Effect of the H2 receptor antagonist nizatidine on xerostomia in patients with primary Sjögren's syndrome

Current developments and opportunities of pluripotent stem cells-based therapies for salivary gland hypofunction

Salivary gland hypofunction (SGH) caused by systemic disease, drugs, aging, and radiotherapy for head and neck cancer can cause dry mouth, which increases the risk of disorders such as periodontitis, taste disorders, pain and burning sensations in the mouth, dental caries, and dramatically reduces the quality of life of patients. To date, the treatment of SGH is still aimed at relieving patients' clinical symptoms and improving their quality of life, and is not able to repair and regenerate the damaged salivary glands. Pluripotent stem cells (PSCs), including embryonic stem cells (ESCs), induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), and extended pluripotent stem cells (EPSCs), are an emerging source of cellular therapies that are capable of unlimited proliferation and differentiation into cells of all three germ layers. In recent years, the immunomodulatory and tissue regenerative effects of PSCs, their derived cells, and paracrine products of these cells have received increasing attention and have demonstrated promising therapeutic effects in some preclinical studies targeting SGH. This review outlined the etiologies and available treatments for SGH. The existing efficacy and potential role of PSCs, their derived cells and paracrine products of these cells for SGH are summarized, with a focus on PSC-derived salivary gland stem/progenitor cells (SGS/PCs) and PSC-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs). In this Review, we provide a conceptual outline of our current understanding of PSCs-based therapy and its importance in SGH treatment, which may inform and serve the design of future studies.

Patient burden of Sjögren's: a comprehensive literature review revealing the range and heterogeneity of measures used in assessments of severity

CONTEXT

The severity of Sjögren's syndrome has been evaluated using a wide variety of clinical measures and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). This may contribute to the lack of clarity concerning the burden of Sjögren's from the patient perspective.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a comprehensive peer-reviewed literature analysis of the patient aspects of Sjögren's, focusing on PROs, to investigate the complexity underlying the evaluation of the syndrome and to elucidate the discordance between the different measures.

METHODS

We searched Embase for articles published between January 2005 and September 2015. Research articles, clinical and diagnostic reviews, and validation studies with a focus on patient aspects of Sjögren's were selected as the primary information source.

RESULTS

157 articles met the eligibility criteria. A wide variety of assessment measures used to evaluate glandular, extraglandular and functional domains were observed. Many different, non-validated Visual Analogue Scales, with a wide range of anchor words, were used in the quantification of Sjögren's disease burden, impeding comparisons between studies. Relatively few clinical trials of drug therapies used validated scales: European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Patient Reported Index was used most often for symptom assessment and 36 Item Short Form Survey for quality of life (QoL).

CONCLUSION

A wide range and diversity of measures are used to evaluate the patient burden of Sjögren's; most are not validated for use in this disease. PRO endpoints, validated specifically in Sjögren's, that demonstrate improvement are needed. These measures should focus on QoL aspects important to patients and will most likely involve gauging change in function rather than patient-reported symptoms.

Management of xerostomia and other complications of Sjögren's syndrome

This article provides an overview of the published literature in English in the past 63 years involving the management of xerostomia and other oral complications of Sjögren's syndrome. The evidence supporting studied interventions was evaluated using published criteria.

Do pilocarpine drops help dry mouth in palliative care patients: a protocol for an aggregated series of n-of-1 trials

Background

It is estimated that 39,000 Australians die from malignant disease yearly. Of these, 60% to 88% of advanced cancer patients suffer xerostomia, the subjective feeling of mouth dryness. Xerostomia has significant physical, social and psychological consequences which compromise function and quality of life. Pilocarpine is one treatment for xerostomia. Most studies have shown some variation in individual response to pilocarpine, in terms of dose used, and timing and extent of response.

We will determine a population estimate of the efficacy of pilocarpine drops (6 mg) three times daily compared to placebo in relieving dry mouth in palliative care (PC) patients. A secondary aim is to assess individual patients’ response to pilocarpine and provide reports detailing individual response to patients and their treating clinician.

Methods/Design

Aggregated n-of-1 trials (3 cycle, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials using standardized measures of effect). Individual trials will identify which patients respond to the medication. To produce a population estimate of a treatment effect, the results of all cycles will be aggregated.

Discussion

Managing dry mouth with treatment supported by the best possible evidence will improve functional status of patients, and improve quality of life for patients and carers. Using n-of-1 trials will accelerate the rate of accumulation of high-grade evidence to support clinical therapies used in PC.

Trial registration

Australia and New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry Number: 12610000840088.

A study of the effects of saliva stimulation by nizatidine on dry mouth symptoms of primary biliary cirrhosis

AIM

To elucidate the effect of saliva stimulation by nizatidine on oral symptoms of primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC) by administering it to PBC cases.

METHODS

From among 73 cases that had been definitively diagnosed as PBC at our hospital by February 2010, we selected 27 cases of PBC, 4 males and 23 females, as subjects. We obtained subjects' consent after giving them a full explanation of the administration of nizatidine. Nizatidine 150 mg was administered internally twice daily, after morning and evening meals. To observe changes in the quantity of saliva secreted, chewing gum tests were carried out four times: before the initial dose, and after 6 mo, 12 mo and 24 mo of administration. For subjective dry mouth symptoms, a visual analog scale (VAS) method was used to assess their feelings of oral dryness and eating difficulty, five times: before the initial dose, and after 1, 6, 12 and 24 mo of administration in 8 cases. The nutritional condition and the hepatic functional reserve were compared between before and after the nizatidine treatment.

RESULTS

The result of a chewing gum test on the subjects before the administration of nizatidine showed that 50% produced less than 10 mL of saliva, i.e., the standard under which cases are considered to have hyposalivation. The results of these tests showed that the quantity of saliva secreted was 10.5 ± 6.8 mL before administration of nizatidine, 10.9 ± 6.0 mL after 6 mo, 10.6 ± 4.9 mL after 12 mo, and 11.8 ± 6.8 mL after 24 mo administration. Thus, there was a slowly increasing trend in the quantity of saliva in the whole group. The percentage of subjects with saliva production above 10 mL was 45.8% after 6 mo administration of nizatidine, that is, only a slight change from before its administration, but it was 64.3% after 12 mo, that is, a significant increase. The saliva secretion by subject patients was examined before the beginning of administration of nizatidine, 12 mo later, and 24 mo later, and Fisher's combined probability test was used to examine the results for increases in saliva secretion. The analysis yielded P values of 0.51 and 0.53 for 12 mo later and 24 mo later, respectively. Thus, although there was no statistically significant increase, it was confirmed that saliva secretion tended to increase. A VAS method was employed to study the intensities of subjective symptoms of oral dryness and eating difficulty. Almost every case indicated some improvement of subjective oral dryness on the VAS early in the administration, i.e., one month after. We also studied the effects of the administration of nizatidine on nutritional condition, hepatic functional reserve, and long-term prognosis of PBC. No significant improvements in cholinesterase (ChE) level, albumin (Alb) level, or Child-Pugh score were found during the period of observation from the beginning to the end of administration of nizatidine, nor in comparison with the non-administration group. A comparative analysis between before administration and 24 mo later yielded P values of 0.41 for Alb, 0.56 for ChE, and 0.59 for the Child-Pugh scores.

CONCLUSION

It was confirmed that administering nizatidine to cases of PBC with dry mouth increased the secretion of saliva and improved the symptoms.

Topical and systemic medications for the treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome

The treatment of primary Sjögren's syndrome (SS) is based principally on the management of sicca features and systemic manifestations. Sicca manifestations are treated symptomatically through administration of topical therapies, such as saliva substitutes and artificial tears; in patients with residual salivary gland function, stimulation of salivary flow with a sialogogue is the therapy of choice. The management of extraglandular features must be tailored to the specific organ or organs involved; however, limited data have been obtained from controlled trials in SS to guide the treatment of systemic symptoms using therapies including antimalarials, glucocorticoids, immunosuppressive drugs and biologic agents. Nevertheless, randomised controlled trials of biologic agents that target molecules and receptors involved in the aetiopathogenesis of primary SS have initiated a new era in the therapeutic management of the disease, although the potential risks and benefits of these agents must be carefully considered. In this Review, we analyse the evidence regarding the efficacy of the therapeutic agents currently available to treat the manifestations of SS. On the basis of this evidence, we provide guidance on the use of these agents in different clinical scenarios.