Long-term outcomes of initial therapy for idiopathic membranous nephropathy

Effect of immunosuppressive agents on clinical outcomes in idiopathic membranous nephropathy

BACKGROUND

Few comparative studies on the effects of immunosuppressants in patients with idiopathic membranous nephropathy have been conducted.

METHODS

Data from 489 patients who received conservative treatment or immunosuppressants were retrospectively analyzed by propensity score matching. Primary outcomes were complete or partial remission (CR or PR) of proteinuria, and secondary outcomes were renal survival and infection.

RESULTS

Of the 489 patients, 357 (73.0%) received immunosuppressants. Propensity score matching identified 82 patients from the conservative group and 82 patients in the immunosuppressant group. CR or PR at 12 months was significantly higher in the immunosuppressant group compared with the conservative group for the total population (p = 0.002) and the propensity score-matched population (p = 0.02). The use of immunosuppressants was significantly more effective with respect to achieving a CR or PR at 12 months in patients who were aged <65 years or female, or who had a proteinuria level of ≥4.0 g/g or an estimated glomerular filtration rate of ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 (p < 0.05). Renal survival was similar between patients receiving immunosuppressants and conservative treatment in both the total and matched populations. The immunosuppressant group (21.8%) had a significantly higher incidence of infections compared with the conservative group (13.6%) for the total population (p = 0.03), but statistical significance disappeared in the matched population (p > 0.99).

CONCLUSION

The remission rate was significantly higher in the immunosuppressant group than in the conservative group, particularly in the subgroup of patients who were young or female, or those with heavy proteinuria loads or good renal function.

Comparative efficacy of three regimens (cyclosporine, tacrolimus, and cyclophosphamide) combined with steroids for the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of combined immunosuppressive regimens of cyclosporine (CsA), tacrolimus (TAC), or cyclophosphamide (CTX) combined with steroids in the treatment of idiopathic membranous nephropathy (IMN).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 150 biopsy-proven IMN patients were divided into three groups: CTX, TAC, and CsA groups (50 cases each). Patients received a selected regimen for 48 weeks. The efficacy (remission rate, 24h urinary protein, and serum albumin and creatinine) and safety (adverse events) profiles of administered regimens were evaluated at 12, 24 and 48 weeks.

RESULTS

At 12 weeks, the response rates for CsA, TAC, and CTX groups were 14%, 50%, and 22%, respectively. This increased to 74%, 84%, and 82%, respectively at 48 weeks. During follow-up, 24h urinary protein significantly reduced from baseline in all regimens (P<0.05), while serum albumin increased in TAC and CTX groups after 12 weeks (P<0.05), and CsA group at 48 weeks (P<0.05). No significant changes in serum creatinine levels were noted in all three regimens (P>0.05). Safety was comparable in all groups, with lower respiratory tract infection being the most frequent adverse event.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined regimens (i.e., TAC, CsA, and CTX) are effective in the treatment of patients with IMN at 48 weeks, while TAC and CTX might be more beneficial in terms of shortened time to remission and increased complete response rate.

Effect of Low-Density Lipoprotein Apheresis for Nephrotic Idiopathic Membranous Nephropathy as Initial Induction Therapy

Low-density lipoprotein apheresis (LDL-A) has been used for nephrotic syndrome (NS) caused by focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in Japan. Idiopathic membranous nephropathy (iMN) can also cause treatment-resistant NS. Therefore, we investigated the effect of LDL-A during initial induction for it. This retrospective, observational, and single-center study enrolled consecutive iMN patients who received steroids from March 2000 to May 2015. We compared data between 11 patients treated with LDL-A (LDL-A group) and 27 patients without (non-LDL-A group) at baseline and 4 and 8 weeks later. Reduction rate of proteinuria and increase rate of serum albumin in LDL-A group were significantly higher than the other after 4 weeks (P = 0.036 and 0.030) and 8 weeks (P = 0.030 and <0.001), respectively. There was no adverse event caused by LDL-A and immunosuppressant dose was not significantly different. In conclusion, LDL-A may be an effective choice for initial induction of nephrotic iMN.

Therapeutic efficacy of rituximab for the management of adult-onset steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Recent reports have described the efficacy of rituximab in treating steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) in pediatric patients. However, few reports describe data regarding adult-onset SDNS. We investigated the efficacy of rituximab for the management of adult-onset SDNS.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective cohort study investigating eight patients with adult-onset SDNS who were treated with rituximab. Clinical data were obtained at the initiation of rituximab therapy. The primary outcomes evaluated were successful suppression of relapses and CD19+ cells after rituximab treatment. The corticosteroid- and immunosuppressant-sparing effect and adverse events were additionally evaluated.

RESULTS

All eight patients were diagnosed with minimal change nephrotic syndrome and received immunosuppressants in addition to corticosteroid. Total number of relapses was 10.5 times as a median value. Rituximab administration was repeated in two patients, whereas six received single-dose rituximab. Three of eight (37.5%) patients showed relapse after rituximab therapy. A rituximab-induced depletion in CD19+ cells noted initially was followed by their reappearance in all patients. There were cases with no relapse after the reappearance of CD19+ cells. The median relapse time pre- and post-rituximab therapy showed a decrease from 1 time/year (interquartile range [IQR] 1-3 times/year) to 0 time/year (IQR 0-1 time/year). Rituximab treatment induced a significant reduction in the required doses of corticosteroid and cyclosporine (P < 0.01). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSION

Rituximab treatment was effective not only in childhood-onset but also in adult-onset SDNS. Further studies are needed to establish optimal treatment regimens.