Retroperitoneal sepsis with mediastinal and subcutaneous emphysema complicating stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR)

Transanal Suture Mucopexy for Hemorrhoids

BACKGROUND

Core factors involved in the treatment of hemorrhoids include the engorgement of hemorrhoids, prolapse, recurrence, and pain.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to assess the safety, pain, and efficacy of the transanal suture mucopexy for the treatment of hemorrhoids.

DESIGN

This was a retrospective study over a 13-year period.

SETTING

This procedure was performed, and data collected, from medical records at six centers in India.

PATIENTS

This study includes 5634 patients who had grade II to IV symptomatic hemorrhoids. Patients suffering from thrombosed hemorrhoids, inflammatory bowel disease, anal strictures, and anorectal carcinoma were excluded.

INTERVENTIONS

Hemorrhoidal swelling was reduced by manual massage and a steep Trendelenburg position under saddle block. The reduced hemorrhoids were fixed to the muscles of the rectal wall using sutures. Each suture measured 0.5 to 1.0 cm in length; double-locking continuous sutures were used, along the complete circumference of the rectum, at 2 and 4 cm proximal to the dentate line.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain assessed using the visual analog scale and hemorrhoid recurrence served as outcome measures.

RESULTS

The transanal suture mucopexy procedure was performed for 5634 patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids. A dull pain compatible with a visual analog score of 2 to 3 was reported in 126 (2.2%) patients; in the remaining 5508 (97.8%) patients, the visual analog score was 1 to 2. Effective treatment without complications occurred for 5541 patients (98.65%). A recurrence rate of 1.3% was recorded in 5634 cases with a mean follow-up of 7 ± 6 years.

LIMITATIONS

Utilization of a self-illuminating proctoscope or Brinckerhoff or anal speculum is essential.

CONCLUSION

Transanal suture mucopexy, designed with 2 suture rows, is a safe procedure with a short learning curve. It is associated with minimal pain, low recurrence rate, and fewer complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B841.

MUCOPEXIA TRANSANAL CON SUTURA PARA ENFERMEDAD HEMORROIDAL

ANTECEDENTES:Los factores centrales involucrados en el tratamiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal incluyen congestión de hemorroides, prolapso, recurrencia y dolor.OBJETIVO:Evaluar la seguridad, el dolor y la eficacia de la mucopexia transanal con sutura para el tratamiento de la enfermedad hemorroidal.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo durante un período de 13 años.ESCENARIO:Este procedimiento se realizó y se recopilaron datos de expedientes médicos en seis centros en India.PACIENTES:Este estudio incluye 5634 pacientes con enfermedad hemorroidal sintomática grado II a IV. Se excluyeron pacientes que padecían hemorroides trombosadas, enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal, estenosis anales y carcinoma anorrectal.INTERVENCIONES:La inflamación hemorroidal se redujo mediante masaje manual y posición Trendelenburg profundo bajo bloqueo caudal. Las hemorroides reducidas se fijaron a los músculos de la pared rectal mediante suturas. Cada sutura midió 0.5 a 1.0 cm de longitud, se utilizaron suturas en surgete continuo de doble anclado, a lo largo de la circunferencia completa del recto, a dos y cuatro cm proximales a la línea dentada.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El dolor se evaluó mediante la escala de puntuación analógica visual y se evaluó la presencia de recurrencia.RESULTADOS:El procedimiento de mucopexia transanal con sutura se realizó en 5634 pacientes con hemorroides sintomáticas. Se informó un dolor sordo compatible con una puntuación analógica visual de 2-3 en 126 (2.2%) pacientes; en los 5508 (97.8%) pacientes restantes, la puntuación analógica visual fue de 1-2. La mayoría (5541 pacientes [98.65%]) tuvo un tratamiento eficaz sin complicaciones. Se registró una tasa de recurrencia del 1.3% en 5634 casos con un seguimiento medio de 7 ± 6 años.LIMITACIONES:La utilización de un proctoscopio autoiluminado o de Brinckerhoff o espéculo anal es esencial.CONCLUSIÓN:La mucopexia transanal con sutura es un procedimiento seguro diseñado con dos filas de suturas asociadas con dolor mínimo y baja tasa de recurrencia con menos complicaciones. Tiene una curva de aprendizaje corta. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B841. (Traducción-Dr. Jorge Silva Velazco).

Ectopic air localizations after transanal procedures: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Aim of this study is to report and to analyze the incidence, clinical impact and treatment options of ectopic air localizations after transanal procedures.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The research was carried out using the PubMed database, identifying 40 articles with the following keywords: "transanal" AND "emphysema"; "transanal" AND "subcutaneous emphysema"; "transanal" AND "pneumomediastinum"; "transanal" AND "pneumothoraces"; "transanal" AND "pneumopericardium"; "transanal" AND "retropneumoperitoneum".

RESULTS

Nineteen articles, published between 1993 and 2017, were included in the study for a total of 29 patients. The most frequent air localization was in the retroperitoneum, followed by subcutaneous tissues, mediastinum and neck. This condition was treated conservatively in 20 patients, with colostomy in 4 patients, with bowel resection and negative diagnostic laparoscopy in one patient each. In three cases the treatment was not specified. Ectopic air location resolved in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Pneumo-mediastinum and pneumo-retroperitoneum after transanal procedures are unusual complications with a dramatic radiological appearance but can be managed successfully with a completely benign course in most cases. Initially, a conservative approach is recommended. Surgical treatment should be reserved only in case of fluid collection or suture dehiscence.

Management of obstructed defecation

The management of obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is mainly conservative and mainly consists of fiber diet, bulking laxatives, rectal irrigation or hydrocolontherapy, biofeedback, transanal electrostimulation, yoga and psychotherapy. According to our experience, nearly 20% of the patients need surgical treatment. If we consider ODS an “iceberg syndrome”, with “emerging rocks”, rectocele and rectal internal mucosal prolapse, that may benefit from surgery, at least two out of ten patients also has “underwater rocks” or occult disorders, such as anismus, rectal hyposensation and anxiety/depression, which mostly require conservative treatment. Rectal prolapse excision or obliterative suture, rectocele and/or enterocele repair, retrograde Malone’s enema and partial myotomy of the puborectalis muscle are effective in selected cases. Laparoscopic ventral sacral colporectopexy may be an effective surgical option. Stapled transanal rectal resection may lead to severe complications. The Transtar procedure seems to be safer, when dealing with recto-rectal intussusception. A multidisciplinary approach to ODS provides the best results.

Stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) in the surgical treatment of the obstructed defecation syndrome: results of STARR Italian Registry

PURPOSE

This study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of stapled trans-anal rectal resection (STARR) in the treatment of obstructed defecation syndrome ODS by the analysis of the data collected in the STARR Italian Registry (SIR) with a special emphasis on the analysis of symptoms and quality of life.

METHODS

Collected data included, preoperative tests findings, and the evaluation of symptoms; the latter was obtained by using dedicated tools such as the Obstructed Defecation Syndrome Score (ODS-S), the Severity Symptom Score (SSS), and the Continence Grading Scale (CGS). Data on the quality of life were collected by Patient Assessment of Constipation Quality of Life (PAC-QoL) and the Euro Quality of Life-5 Domains Visual Analogue Scale (EQ-5D VAS). The evaluation of the symptoms and the quality of life was repeated 6 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

The SIR had collected data on 2171 patients (1653 females, 76.1%; mean age 56.2 years; range 20-96 years). A significant improvement (P < .0001) was seen between preoperative and 12-month follow-up in all scores: ODS-S (16.7 vs. 5.0), SSS (15.6 vs. 2.6), CGS (2.0 vs. 0.7), PAC-QoL (51.0 vs. 22.1), and EQ-5D VAS (57.5 vs. 85.7). Complications included defecatory urgency (4.5% at 12 months), bleeding (3.6%), perineal sepsis (3.4%), and one case of rectovaginal fistula (0.05%).

CONCLUSION

The analysis of SIR data seems to confirm that STARR is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of ODS. However, further studies are required to evaluate the long-term stability of results.

Overview of pelvic floor disorders

Disorders of the pelvic floor are common sources of morbidity, decreased quality of life, and are unfortunately increasing in incidence. Owing to their complex and often coexistent nature, a comprehensive, multidisciplinary strategy of testing and care is required. Many nonoperative and operative approaches for management of the symptoms of pelvic floor disorders are available. This article reviews the evaluation and management for these difficult disorders.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.

Postoperative complications after procedure for prolapsed hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) procedures

Procedure for prolapsing hemorrhoids (PPH) and stapled transanal rectal resection for obstructed defecation (STARR) carry low postoperative pain, but may be followed by unusual and severe postoperative complications. This review deals with the pathogenesis, prevention and treatment of adverse events that may occasionally be life threatening. PPH and STARR carry the expected morbidity following anorectal surgery, such as bleeding, strictures and fecal incontinence. Complications that are particular to these stapled procedures are rectovaginal fistula, chronic proctalgia, total rectal obliteration, rectal wall hematoma and perforation with pelvic sepsis often requiring a diverting stoma. A higher complication rate and worse results are expected after PPH for fourth-degree piles. Enterocele and anismus are contraindications to PPH and STARR and both operations should be used with caution in patients with weak sphincters. In conclusion, complications after PPH and STARR are not infrequent and may be difficult to manage. However, if performed in selected cases by skilled specialists aware of the risks and associated diseases, some complications may be prevented.