NOTES/NOSE/NOSCAR/LATAS: what does it all mean?

Long-term Oncologic Outcomes of Laparoscopic Anterior Resections for Cancer with Natural Orifice Versus Conventional Specimen Extraction: A Case-Control Study

BACKGROUND

Although the short-term advantages of natural orifice specimen extraction are widely recognized, controversy exists concerning oncologic safety after laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the impact of natural orifice specimen extraction on local recurrence and long-term survival of patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

DESIGN

This is a propensity score-matched comparative study.

SETTING

This study presents a single-center experience.

PATIENTS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of patients who underwent curative laparoscopic anterior resection for American Joint Committee on Cancer stage I to III sigmoid or upper rectal cancer in 2011 to 2014, based on prospectively collected data.

INTERVENTIONS

Oncologic outcomes were compared between patients undergoing natural orifice or conventional specimen extraction by minilaparotomy. Patients were matched 1:1 according to propensity scores calculated by logistic regression analysis with the following covariates: American Joint Committee on Cancer stage, tumor diameter, age, sex, BMI, and T stage. Cox proportional hazards regression analysis was performed to determine the impact on oncologic outcome.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcomes measured were local recurrence and disease-free survival rates at 5 years.

RESULTS

Of 392 eligible patients, 188 were matched (94 undergoing natural orifice specimen extraction and 94 undergoing conventional extraction by minilaparotomy). Median follow-up was 50.3 months. The cumulative local recurrence risk at 5 years was 2.3% and 3.5% (p = 0.632), whereas 5-year disease-free survival for all tumor stages combined was 87.3% and 82.0% (p = 0.383) in laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction and conventional extraction groups. T3 and T4 stages were the only variables independently associated with disease-free survival.

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited because it focused on a single center, was a retrospective analysis, contained no long-term anorectal function testing, and had a small sample size.

CONCLUSION

Long-term oncologic outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic anterior resection with natural orifice specimen extraction for sigmoid and upper rectal cancer do not differ from those undergoing conventional extraction. Thus, natural orifice specimen extraction could be a viable alternative to reduce abdominal wall insult in laparoscopic colorectal operations for malignancy in selected patients. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B241. RESULTADOS ONCOLÓGICOS A LARGO PLAZO DE RESECCIONES ANTERIORES LAPAROSCÓPICAS PARA CÁNCER A TRAVÉS DE ORIFICIO NATURAL FRENTE A EXTRACCIÓN CONVENCIONAL DEL ESPÉCIMEN: UN ESTUDIO DE CASOS Y CONTROLES: Si bien las ventajas a corto plazo de la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural son ampliamente reconocidas, existe controversia con respecto a la seguridad oncológica después de la cirugía laparoscópica para el cáncer colorrectal.Investigar el impacto de la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural en la recurrencia local y la supervivencia a largo plazo de pacientes sometidos a cirugía de cáncer colorrectal.Estudio comparativo con emparejamiento por puntuación de propensión.Experiencia en un centro único.Analizamos retrospectivamente los registros de pacientes que se sometieron a resección anterior laparoscópica curativa para cáncer sigmoideo o rectal superior AJCC en estadio I-III en 2011-2014, con base en datos recolectados prospectivamente.Los resultados oncológicos se compararon entre pacientes sometidos a extracción por orificio natural o convencional mediante minilaparotomía de especímenes. Los pacientes fueron emparejados 1:1 de acuerdo con los puntajes de propensión calculados por análisis de regresión logística con las siguientes covariables: estadio AJCC, diámetro del tumor, edad, sexo, índice de masa corporal y estadio T. Se realizó un análisis de regresión de riesgos proporcionales de Cox para determinar el impacto en el resultado oncológico.Recurrencia local y tasas de supervivencia libre de enfermedad a los 5 años.De 392 pacientes elegibles, 188 fueron emparejados (94 sometidos a extracción de espécimen por orificio natural y 94 a extracción convencional por minilaparotomía). La mediana de seguimiento fue de 50.3 meses. El riesgo cumulativo de recurrencia local a 5 años fue de 2.3% y 3.5% (p = 0.632), mientras que la supervivencia libre de enfermedad a 5 años para todas las etapas tumorales combinadas fue de 87.3% y 82.0% (p = 0.383) en los grupos de resección anterior laparoscópica con extracción de espécimen por orificio natural y extracción convencional, respectivamente. Las etapas T3 y T4 fueron las únicas variables asociadas independientemente con la supervivencia libre de enfermedad.Centro único, análisis retrospectivo, ausencia de pruebas de función anorrectal a largo plazo y tamaño de muestra pequeño.Los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo de los pacientes sometidos a resección anterior laparoscópica con extracción de espécimen por orificio natural para cáncer sigmoideo y rectal superior no difieren de los de aquellos sometidos a extracción convencional. Por lo tanto, la extracción de especímenes por orificio natural podría ser una alternativa viable para reducir el insulto a la pared abdominal en operaciones colorrectales laparoscópicas por malignidad en pacientes selectos. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B241.

Unlimited-Length Proctocolectomy Utilizing Sequential Intussusception and Pull-Through

Transanal, hybrid natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and NOTES-assisted natural orifice specimen extraction techniques hold promise as leaders in the field of natural orifice surgery. We report the feasibility of a novel NOTES assisted technique for unlimited length, clean, endolumenal proctocolectomy in a porcine model. This technique is a modification of a transanal intussusception and pull-through procedure recently published by our group. Rectal mobilization was achieved laparoscopically; this was followed by a transanal recto-rectal intussusception and pull-through (IPT). IPT was established in a stepwise fashion. First, the proximal margin of resection was attached laparoscopically to the shaft of the anvil of an end-to-end circular stapler with a ligature around the rectum. Second, this complex was pulled transanally to produce IPT. To achieve an unlimited-length proctocolectomy, the IPT step was repeated several times prior to bowel resection. This was facilitated by removing the ligature applied in the first step of this procedure. Once sequential IPT established the desired length of bowel to be resected, a second ligature was placed around the rectum approximating the proximal and distal resection margins. The specimen was resected and extracted by making a full-thickness incision through the 2 bowel walls. The anastomosis was achieved by deploying the stapler. The technique was found to be feasible. Peritoneal samples, collected after transanal specimen extraction, did not demonstrate bacterial growth. The minimally invasive nature of this evolving technique as well as its aseptic bowel manipulation has the potential to limit the complications associated with abdominal wall incision and surgical site infection.

Novel Totally Laparoscopic Endolumenal Rectal Resection With Transanal Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction (NOSE) Without Rectal Stump Opening: A Modification of Our Recently Published Clean Surgical Technique in a Porcine Model

Our group has recently described a novel technique for clean endolumenal bowel resection, in which abdominal and transanal approaches were used. In the current study, 2 modifications of this procedure were tested for feasibility in a porcine model. A laparoscopic approach to the peritoneal cavity was employed in rectal mobilization; this was followed by a transanal rectorectal intussusception and pull-through (IPT). IPT was established in a stepwise fashion. First, the proximal margin of resection was attached to the shaft of the anvil of an end-to-end circular stapler with a ligature around the rectum. Second, this complex was pulled transanally to produce IPT. Once IPT was established, a second ligature was placed around the rectum approximating the proximal and distal resection margins. This was followed by a purse string suture through 2 bowel walls, encircling the shaft of the anvil just proximal to the ligatures. The specimen was resected and extracted by making a full-thickness incision through the 2 bowel walls distal to the previously placed purse string suture and ligatures. The anastomosis was achieved by applying the stapler. The technique was found to be feasible. Peritoneal samples, collected after transanal specimen extraction, did not demonstrate bacterial growth. Although, this is a novel and evolving procedure, its minimally invasive nature, as well as aseptic bowel manipulation during endolumenal rectal resection, has the potential to limit the complications associated with abdominal wall incision and surgical site infection.

Colorectal natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) and transvaginal/transrectal specimen extraction

Advancements in minimally invasive surgery have both revolutionized laparoscopy and set the stage for the advancement of endoscopic surgery to the forefront of modern medicine. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) has now become a subject of great interest to surgeons worldwide who wish to reduce the morbidity associated with abdominal operations. However, the application of NOTES to colorectal surgery has thus far been limited due to the complex dissection, anastomosis and specimen extraction typically required when operating on the large bowel. For this reason, laparoscopic-assisted natural orifice surgery has been the means by which most surgeons have begun to incorporate natural orifice surgery into their established practices. Transanal endoscopic surgery, transvaginal-assisted laparoscopy and transrectal specimen extraction are all emerging techniques that may be currently employed, in a hybrid manner, with traditionally accepted laparoscopic operations in order to transition toward less invasive surgery and even pure NOTES. To this end, the vagina appears to be the most practical and widely used site of specimen extraction and adjunct access site for laparoscopic hybrid operations. An accompanying video demonstrates the authors' preferred technique for transvaginal and transrectal specimen extraction.

Endolumenal rectal resection and transanal natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) without rectal stump opening: a novel, clean surgical technique in a porcine model

Minimally invasive surgery has been continuously evolving over the past 20 years. The use of natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) is one of the most recent contributions to minimally invasive methods. The anus has been widely used in NOSE procedures. However, an open rectal stump carries the highest risk of contamination compared with other translumenal approaches to the peritoneal cavity. In this study, the feasibility of a novel NOSE method was tested in a porcine model. This technique combined abdominal and transanal approaches. The abdominal approach was used in rectal mobilization; this was followed by a transanal recto-rectal intussusception and pull-through (IPT). IPT was established in a stepwise fashion. First, the proximal margin of resection was attached to the shaft of the anvil of an end-to-end circular stapler with a ligature around the rectum. Second, this complex was pulled transanally to produce IPT. Once IPT was established, a second ligature was placed around the rectum, approximating the proximal and distal resection margins. The specimen was resected and extracted by making a full-thickness incision through 2 bowel walls distal to the previously placed ligatures. Anastomosis was achieved by applying the stapler. The technique was found to be feasible. A substantial length of bowel was resected in all experiments. Peritoneal samples, collected after transanal specimen extraction, did not demonstrate bacterial growth. Although more investigation is warranted, this procedure has the potential to limit surgical site infections by using aseptic bowel manipulation during colorectal resection and transanal specimen extraction.

Fully laparoscopic colorectal anastomosis involving percutaneous endoluminal colonic anvil control (PECAC)

INTRODUCTION

A novel technique for secure placement of the anvil for mechanical stapled anastomosis in the proximal colon without exteriorization of the bowel is described.

METHODS

After standard laparoscopic segmental colonic mobilization, a needle-cannula from a percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy kit is passed under direct endoscopic vision transparietally into the colon at the site intended for anvil placement. A wire passed through the cannula into the colon is then withdrawn endoscopically per ano. The stapler anvil is fixed to the wire and pulled back along the intestine before being positioned by traction through the needle puncture site. After distal specimen transection, a standard stapled anastomosis is performed.

RESULTS

The technique is illustrated in 2 patients undergoing laparoscopic sigmoidectomy by either a single port or a multiport procedure with transanal specimen extraction.

CONCLUSION

By positioning the anvil without colon exteriorization, this technique enables pure intraperitoneal colonic anastomoses that may advance natural orifice operating.