Endoscopic full-thickness dissection (EFTD) in the rectum: a case series

Knife-assisted full-thickness resection guided by the pocket-detection method for posterior deeply invasive rectal cancer: A novel endoscopic approach (with video)

Local full-thickness resection techniques for rectal cancer are limited by lesion size, location, or poor margin delineation. We aimed to evaluate the feasibility of endoscopic knife-assisted full-thickness resection (kFTR) guided by the pocket-detection method (PDM) for deeply invasive rectal cancer. Consecutive posterior-lateral rectal lesions suspected of deep submucosal invasion treated at a tertiary care center from February to October 2024 were retrospectively included. kFTR guided by PDM involved creating a submucosal pocket to detect and isolate the suspected invasive component (muscle-retracting sign), followed by muscularis propria incision and full-thickness resection. Technical success, accuracy of detecting deep submucosal invasion, and en-bloc resection rates were 100%. The median procedure time was 141.5 [IQR 123.7-179.5] minutes and the median hospitalization was 1 [IQR 1-7] day. No adverse events occurred. Histopathology showed R1-vertical margin in patient 1 (pT2 adenocarcinoma) and R0 resection in patients 2, 3, and 4 (pT1bsm3) after refinement of the procedure to include a ≥3 mm muscularis propria margin around the suspected invasive component. There was no recurrence at the first endoscopic follow-up of patients 1, 2, and 4. Patient 3 was sent to surgical low anterior resection due to multiple high-risk histological features. The previous kFTR did not impair surgery (no residual rectal carcinoma and 1/17 positive lymph nodes). Endoscopic kFTR guided by the PDM may be a feasible organ-preserving treatment for the detection and resection of deeply invasive posterior rectal cancer. Future studies are needed to ascertain whether rectal kFTR could represent a viable alternative to conventional surgical local excision techniques.

Endoscopic Full Thickness Resection: A Systematic Review

Background Endoscopic full thickness resection (EFTR) is an emerging therapeutic option for resecting subepithelial lesions (SELs) and epithelial neoplasms. We aimed to systematically review the techniques, applications, outcomes, and complications of EFTR.

Methods A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed. All relevant original research articles involving EFTR were included for the review along with case report/series describing novel/rare techniques from 2001 to February 2022.

Results After screening 7,739 citations, finally 141 references were included. Non-exposed EFTR has lower probability of peritoneal contamination or tumor seeding compared with exposed EFTR. Among exposed EFTR, tunneled variety is associated with lower risk of peritoneal seeding or contamination compared with non-tunneled approach. Closure techniques involve though the scope (TTS) clips, loop and clips, over the scope clips (OTSC), full thickness resection device (FTRD), and endoscopic suturing/plicating/stapling devices. The indications of EFTR range from esophagus to rectum and include SELs arising from muscularis propria (MP), non-lifting adenoma, recurrent adenoma, and even early gastric cancer (EGC) or superficial colorectal carcinoma. Other indications include difficult locations (involving appendicular orifice or diverticulum) and full thickness biopsy for motility disorders. The main limitation of FTRD is feasibility in smaller lesions (<20–25 mm), which can be circumvented by hybrid EFTR techniques. Oncologic resection with lymphadencetomy for superficial GI malignancy can be accomplished by hybrid natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) combining EFTR and NOTES. Bleeding, perforation, appendicitis, enterocolonic fistula, FTRD malfunction, peritoneal tumor seeding, and contamination are among various adverse events. Post OTSC artifacts need to be differentiated from recurrent/residual lesions to avoid re-FTRD/surgery.

Conclusion EFTR is safe and effective therapeutic option for SELs, recurrent and non-lifting adenomas, tumors in difficult locations and selected cases of superficial GI carcinoma.

State of the Art in Endoscopic Therapy for the Management of Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

OPINION STATEMENT

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NENs) comprise a heterogeneous group of slow growing tumors arising from the neuroendocrine cells of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Although they are considered relatively rare, their incidence is rising and it is believed that the more frequent use of endoscopy and imaging studies have at least in part contributed to the increased diagnosis especially of localized neoplasms. The management of these neoplasms should be guided by a multidisciplinary NEN team following appropriate staging investigations. Localized neoplasms of the GI tract may be suitable for endoscopic therapy, while patients with pancreatic NENs, unsuitable for surgery, should be considered for endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided ablation. In this review, we discuss the evidence regarding endoscopic resection of luminal NENs and EUS-guided therapy of pancreatic NENs. The efficacy, safety, and other longer-term outcomes of these techniques are summarized. In conclusion, this review of endoscopic therapies for localized NENs may be a useful guide for NEN clinicians and endoscopists who are considering these therapeutic options for the management of focal GEP NENs.