determinants of overall survival (OS) and poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the prognostic value of positive lymph nodes independently from resection margin status on OS has not been evaluated. Methods: From the European Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA) registry, patients who underwent resection for pCCA between 1994 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was OS stratified for resection margin and lymph node status. The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Results: A total of 325 patients from 11 different centers and six European countries were included. Of these, 194 (59.7%) patients had negative resection margins. In 113 (34.8%) patients, positive lymph nodes were found. Lymph node status, histological grade, and ECOG performance status were independent prognostic factors for survival. The median OS for N0R0, N0R1, N+R0, and N+R1 was 38, 30, 18, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data indicate that in the presence of positive regional lymph nodes, resection margin status does not determine OS or RFS in patients with pCCA. Achieving negative margins in patients with positive nodes should not come at the expense of more extensive surgery and associated higher mortality.