Sequential endoscopic and surgical removal of giant rectal adenomas extending to the dentate line

Submucosal Enhancing Stripe as a Contrast Material-enhanced MRI-based Imaging Feature for the Differentiation of Stage T0-T1 from Early T2 Rectal Cancers

Background Accurate differentiation of stage T0-T1 rectal tumors from stage T2 rectal tumors facilitates the selection of appropriate surgical treatment. MRI is a recommended technique for local staging, but its ability to distinguish T1 from T2 tumors is poor. Purpose To explore the value of a submucosal enhancing stripe (SES), an uninterrupted enhancing band between the rectal tumor and the muscular layer on contrast material-enhanced T1-weighted images, as a potential imaging feature to differentiate T0-T1 from T2 rectal tumors. Materials and Methods This retrospective study included patients with pT0-T1 and pT2 rectal tumors who underwent pretreatment MRI and rectal tumor resection between January 2012 and November 2019. Two radiologists independently evaluated tumor characteristics (SES; status of muscularis propria [SMP]; and tumor shape, location, and size) at MRI. The associations of clinical and imaging characteristics with stage T0-T1 or T2 tumors were assessed, β values were calculated, and predictive models were built. The diagnostic accuracies for the differentiation of T0-T1 tumors from T2 tumors with SES and SMP were compared. Results Data from 431 patients (mean age, 60 years ± 10 [standard deviation]; 261 men) were evaluated. SES (β = 3.9; 95% CI: 3.1, 4.7; P < .001), SMP (β = 1.3; 95% CI: 0.7, 1.9; P < .001), and carpetlike shape (β = 1.6; 95% CI: 0.5, 2.8; P = .01) were independent factors distinguishing T0-T1 tumors from T2 tumors. The diagnostic accuracy was 87% (95% CI: 84, 90; 376 of 431) for SES and 67% (95% CI: 63, 72; 290 of 431) for SMP (P < .001). Conclusion Submucosal enhancing stripe (SES) at contrasted-enhanced MRI, status of muscularis propria (SMP) on T2-weighted images, and tumor shape can serve as independent imaging features to differentiate stage T0-T1 rectal tumors from stage T2 rectal tumors. Moreover, SES is a more accurate feature than is SMP. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Turkbey in this issue.

Giant villous adenoma of rectum- what is the malignant potential and what is the optimal treatment? A case and review of literature

INTRODUCTION

Villous adenomas are dubiously benign lesions, which are difficult to interpret because of their malignant potential. Distal villous adenomas present with bleeding or mucus discharge. Giant adenomas are not amenable for endoscopic or transanal resection. Only few isolated cases have been reported by laparoscopic resection. We present our case of a circumferential giant villous adenoma of the rectum managed successfully by laparoscopic ultra-low anterior resection with colo-anal anastomosis with a review of literature in regard to their malignant potential.

CASE REPORT

A 62-year-old lady presented with complaints of painless bleeding per rectum and a fleshy mass protruding from the anal canal which on digital rectal examination appeared a large soft velvety flat mass with mucus discharge. Colonoscopy showed circumferential irregular, friable, edematous mucosa in rectum extending for 15 cm. Computed tomography showed a large heterogeneously enhancing polypoid mass lesion in the rectal wall involving the entire rectum. The patient underwent laparoscopic low anterior resection with colo-anal anastomosis and protecting loop ileostomy. Histopathological examination of the resected specimen revealed villous adenoma of the rectum with moderate to severe dysplasia.

DISCUSSION

Villous adenomas are sessile growths lined by dysplastic glandular epithelium, whose risk of malignancy is especially high up to 50% when greater than 2 cm in size. Large size, villous content, and distal location are all associated with severe dysplasia in colorectal adenomas. Large villous rectal tumors, particularly of circumferential type pose a great challenge for endoscopic or transanal removal. Henceforth, open or laparoscopic surgery is required for these cases.

CONCLUSION

Giant rectal villous polyps are usually unresectable by endoscopic methods or transanal endoscopic microsurgery and are associated with a high rate of unsuspected cancer which requires a formal radical oncologic resection. As per current data, the combined risk of dysplasia/malignancy is about 83% with 50% risk of dysplasia and frank malignancy in 33% of cases of giant rectal villous adenomas of more than 8 cm in size. Laparoscopic colorectal resection is safe and effective.