Detection of antimicrobial-treated Chlamydia trachomatis with Amplicor PCR test kit

Clinical relevance of nucleic acid amplification test for patients with urinary tuberculosis during antituberculosis treatment

The nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) has been valuable in the diagnosis of urinary tuberculosis; however, no studies have attempted to determine the significance of NAAT post treatment. We encountered three patients with urinary tuberculosis who underwent sequential NAAT during antituberculosis chemotherapy and post treatment. All patients were diagnosed as having urinary tuberculosis by positive NAAT and specific renal deformity revealed by imaging. In two of the three patients, positive culture results were obtained and one was negative in standard culture. During antituberculosis chemotherapy, a negative NAAT was obtained from 3 to 5 months after the start of treatment and no positive culture results were obtained during the same period. At the end of chemotherapy, 6 months or more after the start of medication, all patients had negative NAAT results. These results suggest that NAAT for Mycobacterium tuberculosis provides an effective and rapid detection method for urinary tuberculosis both pre- and post-treatment.

Efficacy of an RNA detection test kit in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection

A nucleic acid amplification method based on DNA detection, the current standard method for the diagnosis of genital infection by Chlamydia trachomatis, has been shown to potentially yield false-positive results after treatment in the clinical setting. RNA detection methods are more appropriate because viable organisms have multiple RNA copies that are surely detected by the method. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of a new RNA detection test kit, the VIDAS PROBE CT test, in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection. For comparison, the standard DNA detection method, Amplicor STD-I, was also used in the study. First voided-urine samples and urethral smears from male patients with urethritis, and first voided-urine samples and cervical smears from female patients with cervicitis served as samples for the detection of C. trachomatis. Of the 60 first voided-urine samples from male patients, 21 were positive and 39 negative with the VIDAS PROBE CT test. Amplicor STD-I achieved exactly the same result. In female patients with cervicitis, the two test kits produced the same result, with 2 positive cervical smears and 38 negative. These results suggest that the VIDAS PROBE CT test is as efficient as Amplicor STD-I in the detection of C. trachomatis. While studies including a greater number of patients will be needed for revealing the unique advantages of the new RNA detection test kit, VIDAS PROBE CT, we concluded from the current study that the test may be clinically useful in the diagnosis of genital chlamydial infection.