Imaging of acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with perflubutane microbubbles and positron emission tomography-computed tomography

Efficacy of 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for detecting renal cell carcinoma in patients with end-stage renal disease

PURPOSE

Dialysis patients are at an increased risk of developing renal cell carcinoma (RCC); however, differentiating between RCC and benign cysts can sometimes be difficult using modalities, such as computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonography. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET)/CT efficiently detects malignant tumors; however, physiological accumulation of FDG in the kidney limits its efficacy in detecting renal tumors. However, in patients with severely impaired renal function, the renal accumulation of FDG is decreased, possibly improving the detection of renal malignancies in this patient population. This study evaluated the usefulness of FDG-PET/CT as a screening tool for detecting RCC in patients with end-stage renal disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective study recruited 150 participants from 2012 to 2016 who were on dialysis or underwent renal transplantation and were on dialysis until transplantation. FDG-PET/CT was performed to screen for RCC. Three radiologists independently evaluated the images. No protocol was defined for the additional management of positive examinations, leaving decisions to the discretion of each participant. Negative examinations were observed until the end of 2019.

RESULTS

In total, 150 participants (mean age, 58 ± 13 years; 105 men) underwent FDG-PET/CT. Twenty patients (13.4%) were diagnosed as positive. Fifteen patients underwent additional examinations and/or procedures, and RCC was found in seven patients. Of the four patients who underwent surgical resection, the pathological results were clear cell RCC in one, papillary RCC in one, and acquired cystic disease-associated RCC in two. Two participants were diagnosed with RCC on bone biopsy, and one was diagnosed on dynamic CT but opted for observation. The sensitivity, specificity, and negative predictive value were 100%, 93.9%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

FDG-PET/CT was useful for detecting RCC in patients with end-stage renal disease. Our findings show the potential use of FDG-PET/CT as a screening tool for RCC in this patient population.

Case Report: The ultrasound features of acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma: a case series

Background

Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (ACD-RCC) is a new subtype listed by the 2016 World Health Organization (WHO) classification, which occurred in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. This study will present the imaging characteristics of the four cases diagnosed with ACD-RCC. Ultrasound is expected to help detect abnormalities early in the follow-up of patients on regular dialysis, allowing patients to receive early treatment.

Case presentation

We searched the pathology database of our hospital for all inpatients diagnosed with ACD-RCC between January 2016 and May 2022. Pathology, ultrasound, and radiology readings are performed by experienced physicians with the title of attending physician or higher. Four cases were included in this study, all of whom were male, aged from 17 to 59. Two cases suffered from ACD-RCC in both kidneys, and kidney nephrectomies were performed. One case underwent renal transplantation, whose creatinine was back to normal, and the rest were on hemodialysis. On the pathological images, heteromorphic cells and oxalate crystals can be seen. Both ultrasound and enhanced CT showed an enhancement of the solid component of the occupancy. We followed up with outpatient and telephone visits.

Conclusion

In clinical work, ACD-RCC should be considered when the mass appears in the background of multiple cysts in the kidney in patients with ESRD. A timely diagnosis will help with treatment and prognosis.

Cystic Kidney Diseases That Require a Differential Diagnosis from Autosomal Dominant Polycystic Kidney Disease (ADPKD)

Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) is the most common hereditary cystic kidney disease, with patients often having a positive family history that is characterized by a similar phenotype. However, in atypical cases, particularly those in which family history is unclear, a differential diagnosis between ADPKD and other cystic kidney diseases is important. When diagnosing ADPKD, cystic kidney diseases that can easily be excluded using clinical information include: multiple simple renal cysts, acquired cystic kidney disease (ACKD), multilocular renal cyst/multilocular cystic nephroma/polycystic nephroma, multicystic kidney/multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK), and unilateral renal cystic disease (URCD). However, there are other cystic kidney diseases that usually require genetic testing, or another means of supplementing clinical information to enable a differential diagnosis of ADPKD. These include autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (ARPKD), autosomal dominant tubulointerstitial kidney disease (ADTKD), nephronophthisis (NPH), oral-facial-digital (OFD) syndrome type 1, and neoplastic cystic kidney disease, such as tuberous sclerosis (TSC) and Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) syndrome. To help physicians evaluate cystic kidney diseases, this article provides a review of cystic kidney diseases for which a differential diagnosis is required for ADPKD.

CT features of acquired cystic kidney disease-associated renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

Acquired cystic kidney disease-associated renal cell carcinoma (ACKD-RCC) is a relatively recently described entity with scarce literature describing its imaging appearance (1, 2). The purpose of this study was to determine typical and potentially unique features of ACKD-RCC on CT scan that could aid lesion identification.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review of the CT scans of 24 patients with 29 histologically proven ACKD-RCC lesions was performed. Imaging features were recorded based on consensus readings of two radiologists.

RESULTS

Tumors ranged in size from 1.2 to 5 cm. Nineteen lesions were right-sided and 10 left-sided. Nineteen lesions were exophytic. One patient had bilateral lesions and three patients had multiple lesions in the same kidney. All lesions had well-defined margins with 21 round, 7 lobulated and 1 crescentic in shape. On non-enhanced exam 4 lesions were hypodense, 16 iso-dense and 9 hyperdense; 5 had gross calcifications. Twenty two patients had contrast-enhanced CT exams, with 13 lesions demonstrating homogeneous enhancement (solid pattern) and 14 having inhomogeneous enhancement (cystic or mixed solid and cystic pattern). Only 1 patient had metastatic disease. Eight patients had a history of renal transplants.

CONCLUSION

ACKD-RCCs are well-defined lesions of variable size that are almost always rounded and most often exophytic. They occasionally have calcifications and are not uncommonly hyperdense on non-enhanced exam. They are most often iso-dense on non-enhanced exam and can be solid, cystic or mixed in attenuation on enhanced exam.

Renal Cell Carcinoma on the Native Kidney Following Kidney Transplantation

A 48-year-old man with histories of IgA nephropathy for 33 years, hemodialysis for 29 years, and a kidney transplant from a deceased donor 5 years ago was admitted to our institute complaining of high fever and back pain. Although repeated follow-up of computed tomography failed to detect any de novo issues, he was eventually diagnosed as a renal cell carcinoma with multiple metastases, developing from his native-acquired cystic disease kidney with multiple cysts using a positron emission tomography. We should be cautious of de novo renal cell carcinoma in kidney transplantation recipients, and careful follow-up might be helpful to detect it.

Acquired Cystic Disease-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma Extending to the Renal Pelvis Mimicking Urothelial Carcinoma on Computed Tomography (CT): Two Case Reports

Case series

Patients: Male, 66-year-old • Male, 67-year-old

Final Diagnosis: Acquired cystic disease-associated renal cell carcinoma

Symptoms: Hematuria

Medication: —

Clinical Procedure: —

Specialty: Oncology • Radiology

Usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma in dialysis patients: Comparison with computed tomography

AIMS

To investigate the usefulness of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography for diagnosing renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in dialysis patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Of 1301 dialysis patients who underwent abdominal computed tomography (CT) between January 2012 and March 2017, 19 were suspected to have solid renal lesions; of these patients, 18 gave consent for and underwent contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with perflubutane in addition to CT; 13 underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced CT, and 5, who could not be administered iodinated contrast media, underwent unenhanced CT. The final diagnoses were based on histopathological findings or the presence/absence of enlargement of the lesion during follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 19 lesions in 18 patients, 14 were diagnosed as RCC and 5 as benign cysts. CT facilitated accurate diagnosis in 10/19 lesions (52.6%) with obvious enhancement (≥20 Hounsfield units [HU]), while definitive diagnosis by CT was difficult in 9 lesions: 2 lesions showed ambiguous enhancement (10-20 HU), 1 lesion was an inflammatory cyst with obvious enhancement, and 6 lesions were assessed by unenhanced CT. Compared with CT, contrast-enhanced ultrasonography allowed more accurate diagnosis (McNemar test, P = .02) in 17/19 lesions (89.5%, 14 RCC and 3 cysts; including all lesions assessed by unenhanced CT and 2 with ambiguous enhancement on CT), with 1 false-positive (inflammatory cyst with hyper-enhancement) and 1 false-negative result due to deep location of the lesion.

CONCLUSIONS

Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography was useful for the diagnosis of RCC in dialysis patients with suspected solid renal lesions especially when contrast enhancement was not obvious on CT or contrast-enhanced CT could not be performed.

Imaging of renal cell carcinoma in patients with acquired cystic disease of the kidney: comparison 11C-choline and FDG PET/CT with dynamic contrast-enhanced CT

PURPOSE

To evaluate renal cell carcinoma (RCC) findings in acquired cystic disease of the kidney (ACDK) shown by ¹¹C-choline and FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Six ACDK patients with 7 RCCs underwent ¹¹C-choline and FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced CT before nephrectomy. Findings obtained with 3 imagings were evaluated and sensitivity detecting RCC was compared using 3-point grading scale (negative, equivocal, positive). The equivocal scale used for SUVmax ranged from 2.0 to 3.0 for PET/CT and a peak enhancement value ranging from 20 to 30 HU was used for CT.

RESULT

The histopathologic subtypes of 7 RCCs were clear-cell (n = 4) and ACD-associated RCC (n = 3). The negative/equivocal/positive grading results were 0/0/7 for ¹¹C-choline-PET/CT, 0/3/4 for FDG-PET/CT, and 2/2/3 for CT. Three equivocal cases by FDG-PET/CT were 2 clear-cell RCCs and 1 ACD-associated RCC. CT of 3 ACD-associated RCCs showed negativity for 2 and equivocality for 1. Sensitivity defining equivocal interpretation as negative for ¹¹C-choline-PET/CT, FDG-PET/CT, and CT was 100% (7/7), 57.1% (4/7), and 42.9% (3/7).

CONCLUSION

¹¹C-choline-PET/CT was more sensitive to detect RCC in ACDK as compared to FDG-PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT in our series. FDG-PET/CT may be limited for detecting clear-cell RCC, while CT may have difficulty with detection of ACD-associated RCC.