Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for internal rectal prolapse

Giant Villous Adenoma of the Rectum With Prolapse: Case Report

Colorectal polyps, frequently adenomas, are common in older adults, with villous adenomas being a notable subset due to their potential for significant malignancy risk. This case report highlights a rare instance of a giant villous adenoma in a 79-year-old female patient, challenging in both diagnosis and treatment. The patient, with a history of untreated essential arterial hypertension, was hospitalized for severe anemia following a massive rectal hemorrhage. An irreducible, prolapsed rectal mass was evident upon examination, and further investigations, including rectoscopy and abdominopelvic computed tomography scan, confirmed a villous adenoma with severe dysplasia. Given the tumor's substantial size, circumferential nature, and proximity to the dentate line, an abdominoperineal resection using the Miles technique was performed. The histopathological examination post-surgery confirmed the presence of a villous adenoma with high-grade epithelial neoplasia and localized areas of well-differentiated tubular adenocarcinoma. This case underscores the diagnostic and management complexities of large villous adenomas, emphasizing the need for meticulous surgical decision-making to ensure oncological safety and patient welfare, particularly when conservative resection may be inadequate.

Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery for non- adenomatous rectal lesions

BACKGROUND

Trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) enables a good visualization of the surgical field and is considered the method of choice for excision of adenomas and early T1 rectal cancer. The rectum and retro-rectal space might be the origin of uncommon neoplasms, benign and aggressive, certain require radical trans-abdominal surgery, while others can be treated by a less aggressive approach. In this study we report outcomes in patients undergoing TEM for rare and non-adenomatous rectal and retro-rectal lesions over a period of 11 years.

AIM

To report outcomes in patients undergoing TEM for rare and non-adenomatous rectal and retro-rectal lesions over a period of 11 years.

METHODS

Between January 2008 to December 2019 a retrospective analysis was completed for all patients who underwent TEM for non-adenomatous rectal lesion or retro-rectal mass in our institution. Patients were discharged once diet was well tolerated and no complications were identified. They were evaluated at 3 wk post operatively, then at 3-mo intervals for the first 2 years and every 6 mo depending on the nature of the final pathology. Clinical examination and rectoscopy were performed during each of the follow-up visits.

RESULTS

Out of 198 patients who underwent TEM during the study period, 18 had non-adenomatous rectal or retro-rectal lesions. Mean age was 47 years. The mean size of the lesions was 2.9 mm, with a mean distance from the anal margin of 7.9 cm. Mean surgical time was 97.8 min. There were no intra-operative neither late post-operative complications. Mean length of stay was 2.5 d. Mean patient follow-up duration was 42 mo.

CONCLUSION

TEM allows for reduced morbidity given its minimally invasive nature. Surgeons should be familiar with the technique but careful patient selection should be considered. It can be used safely for uncommon rectal and selected retro-rectal lesions without compromising outcomes. We believe that it should be reasonably considered as one of the surgical methods when treating rare lesions.

Pathophysiological basis, clinical assessment, investigation and management of patients with obstruction defecation syndrome

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a clinical syndrome manifest as difficulty in faecal evacuation despite no mechanical obstruction. It is the final clinical pathway of a number of anatomical and physiological pathologies they can result in considerable misery to the lives of the patients it afflicts. Herein, the authors seek to breakdown the syndrome into its component parts, looking first at normal pelvic floor anatomy and physiology; followed by each pathological element; clinical features and investigation; individual management and management of the patient as a whole. It must be stated that correction of anatomy is not the sine qua non, as this does not always correlate to improvement of symptoms. There is a complex interplay of all elements, and a holistic approach appreciating the gestalt principle of "the whole is greater than the sum of its parts" is paramount. Causes of pelvic pain (levator ani syndrome, coccygodynia, proctalgia fugax and pudendal neuralgia) do not fall into ODS and are beyond the scope of this paper.

Natural Orifice Transanal Endoscopic Rectopexy for Complete Rectal Prolapse: Prospective Evolution of a New Technique and Short-term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Endoluminal surgery for the management of rectal prolapse remains largely experimental.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the evolution and short-term outcomes of a new endoluminal technique for the management of complete rectal prolapse.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at a single tertiary care teaching center.

PATIENTS

A total of 29 patients were included. The first 12 patients underwent the procedure with our initial technique, and the last 17 patients were subjected to the new modified procedure. The follow-up duration was 3 years for the older technique and 26 months for the newer technique.

INTERVENTION

This technique involves: 1) ventral "suture" rectopexy: rectum is fixed anteriorly to the anterior abdominal wall using percutaneously placed sutures. 2) Posterior rectum is fixed to the sacral promontory using tackers through a submucosal tunnel.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Safety, recurrence, functional outcomes, morbidity, and mortality were the main outcome measures.

RESULTS

There were improvements in constipation and incontinence scores, anal manometric pressures, anorectal angle, anorectal descent, and quality of life postoperatively in both groups. In patients undergoing the modified procedure, there was a significant decrease in duration of surgery (220 ± 48.89 vs 110 ± 12.51 min), shortened hospital stay (4.6 ± 1.71 vs 2.6 ± 0.65 d), decreased recurrence (25% vs 5.8%), and complications (surgical-site infection and retrorectal abscess).

LIMITATIONS

Short follow-up, small sample size, and single-center study were the limitations.

CONCLUSION

This is a novel endoluminal technique for treating rectal prolapse obviating perirectal dissection, abdominal incisions, or a mesh. This can now be performed under complete endoscopic and fluoroscopic vision. It avoids general anesthesia and therefore can be an alternative for patients with comorbid conditions in whom the standard abdominal procedure may not be well tolerated. Larger randomized multicentric studies with longer follow-ups are warranted. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C59.

RECTOPEXIA ENDOSCPICA TRANSANAL POR ORIFICIO NATURAL PARA EL PROLAPSO RECTAL COMPLETO EVOLUCIN PROSPECTIVA DE UNA NUEVA TCNICA Y RESULTADOS A CORTO PLAZO

ANTECEDENTES:La cirugía endoluminal para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal ha permanecido en gran parte experimental.OBJETIVO:Este estudio tiene como objetivo evaluar la evolución y los resultados a corto plazo de una nueva técnica endoluminal para el manejo del prolapso rectal completo.DISEÑO:Estudio prospectivo.ÁMBITOS:Único centro docente de tercer nivel de atención.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 29 pacientes (19 hombres y 10 mujeres) con prolapso rectal completo. Los primeros 12 pacientes fueron sometidos al procedimiento con nuestra técnica anteriormente descrita y los últimos 17 pacientes fueron sometidos al nuevo procedimiento modificado. La duración del seguimiento es de 3 años para la técnica más antigua y de 26 meses para la técnica más nueva.INTERVENCIÓN:Esta técnica implica: A) Rectopexia de "sutura" ventral: el recto se fija anteriormente a la pared abdominal anterior mediante suturas colocadas percutáneamente. B) El recto posterior se fija al promontorio sacro mediante grapas a través de un túnel submucoso.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Seguridad, recurrencia, resultados funcionales, morbilidad y mortalidad.RESULTADOS:Hubo mejorías en las puntuaciones de estreñimiento (ODS) e incontinencia (SMIS), presiones manométricas anales (reposo y contracción), ángulo anorrectal, descenso anorrectal y calidad de vida post operatoria en ambos grupos. En los pacientes sometidos al procedimiento modificado hubo una significativa disminución en la duración de la cirugía (220 + 48,89 vs 110 + 12,51 minutos), acortamiento de la estancia hospitalaria (4,6 + 1,71 vs 2,6 + 0,65 días), disminución de la recurrencia (25% vs 5,8%) y complicaciones (infecciónes del sitio quirúrgico y abscesos retrorrectales).LIMITACIONES:Seguimiento corto, tamaño de muestra pequeña, estudio de un solo centro.CONCLUSIÓNES:La rectopexia endoscópica transanal por orificio natural (NOTER) es una novedosa técnica endoluminal para el tratamiento del prolapso rectal que evita la disección perirrectal, las incisiones abdominales o la fijación de una malla. Este procedimiento puede realizar hoy día bajo visión completa endoscópica y fluoroscópica. Evita la anestesia general y, por lo tanto, puede ser una alternativa para pacientes con condiciones comórbidas donde el procedimiento abdominal estándar puede no ser bien tolerado. Se justifican estudios multicéntricos aleatorios más grandes con un seguimiento más prolongado para validar aún más esta nueva técnica. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C59. (Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto).

A Meta-analysis of Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery versus Total Mesorectal Excision in the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Background  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEMS) has been suggested as an alternative to total mesorectal excision (TME) in the treatment of early rectal cancers. The extended role of TEMS for higher stage rectal cancers after neoadjuvant therapy is also experimented. The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the oncological outcomes and report on the evidence-based clinical supremacy of either technique.

Methods  Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for the randomized controlled trials comparing the oncological and perioperative outcomes of TEMS and a radical TME. A local recurrence and postoperative complications were analyzed as primary end points. Intraoperative blood loss, operation time, and duration of hospital stay were compared as secondary end points.

Results  There was no statistical difference in the local recurrence or postoperative complications with a risk ratio of 1.898 and 0.753 and p -values of 0.296 and 0.306, respectively, for TEMS and TME. A marked statistical significance in favor of TEMS was observed for secondary end points. There was standard difference in means of −4.697, −6.940, and −5.685 with p -values of 0.001, 0.005, and 0.001 for blood loss, operation time, and hospital stay, respectively.

Conclusion  TEMS procedure is a viable alternative to TME in the treatment of early rectal cancers. An extended role of TEMS after neoadjuvant therapy may also be offered to a selected group of patients. TME surgery remains the standard of care in more advanced rectal cancers.

Non-conventional applications for Transanal endoscopic microsurgery. A single centre experience and a systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and Transanal endoscopic operation (TEO) have been initially described for local excision of rectal adenomas and selected cases of rectal carcinomas. In the past decade, however, several new indications raised, and others could raise in the future. The aim of this review was to evaluate, both in the literature and in our personal experience, the use of TEM and TEO for nonconventional applications, different from rectal tumors.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of published papers and we selected articles reporting patients who underwent endoscopic surgery for other medical reason than polyp cancer resection, with TEM or TEO. PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE and bibliographies of the selected studies were searched for articles in English published up to May 2020 to identify all relevant articles. We excluded articles reporting TEM and TEO used for classical indications. We finally report our experience of non-conventional use of TEO in 5 patients with different diseases.

RESULTS

The research revealed 800 papers and among them we selected 52 articles for a total of 697 patients. Of all patients, only 52 had intraoperative or postoperative complications, with only 10 patients requiring major surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggest that TEM and TEO may be valid alternatives to traditional surgery in situations other than its classical indication. These findings can positively impact on the care of patients, who could benefit from less invasive surgical procedures associated with lower morbidity.

Transanal Endoscopic Microsurgery: An Alternative Perineal Approach to Treat Rectal Prolapse: A Video Vignette

PURPOSE

Laparoscopic ventral rectopexy is the most favored surgical treatment for rectal prolapse. Perineal approaches are recommended for frail patients and those with major comorbidities, and in young men to avoid genitourinary disorders. There are very few descriptions in the literature of transanal endoscopic surgery to treat complete rectal prolapse. The aim of this article is to describe our experience with this technique.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing transanal endoscopic surgery for rectal prolapse repair between 2010 and 2019 were recruited for the study. Preoperative, surgical, and postoperative variables were recorded. Surgical technique, 30-day morbidity and follow-up are described.

RESULTS

Five patients have been included. The postoperative period was uneventful and all patients were discharged in 48 hours without complications. All showed improved symptoms at 1-year control, and none presented recurrence in a mean follow-up period of 6 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The transanal endoscopic procedure allows improved endoscopic vision, and the reconstruction is performed transpelvically by fixing the anastomosis suture to the pelvic wall to prevent recurrence. Therefore, we think it is a valid alternative to other perineal procedures in patients in whom abdominal surgery is contraindicated.

Per anal endoscopic rectopexy for treatment of complete rectal prolapse: A preliminary report

We describe Per Anal Endoscopic Rectopexy (PAER), a new treatment for complete rectal prolapse, which involves fixing the anterior rectal wall to the under-surface of the anterior abdominal wall and posterior rectal wall to the sacrum, through a submucosal tunnel (both endoluminally). This is a prospective single-centre pilot study done at a tertiary care centre. A total of 12 patients with a mean age of 48 years underwent the procedure. Constipation and incontinence were present in 8 and 4 patients, respectively and a significant improvement was seen in both following the procedure. A significant decrease in anorectal angle and its descent was also observed on post procedure magnetic resonance defecography. One patient had partial recurrence of prolapse. No major morbidity was observed. PAER is a minimally invasive and safe option for rectal prolapse, which needs to be validated in more patients over a longer follow up period.

Transanal surgery for obstructed defecation syndrome: Literature review and a single-center experience

Obstructed defecation syndrome (ODS) is a functional disorder commonly encountered by colorectal surgeons and gastroenterologists, and greatly affects the quality of life of patients from both societal and psychological aspects. The underlying anatomical and pathophysiological changes of ODS are complex. However, intra-rectal intussusception and rectocele are frequently found in patients with ODS and both are thought to play an important role in the pathogenesis of ODS. With the development of evaluation methods in anorectal physiology laboratories and radiology studies, a great variety of new operative procedures, especially transanal procedures, have been invented to treat ODS. However, no procedure has been proved to be superior to others at present. Each operation has its own merits and defects. Thus, choosing appropriate transanal surgical procedures for the treatment of ODS remains a challenge for all surgeons. This review provides an introduction of the current problems and options for treatment of ODS and a detailed summary of the essential assessments needed for patient evaluation before carrying out transanal surgery. Besides, an overview of the benefits and problems of current transanal surgical procedures for treatment of ODS is summarized in this review. A report of clinical experience of some transanal surgical techniques used in the authors’ center is also presented.