Ligation under vision of haemorrhoidal cushions for therapy of bleeding haemorrhoids

Comparison of two procedures for symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease: Ligation under Vision and Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy - a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To compare Ligation under Vision (LUV) with Ferguson Hemorrhoidectomy (FH) in patients with Grade II, III and IV hemorrhoidal diseases according to their postoperative outcomes.

METHODS

Between July 2008 and August 2014, 155 patients underwent FH and 120 patients LUV, in Sakarya University Teaching and Research Hospital. Our retrospective analysis focuses on postoperative complications, postoperative pain and rate of recurrence. In LUV procedure, submucosal tissue of the hemorrhoidal pile base was transfixed using absorbable sutures under direct vision through anoscope in the Jackknife position.

RESULTS

In a mean postoperative follow-up period of 51.76+/-22.3 months; ectropion, anal fissure, and anal incontinence were the most frequent complications. The overall complication rate was significantly less after LUV than FH, (6.7% vs. 14.2%, P=0.047). The complication rate and need for a second or third surgery did not significantly differ between the two procedures with the increase in affected quadrants (P>0.05). The visual analog scale (VAS) at 24 hours was similar in both groups (P=0.267).

CONCLUSIONS

LUV is a safe, and practical procedure with similar outcomes compared to FH. LUV may be a better choice than excisional hemorrhoidectomies when three or four quadrants of the anal canal are involved with hemorrhoids as this reduces mucosal defect related possible complications such as ectropion and anal stenosis.

Ligation under vision in the management of symptomatic hemorrhoids: A preliminary experience

AIM

To evaluate the surgical outcomes of 47 patients who underwent hemorrhoidal arterial ligation under vision (LUV) for symptomatic Grade II and Grade III hemorrhoids.

METHODS

A total of 47 patients who underwent LUV between May 2005 and February 2009 were analyzed retrospectively. The patients were evaluated with regard to demographic data, grade of the disease, symptoms, medical and/or surgical treatment previously received, operation time, pain scores, analgesic requirement, length of hospital stay, and complications related to the procedure.

RESULTS

The study population (n = 47) included 31 (65.9%) men and 16 (34.1%) women with a median age of 37.4 ± 11.7 (range, 19-63) years. Of these 47 patients, 18 (38.3%) patients had Grade II hemorrhoidal disease (HD) and 29 (61.7%) patients had Grade III HD. On average, six ligatures (range, 3-8) were used. The mean operation time was 27 ± 4.8 (range, 15-35) minutes. No major complication that required surgical intervention occurred in the early postoperative period for any of the patients except for two patients with rectal submucosal hematoma. The mean hospital stay was 1.2 ± 0.65 (range, 1-4) days. The median follow-up period was 21.5 ± 7.7 (range, 12-44) months. At the last follow-up, 38 (80.8%) patients remained asymptomatic; two (4.2%) patients with Grade II HD and four (8.5%) patients with Grade III HD were still suffering from bleeding but with a reduction in the frequency; prolapsed hemorrhoids were detected only in three (6.3%) patients.

CONCLUSION

LUV is a safe and easily applied alternative technique with low postoperative complications for the surgical treatment of symptomatic Grade II and III HD.

Ligation anopexy versus hemorrhoidectomy in the treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to compare ligation anopexy (LA) and conventional hemorrhoidectomy (CH) in treatment of second- and third-degree hemorrhoids.

METHODS

A prospective controlled randomized clinical trial included 100 patients who underwent CH (CH group) and 100 patients who underwent LA (LA group). A detailed history was taken from all the patients. The effectiveness, safety, postoperative complications, operative time, length of hospital stay, time until first bowel movement, time until return to work, and postoperative pain score were assessed.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between groups regarding age, sex, and preoperative symptoms. The LA group had significantly shorter operative times, earlier first bowel movement, and an earlier return to work/activities. The postoperative pain score in the LA group was significantly lower than that in the CH group on days 1, 3, 7, and 14 after surgery. There was no significant difference between groups as regards postoperative complications.

CONCLUSIONS

LA is safe, and as effective as CH in the treatment of grade II and grade III hemorrhoids, with shorter operative times, earlier mobilization, and lower postoperative pain scores.

[Operations for hemorrhoids: indications and techniques]

Haemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common diseases in general and will in most cases progress without therapy. In the therapeutic context the means of choice are conservative therapies and in the advanced stage of the disease operative measures are necessary. In Germany 40,000-50,000 operations are performed each year. Our aim with the currently available various operation techniques is individualized therapy and indications. Thus a high healing rate, low complication rate and high patient satisfaction can be achieved.

Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation does not offer any advantage over suture ligation of grade 3 symptomatic hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

Doppler-guided ligation of hemorrhoidal vessels is being proposed as a treatment of grade 2 and 3 hemorrhoids. Many researchers are coupling this procedure with mucopexy or lifting of hemorrhoids to control the prolapse more effectively. The present study was conducted in patients with 3rd-degree hemorrhoids to determine the usefulness of Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation compared to mucopexy of prolapsing hemorrhoids and to compare it with mere mucopexy of the hemorrhoids.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A double-blind, randomized controlled study was conducted on 48 consecutive patients with grade III hemorrhoids requiring surgery. The patients were randomized into two groups. Half of them were treated with ligation and mucopexy [SL], while the remaining patients underwent a Doppler-guided hemorrhoidal artery ligation followed by ligation and mucopexy [DSL]. The patients were examined by a blinded independent observer at 2, 4, and 6 weeks and at the end of 1 year after the operation to evaluate postoperative pain scores, amount of analgesics consumed, and complications encountered. The observer also assessed recurrence of hemorrhoids after 1 year.

RESULTS

Operative time was significantly longer in the DSL group (31 min vs. 9 min P < 0.003). The postoperative pain score was significantly higher in the Doppler group [4.4 vs. 2.2, P < 0.002 (visual analogue scale)]. The mean total analgesic dose and duration of pain control using analgesics were greater and longer for the Doppler group than for the SL group (17 vs. 11 tablets, and 13 days vs. 9 days, respectively; P < 0. 01). Complications were similar in both the groups. At 1-year follow-up, the recurrence of hemorrhoids was not statistically significant in either group (4 patients in SL group and 3 patients in DSL group; P < 0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

Suture ligation of hemorrhoids is a simple, cost-effective, and convenient modality for treating grade 3 hemorrhoids. Doppler assistance in ligating the hemorrhoidal vessels prior to hemorrhoidal mucopexy offers no advantage and is a time-consuming procedure.

Radiowave ablation and mucopexy for prolapsing hemorrhoids--a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

The author proposes a technique of radiowave ablation and mucopexy of hemorrhoids for patients having symptomatic and prolapsing hemorrhoids and enumerates the events in such patients over 10 years.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

From May 1997 through December 2007, 3148 patients were included in the study. The hemorrhoids were ablated using radiowaves through a Ellman radiowave generator and were followed by suture ligation with absorbable suture material under vision. Operating time, postoperative complications, time to return to work, and outcome of the procedure were analyzed.

RESULTS

The mean procedure time was 8+/-0 min (range, 5-14 min). The mean total analgesic dose and duration of pain control using analgesics was 17+/-5 tablets, and 10+/-4 days respectively. The mean period of incapacity for work was 6 days [range 4-17 days]. Complications were identified in 4.8% patients. The postoperative follow-up after 4 weeks revealed therapeutic success in 3013 patients (95.7%), who presented with hemorrhoidal bleeding. Prolapse was no longer observed in 3085 (98%) of patients and 3022 (96%) patients experienced no pain after defecation. Up to December 2006, a total of 2897 patients were treated with this method. 2246 patients responded to our inquiry conducted at the beginning of 2008. Ninety-six percent of these patients confirmed that they no longer experienced any bleeding or pain during defecation and ninety-two percent patients did not had any prolapse.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that radiowave ablation followed by suture ligation of hemorrhoids is a simple, cost effective and convenient modality in treating prolapsing hemorrhoids.

Randomized controlled study between suture ligation and radio wave ablation and suture ligation of grade III symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease

PURPOSE

Suture ligation is a simple method to curb the hemorrhoids. The present study was conducted to determine the usefulness of suture ligation in third-degree hemorrhoids and to compare it with author's procedure of suture ligation coupled with hemorrhoidal ablation through radiowave.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and twenty-four consecutive patients with grade III hemorrhoids requiring surgery were randomized into two groups. Half of them were treated by suture ligation, while the remaining patients underwent a radiowave ablation of hemorrhoids using a Ellman radiowave generator followed by suture ligation. A blinded observer evaluated postoperative pain scores, amount of analgesics consumed, and complications encountered. He also assessed recurrence of hemorrhoids after 1 year.

RESULTS

The postoperative pain score was significantly higher in the suture ligation group (3.4+/-0.2 vs. 2.2+/-0.1, p<0.005). The mean total analgesic dose and duration of pain control using analgesics were greater and longer for suture ligation group than radiowave group (29+/-4 vs. 23+/-3 tablets, and 15+/-3 days vs. 12+/-4 days, respectively; p<0.001). Complications were seen more frequently in radiowave group (22% vs.18%). At 1 year follow-up, the recurrence of hemorrhoids was more significant with the suture ligation group (five patients vs. one patient, p<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Suture ligation of hemorrhoids is a simple, cost-effective, and a convenient modality in treating third-degree hemorrhoids. The efficacy and postoperative comfort is further enhanced if the hemorrhoids are ablated with radiowave prior to ligating them.