Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence secondary to congenital imperforate anus

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence in patients with sacral malformation

INTRODUCTION

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a common and effective treatment for faecal incontinence (FI), but accessibility of the sacral nerves is mandatory. In some cases, electrode placement fails for unknown reasons. A frequent cause could be sacral malformations, which have a high incidence (up to 24.1%) and can be unsuspected.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We report two patients with FI consequent to congenital anorectal malformation and associated sacral malformation. Despite partial sacral agenesis, SNS was feasible in both. They benefitted greatly from SNS, with an improved ability to postpone the urge up to at least 15 min, reduced incontinence episodes (at least 50%), and significantly better quality of life.

CONCLUSION

SNS may be feasible in patients with FI, even in the presence of sacral malformation. However, clinicians should be aware of the attendant technical difficulties. Preoperative imaging, preferably with MRI of the sacrum, is advisable. If the sacral spinal nerves are inaccessible technically, pudendal nerve stimulation could be considered, if anatomy permits.

Sacral nerve stimulation lead implantation in partial sacral agenesis using intra-operative computerized tomography

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) lead implantation is a straightforward procedure for individuals with intact spinal vertebrae. When sacral anomalies are present, however, the anatomical and radiological reference points used for the accurate placement of the electrode may be absent or difficult to identify.

METHOD

We describe an innovative surgical procedure of percutaneous nerve evaluation for SNS in a patient with faecal incontinence secondary to a congenital imperforate anus and partial sacral agenesis using a surgical imaging platform (O-arm system) under neurophysiological control.

RESULTS

Using intra-operative CT and neuronavigation, the insertion point at the skin was identified. The lead was introduced into the right-sided S3 foramen and placed at the correct depth. An appropriate motor response was obtained after stimulation and neurophysiological control confirmed that the right S3 root was being stimulated.

CONCLUSION

Our experience showed that O-arm guided navigation can be used to overcome the difficulty of SNS lead placement in patients with partial sacral agenesis who have faecal incontinence.

Sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of bowel dysfunction from imperforate anus: A case report

INTRODUCTION

Bowel dysfunction (fecal incontinence and constipation) presents in over 50% of patients after treatment of congenital anal malformations. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for the treatment of fecal incontinence improves function in the majority of patients. We present a case report of the treatment of bowel dysfunction with sacral nerve stimulation in a patient with a history of an imperforate anus.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A twenty year-old female with a history of imperforate anus at birth, repaired during infancy with anorectoplasty, presented with fecal incontinence and constipation. Since childhood, she had been suffering from intermittent constipation with worsening fecal incontinence in early adulthood. Examination revealed mild anal stenosis and mucosal prolapse. Endoanal ultrasound demonstrated intact internal and external sphincter with low resting and squeeze pressures on anal manometry. Flexible sigmoidoscopy was normal. The patient underwent permanent sacral nerve stimulation with a primary goal of improvement in continence and, secondarily, for the alleviation of intermittent chronic constipation.

DISCUSSION

At 15 month follow-up, the patient had improvement in fecal incontinence (CCIS of 14 pre-SNS to 1 post-SNS), constipation (CCCS of 28 pre-SNS to 20 post-SNS), and quality of life (FIQOL improved in lifestyle (3.7), coping/behavior (3.4), self perception (3.9), and social embarrassment (4.5).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of bowel dysfunction in adults secondary to imperforate anus can be performed safely and with good results.

A review of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence following rectal surgery and radiotherapy

AIM

Faecal incontinence may occur following rectal surgery and/or radiotherapy for rectal cancer. The aim of this paper was to review the evidence to support the use of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for patients with incontinence who had undergone rectal surgery or received rectal radiotherapy.

METHOD

A search was performed of PubMed, Medline and Embase. All studies which reported the outcome of SNS in patients who had undergone a rectal resection or radiotherapy were reviewed.

RESULTS

The first report of SNS following rectal surgery was in 2002. Since then seven further studies have described its effect in patients who have undergone anterior resection or pelvic radiotherapy. The total number of patients was 57. All studies were single group series, which ranged in size from one to 15 patients. The follow-up ranged from 1 to 36 months. The success of peripheral nerve evaluation ranged from 47% to 100%. Permanent SNS improved the symptoms and in some studies this was reflected in improved quality of life. The wide variation of patient factors, operations performed, the dose of radiotherapy given and time from operation makes interpretation of the results difficult.

CONCLUSION

Larger studies with better patient selection are needed to investigate the effect of SNS on incontinence following radiotherapy or rectal surgery.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation: a European consensus statement

AIM

In Europe during the last decade sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) or sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been used to treat faecal incontinence (FI) and constipation. Despite this, there is little consensus on baseline investigations, patient selection and operative technique. A modified Delphi process was conducted to seek consensus on the current practice of SNS/SNM for FI and constipation.

METHOD

A systematic literature search of SNS for FI and constipation was conducted using PubMed. A set of questions derived from the search and expert opinion were answered on-line on two occasions by an international panel of specialists from Europe. A 1-day face-to-face meeting of the experts finalized the discussion.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-three articles were identified from the literature search, of which 147 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two specialists in FI and constipation from Europe participated. Agreement was achieved on 43 (86%) of 50 domains including the set-up of service, patient selection, baseline investigations, operative technique and programming of the device. The median of agreement was 95% (35-100%).

CONCLUSION

Consensus was achieved on the majority of domains of SNS/SNM for FI and constipation. This should serve as a benchmark for safe and quality practice of SNS/SNM in Europe.

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate both the feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients who had undergone surgical repair of anorectal malformations (ARM).

METHODS

Patients with ARM with or without sacral dysgenesis who presented with fecal incontinence, constipation, or combined symptoms were treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Success of SNS was assessed by scores preoperatively and after a 3-week test period: Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCI), Surgical Working Group for Coloproctology (CACP) continence score, German version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS). The follow-up results of the patients who received a definitive pacemaker were used to evaluate the long-term effect of SNS in patients with ARM.

RESULTS

Four patients with fecal incontinence and one patient with constipation (two males, three females; median age 24 years [13; 31]) were treated with SNS between May 2012 and May 2013. Four patients had a normal sacrum; one patient had a sacral dysgenesis. Preoperatively and after the test phase, median CACP continence scores were 8 [1; 10] and 11.5 [3; 16], median CCI 14 [12; 19] and 13 [11; 17], and median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved in all categories. For constipation, CCCSs were 16 and 7.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation is a feasible treatment modality for adult patients with ARM with a normally developed sacrum. Patients with sacrum dysgenesis are not suited for SNS because a definitive quadripolar electrode could not be anchored in the absence of a sacral bone.

Sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients with anorectal malformation--a feasibility study in patients with or without sacral dysgenesis

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate both the feasibility and effectiveness of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence and constipation in adult patients who had undergone surgical repair of anorectal malformations (ARM).

METHODS

Patients with ARM with or without sacral dysgenesis who presented with fecal incontinence, constipation, or combined symptoms were treated with sacral nerve stimulation (SNS). Success of SNS was assessed by scores preoperatively and after a 3-week test period: Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score (CCI), Surgical Working Group for Coloproctology (CACP) continence score, German version of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale, and Cleveland Clinic Constipation Score (CCCS). The follow-up results of the patients who received a definitive pacemaker were used to evaluate the long-term effect of SNS in patients with ARM.

RESULTS

Four patients with fecal incontinence and one patient with constipation (two males, three females; median age 24 years [13; 31]) were treated with SNS between May 2012 and May 2013. Four patients had a normal sacrum; one patient had a sacral dysgenesis. Preoperatively and after the test phase, median CACP continence scores were 8 [1; 10] and 11.5 [3; 16], median CCI 14 [12; 19] and 13 [11; 17], and median Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life Scale improved in all categories. For constipation, CCCSs were 16 and 7.

CONCLUSION

Sacral neuromodulation is a feasible treatment modality for adult patients with ARM with a normally developed sacrum. Patients with sacrum dysgenesis are not suited for SNS because a definitive quadripolar electrode could not be anchored in the absence of a sacral bone.