Relationship between compliance with management target values and renal prognosis in multidisciplinary care for outpatients with chronic kidney disease

Examine the optimal multidisciplinary care teams for patients with chronic kidney disease from a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Multidisciplinary team-based integrated care (MDC) has been recommended for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, team-based specific structured care systems are not yet established. Therefore, we investigated the efficacy of MDC system and the optimal number of professionals that make up the team for maintaining kidney function and improving prognosis.

METHODS

This nationwide, multicenter, observational study included 2,957 Japanese patients with CKD who received MDC from 2015 to 2019. The patients were divided into four groups according to the number of professionals in the MDC team. Groups A, B, C, and D included nephrologists and one, two, three, and four or more other professionals, respectively. Changes in the annual decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate before and after MDC were evaluated. Cox regression was utilized to estimate the correlation between each group and all-cause mortality and the start of renal replacement therapy (RRT) for 7 years.

RESULTS

The change in eGFR significantly improved between before and at 6, 12, and 24 months after MDC in all groups (all p < 0.0001). Comparing group D to group A (reference), the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality and the start of the RRT was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.73; p < 0.0001) after adjustment for multiple confounders. Lower HR in group D was confirmed in both diabetes and nondiabetes subgroups.

CONCLUSION

An MDC team comprised of five or more professionals might be associated with improvements in mortality and kidney prognosis. Furthermore, MDC might be effective for treating CKD other than diabetes.

Key Performance Indicators of Secondary Health Care in Chronic Kidney Disease: Experience in Public and Private Services in the State of São Paulo, Brazil

Introduction: The objective of this study was to evaluate quality indicators of secondary health care in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: This retrospective longitudinal study was conducted in an outpatient medical nephrology clinic of the Brazilian Unified Health System (UHS) and a multidisciplinary outpatient clinic of a private health plan (PHP). The inclusion criteria were age ≥ 18 years, ≥ 3 medical appointments, and follow-up time ≥ 6 months. Results: Compared to PHP patients (n = 183), UHS patients (n = 276) were older (63.4 vs. 59.7 years, p=0.04), had more arterial hypertension (AH) (91.7% vs. 84.7%, p=0.02) and dyslipidemia (58.3 vs. 38.3%, p < 0.01), and had a lower estimated baseline glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (29.9 [21.5-42.0] vs. 39.1 [28.6-54.8] mL/min/1.73 m2, p < 0.01). Compared to PHP patients, UHS patients had a lower percentage of diabetics with glycated hemoglobin < 7.5% (46.1% vs. 61.2%, p=0.03), fewer people with potassium < 5.5 mEq/L (90.4% vs. 95.6%, p=0.04), and fewer referrals for hemodialysis with functioning arteriovenous fistula (AVF) (9.1% vs. 54.3%, p < 0.01). The percentages of people with hypertension and blood pressure < 140 × 90 mmHg were similar between the UHS and PHP groups (59.7% vs. 66.7%; p=0.17), as was the percentage of people with parathyroid hormone control (85.6% vs. 84.8%; p=0.83), dyslipidemia and LDL-cholesterol < 100 mg/dL (38.3% vs. 49.3%; p=0.13), phosphorus < 4.5 mg/dL (78.5% vs. 72.0%; p=0.16), and 25-OH-vitamin-D > 30 ng/mL (28.4% vs. 36.5%; p=0.11). The crude reduction in eGFR was greater in the UHS group than in PHP (2.3 [-0.1; 5.9] vs. 1.1 [-1.9; 4.6] mL/min/1.73 m2; p < 0.01). In the multivariate linear mixed-effects model, UHS patients also showed faster CKD progression over time than PHS ones (group effect, p < 0.01; time effect, p < 0.01; interaction, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Quality of care for patients with CKD can be improved through both services, and multidisciplinary care may have a positive impact on the control of comorbidities, the progression of CKD, and the planning of the initiation of hemodialysis.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Program Based on Effectiveness of a Multidisciplinary Model of Care for Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The effectiveness of the multidisciplinary nursing model in the nursing of chronic kidney disease (CKD) by using meta-analysis is explored. Relevant literatures that are in line with the multidisciplinary nursing model for CKD intervention are searched and screened from domestic and foreign literature databases such as Wanfang Medical Center, CNKNET, VIP, and PubMed, and Meta-analysis is conducted with RevMan 5.2 software. A total of 6 literatures are included, and the publication bias of the included literatures is low. Meta-analysis shows that the multidisciplinary group had a better Hb compliance rate, Hb level, Scr, eGFR, SBP, and DBP than the traditional group. The experimental results show that multidisciplinary nursing intervention can improve the nursing effect of patients with CKD and help to improve Hb, Scr, blood pressure, and glomerular filtration function of patients.