Inpatient educational program delays the need for dialysis in patients with chronic kidney disease stage G5

Effects of 1-week inpatient multidisciplinary care for chronic kidney disease prior to outpatient collaborative care

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary care for Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) has been reported to be effective in preventing deterioration of renal function and avoiding hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter.

METHODS

We included 171 patients who received dialysis at our department between October 2014 and June 2017. Patients were divided into two groups: an inpatient group who received inpatient multidisciplinary care for CKD (educational hospitalization) prior to outpatient collaborative care from their family physician and nephrologist, and a non-inpatient group who did not receive such care. We compared factors related to dialysis induction.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in eGFR between the groups at the start of observation. The mean time from the start of observation to dialysis induction (inpatient group vs. non-inpatient group; 40.8 ± 2.8 vs. 23.9 ± 3.0 months, respectively; P < 0.001) and the rate of hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter (22.5 vs. 47.1%, respectively; P = 0.002) were significantly different between the groups. Survival analysis showed that the time to dialysis induction was significantly longer in the inpatient group (P = 0.0001). Multivariate analysis revealed that educational hospitalization (odds ratio = 0.30 [95% CI 0.13, 0.67]) was significantly associated with hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter.

CONCLUSION

Educational hospitalization prior to outpatient collaborative care is beneficial for preventing hemodialysis induction using a central venous catheter and postponing dialysis induction.

Effect of multidisciplinary care on diabetic kidney disease: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is the most common disease among patients requiring dialysis for the first time in Japan. Multidisciplinary care (MDC) may prevent the progression of kidney failure. However, the effectiveness and timing of MDC to preserve kidney function in patients with DKD is unclear. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate whether MDC for patients with DKD affects the preservation of kidney function as well as the timing of MDC in clinical practice.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and DKD from April 2012 to January 2020 using a nationwide Japanese healthcare record database. The fee code for medical guidance to prevent dialysis in patients with diabetes was used to distinguish between the MDC and non-MDC groups. The primary outcome was a 40% decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate, and secondary outcomes were death, hospitalization, permanent dialysis, kidney failure with replacement therapy, and emergency temporary catheterization. Propensity score matching was performed, and Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 9,804 eligible patients met the inclusion criteria, of whom 5,614 were matched for the main analysis: 1,039 in the MDC group, and 4,575 in the non-MDC group. The primary outcome did not differ between the groups (hazard ratio: 1.18, [95% confidence interval: 0.99-1.41], P = 0.07). The groups also did not differ in terms of the secondary outcomes. Most patients with DKD received their first MDC guidance within 1 month of diagnosis, but most received guidance only once per year.

CONCLUSIONS

Although we could not demonstrate the effectiveness of MDC on kidney function in patients with DKD, we clarified the characteristics of such patients assigned the fee code for medical guidance to prevent dialysis related to diabetes.

Association between inpatient education program for patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease and new-onset cardiovascular disease after initiating dialysis

BACKGROUND

The association between inpatient education programs (IEPs) for patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) and new-onset cardiovascular disease (CVD) after initiating dialysis is unclear.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018, evaluating CKD patients who were divided into two groups based on whether or not they participated in IEPs. The primary outcome was a new-onset CVD event after initiating dialysis. Cumulative incidence function was used to describe new-onset CVD considering the competing outcome of death. Additionally, Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the hazard ratio of new-onset CVD between IEP and non-IEP groups.

RESULTS

Of the 493 patients, 131 (26.6%) patients had participated in IEPs. The IEP group had a significantly longer duration of CKD management by nephrologists (median 142 vs. 115 days, P = 0.007), lower rate of emergency hospital admissions (9.9% vs. 27.1%, P < 0.001), better ability to perform activities of daily living (Grade J; 81.6% vs. 69.1%, P = 0.046), higher rate of pre-placement of permanent vascular access or peritoneal dialysis catheters (82.4% vs. 59.4%, P < 0.001), and a higher serum albumin level at the beginning of dialysis (3.5 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 0.6 g/dL, P < 0.001). The cumulative incidence of new-onset CVD at three years after initiating dialysis in the IEP and non-IEP groups was 16.9% and 22.5%, respectively. The hazard ratio for new-onset CVD after initiating dialysis in the IEP group was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.41-0.97, P = 0.036).

CONCLUSION

IEPs were associated with a lower rate of new-onset CVD after initiating dialysis.

Inpatient multidisciplinary care can prevent deterioration of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease: a nationwide cohort study

Background

Multidisciplinary care is necessary to prevent worsening renal function and all-cause mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) but has mostly been investigated in the outpatient setting. In this study, we evaluated the outcome of multidisciplinary care for CKD according to whether it was provided in an outpatient or inpatient setting.

Methods

This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective, observational study included 2954 Japanese patients with CKD stage 3-5 who received multidisciplinary care in 2015-2019. Patients were divided into two groups: an inpatient group and an outpatient group, according to the delivery of multidisciplinary care. The primary composite endpoint was the initiation of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and all-cause mortality, and the secondary endpoints were the annual decline in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) and the changes in proteinuria between the two groups.

Results

Multidisciplinary care was provided on an inpatient basis in 59.7% and on an outpatient basis in 40.3%. The mean number of health care professionals involved in multidisciplinary care was 4.5 in the inpatient group and 2.6 in the outpatient group (P < 0.0001). After adjustment for confounders, the hazard ratio of the primary composite endpoint was significantly lower in the inpatient group than in the outpatient group (0.71, 95% confidence interval 0.60-0.85, P = 0.0001). In both groups, the mean annual ΔeGFR was significantly improved, and proteinuria significantly decreased 24 months after the initiation of multidisciplinary care.

Conclusion

Multidisciplinary care may significantly slow deterioration of eGFR and reduce proteinuria in patients with CKD and be more effective in terms of reducing initiation of RRT and all-cause mortality when provided on an inpatient basis.

Impact of inpatient educational programs on mortality after the start of dialysis therapy

BACKGROUND

Although inpatient educational programs (IEPs) for non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD) have been reported to slow disease progression, their legacy effect on prognosis after the start of dialysis therapy is unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who started dialysis therapy between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2018 were included in a single-center, retrospective, observational study. The patients were divided into two groups according to whether or not they participated in IEPs before dialysis introduction, and their background characteristics were compared. The survival rate for each group was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. Furthermore, the hazard ratio (HR) of IEP participation adjusted for confounding factors associated with mortality was calculated using Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 490 subjects (median age 69 years, 71.0% male), 129 patients (26.3%) participated in the IEP. At the start of dialysis, the IEP group had higher serum albumin (3.5 vs. 3.3 g/dL, p < 0.001) and lower serum total cholesterol levels (151 vs. 166 mg/dL, p = 0.0076) and the proportion of patients with independence in their daily living activities was high (p = 0.034). The median observation period was 3.4 years, during which 153 patients (31.2%) died. The 5-year survival rates were 81.0 and 61.5% in the IEP and non-IEP groups, respectively (p = 0.0038). Cox regression analysis revealed a HR for IEP of 0.57 (95% Confidence interval 0.37-0.88, p = 0.011).

CONCLUSION

IEPs for CKD patients are associated with a more favorable prognosis after the start of dialysis.

Discontinuing Hemodialysis with Patient Care and a Successful 9-Year Follow-up in a Patient Presumed to have End-Stage Kidney Disease Scheduled to Lifelong Hemodialysis: A Case Report

End-stage kidney disease patients who require hemodialysis for more than 3 months have a small chance of leaving dialysis unless they have a kidney transplant. Educating the patient about lifestyle changes can play a major role in improving kidney function. Therefore, we created a patient education program according to our nephrology experiences. Herein, we show an end-stage kidney disease patient who underwent hemodialysis for 6 months. Afterwards, dialysis was terminated with patient care, and the patient was then followed up for 9 years without dialysis. To date, there have been no reports regarding the termination of long-term dialysis with a kidney care program and the ensuing 9-year follow-up without renal replacement therapy.