Clinical effectiveness of surgical treatment after lenvatinib administration for hepatocellular carcinoma

A questionnaire survey to explore the current treatment policies adopted for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma at board-certified HPB training institutions in Japan: A JSHBPS project study 2023, Part 1

PURPOSE

To clarify the views of expert hepatobiliary surgeons on the management of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey was conducted of Japanese board-certified HPB training centers.

RESULTS

A total of 100 centers responded to the survey. For solitary large (>10 cm) lesions, 77% of the respondents selected upfront surgery, while an increasing number of respondents selected combined therapy with atezolizumab + bevacizumab as the treatment of first choice as the number of lesions increased. In regard to the treatment of patients with vascular invasion, the proportion of respondents who selected systemic therapy with the intent to "potential conversion" surgery increased according to the extent of tumor thrombosis, while only a limited number of respondents excluded these groups of patients from potential surgical indications. As for the initial treatment for extrahepatic spread, consideration of systemic conversion therapy was the most commonly selected option, while upfront surgery was frequently selected for right adrenal metastasis (50%) and solitary hilar node involvement (35%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present survey clarified the current clinical approaches for the treatment of advanced HCC at HPB training centers. Future analysis, including survival outcomes, would offer important insights into the optimal management of advanced HCC.

Prognostic factors and clinical significance of preoperative systemic therapy in patients with borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma: A JSHBPS project study 2023, Part 2

PURPOSE

To explore factors influencing the prognosis in patients with borderline-resectable hepatocellular carcinoma (BR-HCC) undergoing surgery.

METHODS

The clinical data of patients with BR-HCC according to the definition in the Expert Consensus Statement 2023 were collected from board-certified HPB training centers and analyzed in detail.

RESULTS

Data of a total of 1509 patients with BR-HCC (BR1, n = 718 and BR2, n = 791) who underwent surgery were collected. The 5-year disease-specific survival rate (DSS) and 3-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) were determined as 40.8% and 19.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified the oncological resectability category (i.e., BR2 vs. BR1) as a significant prognostic factor, and also the number of criteria fulfilled for classification into BR2 disease as being predictive of the DSS (hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI]: one factor: 1.32 [1.13-1.54]; two to three factors: 1.51 [1.15-1.96]). Preceding systemic therapy was significantly correlated with a longer DSS (HR, 0.41: 95% CI, 0.18-0.91) and RFS (HR, 0.80: 95% CI, 0.66-0.97) in the patients with BR1 disease, while its clinical significance was unclear in the patients with BR2 disease.

CONCLUSION

Multicenter data confirm the clinical relevance of the oncological resectability category and the potential advantage of preceding systemic therapy in a specific group of BR-HCC.

Differences in Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocyte Counts in the Peritumoral Area in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Resection After Lenvatinib and Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

AIM

With advances in systemic therapy, the number of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who can undergo hepatic resection has increased in recent years, but there are no reports evaluating the immune status in the peritumoral area.

METHODS

We enrolled 14 patients who underwent hepatic resection after lenvatinib (LEN, n = 7) or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV, n = 5) therapy. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), including CD3+ and CD8+ TILs, in the peritumoral area were evaluated by hematoxylin and eosin staining and immunohistochemistry.

RESULTS

The median TIL counts after LEN and ATZ/BEV therapy were 32 and 92 cells/0.237 mm2, respectively (p = 0.0044). The median CD3+ TIL counts after LEN and ATZ/BEV therapy were 26 and 71 cells/0.237 mm2, respectively (p = 0.0057). The median CD8+ TIL counts after LEN and ATZ/BEV therapy were 14 and 42 cells/0.237 mm2, respectively (p = 0.0044).

CONCLUSION

TIL counts, including those of CD3+ and CD8+ TILs, in the peritumoral area were significantly higher after ATZ/BEV than after LEN therapy.

Outcome of hepatectomy after systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: a Japanese multicenter study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

In recent years, new systemic therapies have been developed for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC treated with R0 hepatectomy after systemic therapy.

METHODS

Data from 27 patients who underwent hepatectomy for HCC after systemic therapy at six facilities were analyzed retrospectively. Cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) after hepatectomy were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves. We examined the prognostic value of the oncological criteria of resectability for HCC reported by the Japanese Expert Consensus 2023.

RESULTS

R0 resection was performed in 24 of the 27 patients. Using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, 0 patient had a complete response, 16 had a partial response, 6 had stable disease, and 2 had progressive disease. Median CSS was not evaluated, but the median RFS was 17.8 months. Patients with resectable and borderline resectable (BR) 1 cancers had a better prognosis than those with BR2 cancers. The group whose oncological criteria were improved by systemic therapy had a lower recurrence rate than the group whose oncological criteria were maintained, but no difference was observed in CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that hepatectomy after systemic therapy may improve the prognosis of HCC patients.

Advances in systemic therapy leading to conversion surgery for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Recently, a systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been developed. The regimen for unresectable HCC varies and includes single or multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or their combinations. Treatment with these agents begins with sorafenib as the first-line drug for unresectable HCC. Subsequently, several systemic therapies, including lenvatinib, ramucirumab, cabozantinib, and regorafenib have been investigated and established. With advances in systemic therapy for unresectable HCC, the prognosis of patients with unresectable HCC has improved significantly than previously. Conversion surgery, consisting of systemic therapy and surgery, showed the possibility of improving the prognosis than systemic therapy alone. Although a combination of atezolizumab and bevacizumab is mostly used for initially unresectable HCC to conduct conversion surgery because of the high response rate and fewer adverse events compared to others, many trials are being conducted to assess their efficacy for initially unresectable HCC. However, the appropriate timing of surgery and interval between systemic therapy and surgery remain controversial. To address these issues, a multidisciplinary team can play a vital role in determining the strategies for treating unresectable HCC. This review describes previous and current trends in the treatment of HCC, with a particular focus on conversion surgery for initially unresectable HCC.

Oncological Resectability Criteria for Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Era of Novel Systemic Therapies: The Japan Liver Cancer Association and Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Expert Consensus Statement 2023

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have led to debates about the feasibility of combination therapies, such as systemic therapy combined with surgery or transarterial chemoembolization, for patients with advanced HCC. However, a lack of consensus on the oncological resectability criteria has hindered discussions of "conversion therapy" and the optimal management in patients with HCC. To address this issue, the Japan Liver Cancer Association (JLCA) and the Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery (JSHBPS) established a working group and discussed the concept of borderline resectable HCC. Herein, we present a consensus statement from this expert panel on the resectability criteria for HCC from the oncological standpoint under the assumption of technically and liver-functionally resectable situations. The criteria for oncological resectability in HCC are classified into three grades: resectable, representing an oncological status for which surgery alone may be expected to offer clearly better survival outcomes as compared with other treatments; borderline resectable 1, representing an oncological status for which surgical intervention as a part of multidisciplinary treatment may be expected to offer survival benefit; and borderline resectable 2, representing an oncological status for which the efficacy of surgery is uncertain and the indication for surgery should be determined carefully under the standard multidisciplinary treatment. These criteria aim to provide a common language for discussing and analyzing the treatment strategies for advanced HCC. It is also expected that these criteria will be optimized, modified, and updated based on further advancements in systemic therapies and future validation studies.

Clinical Utility of the Novel Oncological Criteria of Resectability for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Introduction of new systemic therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has led to the development of new oncological criteria of resectability for the resectability of HCC. This study was aimed at validating the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of the resectability classification based on the novel criteria in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

This study was conducted in 1,822 patients who had undergone curative resection for HCC (population 1) and 107 patients with unresectable disease who had received lenvatinib therapy (population 2). Patients were classified into three groups according to the novel oncological criteria for resectability (R, resectable; BR1, borderline resectable 1; and BR2, borderline resectable 2), and the prognosticating ability and clinical utility of this classification based on the novel criteria were examined.

RESULTS

Multivariate analysis confirmed that classification of the patients according to the oncological resectability criteria was significantly correlated with the overall survival (OS) (BR1: hazard ratio [HR], 1.88; 95% CI, 1.38-2.55; BR2: HR, 4.12; 95% CI, 3.01-5.65) and recurrence-free survival (BR1: HR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.44-2.41; BR2: HR, 3.62; 95% CI, 2.71-4.82) in population 1. In population 2, the resectability classification was correlated with the rates of successful additional intervention (surgery, transarterial chemoembolization, or radiotherapy) (BR1 65.7% vs. BR2 42.3%, p = 0.023) and curative-intent conversion surgery (BR1 17.1% vs. BR2 4.2%, p = 0.056) after lenvatinib therapy, and was also predictive of the OS (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.13-3.38 for BR2 [vs. BR1]) and time-to-treatment failure (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.04-3.17 for BR2 [vs. BR1]).

CONCLUSION

The resectability classification based on the novel oncological criteria for resectability showed acceptable prognosticating ability in both surgically and medically treated populations with advanced HCC.

Systemic conversion therapies for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Systemic conversion therapy provides patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) the chance to salvage radical liver resection and superior survival outcomes, but the optimal conversion strategy is unclear.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library between 2007 and 2024 focusing on studies reporting conversion therapy for HCC. The treatment groups were divided into Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), TKI plus loco-regional therapy (LRT), TKI plus anti-PD-1 therapy (TKI + PD-1), TKI + PD-1 + LRT, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) plus LRT, and Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + T) groups. The conversion to surgery rate (CSR), objective response rate (ORR), grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events (AEs), overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were analyzed.

RESULTS

38 studies and 4,042 patients were included. The pooled CSR were 8% (95% CI, 5-12%) in TKI group, 13% (95% CI, 8-19%) in TKI + LRT group, 28% (95% CI, 19-37%) in TKI + PD-1 group, 33% (95% CI, 25-41%) in TKI + PD-1 + LRT group, 23% (95% CI, 1-46%) in ICI + LRT group, and 5% (95% CI, 3-8%) in A + T group, respectively. The pooled HR for OS (0.45, 95% CI, 0.35-0.60) and PFS (0.49, 95% CI, 0.35-0.70) favored survival benefit of conversion surgery. Subgroup analysis revealed that lenvatinib + PD-1 + LRT conferred higher CSR of 35% (95% CI, 26-44%) and increased ORR of 70% (95% CI, 56-83%).

CONCLUSIONS

The current study indicates that TKI + PD-1 + LRT, especially lenvatinib + PD-1 + LRT, may be the superior conversion therapy with a manageable safety profile for patients with initially unresectable HCC. The successful conversion therapy favors the superior OS and PFS compared with systemic treatment alone.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

International prospective register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) (registration code: CRD 42024495289).

A patient alive without disease 32 months after conversion surgery following lenvatinib treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma with a tumor thrombus originating in the middle hepatic vein and reaching the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava: a case report

Conversion surgery for initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma appears to be increasing in incidence since the advent of new molecular target drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors; however, reports on long-term outcomes are limited and the prognostic relevance of this treatment strategy remains unclear. Herein, we report the case of a 75-year-old man with hepatocellular carcinoma, 108 mm in diameter, accompanied by a tumor thrombus in the middle hepatic vein that extended to the right atrium via the suprahepatic vena cava. He underwent conversion surgery after preceding lenvatinib treatment and is alive without disease 51 months after the commencement of treatment and 32 months after surgery. Just before conversion surgery, after 19 months of lenvatinib treatment, the main tumor had reduced in size to 72 mm in diameter, the tip of the tumor thrombus had receded back to the suprahepatic vena cava, and the tumor thrombus vascularity was markedly reduced. The operative procedure was an extended left hepatectomy with concomitant middle hepatic vein resection. The tumor thrombus was removed under total vascular exclusion via incision of the root of the middle hepatic vein. Histopathological examination revealed that more than half of the liver tumor and the tumor thrombus were necrotic.

Noninvasive Visualization of Tumor Blood Vessels within Hepatocellular Carcinoma by Application of Superb Microvascular Imaging to Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography

The combination or sequential use of systemic therapies, such as lenvatinib and locoregional therapies, can improve the curability rate of hepatocellular carcinoma. This is based on the notion that lenvatinib remodels abnormal tumor vessels into normal vessels, potentially enhancing the efficacy of locoregional therapies. In this case report, we achieved noninvasive visualization of tumor blood vessels by applying superb microvascular imaging (SMI) to contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS). A man in his 80s with a borderline resectable hepatocellular carcinoma received preoperative therapy using lenvatinib. The patient achieved a complete response after lenvatinib therapy, underwent hepatectomy, and maintained a cancer-free status. CEUS and SMI revealed a decrease in tumor blood vessels at 1 week after lenvatinib administration and a decrease in tumor perfusion at 2 weeks. Although CEUS alone is adequate for noninvasive real-time evaluation of tumor perfusion, it is not sufficient to achieve accurate assessments of tumor blood vessels. We performed a noninvasive time-course evaluation of vascular normalization after lenvatinib administration by applying SMI. The evaluation of vascular normalization with lenvatinib therapy using CEUS and SMI can support the decision to proceed to conversion therapies.

Questionnaire survey of Japanese board-certified expert hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgeons and instructors on the surgical indications for hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Recent advancements in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) necessitate the establishment of resectability criteria for advanced HCC.

METHODS

A questionnaire survey sought to clarify the perspectives of Japanese expert hepatobiliary surgeons regarding surgical indications for HCC. Thirty-one questions were used to determine when surgery is strongly recommended (resectable: R) or not recommended (unresectable: UR).

RESULTS

A total of 351 responses were obtained. While 64.7% of the respondents considered solitary tumors as being R, irrespective of size, opinions diverged on the upper limit of the number of tumors/tumor size for R: (1) up to three nodules with no size limit (27.9%), (2) up to three nodules ≤5 cm in diameter each (21.4%) and (3) up to three nodules ≤3 cm in diameter each (19.4%). Vp1, Vp2, Vp3, and Vp4 were considered as being R by 90.9%, 70.7%, 39.0%, and 8.0% of respondents, respectively. Half of the respondents indicated they would consider resection even for cases with extrahepatic spread under limited conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

The current views of Japanese expert surgeons on the resectability criteria for HCC were clarified for the first time. The findings could serve as a basis for preparing expert consensus statements on the resectability criteria for HCC.

Curative surgery for multiple hepatocellular carcinomas after lenvatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization: a case report

Surgical therapy following lenvatinib (LEN) plus transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is a useful therapeutic option for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). A 66-year-old man with a history of hepatitis C was detected four masses in the caudate lobe and segment 6/7 of the liver, with a maximum lesion diameter of 14 cm by computed tomography. The patient was diagnosed with intermediate-stage HCC and received LEN plus TACE. After resuming LEN for 8 weeks, computed tomography showed weakened stained areas of the tumors, and no new lesions. Thus, the patient was evaluated as having a partial response in the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. The patient underwent hepatic caudate lobectomy, partial hepatectomy of S6/7, and S6 microwave coagulation therapy for radical resection. The patient is currently alive and recurrence-free at 12 months postoperatively. In patients with multiple HCC lesions, hepatic resection combined with local therapy might be an effective treatment option.