Tailored anal block (TAB): a new anesthesia procedure for surgical treatment of hemorrhoids in an outpatient setting

Fissurectomy with or without anoplasty for chronic anal fissures is a valid alternative to lateral internal sphincterotomy: a retrospective cohort study of 475 patients

BACKGROUND

After the failure of conservative therapy, the most effective surgical treatment for chronic anal fissures (CAFs) is lateral internal sphincterotomy. However, the choice of the procedure must be always evaluated carefully due to the risk of long-term anal continence impairment. The aim of the present study is to report the outcomes of fissurectomy with or without associated anoplasty.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective study including patients with CAFs in whom conservative medical and non-medical treatments failed and who underwent fissurectomy with or without anoplasty from January 2015 to June 2023. Fecal continence, pain, and complications were assessed using specific questionnaires and scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 475 patients [280 males (58.9%)] with CAF underwent fissurectomy, with (n = 392; 82.5%) or without (n = 83; 17.5%) anoplasty. The majority of them (n = 379; 79.8%) had a posterior fissure. The mean follow-up was 49.9 months ± 26.13 months, with a minimum of 1 year, showing no intraoperative complications and a 4.2% postoperative complication rate. Missed healing occurred in 7.15% of patients at 6 months of follow-up, with higher recurrence and sphincterotomy rates in posterior fissures (p = 0.04). Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores were higher in patients who underwent anoplasty (p = 0.002). Interestingly, anoplasty led to a significant decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.001), compared with those who did not undergo the procedure, with a consequent faster recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that fissurectomy, whether performed with or without anoplasty, was a highly effective surgical option for treating CAFs, achieving an overall success rate of 92.8% without significant impairment of continence and with a low complication rate. Further randomized prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding. Interestingly, fissurectomy with anoplasty seems to allow for better short-term outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and recovery time compared with fissurectomy alone.

Comparison of Pudendal Nerve Block and Spinal Anesthesia in Proctological Surgeries: Efficacy, Safety, and Patient Outcomes

Background and Objectives: The selection of an appropriate anesthesia method is a critical factor in the surgical treatment of proctological diseases, significantly impacting patient outcomes and comfort. Pudendal nerve block (PNB) and spinal anesthesia (SA) are commonly employed in these surgeries, yet the optimal choice between the two remains debated. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of PNB and SA in patients undergoing surgical treatment for various proctological conditions, with a focus on postoperative pain management, functional outcomes, and complication rates. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted on 590 patients who underwent proctological surgery under either PNB (n = 435) or SA (n = 155). Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), while functional outcomes were measured using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Statistical analysis was performed to compare the outcomes between the two groups. Results: Patients in the PNB group reported significantly lower postoperative VAS scores compared to those in the SA group, particularly in hemorrhoidectomy and laser hemorrhoidoplasty procedures. The PNB group also demonstrated superior functional outcomes, with lower postoperative WHODAS 2.0 scores and a reduced incidence of urinary retention compared to the SA group. Furthermore, the duration of surgery and hospital stay were significantly shorter for patients in the PNB group. Conclusions: The findings suggest that PNB may offer advantages over SA in proctological surgeries, particularly in terms of pain management, functional recovery, and reduced complication rates. PNB should be considered a viable alternative to SA, particularly in cases where rapid recovery and minimizing complications are priorities. Exceptions to this include specific proctological surgeries, such as those for malignant tumors in the region, complex anal fistulas, proctological conditions arising from inflammatory bowel diseases, and patients on immunosuppressive therapy. Further research is needed to confirm these results and optimize anesthesia selection in this context.

Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam for the treatment of mucocutaneous bridges and/or residual piles after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy

Injection sclerotherapy is an effective and safe treatment in selected cases. It might be used as the first treatment for I-III degree hemorrhoidal disease (HD), but also as a bridge therapy for more severe cases not amenable to invasive treatments. However, concerning the long-term recurrence rate, open excisional hemorrhoidectomy remains the gold standard in cases of III- and IV-degree HD. In this context, it is recommended to perform the excision of no more than three piles and to preserve the muco-cutaneous bridges to avoid post-operative anal stenosis. The aim of this study is to evaluate surgical outcomes and efficacy of the combined treatment of open excisional hemorrhoidectomy and the use of ST on the remnant muco-cutaneous bridges/residual piles. This was a single-center retrospective study and a total of 18 patients with IV-degree HD, aged between 18 and 75 years with symptomatic HD according to the Goligher classification, were enrolled between January 2023 and June 2023 and their follow-up continued until October 2023 after reaching 3 months of follow-up. The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey Incontinence Score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence. A total of 77.8% (14/18) of the patients were symptom-free (hemorrhoidal disease symptom score (HDSS) score = 0) after 3 months. Moreover, a statistically significant decrease in the median HDSS and short health scale for HD (SHS-HD) score was registered from 16 preoperatively (T0) to 2 at 3-month follow-up (T3). Neither post-operative bleeding nor any type of complications occurred. The use of sclerotherapy in combination with the traditional open excisional hemorrhoidectomy has shown promising results. Further structured studies are needed and greater dissemination and education of the general surgeon on the subject is necessary.

General anesthesia with local infiltration reduces urine retention rate and prolongs analgesic effect than spinal anesthesia for hemorrhoidectomy

Introduction

Postoperative pain and complications pose significant challenges following a hemorrhoidectomy. Attaining effective anesthesia with minimal complications is crucial. The ideal anesthesia method for ambulatory hemorrhoidectomy remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate whether the combination of general anesthesia plus local infiltration (GAL) is associated with lower complications and reduced pain compared to spinal anesthesia (SA) in the context of hemorrhoidectomy.

Methods

This retrospective single-center cohort study, conducted in a tertiary medical center in East Asia, evaluated excisional hemorrhoidectomies performed between January 1, 2017, and March 31, 2023, utilizing GAL or SA. Data on the six most common complications-pain, constipation, acute urine retention (AUR), bleeding, nausea, and headache-were extracted from medical records. A total of 550 hemorrhoidectomies were included: 220 in the GAL group and 330 in the SA group. Patient characteristics were comparable between the two groups.

Results

The AUR rate was significantly lower in the GAL group compared to the SA group (15.5% vs. 32.1%, P < 0.001). Although the proportion of pain scores ≥4 did not differ significantly between the GAL and SA groups (36.2% vs. 39.8%, P = 0.429), the pain score curve indicated a stable trend. Overall, the GAL group exhibited a lower rate of adverse effects (56.9% vs. 67.4%, P = 0.023). There were no significant differences in the rates of other complications and emergency department readmission between the GAL and SA groups.

Discussion

GAL emerges as a favorable choice for anesthesia in hemorrhoidectomy, demonstrating a lower incidence of urine retention and a prolonged analgesic effect in multiple hemorrhoidectomies. These findings support the conclusion that GAL represents an optimal anesthetic method for enhancing the postoperative experience in patients undergoing hemorrhoidectomy.

Open Hemorrhoidectomy With Ligasure™ Under Local or Spinal Anesthesia: A Comparative Study

BACKGROUND

There is increasing evidence that many anorectal surgical procedures may be performed under local anesthesia. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic vs spinal anesthesia in the operating room for open hemorrhoidectomy.

METHODS

Sixty-two patients with grade III or IV hemorrhoids underwent open hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure™ between 2018 and 2020. Of them, 32 procedures were performed in the operating room under spinal anesthesia with hyperbaric bupivacaine and other 30 procedures were undertaken in the outpatient clinic under local anesthesia with ropivacaine.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences regarding age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, and Goligher's grade in between groups. No significant differences were observed in postoperative pain score (P = .85), perioperative complications (P = .51), and reoperation rate (P = .96). No recurrences and no differences in patients' satisfaction degree (P = .76) were documented at long-term follow-up in both study groups.

DISCUSSION

Our results suggest that open hemorrhoidectomy with LigaSure™ performed in selected patients under local anesthesia in the outpatient clinic is a well-tolerated, safe, and effective procedure.

The impact of COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary referral proctology center: no one should be left behind

BACKGROUND

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has disrupted healthcare delivery. We aimed to describe a novel strategy to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on a tertiary referral proctology center during the first wave of infection in Italy.

METHODS

All patients booked appointments at the Proctology Unit between March 9th and May 4th, 2020 were identified. Patients booked for a first visit underwent a structured remote consultation. Patients with perianal or sacrococcygeal abscesses, major anorectal bleeding, incoercible anal pain and red flags for malignancy were labelled as "non-deferrable." A flowchart was designed to comply with adequate assistance of proctologic patients. Demographics, clinical data and outcomes of in-office procedures were collected.

RESULTS

On a total of 548 booked visits, 198 (36.1%) were cancelled before remote consultation. Of the remaining 350, 112 (32.0%) attended a follow-up visit. Among 238 (68.0%) patients undergoing remote consultation, 88 (25.1%) were deemed "deferrable" and 148 (42.3%) "non-deferrable." Two (0.6%) were hospitalized for COVID-19 while waiting for an outpatient visit. Twenty-five of 88 (28.4%) deferrable patients cancelled their appointment as felt no longer necessary. A total of 45 of 148 (30.4%) non deferrable patients (mean age, 46 years; 31% females) underwent in-office procedures, most often related to anal abscess and/or fistula (48.9%). Final diagnosis of malignancy occurred in four cases. A 55% increase in the number of in-office procedures was noted compared to the previous year. None of the attending patients nor staff members resulted COVID-19 positive during the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the uncertainties accompanying the use of remote consultations in proctology, the results of this study may inform the development of strategies for restructuring activities in response to future emergencies of this magnitude.

Local Perianal Anesthetic Infiltration Is Safe and Effective for Anorectal Surgery

Background: General or regional anesthesia is predominantly used for anorectal surgery, however in the recent years more attention was drawn in the use of local anesthesia for anorectal surgery. In this study we present the technique and results of the use of local perianal anesthetic infiltration for minor anorectal operations. Methods: In this cohort study patients undergoing surgery for hemorrhoids, anal fissures and low anal fistulas were included. Posterior perineal block was induced with a mixture containing 0.125% bupivacaine and 0.5% lidocaine. All patients were followed up at 30 days either by a post-operative visit or a telephone call and all post-operative complications over the post-operative 30-day period were registered. Results: One thousand and twenty-six consecutive patients were included in our study. For all patients' intraoperative analgesia was achieved after performing perianal anesthetic infiltration and no additional support from the anesthesia team was necessary in any of case. Complications were observed in 14 (1.4%). Urinary retention occurred in 5 (0.5%) cases. Six cases of bleeding occurred after hemorrhoidectomy (0.6%) and 1 (0.1%) after lateral internal sphincterotomy. Perianal abscess developed for two patients (0.2%). Conclusions: Local anesthesia using posterior perineal block technique is safe and effective for intraoperative analgesia in anorectal surgery, saving a substantial operation cost by avoiding the involvement of an anesthesia team and resulting in minimal incidence of urinary retention and other complications.

Pudendal nerve block (PNB): a safe, simple and effective approach in surgical proctological patients

BACKGROUND

Pudendal nerve block (PNB) is commonly used in pudendal neuralgia (PN) and as an anaesthesiological technique in obstetrical and urological procedures. The purpose of this retrospective study was to compare the efficacy of PNB with other anaesthesiolocal techniques in proctological surgery.

METHODS

A total of 362 patients were seen from a 22 months time interval. Surgical indication was placed after a conservative therapy. 78 patients underwent surgery: 42 with spinal anaesthesia with PNB and 36 with PNB alone according to their anatomical characteristics. All the patients underwent PNB in lithotomy position and with a perirectal approach. The success rate of PNB was evaluated in post operative pain control with the VAS score, after the first and the second evacuation. The follow up also included a third check on the seventh day after surgery.

RESULTS

In post operative period, the mean VAS score found after the first evacuation in patients undergoing PNB was 2.66, after the second evacuation was 1.55, while the VAS score on the seventh day was 0.38. The mean VAS score in the group who underwent spinal anaesthesia and PNB were respectively 3.71 and 1.80 after the first and second evacuation. The VAS score calculated on the seventh day was 0.50. There were no statistically significant differences in the VAS score between the 2 groups (P >0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

PNB may be a valid alternative to spinal anaesthesia in proctological patients. PNB has proven to be both safe and effective technique.

Short-Term Outcomes of Polycarbophil and Propionibacterium acnes Lysate Gel after Open Hemorrhoidectomy: A Prospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Pain is the most common complication after open excisional hemorrhoidectomy (OEH). We assessed the effectiveness of polycarbophil and Propionibacterium acnes lysate gel (Emorsan®Gel) on pain control after OEH.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Fifty consecutive patients undergoing OEH were included. All patients received stool softeners and oral analgesia in the post-operative period. Emorsan®Gel was also used topically by the last 25 patients (Emorsan®Gel group (EG)) until Post-Operative Day 20 (POD 20). The primary outcome was the effectiveness of Emorsan®Gel on pain relief using an 11-point visual analogue scale (VAS). Morbidity, wound healing (WH), and time to work were documented at POD 1, POD 10, POD 20, and POD 40.

RESULTS

Of the 50 patients enrolled, twenty-eight (56%) were males; median age, 49 (range, 28-73) years. The VAS score decreased over time in all patients, with significantly lower scores at POD 20 in the EG (1.44 (SD, 1.16) vs. 2.12 (0.93) in the control group (CG); p = 0.045). All patients in the EG achieved complete WH at last follow-up, compared to only 17 (68%) in the CG (p = 0.004). The likelihood of WH was 66% higher in the EG (OR, 1.66 [95%CI, 0.80-3.44; p = 0.172).

CONCLUSIONS

Emorsan®Gel is safe and effective at reducing pain after EOH, promoting earlier WH compared to standard care treatment.

Deadlock of proctologic practice in Italy during COVID-19 pandemic: a national report from ProctoLock2020

Proctology is one of the surgical specialties that suffered the most during COVID-19 pandemic. Using data from a cross-sectional worldwide web survey, we aimed to snapshot the current status of proctologic practice in Italy with differences between three macro areas (North, Centre, South). Specialists affiliated to renowned scientific societies with an interest in coloproctology were invited to join a 27-item survey. Predictive power of respondents' and hospitals' demographics on the change of status of surgical activities was calculated. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04392245). Of 299 respondents from Italy, 94 (40%) practiced in the North, 60 (25%) in the Centrer and 82 (35%) in the South and Islands. The majority were men (79%), at consultant level (70%), with a mean age of 46.5 years, practicing in academic hospitals (39%), where a dedicated proctologist was readily available (68%). Southern respondents were more at risk of infection compared to those from the Center (OR, 3.30; 95%CI 1.46; 7.47, P = 0.004), as were males (OR, 2.64; 95%CI 1.09; 6.37, P = 0.031) and those who routinely tested patients prior to surgery (OR, 3.02; 95%CI 1.39; 6.53, P = 0.005). The likelihood of ongoing surgical practice was higher in the South (OR 1.36, 95%CI 0.75; 2.46, P = 0.304) and in centers that were not fully dedicated to COVID-19 care (OR 4.00, 95%CI 1.88; 8.50, P < 0.001). The results of this survey highlight important factors contributing to the deadlock of proctologic practice in Italy and may inform the development of future management strategies.