Design and baseline characteristics of the LANDMARK study

Effect of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors on cardiovascular events in hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia: A post hoc analysis of the LANDMARK trial

INTRODUCTION

The clinical benefits of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASi) in patients undergoing hemodialysis remain obscure.

METHODS

This is a post hoc cohort analysis of the LANDMARK trial investigate whether RASi use was associated with cardiovascular events (CVEs) and all-cause mortality. A total of 2135 patients at risk for vascular calcification were analyzed using a Cox proportional hazards model with propensity-score matching.

RESULTS

The risk of CVEs was similar between participants with RASi use at baseline and those without RASi use at baseline and between participants with RASi use during the study period and those without RASi use during the study period. No clinical benefits of RASi use on all-cause mortality were observed. Serum phosphate levels were significantly associated with the effect of RASi on CVEs.

CONCLUSIONS

RASi use was not significantly associated with a lower risk of CVEs or all-cause mortality in hemodialysis patients at risk of vascular calcification.

Target phosphate and calcium levels in patients undergoing hemodialysis: a post-hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study

BACKGROUND

It is necessary to re-examine the optimal phosphate (P) and calcium (Ca) target values in the contemporary management of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder to reduce the risks of cardiovascular events in patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

We performed a post-hoc analysis of the LANDMARK study. The outcomes were defined as cardiovascular events and all-cause death. Data from 2135 patients receiving hemodialysis at risk of vascular calcification were analyzed using a time-dependent Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for background factors.

RESULTS

On the hazard ratio (HR) curve, the ranges where the lower 95% confidence interval (CI) were below the minimum of HR (= 1.00) were as follows: P = 3.5-5.5 mg/dL; albumin-adjusted Ca < 9.1 mg/dL for cardiovascular events; and P = 3.6-5.3 mg/dL; albumin-adjusted Ca < 9.1 mg/dL for all-cause mortality. In stratified analysis, the HRs for cardiovascular events in P < 3.5 mg/dL and P ≥ 5.5 mg/dL were similar to that of P = 3.5-5.5 mg/dL (P ≥ 0.05), and albumin-adjusted Ca ≥ 9.1 mg/dL had higher HR than values < 9.1 mg/dL [1.30 (95% CI 1.00-1.68; P = 0.046)]. For all-cause mortality, the HR in P < 3.6 mg/dL was higher than that in P = 3.6-5.3 mg/dL [1.76 (95% CI 1.25-2.48; P = 0.001)], while the HRs between P ≥ 5.3 mg/dL and P = 3.6-5.3 mg/dL as well as those between albumin-adjusted Ca ≥ 9.1 and < 9.1 mg/dL were not significantly different (P ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Managing albumin-adjusted Ca < 9.1 mg/dL may reduce the cardiovascular risk among patients undergoing hemodialysis. Hypophosphatemia < 3.6 mg/dL may be associated with mortality.

Effect of lanthanum carbonate and calcium carbonate on the progression of coronary artery calcification among hemodialysis patients with vascular calcification risk: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Coronary artery calcification (CAC) is predictive of cardiovascular events. We assessed whether a non-calcium-based phosphate binder, lanthanum carbonate (LC), could delay CAC progression compared with a calcium-based phosphate binder, calcium carbonate (CC), in hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

This was a subsidiary of the LANDMARK study, which is a multicenter, open-label, randomized control study comparing LC and CC for cardiovascular events among Japanese hemodialysis patients with hyperphosphatemia who were at risk of vascular calcification. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive LC or CC. The changes in the total Agatston score of CAC 2 years from baseline were the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the changes in the total Agatston score at 1 year from baseline and the changes in serum phosphate, corrected calcium, and intact parathyroid hormone concentrations.

RESULTS

Of 239 patients, 123 comprised the full analysis set. The median daily drug dose (mg) was 750 [interquartile range (IQR), 750‒1500] in the LC group and 3000 (IQR, 3000‒3000) in the CC group; it remained constant throughout the study period. There was no significant difference in the change in total Agatston score from baseline to 2 years between the LC and CC groups [368 (95% confidence interval, 57-680) in the LC group vs. 611 (105-1118) in the CC group; difference, 243 (- 352-838)].

CONCLUSIONS

LC-based treatment for hyperphosphatemia did not delay CAC for 2 years compared with CC-based treatment in hemodialysis patients with at least one risk factor for vascular calcification.

Effect of Treating Hyperphosphatemia With Lanthanum Carbonate vs Calcium Carbonate on Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease Undergoing Hemodialysis: The LANDMARK Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Among patients with hyperphosphatemia undergoing dialysis, it is unclear whether non-calcium-based phosphate binders are more effective than calcium-based binders for reducing cardiovascular events.

Objective

To determine whether lanthanum carbonate reduces cardiovascular events compared with calcium carbonate in patients with hyperphosphatemia at risk of vascular calcification undergoing hemodialysis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Open-label, randomized, parallel-group clinical trial with blinded end point adjudication performed in 2374 patients with chronic kidney disease from 273 hemodialysis facilities in Japan. Eligible patients had hyperphosphatemia and 1 or more risk factors for vascular calcification (ie, ≥65 years, postmenopausal, diabetes). Enrollment occurred from November 2011 to July 2014; follow-up ended June 2018.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive either lanthanum carbonate (n = 1154) or calcium carbonate (n = 1155) and titrated to achieve serum phosphate levels of between 3.5 mg/dL and 6.0 mg/dL.

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was a composite cardiovascular event (cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction or stroke, unstable angina, transient ischemic attack, or hospitalization for heart failure or ventricular arrhythmia). Secondary outcomes included overall survival, secondary hyperparathyroidism-free survival, hip fracture-free survival, and adverse events.

Results

Among 2309 randomized patients (median age, 69 years; 40.5% women), 1851 (80.2%) completed the trial. After a median follow-up of 3.16 years, cardiovascular events occurred in 147 of 1063 patients in the lanthanum calcium group and 134 of 1072 patients in the calcium carbonate group (incidence rate, 4.80 vs 4.30 per 100 person-years; difference 0.50 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.57 to 1.56]; hazard ratio [HR], 1.11 [95%, CI, 0.88 to 1.41], P = .37). There were no significant differences in all-cause death (difference, 0.43 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.63 to 1.49]; HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 0.88 to 1.37]; P = .42) or hip fracture (difference, 0.10 per 100 person-years [95% CI, -0.26 to 0.47]; HR, 1.21 [95% CI, 0.62 to 2.35]; P = .58). The lanthanum carbonate group had an increased risk of cardiovascular death (difference, 0.61 per 100 person-years [95% CI, 0.02 to 1.21]; HR, 1.51 [95% CI, 1.01 to 2.27]; P = .045) and secondary hyperparathyroidism (difference, 1.34 [95% CI, 0.49 to 2.19]; HR, 1.62 [95% CI, 1.19 to 2.20]; P = .002). Adverse events occurred in 282 (25.7%) in the lanthanum carbonate group and 259 (23.4%) in the calcium carbonate groups.

Conclusions and Relevance

Among patients undergoing hemodialysis with hyperphosphatemia and at least 1 vascular calcification risk factor, treatment of hyperphosphatemia with lanthanum carbonate compared with calcium carbonate did not result in a significant difference in composite cardiovascular events. However, the event rate was low, and the findings may not apply to patients at higher risk.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01578200; UMIN Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: UMIN000006815.

State-of-the-Art Management of Hyperphosphatemia in Patients With CKD: An NKF-KDOQI Controversies Perspective

Phosphate binders are among the most common medications prescribed to patients with kidney failure receiving dialysis and are often used in advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD). In patients with CKD glomerular filtration rate category 3a (G3a) or worse, including those with kidney failure who are receiving dialysis, clinical practice guidelines suggest "lowering elevated phosphate levels towards the normal range" with possible strategies including dietary phosphate restriction or use of binders. Additionally, guidelines suggest restricting the use of oral elemental calcium often contained in phosphate binders. Nutrition guidelines in CKD suggest<800-1,000mg of calcium daily, whereas CKD bone and mineral disorder guidelines do not provide clear targets, but<1,500mg in maintenance dialysis patients has been previously recommended. Many different classes of phosphate binders are now available and clinical trials have not definitively demonstrated the superiority of any class of phosphate binders over another with regard to clinical outcomes. Use of phosphate binders contributes substantially to patients' pill burden and out-of-pocket costs, and many have side effects. This has led to uncertainty regarding the use and best choice of phosphate binders for patients with CKD or kidney failure. In this controversies perspective, we discuss the evidence base around binder use in CKD and kidney failure with a focus on comparisons of available binders.

An expert update on novel therapeutic targets for hyperphosphatemia in chronic kidney disease: preclinical and clinical innovations

Introduction: The management of hyperphosphatemia in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) is complicated, requiring a multidisciplinary approach that includes dietary phosphate restriction, dialysis, and phosphate binders.Areas covered: We describe key players involved in regulating inorganic phosphate homeostasis and their differential role in healthy people and different stages of CKD. The contribution of paracellular and transcellular intestinal absorptive mechanisms are also examined. Finally, we illuminate recent therapeutic approaches for hyperphosphatemia in CKD. We searched PubMed/Medline (up to November 2019) using the following terms: chronic kidney disease, dialysis, diet, hyperphosphatemia, NaPi2b, nicotinamide, phosphate binder, secondary hyperparathyroidism, tenapanor and vascular calcification.Expert opinion: The precise mechanisms regulating intestinal phosphate absorption in humans is not completely understood. However, it is now established that this process involves two independent pathways: a) active transport (i.e. transcellular route, via specific ion transporters) and inactive transport (i.e. paracellular route across tight junctions). Dietary phosphate restriction and phosphate-binder use can lead to an undesirable maladaptive increase in phosphate uptake and promote active phosphate transport by increased expression of the gastrointestinal sodium-dependent phosphate transporter, NaPi2b. Nicotinamide may overcome these limitations through the inhibition of NaPi2b, by improved efficacy and reduced phosphate binder use and better compliance.

Phosphate binders for preventing and treating chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD)

BACKGROUND

Phosphate binders are used to reduce positive phosphate balance and to lower serum phosphate levels for people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) with the aim to prevent progression of chronic kidney disease-mineral and bone disorder (CKD-MBD). This is an update of a review first published in 2011.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to assess the benefits and harms of phosphate binders for people with CKD with particular reference to relevant biochemical end-points, musculoskeletal and cardiovascular morbidity, hospitalisation, and death.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 12 July 2018 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs of adults with CKD of any GFR category comparing a phosphate binder to another phosphate binder, placebo or usual care to lower serum phosphate. Outcomes included all-cause and cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, adverse events, vascular calcification and bone fracture, and surrogates for such outcomes including serum phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), and FGF23.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected studies for inclusion and extracted study data. We applied the Cochrane 'Risk of Bias' tool and used the GRADE process to assess evidence certainty. We estimated treatment effects using random-effects meta-analysis. Results were expressed as risk ratios (RR) for dichotomous outcomes together with 95% confidence intervals (CI) or mean differences (MD) or standardised MD (SMD) for continuous outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 104 studies involving 13,744 adults. Sixty-nine new studies were added to this 2018 update.Most placebo or usual care controlled studies were among participants with CKD G2 to G5 not requiring dialysis (15/25 studies involving 1467 participants) while most head to head studies involved participants with CKD G5D treated with dialysis (74/81 studies involving 10,364 participants). Overall, seven studies compared sevelamer with placebo or usual care (667 participants), seven compared lanthanum to placebo or usual care (515 participants), three compared iron to placebo or usual care (422 participants), and four compared calcium to placebo or usual care (278 participants). Thirty studies compared sevelamer to calcium (5424 participants), and fourteen studies compared lanthanum to calcium (1690 participants). No study compared iron-based binders to calcium. The remaining studies evaluated comparisons between sevelamer (hydrochloride or carbonate), sevelamer plus calcium, lanthanum, iron (ferric citrate, sucroferric oxyhydroxide, stabilised polynuclear iron(III)-oxyhydroxide), calcium (acetate, ketoglutarate, carbonate), bixalomer, colestilan, magnesium (carbonate), magnesium plus calcium, aluminium hydroxide, sucralfate, the inhibitor of phosphate absorption nicotinamide, placebo, or usual care without binder. In 82 studies, treatment was evaluated among adults with CKD G5D treated with haemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis, while in 22 studies, treatment was evaluated among participants with CKD G2 to G5. The duration of study follow-up ranged from 8 weeks to 36 months (median 3.7 months). The sample size ranged from 8 to 2103 participants (median 69). The mean age ranged between 42.6 and 68.9 years.Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were low risk in 25 and 15 studies, respectively. Twenty-seven studies reported low risk methods for blinding of participants, investigators, and outcome assessors. Thirty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias and 69 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias.In CKD G2 to G5, compared with placebo or usual care, sevelamer, lanthanum, iron and calcium-based phosphate binders had uncertain or inestimable effects on death (all causes), cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. Sevelamer may lead to constipation (RR 6.92, CI 2.24 to 21.4; low certainty) and lanthanum (RR 2.98, CI 1.21 to 7.30, moderate certainty) and iron-based binders (RR 2.66, CI 1.15 to 6.12, moderate certainty) probably increased constipation compared with placebo or usual care. Lanthanum may result in vomiting (RR 3.72, CI 1.36 to 10.18, low certainty). Iron-based binders probably result in diarrhoea (RR 2.81, CI 1.18 to 6.68, high certainty), while the risks of other adverse events for all binders were uncertain.In CKD G5D sevelamer may lead to lower death (all causes) (RR 0.53, CI 0.30 to 0.91, low certainty) and induce less hypercalcaemia (RR 0.30, CI 0.20 to 0.43, low certainty) when compared with calcium-based binders, and has uncertain or inestimable effects on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification. The finding of lower death with sevelamer compared with calcium was present when the analysis was restricted to studies at low risk of bias (RR 0.50, CI 0.32 to 0.77). In absolute terms, sevelamer may lower risk of death (all causes) from 210 per 1000 to 105 per 1000 over a follow-up of up to 36 months, compared to calcium-based binders. Compared with calcium-based binders, lanthanum had uncertain effects with respect to all-cause or cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture, or coronary artery calcification and probably had reduced risks of treatment-related hypercalcaemia (RR 0.16, CI 0.06 to 0.43, low certainty). There were no head-to-head studies of iron-based binders compared with calcium. The paucity of placebo-controlled studies in CKD G5D has led to uncertainty about the effects of phosphate binders on patient-important outcomes compared with placebo.It is uncertain whether the effects of binders on clinically-relevant outcomes were different for patients who were and were not treated with dialysis in subgroup analyses.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In studies of adults with CKD G5D treated with dialysis, sevelamer may lower death (all causes) compared to calcium-based binders and incur less treatment-related hypercalcaemia, while we found no clinically important benefits of any phosphate binder on cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, fracture or coronary artery calcification. The effects of binders on patient-important outcomes compared to placebo are uncertain. In patients with CKD G2 to G5, the effects of sevelamer, lanthanum, and iron-based phosphate binders on cardiovascular, vascular calcification, and bone outcomes compared to placebo or usual care, are also uncertain and they may incur constipation, while iron-based binders may lead to diarrhoea.