Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex anorectal fistula: efficacy and risk factors for failure at 3-year follow-up

Efficacy and safety of video-assisted anal fistula treatment in anorectal fistula: a meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

By searching relevant literature, the recurrence rate, complication rate after video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT), and efficacy and safety of the treatment were analyzed.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Articles that reported the outcomes of VAAFT up to December 2020 were searched in PubMed (Medline) and Cochrane Library, in accordance with the preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis (PRISMA) screening guidelines. Two researchers independently completed the whole process from screening and inclusion to quality evaluation and bias risk assessment, and the data was included in the RevMan 5.3 software for analysis. The main outcomes were demographic data of patients, detection rate, classification of internal opening of anorectal fistula, postoperative recurrence rate, and incidence of complications.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 10 articles were included (779 patients). The average age of the patients was 44 years old, average operation time was 60 min, and the average follow-up time was 22 months. The ratio of male to female was 2.4:1, the ratio of high anorectal fistula to low anorectal fistula was 6.6:1, the detection rate of internal openings was 98%, the weighted recurrence rate was 24%, and the weighted complication rate was 1%.

CONCLUSIONS

VAAFT is effective and safe in the treatment of anorectal fistulas.

Long term results of video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anal fistula: another shattered dream?

AIM

Complex anal fistula represents a burden for patients, and its management is a challenge for surgeons. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) is one sphincter-sparing technique. However, data on its long-term effectiveness are scant. We aimed to explore the outcomes of VAAFT in a retrospective cohort of patients referred to a tertiary centre.

METHOD

Consecutive adult patients with a minimum of 2 years' follow-up after VAAFT were reviewed. Patients were followed up to 5 years postoperatively. Failure was defined as incomplete healing of the external orifice(s) during the first 6 months. Recurrence was defined as new radiologically and/or clinically confirmed onset of the fistula after primary healing. A generalized linear model was fitted to evaluate the association between failure and sociodemographic characteristics. Predictors of recurrence were determined in a subgroup analysis of patients found to be free from disease at 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Overall, 106 patients (70% male; mean age 41 years) were reviewed. Of these 86% had a previous seton placement. Fistulas were either high trans-sphincteric (74%), suprasphincteric (12%) or extrasphincteric (13%). Eight (7%) patients experienced postoperative complications, none of which required reintervention. Mean follow-up was 53 ± 13.2 months. VAAFT failed in 14 (13%) patients. The overall recurrence rate ranged from 29% at 1 year to 63% at 5 years. Multiple external orifices, suprasphincteric fistula, younger age, previous surgery and higher complexity of the fistulous tract were independent risk factors for recurrence.

CONCLUSION

VAAFT is a safe sphincter-sparing technique. The initially high success rate decreases over time and relates to a higher degree of complexity.

Surgery of Simple and Complex Anal Fistulae in Adults: A Review of the Literature for Optimal Surgical Outcomes

Anal fistulas are common anorectal conditions, and surgery is the primary treatment option. In the last 20 years of literature, there exist a large number of surgical procedures, especially for the treatment of complex anal fistulas, as they present more recurrences and continence problems than simple anal fistulas. To date, there are no guidelines for choosing the best technique. We conducted a recent literature review, mainly the last 20 years, based on the PubMed and Google Scholar medical databases, with the goal of identifying the surgical procedures with the highest success rates, lowest recurrence rates, and best safety profiles. Clinical trials, retrospective studies, review articles, comparative studies, recent systematic reviews, and meta-analyses for various surgical techniques, as well as the latest guidelines of the American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons, the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland, and the German S3 guidelines on simple and complex fistulas were reviewed. According to the literature, there is no recommendation for the optimal surgical technique. The etiology, complexity, and many other factors affect the outcome. In simple intersphincteric anal fistulas, fistulotomy is the procedure of choice. In simple low transsphincteric fistulas, the patient's selection is crucial in order to perform a safe fistulotomy or another sphincter-saving technique. The healing rate in simple anal fistulas is higher than 95% with low recurrence and without significant postoperative complications. In complex anal fistulas, only sphincter-saving techniques should be used; the optimal outcomes are obtained by the ligation of the intersphincteric fistulous tract (LIFT) and rectal advancement flaps. Those techniques assure high healing rates of 60-90%. The novel technique of the transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS) is under evaluation. The novel sphincter-saving techniques of fistula laser closure (FiLac) and video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) are safe, with reported healing rates ranging from 65% to 90%. Surgeons should be familiar with all sphincter-saving techniques in order to face the variability of the fistulas-in-ano. Currently, there is no universally superior technique that can treat all fistulas.

The Value of Transrectal Ultrasound in the Preoperative Diagnosis of Complex Anal Fistula (CAF): Based on a Retrospective Cohort Study

Objective

A case-control study was employed to retrospectively analyze the value of transrectal ultrasound in the preoperative diagnosis of complex anal fistula (CAF).

Methods

The clinical data of 128 patients with CAF treated in our hospital from March 2019 to June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. All patients were examined by transrectal ultrasound and MRI with Hitachi HI Vision Ascendus ultrasound diagnostic apparatus and MRI. The general data of the patients (age, sex, course of disease, complications, and previous operation history) and ultrasonic image characteristics were recorded. The consistency of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess detected by ultrasound, MRI, and ultrasound combined with MRI were compared, and the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of ultrasound, MRI, and the combination of ultrasound and MRI (ultrasound+MRI) in the diagnosis of different Parks classification of anal fistula (AF) were compared.

Results

The ultrasound images of the rectal probe in typical cases were compared with the MRI images. The characteristics of the ultrasound images were as follows: the outer orifice of AF was a thin strip of mixed echo or low echo leading to the skin side, and the inner orifice showed local dilated low echo, mixed echo, or interruption of mucosal continuity. The following are the MRI image features: abnormal long bar signal shadow from the dorsal side of the end of the coccyx to the S5 plane, low signal on T1WI, high signal on T2WI, blurred boundary, uneven signal, bifurcation in the lower end of the tail for "Y" shape, one branch opening at the body surface at about 6 o'clock, the other walking horizontally, passing through the levator ani muscle to the right posterior position of the rectum at about 6:00 o'clock, and penetrating the inner mouth of the rectum at 6 o'clock. The detection of internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, and abscess were compared by three examination methods. There was significant difference in the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/purulent cavity among the three methods (P < 0.05). The detection rates of internal mouth and branch/abscess cavity by ultrasound and MRI (94.77% and 94.94%) were higher than those by single ultrasound (75.16% and 79.78%) and MRI (81.05% and 83.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of ultrasound, MRI internal orifice, and branch/purulent cavity (P > 0.05). There was no significant difference in the detection rate of supervisor and abscess among the three methods (P > 0.05). The results of operation included transsphincter type (n = 53), intersphincter type (n = 45), and superior sphincter type (n = 30). Analysis of transsphincter type AF detected by three methods: 42 cases of transsphincter type AF and 86 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound, 36 cases of transsphincter type AF and 92 cases of nontranssphincter type AF were detected by MRI, 57 cases of transsphincter type AF and 71 cases of nonsphincter type AF were detected by ultrasound and MRI. The comparison of the efficacy of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF showed significant difference (P < 0.05). The sensitivity of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (96.23%) was higher than those of single ultrasound (67.92%) and MRI (64.15%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the accuracy and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of transsphincter AF (P > 0.05). There were 41 cases of intersphincter type AF and 87 cases of nonsphincter type AF detected by ultrasound, 38 cases of intersphincter type AF and 90 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by MRI, and 45 cases of intersphincter type AF and 83 cases of nonsphincter intersphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. The sensitivity and accuracy of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The sensitivity and accuracy (100.00% and 100.00%) of ultrasound and MRI in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF were higher than those of single ultrasound (66.67% and 79.69%) and MRI (71.11% and 85.16%) (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of intersphincter AF (P > 0.05). The results of three methods were compared, including 24 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 89 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF, 21 cases of superior sphincter type AF, and 107 cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by MRI and 93 cases of superior sphincter type AF and 128cases of nonsuperior sphincter type AF detected by ultrasound and MRI. There was no significant difference in the sensitivity, accuracy, and specificity of the three methods in the diagnosis of superior sphincter AF (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

The sphincter, anorectal, and surrounding tissues were clearly demonstrated by transrectal ultrasound. The internal orifice, head, branch/abscess, abscess, and the relationship between abscess and sphincter in the diagnosis of CAF were in good agreement with the surgical results. Ultrasound+MRI can take into account the advantages of ultrasound and MRI, make up for each other, and improve the detection rate of internal orifice and branch/abscess. It can improve the sensitivity of diagnosis of transsphincter AF and the sensitivity and accuracy of intersphincter AF, which can provide intuitive and valuable imaging information for surgical intervention.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment for complex anorectal fistulas in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) has gained increasing acceptance as a sphincter-sparing procedure for treating complex anorectal fistulas (CAF), but no unequivocal conclusions can yet be drawn regarding its ultimate effectiveness. We reviewed the literature and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of VAAFT in CAF patients.

METHODS

The study protocol was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021279085). A systematic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases up to June 2021 with no restriction on language based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We used the keywords video-assisted surgery, video-assisted anal fistula treatment, and complex anorectal fistula to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Fourteen trials (7 prospective and 7 retrospective) with a total of 1201 patients (mean age 43.5 years) were included. The median follow-up duration was 16.5(8-48) months. Pooled analysis showed that the rates of success, recurrence and postoperative complication across the studies were 83% (95% CI 81-85%, I² = 37.9%), 16% (95% CI 14-18%, I² = 4.8%), 11% (95% CI 7-15%, I² = 72.1%), respectively. The postoperative Jorge-Wexner score used to assess the level of anal incontinence was 1.09 (95% CI, 0.9-1.27, I² = 74.6%). The internal opening detection rate was 97.6% (95% CI 96.1-99.6%, I² = 48.2%). Recurrence rates varied according to the closure method of internal opening from 21.4% after using staplers, 18.7% after suturing, to 23.5% after advancement flap. The hospital stay was 3.15 days (95% CI 2.96-3.35, I² = 49.7%). Subgroup analysis indicated that the risk of heterogeneity in the urine retention group was higher  compared with that of the overall group and that retrospective studies may be the source of heterogeneity for postoperative anal incontinence. r . Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the pooled results. Begg's and Egger's tests showed no evidence of publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the available evidence, VAAFT may be a valuable alternative to fistulotomy or seton in treating CAF and has the additional long-term benefits of reducing anal incontinence and surgical morbidity, permitting earlier healing and accelerated rehabilitation.

Sphincter-Preserving Fistulectomy Is an Effective Minimally Invasive Technique for Complex Anal Fistulas

Background

The optimal treatment of complex anal fistulas remains unclear, though many different sphincter-preserving procedures have been described. A minimally invasive technique with a better outcome is desired. The purpose of this study was to present a new technique—sphincter-preserving fistulectomy (SPF) and its clinical outcomes.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective study was performed to compare the efficacy and outcomes of SPF with ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) in the management of complex anal fistulas in regards to postoperative pain, complications, wound healing time, recurrence, overall success rate, fecal continence function, and quality of life. Continence function was evaluated using the Wexner incontinence scale and anal manometry. The fecal incontinence quality of life (FIQL) scale was used to assess patients' quality of life.

Results

From June 2020 to July 2021, 41 patients with 43 SPF procedures and 35 patients with 35 LIFT procedures were included. Postoperative pain was comparable between two groups. The morbidity rate and the mean wound healing time in the SPF group were lower than those in the LIFT group (2.3% vs. 48.6%, p < 0.001; 1.4 ± 0.3 vs. 1.7 ± 0.4 months, p = 0.001). At a mean follow-up duration of 11.4 ± 3.5 months in the SPF group and 10.7 ± 4.3 months in the LIFT group, SPF achieved a better overall success rate than LIFT (97.7% vs. 77.1%, p = 0.014). Three patients in the SPF group and 4 patients in the LIFT group who all underwent a simultaneous fistulotomy procedure complained new incontinence of flatus. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in regards to the Wexner scores (p = 0.790), the maximum resting anal canal pressure (p = 0.641), the maximum squeeze pressure (p = 0.289), and the FIQL scores including lifestyle (p = 0.188), coping (p = 0.188), depression (p = 0.850), and embarrassment (p = 0.910).

Conclusions

SPF is a novel, safe, and effective minimally invasive technique for the management of complex anal fistulas, with a promising success rate and negligible impairment on continence. Future prospective studies are needed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of SPF.

Long term efficacy of Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) for complex fistula-in-ano: a single-centre Australian experience

BACKGROUND

Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment (VAAFT) is a novel minimally invasive & sphincter-saving technique for treating complex fistula-in-ano involving endoscopic assessment & treatment of perianal fistula. This retrospective, non-randomized, observational study is the first Australian study of VAAFT. It is also the longest study of VAAFT to-date.

METHODS

From January 2014 to September 2019, 59 patients with a complex anal fistula were identified via MRI & underwent VAAFT. Fourteen patients had undergone previous definitive surgery for anal fistula. Specialized Karl Storz video equipment (fistuloscope) was used in the procedure. The rigid fistuloscope was used to directly visualize the fistula tract/s & internal opening. Closure of the internal opening was then performed. The fistula tract/s were then treated via fulguration. The external opening was kept patent & dressed. Patients were then followed up for a mean 59.5 months.

RESULTS

67.9% (n = 38) of patients achieved primary healing (needing nil further intervention) at a median of 13 weeks. 12.5% (n = 7) experienced healing followed by recurrence while 19.6% (n = 11) experienced non-healing. Of the recurrence/non-healing groups, 11/18 underwent repeat VAAFT with healing occurring in 10/11 patients at a median of 7 weeks. The mean operating time was 41.1 min. There were no major complications & continence scores were not affected. Three patients were lost to follow up.

CONCLUSION

VAAFT is both effective & safe for the treatment of complex fistula-in-ano. Its minimally invasive nature means that in the instance of recurrence or persistence, VAAFT can be repeated with minimal morbidity & reasonable likelihood of success.

Predictive Risk Factors of the Conversion from Video-Assisted Treatment of Anal Fistula to Seton Fistulotomy

Background: To identify the risk factors of converting from video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) to seton fistulotomy. Materials and Methods: A total of 180 patients registered to undergo VAAFT between January 2016 and June 2020 at the Erlonglu Hospital. Intraoperative examination of the fistula tract revealed that the patients were assigned to undergo the VAAFT operation and seton fistulotomy. Results: Among 180 patients aged 37 (±10.4) years who underwent intraoperative examination of the fistula tract, 101 completed the standard VAAFT and 79 converted to seton fistulotomy. Univariate analyses revealed that age, necrotic cavity diameter ≥1 cm, scars at the anal entrance, tissue edema, Parks classification, fistula stenosis, and fistula branches were significantly different between the VAAFT and converted groups (P < .05). Multivariate analysis revealed a significant correlation between the risk of surgery conversion and the presence of necrotic cavity with a diameter of ≥1 cm (odds ratio [OR]: 3.668, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.366-9.853, P = .01), scars at the anal entrance (OR: 9.462, 95% CI: 1.562-57.32, P = .014), fistula stenosis (OR: 25.14, 95% CI: 5.211-121.3, P < .001), and fistula branches (OR: 2.90, 95% CI: 1.088-7.73, P = .033). The nomogram based on the logistic model was fitted with high accuracy and area under curve of 0.793 (95% CI: 0.726-0.861). Conclusions: The independent risk factors of conversion from surgery for VAAFT to seton fistulotomy were the presence of necrotic cavity with a diameter of ≥1 cm, scars at the anal entrance, fistula stenosis, and fistula branches. The protocol of this systematic review was registered a priori in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR) under the registration number of ChiCTR1900022810.

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment versus fistulectomy and sphincter repair in the treatment of high cryptoglandular anal fistula: a randomized clinical study

Background

Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) may have a recurrence rate comparable to that of fistulectomy and sphincter repair (FSR) in the treatment of high anal fistula and with potential advantages in wound healing, functional outcome and quality of life. The aim and objectives of the study are to compare the outcome of VAAFT with that of FSR for high cryptoglandular anal fistula.

Methods

This was a single-centre randomized controlled trial of adults with high anal fistula comparing FSR with VAAFT. Primary outcome was fistula recurrence. Secondary outcomes were results of anal manometry, quality of life and faecal continence. A power calculation of 33 patients in each arm (1 : 1) was based on recurrence in the FSR and VAAFT groups of 5 per cent and 30 per cent respectively. Follow-up at 6 months after surgery included physical examination, MRI, anal manometry, quality-of-life assessment (RAND SF 36 questionnaire) and faecal-continence assessment (Wexner score).

Results

The study was terminated early due to high recurrence rates in both groups. A total of 45 patients were included. Recurrence rates were 65 per cent for VAAFT and 27 per cent for FSR, with hazard ratio 4.18 (P = 0.016). Length of the fistula was a risk factor with an association with recurrence (hazard ratio 1.8, P = 0.020). There were significant differences in quality of life in favour of FSR and in anal manometry in favour of VAAFT with a significant improvement in Wexner score in both groups.

Conclusion

FSR was associated with a lower recurrence rate than VAAFT in the management of complex anal fistulae in this single-centre study but the study was terminated early due to higher than predicted recurrence rate in both groups.

Registration number

NCT02585167 (http://www.clinicaltrials.org).

VAAFT for complex anal fistula: a useful tool, however, cure is unlikely

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic options for complex anal fistula (CAF) are limited. Video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) allows examination of these anatomically complex fistulae from within. The aim of the present study was to evaluate outcomes of VAAFT for a series of CAF.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on consecutive patients at a single centre with complex anal cryptoglandular and Crohn's fistulae managed with VAAFT from June 2016 to June 2019. CAF was diagnosed as high intersphincteric/transsphincteric tract, multiple/secondary tracts, horseshoe or anovaginal fistulae. Patients were treated with 'therapeutic intent' if the internal opening was closed at the time of ablation and 'diagnostic/staged/palliative' VAAFT if there was no ablation/partial treatment/ablation-only, respectively. Symptom improvement was a reduction in reported pain, discharge, or pad use.

RESULTS

Eighty-four patients (73 cryptoglandular, 11 Crohn's, M:F 2.5:1, median age 43 [22-77] years), underwent 105 VAAFT procedures. Twenty patients had > 1 VAAFT. Median follow-up was 8 (1-46) months. 40 (48%) had multiple or secondary tracts; an additional 16 (19%) had horseshoe and 3 (4%) anovaginal fistulae. Of the 84 patients, 19 [16/73 (22%) cryptoglandular and 3/11 (27%) Crohn's fistulae] healed. 34 (40%) unhealed reported improved symptoms; 23 (27%) no improvement; and 6 (7%) were worse. Sixteen (19%) had CAF > 5 years of whom none healed, albeit 50% reported symptom improvement. Five patients (6%) developed faecal incontinence: 2 temporary, 1 to flatus only and 1 to liquid and 1 to solid, all managed conservatively.

CONCLUSIONS

VAAFT is a useful minimally invasive procedure for complex fistula with no other minimally invasive options. Complete healing is rare, and, although symptoms can be improved in a number of cases, there is a small risk of incontinence.

Treatment of Complex Anal Fistula by Video-Assisted Anal Fistula Treatment Combined with Anal Fistula Plug: A Single-Center Study

Objective. The surgical treatment of complex anal fistulae is very challenging because of the incidence of incontinence after traditional approaches. There are no studies on the role of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with anal fistula plug (AFP) in the complex anal fistulae. The aim of this study was to demonstrate the efficacy of treating complex anal fistulae using VAAFT combined with AFP. Method. This was a retrospective, nonrandomized observational study. 57 consecutive patients with complex anal fistulae who had undergone the VAAFT with AFP in our hospital between April 2016 and December 2019 were included. The primary outcomes were the cure rate, recurrence rate, and Wexner incontinence scores; the secondary outcomes were surgery time, blood loss, wound healing time postoperatively, pain, and patient satisfaction. Results. All 57 patients completed the surgery and follow-up, with an average follow-up time of 28 months; 6 patients suffered with recurrence (recurrence rate: 10.5%). The average surgery time was 57.9 minutes, and the average wound healing time was 46 days. There were no severe postoperative complications, and anal sphincter function was protected in all patients. Conclusions. The treatment of complex anal fistula by VAAFT combined with AFP is safe and effective, has a high healing rate and few postoperative complications, and is a promising surgery that can effectively protect the patient's anal sphincter function.

Management of Complex Cryptoglandular Anal Fistula: Challenges and Solutions

Anal fistulae can be a very difficult disease to manage. The management of complex fistulae is even more challenging. The risk to the fecal continence mechanism due to damage to the anal sphincters and refractoriness to the treatment (high recurrence rate) pose the two biggest challenges in the management of this disease. Apart from these, there are several other challenges in the treatment of complex fistulae. The intriguing and uphill task is that satisfactory solutions to most of these challenges are still not known, and there is hardly any consensus on whatever treatment solutions are available. To summarize, there is no gold-standard treatment available for treating complex anal fistulae, and the search for a satisfactory treatment option is still on. In this review, the endeavor has been to discuss and highlight recent path-breaking updates in the management of complex anal fistulae.

Efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler for Parks II anal fistula

Background

To explore the efficacy of video-assisted anal fistula treatment (VAAFT) combined with an internal-opening closure technique using a stapler in the treatment of Parks II anal fistula.

Methods

From September 2017 to June 2019, 75 patients with Parks II anal fistulas in Beijing Erlonglu Hospital were enrolled and randomly allocated into two groups. The 37 patients in the treatment group received VAAFT combined with internal-opening closure techniques, and the 38 patients in the control group were treated with anal fistulotomy with seton placement. The primary outcomes included the healing rate and recurrence, the fecal incontinence severity index (FISI) score, and the Wexner incontinence score during the 6-month postoperative follow-up.

Results

Thirty-two cases were healed in the treatment group (86.5%) and thirty-six cases were cured in the control group (94.7%). There was no notable difference in the healing rate between the two groups (P=0.487). Significant differences between the groups were observed in the Wexner incontinence and FISI scores at 1, 3, and 6 months after the operation (P=0.001). Furthermore, the wound healing time in the treatment group was significantly shorter than in the control group (P<0.05), while the numerical rating scale (NRS) for postoperative pain on the first day and 1 week after the operation were significantly lower in the treatment group than in the control group (P<0.05).

Conclusions

VAAFT combined with closure of the internal opening using a stapler is effective and safe for Parks II anal fistula, and should be promoted as a promising treatment.

Assessing validity of existing fistula-in-ano classifications in a cohort of 848 operated and MRI-assessed anal fistula patients - Cohort study

Aim/background

The commonly used fistula-in-ano classifications, Park or St. James's University hospital(SJUH), neither grade fistulas as per their severity nor guide regarding their management. A new classification(NC), published in 2017, proposed to classify fistulas as per their severity and also guided in its management. The early grades (NC grade I & II) were simple fistulas and were amenable to fistulotomy whereas higher grades (NC grade III-V) were complex fistulas and were not amenable to fistulotomy.

Methods

Lower grades of all the three classifications were classified as simple (Parks: I, SJUH:I-II, NC:I-II) whereas higher grades were classified as complex (Parks: II-IV, SJUH: III-V, NC: III-V) fistulas. Fistulotomy should be possible in simple fistulas but not in complex fistulas. This was analysed for all these classifications. The long-term follow-up of continence was done by an objective scoring system (Vaizey's scores).

Results

The SJUH & Parks classifications categorized 504/828 fistulas as ‘complex’ which was quite inaccurate as 42.7%(215/504) of these fistulas were safely amenable to fistulotomy. On the other hand, the New classification (NC) classified 282/828 fistulas as ‘complex’ which was very accurate as 99% (279/282) of these were actually complex and were not amenable to fistulotomy. The change in the preoperative and the postoperative continence scores in the patients who underwent fistulotomy, as per these classifications, Parks & SJUH vs NC, was 0.064 ± 0.62 and 0.089 ± 0.85 respectively and was not significantly different(p = 0.80, Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions

The New classification(NC) seems better than the existing classifications for grading the disease as well as in guiding the management of the disease.

•

Largest MRI-based series of operated anal fistula patients to be ever published.

•

Analysis of 848 fistula patients to assess the validity of existing classifications.

•

Objective continence scores (Vaizey's scores) of each patient was evaluated.

•

New classification (2017) was far more accurate than Parks and SJUH classifications.

•

It accurately graded the fistulas as per their severity and guided their management.

Porcine dermal collagen mesh (Permacol™) as a bioprosthesis in the ligation of intersphincteric tract (BioLIFT) procedure

BACKGROUND

Ligation of intersphincteric tract (LIFT) is a sphincter-saving technique used to treat anal fistulas. Incorporation of a bioprosthesis in LIFT (BioLIFT) aims to improve healing. The use of cross-linked porcine dermal collagen mesh Permacol™ in BioLIFT has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to compare the healing rates and outcome of LIFT and BioLIFT for complex anal fistulas using the Permacol™ biological mesh.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of all patients having LIFT or BioLIFT for complex fistulas from January 2010 to November 2019 was performed in a tertiary referral centre. Patient data from a prospectively collected database of all patients having LIFT or BioLIFT were analyzed.

RESULTS

LIFT and BioLIFT were performed in 48 (82.8%) and 10 (17.2%) patients, respectively. All BioLIFT patients had previous interventions for their fistulas compared to 30 (62.5%) of patients who had LIFT, p = 0.023. The primary healing rate for LIFT was 87.5% (42/48) compared to 80% (8/10) in BioLIFT, (p = 0.42). Eight (13.8%) patients developed complications, 6 (12.5%) in the LIFT group vs 2 (20%) in the BioLIFT group (p = 0.62). On univariate analysis, the number of previous operations was predictive of complications (p = 0.03). BioLIFT was not associated with complication (OR = 1.75, 95% CI: 0.30-10.3, p = 0.54) or primary healing (OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.97-3.36, p = 0.54). There was no significant difference in recurrence (LIFT 12.5% vs BioLIFT 0%, p = 0.58). Kaplan-Meier analysis found no difference in time to recurrence between the two groups (p = 0.65).

CONCLUSION

Permacol™ mesh in BioLIFT is feasible and achieves a high primary healing rate of 80%. Prospective evidence is needed to establish the benefits of BioLIFT and determine whether Permacol™ is superior to the non-cross-linked porcine submucosal mesh.