Required distal mesorectal resection margin in partial mesorectal excision: a systematic review on distal mesorectal spread

Prognostic impact of tumor budding in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tumor budding (TB) is a negative prognostic factor in colorectal cancer; however, its prognostic impact following neoadjuvant therapy for patients with rectal cancer remains unclear. This study aims to assess the prognostic impact of TB and the correlation between TB and other pathological features in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy.

METHODS

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Scopus, CNKI, Wanfang, and ClinicalKey databases was conducted for studies on the prognosis of TB in rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy from the inception of the databases to January 2023, and the final literature included was determined using predefined criteria. Quality assessment of the studies included, extraction of general and prognostic information from them, and meta-analyses were carried out progressively.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included, and the results of the meta-analysis showed that high-grade tumor budding (TB-1) increased the risk of poor 5-year disease-free survival (HR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38-2.22, P < 0.00001), 5-year overall survival (HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.21-2.59, P = 0.003), local recurrence (OR = 4.15, 95% CI 1.47-11.75, P = 0.007), and distant metastasis (OR = 5.36, 95% CI 2.51-11.44, P < 0.0001) in patients with rectal cancer after neoadjuvant therapy. TB-1 was significantly associated with poor differentiation and lymphatic, perineural, and venous invasion.

CONCLUSION

Tumor budding is significantly correlated with unfavorable prognosis and poor pathological characteristics following neoadjuvant therapy for rectal cancer. We anticipate more high-quality, prospective studies in the future to confirm our findings.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42022377564.

Tumour-specific mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis of oncological and functional outcomes

BACKGROUND

Tumour-specific mesorectal excision (TSME) practice for rectal cancer only relies on small retrospective studies. This study aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the oncological and functional outcomes of TSME practice.

METHODS

A systematic review protocol was drawn to include all the studies that compared partial versus total mesorectal excision (PME vs TME) practised for rectal adenocarcinoma up to 16 cm from the anal verge. A systematic literature search was conducted on EMBASE-Medline, Pubmed and Cochrane Library. Reports were screened for the study's outcomes: oncological radicality, postoperative anastomotic leak risk and functional outcomes. Included studies were appraised for risk-of-bias and meta-analysed. Evidence was rated with the GRADE approach.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies were included, consisting of 12325 patients (PME n = 4460, 36.2%; TME n = 7865, 63.8%). PME was performed for tumours higher than 10 cm from the anal verge in 54.5% of patients. There was no difference between PME and TME in circumferential resection margin positivity (OR 1.31, 95%CI 0.43-3.95, p = 0.64; I2 = 38%), and local recurrence risk (HR 1.05, 95%CI 0.52-2.10, p = 0.90; I2 = 40%). The postoperative leak risk (OR 0.42, 95%CI 0.27-0.67, p < 0.001; I2 = 60%) and the major low anterior resection syndrome risk (OR 0.34, 95%CI 0.28-0.40, p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) were lower after PME surgery. No difference was found in urinary incontinence (OR 0.68, 95%CI 0.13-3.67, p = 0.66) and urinary retention after early catheter removal (OR 2.00, 95%CI 0.24-16.51, p = 0.52).

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence from this meta-analysis shows that TSME for rectal cancer has good oncological results and leads to the best-fitted functional results possible for the patient's condition.

Impact of Microscopically Positive (≤1 mm) Distal Margins on Disease Recurrence in Rectal Cancer Treated by Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The adequate distal resection margin is still controversial in rectal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). The aim of this study was to assess the impact of a distal margin of ≤1 mm on locoregional recurrence-free survival (LRRFS).

METHODS

Among 255 patients treated with nCRT and surgery at the National Cancer Institute of Milan, 83 (32.5%) had a distal margin of ≤1 mm and 172 (67.5%) had a distal margin of >1 mm. Survival analyses were performed to assess the impact of distal margin on 5-year LRRFS, as well as Cox survival analysis. The role of distal margin on survival was analyzed according to different tumor regression grades (TRGs).

RESULTS

The overall 5-year LRRFS rate was 77.6% with a distal margin of ≤1 mm vs. 88.3% with a distal margin of >1 mm (Log-rank p = 0.09). Only stage ypT4 was an independent predictor of worse LRRFS (HR 15.14, p = 0.026). The 5-year LRRFS was significantly lower in TRG3-5 patients with a distal margin of ≤1 mm compared to those with a distal margin of >1 mm (68.5% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.027), while no difference was observed in case of TRG1-2 (p = 0.77).

CONCLUSIONS

Low-responder rectal cancers after nCRT still require a distal margin of >1 mm to reduce the high likelihood of local relapse.