An evidence-based treatment algorithm for anal fissure

Surgeons' practice and preferences for the anal fissure treatment: results from an international survey

The best nonoperative or operative anal fissure (AF) treatment is not yet established, and several options have been proposed. Aim is to report the surgeons' practice for the AF treatment. Thirty-four multiple-choice questions were developed. Seven questions were about to participants' demographics and, 27 questions about their clinical practice. Based on the specialty (general surgeon and colorectal surgeon), obtained data were divided and compared between two groups. Five-hundred surgeons were included (321 general and 179 colorectal surgeons). For both groups, duration of symptoms for at least 6 weeks is the most important factor for AF diagnosis (30.6%). Type of AF (acute vs chronic) is the most important factor which guide the therapeutic plan (44.4%). The first treatment of choice for acute AF is ointment application for both groups (59.6%). For the treatment of chronic AF, this data is confirmed by colorectal surgeons (57%), but not by the general surgeons who prefer the lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) (31.8%) (p = 0.0001). Botulin toxin injection is most performed by colorectal surgeons (58.7%) in comparison to general surgeons (20.9%) (p = 0.0001). Anal flap is mostly performed by colorectal surgeons (37.4%) in comparison to general surgeons (28.3%) (p = 0.0001). Fissurectomy alone is statistically significantly most performed by general surgeons in comparison to colorectal surgeons (57.9% and 43.6%, respectively) (p = 0.0020). This analysis provides useful information about the clinical practice for the management of a debated topic such as AF treatment. Shared guidelines and consensus especially focused on operative management are required to standardize the treatment and to improve postoperative results.

The comparison between the medical and the surgical management of chronic anal fissures

Introduction. Anal fissures can be defined as a tear or a break in the anoderm. Acute fissures do not exceed a 6 week-duration and can be seen as a simple tear in the anoderm along with edema, whereas chronic fissures are longer than 6 weeks. Aim. To compare the efficacy of the medical and surgical options for the treatment of chronic anal fissures and to recommend the appropriate option in terms of their symptomatic relief, healing of fissures and long-term effectiveness. Materials & Methods. A prospective observational study was conducted for a period of 2 years, that is, from October 2018 to October 2020, including a follow-up period of 2 months. A total of 72 patients with chronic anal fissures were included in the study and randomized into two groups, represented by the medical management group and the surgical management group (Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy (LIS)). Results. In the case of the 36 patients with CAF (chronic anal fissure) who underwent surgical management, all 36 (100%) patients had optimal healing of the fissure at 6 weeks. In the case of the 36 patients with CAF who underwent medical management, only 32 (89%) patients had optimal healing of the fissure at 6 weeks, whereas 4 patients failed to heal even after 2 months. Conclusions. Surgical management is the preferable method for chronic anal fissures in comparison to medical management. But the medical management has a role in acting as a bridge to surgical management in patients who are not fit for surgery or do not perceive surgery as an option at the time.

Treatment of anal fissure: a survey of surgical practice in Australia and New Zealand

AIM

The aim was to determine whether or not the clinical management of anal fissure in Australia and New Zealand accords with published guidelines.

METHODS

A comprehensive survey based on common clinical scenarios was distributed to 206 colorectal surgeons in Australia and New Zealand.

RESULTS

The response rate was 44% (91 surgeons). For 19 topic areas, only seven (37%) reached consensus (defined as > 70% majority opinion). Of these, six (86%) agreed with guideline recommendations. Twelve (63%) topic areas demonstrated community equipoise (defined as less than or equal to 70% majority opinion), of which five (42%) agreed with guideline recommendations and seven (58%) disagreed with guidelines. Of the seven topics that disagreed with guidelines, three were based on moderate quality evidence (first line management of acute anal fissure in a young patient, fissure healing and faecal incontinence rates following anocutaneous flap) and four were based on low quality evidence (length of sphincter division during a lateral sphincterotomy in women, management of chronic low-pressure anal fissures postpartum, fissure healing rate following anoplasty with botulinum toxin or sphincterotomy and faecal incontinence rates following repeat sphincterotomy for recurrence). Consensus and/or agreement with guidelines were more prevalent in management when medical therapy failed.

CONCLUSION

While areas of consensus mostly agreed with guideline recommendations, there remain many areas of community equipoise which warrant further research.

Treatment algorithm for anal fissure. Consensus document of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology and the Coloproctology Division of the Spanish Association of Surgeons

The Spanish Association of Coloproctology and the Coloproctology Division of the Spanish Association of Surgeons propose this consensus document with a treatment algorithm for anal fissure that could be used for decision making. Non-surgical therapy and surgical treatment of anal fissure are explained, and the recommended algorithm is provided. The methodology used was: creation of a group of experts; search in PubMed, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library for publications from the last 10 years about anal fissure; presentation at the 21st National Meeting of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology Foundation 2017 with voting for/against each conclusion by the attendees and review by the scientific committee of the Spanish Association of Coloproctology.

Are we following an algorithm for managing chronic anal fissure? A completed audit cycle

BACKGROUND

Anal fissure is one of the commonest proctological diseases with considerable national variation in sequential treatment. We aimed to audit our compliance of chronic anal fissure (CAF) management with national guidance provided by the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI).

METHODS

We retrospectively audited patients presenting to outpatient clinics with CAF over a 6-month period. Using electronic patient records, notes and clinic letters, we compared their management with ACPGBI algorithm. A prospective re-audit was then performed.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included in the analysis (59% male). Sixty-eight percent (n = 28/41) of patients were appropriately started on conservative dietary therapy, of whom only 7.1% (n = 2/28) had treatment success. Eighty-nine percent (n = 25/28) were then appropriately treated with either topical diltiazem 2% or GTN 0.4%. Overall, 43.9% (n = 18/41) of all patients' entire management strategy adhered to the ACPGBI guidelines. In total, 48.8% (n = 20/41) patients had surgical treatment (excluding Botox), of which only 15% (n = 3/20) had undergone ACPGBI-compliant management. After local dissemination of results and education, the re-audit of 20 patients showed significant improvement in adherence to the guidelines (43.9% vs. 95%; P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Topical creams were the most successful treatments (50%; n = 9/18) in ACPGBI-compliant strategies. Importantly, these data suggests that compliance with the ACPGBI algorithm leads to healing without surgery in 83.3% (n = 15/18) of patients, compared to 26.1% (n = 6/23) with non-compliant methods (P = 0.0004). This highlights the benefit of early conservative and medical management of CAF, before attempting surgery.

A Double-Blind Randomized Trial Comparing the Effectiveness and Safety of Nifedipine and Isosorbide Dinitrate in Chronic Anal Fissure

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure is a common disease that is accompanied with pain and bleeding during defecation. Various surgical and non-surgical methods have been offered for the treatment of this condition. The aim of this randomised clinical study was to compare the effectiveness and safety of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in the treatment of chronic anal fissure.

METHODS

This double-blind clinical trial study was performed on patients aged 20 to 60 years old in 2012 to 2013. The samples with a primary diagnosis of chronic anal fissure were enrolled from the patients admitted to public treatment at the educational Imam Ali Clinic, Shahrekord, Iran by researchers and general surgery specialists. The patients were randomised into two groups: nifedipine 0.3% (n = 35) or ISDN 0.2% (n = 35) applied three times a day for three weeks. The patients were examined on the 7th, 14th, and 21st days of treatment, and the symptoms including bleeding, pain, and healing status, as well as the side effects of the drugs, were assessed. Pain was evaluated using a visual analogue scale (VAS).

RESULTS

After 21 days of follow-up, complete healing was achieved in 77.1% (n = 27) of patients in the nifedipine group and 51.4% (n = 18) in the ISDN group (P = 0.05). The mean VAS of the pain on day 21 was 0.91 (SD 0.01) in the ISDN group and 0.45±0.78 in the nifedipine group, with a statistically significant difference (P = 0.038). The bleeding was similar in the two groups (P = 0.498).

CONCLUSION

In view of the findings on healing status and pain in the patients, nifedipine may be significantly more effective in the treatment of chronic anal fissure than ISDN.

The effects of topical application of metronidazole for treatment of chronic anal fissure: A randomized, controlled pilot study

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissures (CAFs) rarely heal with conservative management. Because they are associated with strong anal sphincter tone, most treatment aim to reduce anal pressure. Although infections can cause fissures, as can traumatic injury to the anal canal, antimicrobial treatment is not recommended. In a previous study, we reported identifying a wide spectrum of pathogenic microorganisms in the bases of CAFs, anaerobic bacteria being present in half the cases. We postulated that microbial colonization delays healing of CAF and aimed to determine whether decreasing the bacterial load with topical antibacterial treatment accelerates fissure healing.

METHODS

We cultured fecal samples and swabs from the bases of CAFs in 103 patients. Patients in whose samples anaerobic bacteria were identified (47 patients) were then invited to participate in a prospective randomized clinical trial comparing topical metronidazole with conventional treatment. The primary endpoint was fissure healing confirmed on anoscopy. Secondary endpoints of maximum pain on defecation assessed by visual analog scale, maximum anal resting pressure, and rectal pH were recorded on entry and at 10, 21, and 28 days.

RESULTS

The CAFs were colonized by mixtures of gram-positive/gram-negative anaerobic bacteria or gram-negative aerobic monocultures. Patients with anaerobic bacteria in their swabs who received topical metronidazole treatment experienced rapid relief of pain and anal sphincter spasm along with enhanced fissure healing (95.6 % healing rate compared with 70.8 % in the control group, p = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

Topical antimicrobial treatment can be effective in patients with CAF provided the relevant microorganisms are correctly identified.

Treatment Algorithm for Chronic Anal Fissure – A Review of Literature and it’s Apply in University Clinical Center Mother Teresa – Skopje

Chronic anal fissure is one of the most frequent anorectal disorders. Symptoms vary but typically include bright red rectal bleeding, itching and discomfort or pain during and after defecation. Treatment has undergone a transformation in recent years from surgical to medical, all approaches sharing the goal of reducing the spasm.According to the researched treatment guidelines and the experience at the “University Clinical Center Mother Teresa” (Clinic of Gastroenterohepatology and Clinic of Abdominal Surgery) in Skopje, Macedonia, we propose the following algorithm for treatment of chronic anal fissure in three steps: from topical  nifedipine + lidocaine cream (first-line) to second course of nifedipine + lidocaine cream or digital anal dilatation or botulinum toxin type A injection (second-line) to lateral internal sphincterotomy (third-line).The proposed treatment algorithm allows patients to start with the least invasive treatment. There is no doubt that patients are willing to try less invasive modalities with the hope of avoiding surgery, with its risk of permanent disability. It should be up to the patients to decide which treatment they prefer. Although chemical sphincterotomy is less successful from lateral internal sphincterotomy, the algorithm allows feasibility, efficacy and cost-effectiveness, as well as risk reduction for surgical morbidity.

Choice of treatments for anal fissure

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is one of the most common and painful proctologic diseases. Its treatment has long been discussed and several different therapeutic options have been proposed. The understanding of its pathophysiology has led to a progressive reduction of invasive and potentially invalidating treatments in favor of conservative treatment. Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is a surgical treatment that is considered the 'gold standard' therapy for CAF. It relieves CAF symptoms with a high rate of healing. The risk of incontinence after this procedure seems to be severe. Chemical sphincterotomy (CS) is safe, with the rapid relief of pain, no risk of surgery or anesthesia, but is a statistically less effective therapy for CAF than LIS. In recent years, fissurectomy coupled with CS has been demonstrated to be a satisfactory treatment for chronic anal fissure and an alternative to lateral sphincterotomy when conservative measures fail.

Effect of chronic anal fissure components on isosorbide dinitrate treatment

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissure is diagnosed in the presence of persistent symptoms: The classic triad includes a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers, hypertrophied anal papilla, and a sentinel skin tag. Thus, chronic anal fissure can be divided into three components: the fissure itself; hypertrophied anal papilla; the sentinel skin tag. Not every chronic anal fissure has all three components; some have two components, and others present with only a persistent fissure. The success rate of medical treatment for chronic anal fissure is reported as 42-86 %. In this study, we intended to observe the effect of said components on healing with isosorbide dinitrate treatment.

METHODS

A total of 105 patients with chronic anal fissures were admitted and were divided into three groups. Patients in group I had a single component (only the fissure with a linear mucosal tear exposing the internal sphincter fibers); group II had two components (skin tag or hypertrophied papilla in addition to the fissure); group III had all three components (fissure, skin tag, hypertrophied papilla). Isosorbide dinitrate 0.25 % was applied three times a day.

RESULTS

The success rates in the study groups were 93, 74, and 64 %, respectively. The success rate was significantly higher for group I than for groups II and III.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic anal fissure components should be considered when evaluating the success rates of studies reporting the results of various medical treatments. The number of components seems to be an important factor that affects the results of isosorbide dinitrate treatment.

The management of patients with primary chronic anal fissure: a position paper

Anal fissure is one of the most common and painful proctologic diseases. Its treatment has long been discussed and several different therapeutic options have been proposed. In the last decades, the understanding of its pathophysiology has led to a progressive reduction of invasive and potentially invalidating treatments in favor of conservative treatment based on anal sphincter muscle relaxation. Despite some systematic reviews and an American position statement, there is ongoing debate about the best treatment for anal fissure. This review is aimed at identifying the best treatment option drawing on evidence-based medicine and on the expert advice of 6 colorectal surgeons with extensive experience in this field in order to produce an Italian position statement for anal fissures. While there is little chance of a cure with conservative behavioral therapy, medical treatment with calcium channel blockers, diltiazem and nifepidine or glyceryl trinitrate, had a considerable success rate ranging from 50 to 90%. Use of 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate in standardized fashion seems to have the best results despite a higher percentage of headache, while the use of botulinum toxin had inconsistent results. Nonresponding patients should undergo lateral internal sphincterotomy. The risk of incontinence after this procedure seems to have been overemphasized in the past. Only a carefully selected group of patients, without anal hypertonia, could benefit from anoplasty.

Continence disorders after anal surgery--a relevant problem?

SUBJECT

Anal incontinence is a well-known and feared complication following surgery involving the anal sphincter, particularly if partial transection of the sphincter is part of the surgical procedure.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed to evaluate the risk of postoperative incontinence following anal dilatation, lateral sphincterotomy, surgery for haemorrhoidal disease and anal fistula.

RESULTS

Various degrees of anal incontinence are reported with frequencies as follows: anal dilatation 0-50%, lateral sphincterotomy 0-45%, haemorrhoidal surgery 0-28%, lay open technique of anal fistula 0-64% and plastic repair of fistula 0-43%. Results vary considerably depending on what definition of "incontinence" was applied. The most important risk factors for postoperative incontinence are female sex, advanced age, previous anorectal interventions, childbirth and type of anal surgery (sphincter division). Sphincter lesions have been reported following procedures as minimal as exploration of the anal canal via speculum.

CONCLUSIONS

Continence disorders after anal surgery are not uncommon and the result of the additive effect of various factors. Certain risk factors should be considered before choosing the operative procedure. Since options for surgical repair of postoperative incontinence disorders are limited, careful indications and minimal trauma to the anal sphincter are mandatory in anal surgery.

A review of chronic anal fissure management

Anal fissure management has rapidly progressed in the last 15 years as our understanding of fissure pathophysiology has developed. All methods of treatment aim to reduce the anal sphincter spasm associated with chronic anal fissures. Surgical techniques have been used for over 100 years with success. Lateral internal sphincterotomy remains the surgical treatment of choice for many practitioners. Postoperative impairment of continence remains controversial. Recently, less invasive methods of treatment have been explored. Topical nitrates, calcium channel blockers and botulinum toxin are established treatments. These and other non-surgical treatments are described in this review. Various guidelines and treatment algorithms for anal fissure are also discussed.

La respuesta inicial al diltiazem tópico puede predecir la evolución de la fisura anal crónica

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years, the medical treatment of chronic anal fissure (chemical sphincterotomy) has been introduced as a consequence of the morbidity attributed to surgical sphincterotomy. However, medical treatment has two disadvantages: moderate effectiveness (between 30% and 80%) and the need for treatment to be prolonged for more than 8 weeks.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate initial response to topical diltiazem 2% topical gel as a predictive factor in the curability of chronic anal fissure.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

From February 2004 to December 200, all patients with a history of anal fissure of more than 6 weeks were included in this study. Pregnant patients and those with prior anal surgery, inflammatory bowel disease, diltiazem intolerance and problems for maintaining contact during follow-up were excluded. A magistral formula of diltiazem 2% gel was used in three applications daily for 8 weeks. Patients were followed-up clinically and pain was measured through a visual analog scale (VAS) at the end of weeks 1, 3, 6, and 8. Groups with and without response to diliazem were compared through the chi2 test, Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test. A Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of initial pain response to diliazem, as well as sensitivity, specificity and predictive values.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (70 men), with a mean age of 43 years (22-76) were analyzed. Localization was posterior in 87%, anterior in 11% and lateral in 2%. All patients had pain, 65 had bleeding, and 13 had pruritus. At the end of the 8-week treatment, cure was achieved in 62%, with morbidity of 5% (mild headache in 2%, and pruritus in 3%). No significant differences were found between the groups with and without response to diltiazem 2% in terms of age, sex, localization, bleeding, or pruritus. Notable differences were found in the VAS for pain at the end of weeks 1, 3, 6, and 8 between the two groups (p = 0.00). ROC curves established a cut-off point of 4 in the VAS at the end of week 1, with an area below the curve of 0.925 (95% CI, 0.858-0.989). The capacity of early response to diliazem to predict curability showed a sensitivity of 85.5% (95% CI, 74.7%-92.2%), a specificity of 92.1% (95% CI, 79.2%-97.3%), a positive predictive value of 94.6% (95% CI, 85.4%-98.2%), and a negative predictive value of 79.5% (95% CI, 65.5%-88.8%). Among patients who showed no response to diltiazem by the end of week 1, cure was achieved in only 9% at 8 weeks. In contrast, among those with a favorable response in the first week, cure was achieved in 94.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Lack of response to topical diltiazem 2% gel at the end of the first week reliably predicts failure of medical treatment for chronic anal fissure, obviating the need to prolong treatment for 8 weeks.