The REALISE score: a new statistically validated scoring system to assess the severity of anal fissures

Fissurectomy with or without anoplasty for chronic anal fissures is a valid alternative to lateral internal sphincterotomy: a retrospective cohort study of 475 patients

BACKGROUND

After the failure of conservative therapy, the most effective surgical treatment for chronic anal fissures (CAFs) is lateral internal sphincterotomy. However, the choice of the procedure must be always evaluated carefully due to the risk of long-term anal continence impairment. The aim of the present study is to report the outcomes of fissurectomy with or without associated anoplasty.

METHODS

This study is a single-center retrospective study including patients with CAFs in whom conservative medical and non-medical treatments failed and who underwent fissurectomy with or without anoplasty from January 2015 to June 2023. Fecal continence, pain, and complications were assessed using specific questionnaires and scores.

RESULTS

Overall, 475 patients [280 males (58.9%)] with CAF underwent fissurectomy, with (n = 392; 82.5%) or without (n = 83; 17.5%) anoplasty. The majority of them (n = 379; 79.8%) had a posterior fissure. The mean follow-up was 49.9 months ± 26.13 months, with a minimum of 1 year, showing no intraoperative complications and a 4.2% postoperative complication rate. Missed healing occurred in 7.15% of patients at 6 months of follow-up, with higher recurrence and sphincterotomy rates in posterior fissures (p = 0.04). Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Scores were higher in patients who underwent anoplasty (p = 0.002). Interestingly, anoplasty led to a significant decrease in visual analogue scale (VAS) scores (p < 0.001), compared with those who did not undergo the procedure, with a consequent faster recovery.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that fissurectomy, whether performed with or without anoplasty, was a highly effective surgical option for treating CAFs, achieving an overall success rate of 92.8% without significant impairment of continence and with a low complication rate. Further randomized prospective trials are needed to confirm this finding. Interestingly, fissurectomy with anoplasty seems to allow for better short-term outcomes in terms of postoperative pain and recovery time compared with fissurectomy alone.

The use of a methylene blue and glyceryl trinitrate-based cream for the treatment of chronic anal fissures: a phase II randomized pilot trial from a referral coloproctological unit

BACKGROUND

Chronic anal fissures (CAFs) are the second most common anorectal disease. Non-surgical treatment includes several options with controversial efficacy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new ointment based on methylene blue in addition to glyceryl trinitrate.

METHODS

A phase II randomized single-centre triple-blinded study was carried out in a tertiary proctology unit on patients with CAF. The enrollment started after local ethics committee approval (study n. 6461, protocol approval n. 0045085). Eligible consecutive patients were randomized to one of three different groups, each receiving a different ointment. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated with the REALISE score.

RESULTS

Nine patients were treated with cream A (median age 47 years, IQR 40-56, 22% female), nine with cream B (median age 52 years, IQR 49-57, 33% female), and nine with cream C (median age 58 years, IQR 46-62, 55% female). In group A, REALISE scores decreased significantly from a median of 22 (IQR 12-25) to 6 (IQR 4-8) (p < 0.05) after 40 days. In group B, REALISE scores improved significantly from a median of 20 (IQR 17-22) to 5 (IQR 4-9) (p < 0.05). In group C, REALISE scores decreased significantly from a median of 19 (IQR 19-20) to 4 (4-5) (p < 0.05). No statistically differences were recorded. The healing rate was 77% with creams A and C, while it was 44% with cream B.

CONCLUSION

Methylene blue-based ointments could be a new and innovative treatment for the non-operative management and healing of CAFs.

Belgian consensus guideline on the management of anal fissures

Introduction

Acute and chronic anal fissures are common proctological problems that lead to relatively high morbidity and frequent contacts with health care professionals. Multiple treatment options, both topical and surgical, are available, therefore evidence-based guidance is preferred.

Methods

A Delphi consensus process was used to review the literature and create relevant statements on the treatment of anal fissures. These statements were discussed and modulated until sufficient agreement was reached. These guidelines were based on the published literature up to January 2023.

Results

Anal fissures occur equally in both sexes, mostly between the second and fourth decades of life. Diagnosis can be made based on cardinal symptoms and clinical examination. In case of insufficient relief with conservative treatment options, pharmacological sphincter relaxation is preferred. After 6-8 weeks of topical treatment, surgical options can be explored. Both lateral internal sphincterotomy as well as fissurectomy are well-established surgical techniques, both with specific benefits and risks.

Conclusions

The current guidelines for the management of anal fissures include recommendations for the clinical evaluation of anal fissures, and their conservative, topical and surgical management.

Efficacy and safety of Propionibacterium extract gel versus glyceryl trinitrate ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure: a randomized controlled trial

AIM

Chronic anal fissure (CAF) is an extremely frequent finding in clinical practice. Several topical agents have been proposed for its treatment with the common goal of increasing anodermal blood flow to promote healing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of a Propionibacterium extract gel (PeG) and 0.4% glyceryl trinitrate ointment (GTN) in patients with CAF.

METHOD

Patients were randomly allocated to a PeG or GTN group and medication was administered every 12 h for 40 days. The primary outcome was the success rate, as measured by a decrease in the REALISE scoring system for anal fissure at 10, 20 and 40 days after initiating either treatment. The secondary outcomes recorded at the same time points were healing rate, visual analogue scales for itching and burning, rate of complications and adverse events, patient quality of life and satisfaction, and cost analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 120 patients were enrolled, and 96 patients (PeG, n = 53; GTN, n = 43) completed the primary outcomes. A significant decrease over time in the REALISE score was observed in both groups. Adverse events occurred more frequently in the GTN group than in the PeG group, peaking at visit 1 [37 (63.8%) vs. 2 (3.4%), respectively], with headache being the most prevalent. The between-treatment cumulative average costs per patient were significantly higher for GTN than that for PeG at each follow-up visit. There were no other significant differences between the two groups for any of the other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

While there was no difference in healing rates between the two treatments, PeG was more cost-effective and associated with fewer adverse events.

Safety and efficacy of Levorag emulgel in the treatment of anal fissures using a validated scoring system

Introduction

Anal fissure is one of the most common anal disease characterized by intense anal pain, and deterioration of patients quality of life. Treatment is mainly based on the topical administration of calcium antagonist or nitric oxide ointments, and in cases refractory to medical treatment patients can undergo surgery. This study aims to assess the efficacy and safety of Levorag emulgel in the treatment of acute and chronic fissures using of a validated scoring system.

Material and Methods

A prospective observational study was carried out on patients with anal fissures between February and May 2022. The efficacy of the treatment was evaluated using the REALISE score, a new validated scoring system that rates VAS for pain, NSAID use, pain duration, bleeding, and quality of life (QoL), recorded after 10, 20 and 30 days from the beginning of treatment.

Results

Forty patients (median age 46 years, IQR 29-57, 70% women) with acute (22, 55%) or chronic (18, 45%) anal fissures entered the study. The median anal pain score according to the VAS scale decreased significantly from 7 (IQR 4.7-8) at baseline to 1 (IQR 0-3.2, p = 0.05) after 20 days. At the 30-day proctological examination, 22 patients (61%) were pain free (median VAS of 0, IQR 0-1.2, p < 0.05). Pain duration after defecation measured according to the REALISE score, showed a significant decrease after 10 days, from a median value of 2 (IQR 1-4) to 1 (IQR 1-1.2) (p < 0.005). The median value of the REALISE score decreased significantly, from 15 (IQR 11-19.25) at first proctological evaluation to 4 (IQR 4-6, p = 0.139) after 30 days of treatment. At day 30, complete fissure healing was achieved in 30 patients (80%). The healing rate was 82% and 78% in patients with acute and chronic anal fissures, respectively.

Conclusion

The use of Levorag® Emulgel may represent a safe and effective non-invasive first line treatment in patients affected by acute or chronic anal fissure.

Scanner-Assisted CO2 Laser Fissurectomy: A Pilot Study

Introduction: Surgery for chronic anal fissure is challenging for every proctologist. Solving the pain by guaranteeing rapid and effective healing is the objective, but what is the price to pay today in functional terms? Though this result is nowadays partially achievable through interventions that include the execution of an internal sphincterotomy among the procedures, it is necessary to underline the high rate of patients who can present faecal incontinence. The aim of this study is to explore the effectiveness of scanner-assisted CO₂ laser fissurectomy.

Methods: From April 2021 to September 2021, all consecutive patients who affected by chronic anal fissure suitable for surgery, meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria, were evaluated. All planned data were recorded before surgery, then at 24 h, 1 week, and 1 month follow-up. A scanner-assisted CO₂ laser was used in this study to achieve a smooth and dried wound with a minimal tissue thermal damage, to ensure good postsurgical pain control, rapid and functional, elastic and stable healing, and to prevent potential relapses. Paracetamol 1 g every 8 h was prescribed for the first 24 h and then continued according to each patient's need. Ketorolac 15 mg was prescribed as rescue.

Results: Mean pain intensity ≤3, considered as the principal endpoint, was recorded in 26 out of the 29 patients who enrolled in the study with a final success rate of 89.7% at 1-month follow-up. Pain and anal itching showed a statistically significant reduction while bleeding, burning, and maximum pain, and REALIS score showed a reduction too at the end of the follow-up period. Reepithelisation proved to be extremely fast and effective: 22 of 29 (75.9%) showed a complete healing and 5 showed a partial reepithelisation at 1-month follow-up.

Discussion: Outcomes of this study showed that it is undoubtedly necessary to change the surgical approach in case of anal fissure. The internal sphincterotomy procedure must be most of all questioned, where the availability of cutting-edge technological tools must be avoided and offered only in selected cases. Scanner-assisted CO₂ laser showed great results in terms of pain control and wound healing, secondary to an extremely precise ablation, vaporisation, and debridement procedures with minimal lateral thermal damage.