Long-term medical costs of Alzheimer's disease: matched cohort analysis

The economic burden of diseases in the Nordic countries: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Economic burden studies can provide insights into the drivers leading to increasing healthcare costs. It can also provide a more holistic view of how diseases impact the welfare of patients and their families. Having concrete estimates of the economic burden across multiple diseases can help policymakers determine which diseases are economically more burdensome. This study aimed to review and summarise comprehensively economic burden studies across multiple diseases in the Nordic countries between 2000 and 2020.

METHODS

According to the 2020 PRISMA statement, a systematic literature review was conducted in PubMed, CINAHL, Academic Search Premier and Global Health databases using key terms related to the economic burden of any disease in Denmark, Finland, Greenland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden. Grey literature was also reviewed.

RESULTS

A total of 10,050 potential titles and abstracts were identified and screened, and 254 full-text papers that met the inclusion criteria were evaluated by two independent reviewers. Of these, 119 articles were included in a qualitative synthesis. Twenty-nine had clearly defined comparison groups, thus able to attribute the costs to the disease. Large variations concerning methodology and cost components were noted. Across diseases, the economic burden ranged from EUR 1668 per patient annually for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to EUR 93,041 for multiple sclerosis. However, estimates varied widely, even within each disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review highlights the need for more comparable economic burden studies. Future studies should focus on applying robust methodology and homogeneous cost-reporting methods to inform policymakers about which diseases are economically more burdensome.

Association of Personal Wealth Indicators and Health Care Costs in Persons With Alzheimer's Disease

OBJECTIVES

There is paucity of studies on the relationship between personal wealth and health care costs among persons with dementia, and earlier studies on other indicators of socioeconomic position have assessed costs after dementia diagnosis only. We investigated how different indicators of personal wealth (disposable income, supplementary income, assets subject to taxation, taxes and tax-like payments, and liabilities) are associated with health care costs in persons with Alzheimer's disease (AD) before and after AD diagnosis.

DESIGN

Register-based nationwide cohort study of persons with AD.

SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

Cohort of 70,531 people who received a clinically verified AD diagnosis in Finland between 2005 and 2011 and were community-dwelling at time of diagnosis.

METHODS

Data on income indicators were obtained from Statistics Finland. Data on medication costs and hospital care costs for the 12-month period from 5 years before to 2 years after AD diagnosis were obtained from national registers. Associations of wealth indicators with costs were investigated with multivariate mixed-effect negative binomial regression.

RESULTS

After adjustment for age, region, sex, marital status, comorbidities, expensive medications, use of psychotropic and antidementia medication, and highest occupational class before AD, people with higher levels of personal wealth indicators were more likely to have higher total health care costs along the whole follow-up period. The incidence rate ratios (IRRs), 95% CI for highest quintile vs lowest quintile were 1.17, 1.15-1.19 for disposable income, 1.10, 1.08-1.12 for taxable income, 1.18, 1.16-1.19 for supplementary income, 1.07, 1.06-1.09 for taxes, and 1.05, 1.04-1.07 for taxable wealth.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Our observation on the association between income/wealth indicators and health care costs in a country with a strong public health care system call for more effective measures in targeting health inequalities in the aging population. Although the different indicators were not completely interchangeable, associations of different indicators were toward the same direction.

Healthcare Costs in the Year Before and After Alzheimer's Disease Diagnosis: A Danish Register-Based Matched Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) carries a significant economic burden, with costs peaking around the time of diagnosis. However, the cost of diagnosis, including the time leading up to it, has not been studied thoroughly. Furthermore, regionalized healthcare structure could result in differences in the pre-diagnostic costs for people with suspected AD.

OBJECTIVE

This study set out to estimate the excess healthcare costs before and after AD diagnosis compared to a matched non-AD population and to investigate regional variation in AD healthcare costs in Denmark.

METHODS

We used a register-based cohort of 25,523 matched pairs of new cases of AD and non-AD controls. The healthcare costs included costs on medication, and inpatient-, outpatient-, and primary care visits. Generalized estimating equations were employed to estimate the excess healthcare cost attributable to diagnosing AD, and the variation in costs across regions.

RESULTS

Mean excess costs attributable to AD were € 3,284 and € 6,173 in the year before and after diagnosis, respectively. Regional differences in healthcare costs were identified in both the AD and control groups and were more pronounced in patients with AD (PwAD). The variation over time in regional inequality between PwAD and their controls was identified.

CONCLUSION

PwAD incur higher healthcare costs across all cost categories in the year before and after diagnosis. Regional differences in healthcare utilization by PwAD may reveal potential variation in access to healthcare. These findings suggest that a more standardized and targeted diagnostic process may help reduce costs and variation in access to healthcare.

Diagnostic groups of hospital stays and outpatient visits during 10 years before Alzheimer's disease

BACKGROUND

Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a major determinant of healthcare costs and increase in the healthcare service use occur already before the AD diagnosis. However, little is known how the different diagnosis categories contribute to this increase in healthcare use. We investigated how the hospitalizations and specialized healthcare outpatient visits from different diagnosis categories, based on the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) chapters, contribute to increased specialized healthcare service use during ten-year period preceding AD diagnosis.

METHODS

A register-based nationwide cohort of 42,934 community-dwelling persons who received clinically verified AD diagnosis in between 2008 and 2011 in Finland and 1:1 age, sex and hospital district- matched comparison cohort were included. Hospitalizations and specialized healthcare visits were categorized by the main diagnosis, according to the ICD-10 chapters. AD and dementia were separated to their own category. The number of persons with visits and stays was calculated for every 6 months, irrespective of the frequency of visits/stays individual had during that time window. Furthermore, the relative distribution of the diagnosis categories was computed.

RESULTS

AD cohort was more likely to have visits and stays during the 10-year period (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.17-1.21). The number of persons with visits and stays peaked in AD cohort from 1.5 years before the diagnosis when the differences in relative distribution of different diagnosis categories also became evident. The largest differences were observed for visits/stays with cognitive disorders, symptoms of unspecified diseases and psychiatric disorders diagnoses, and those with missing diagnosis codes in the last time window before AD diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS

Increased healthcare service use before AD diagnosis does not seem to arise from differences in specific diagnosis categories of ICD-10 such as diseases of the circulatory system, but from the higher frequency of visits and stays among persons with AD across diagnosis categories. Based on the relative distribution of diagnosis categories, the steep increase in healthcare service use just before and during the diagnostic process is likely due to prodromal symptoms and visits related to cognition.

The Costs of Dementia in Europe: An Updated Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The prevalence of dementia is increasing, while new opportunities for diagnosing, treating and possibly preventing Alzheimer's disease and other dementia disorders are placing focus on the need for accurate estimates of costs in dementia. Considerable methodological heterogeneity creates challenges for synthesising the existing literature. This study aimed to estimate the costs for persons with dementia in Europe, disaggregated into cost components and informative patient subgroups.

METHODS

We conducted an updated literature review searching PubMed, Embase and Web of Science for studies published from 2008 to July 2021 reporting empirically based cost estimates for persons with dementia in European countries. We excluded highly selective or otherwise biased reports, and used a random-effects meta-analysis to produce estimates of mean costs of care across five European regions.

RESULTS

Based on 113 studies from 17 European countries, the estimated mean costs for all patients by region were highest in the British Isles (73,712 EUR), followed by the Nordics (43,767 EUR), Southern (35,866 EUR), Western (38,249 EUR), and Eastern Europe and Baltics (7938 EUR). Costs increased with disease severity, and the distribution of costs over informal and formal care followed a North-South gradient with Southern Europe being most reliant on informal care.

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this study represents the most extensive meta-analysis of the cost for persons with dementia in Europe to date. Though there is considerable heterogeneity across studies, much of this is explained by identifiable factors. Further standardisation of methodology for capturing resource utilisation data may further improve comparability of future studies. The cost estimates presented here may be of value for cost-of-illness studies and economic evaluations of novel diagnostic technologies and therapies for Alzheimer's disease.

A Literature Review on the Burden of Alzheimer's Disease on Care Partners

BACKGROUND

Many individuals with Alzheimer's disease (AD) are dependent on nonprofessional care partners. Providing informal care can result in emotional, physical, and financial burdens; however, there is a need for a better understanding of the impact of AD on care partners to support the clinical and economic assessment of potential new treatments.

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a literature review to evaluate the burden experienced by care partners of individuals with AD.

METHODS

Electronic screening and supplementary searches identified studies published from 2011 to 2022 describing the association between AD and the quality of life (QoL) and physical health of care partners, and the economic or financial burden of AD.

RESULTS

Following electronic screening, 62, 25, and 39 studies were included on care partner burden, cost, and healthcare resource use in AD, respectively. Supplementary searches identified an additional 32 studies, resulting in 149 unique studies. These studies showed that care partners of individuals with AD report moderate to severe burden. Higher burden and lower QoL were observed in those caring for individuals with more severe AD. Care partners of individuals with AD experience higher burden, lower QoL, and higher levels of stress, depression, and anxiety than those without caring responsibilities. Informal care costs increased with AD severity and accounted for the greatest proportion of overall societal cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Care partners of individuals with AD experience emotional and economic burden, which increases with AD severity. These impacts should be quantified comprehensively in future studies and captured in economic evaluations of AD interventions.

A 14-Year Longitudinal Analysis of Healthcare Expenditure on Dementia and Related Factors (DEMENCOST Study)

BACKGROUND

The large number of dementia cases produces a great pressure on health and social care services, which requires efficient planning to meet the needs of patients through infrastructure, equipment, and financial, technical, and personal resources adjusted to their demands. Dementia analysis requires studies with a very precise patient characterization of both the disease and comorbidities present, and long-term follow-up of patients in clinical aspects and patterns of resource utilization and costs generated.

OBJECTIVE

To describe and quantify direct healthcare expenditure and its evolution from three years before and up to ten years after the diagnosis of dementia, compared to a matched group without dementia.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort design with follow-up from 6 to 14 years. We studied 996 people with dementia (PwD) and 2,998 controls matched for age, sex, and comorbidity. This paper adopts the provider's perspective as the perspective of analysis and refers to the costs actually incurred in providing the services. Aggregate costs and components per patient per year were calculated and modelled.

RESULTS

Total health expenditure increases in PwD from the year of diagnosis and in each of the following 7 years, but not thereafter. Health status and mortality are factors explaining the evolution of direct costs. Dementia alone is not a statistically significant factor in explaining differences between groups.

CONCLUSION

The incremental direct cost of dementia may not be as high or as long as studies with relatively short follow-up suggest. Dementia would have an impact on increasing disease burden and mortality.

Effects of the 2018 Japan Floods on long-term care insurance costs in Japan: retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Climate change has increased the frequency and severity of torrential rains and floods around the world. Estimating the costs of these disasters is one of the five global research priorities identified by WHO. The 2018 Japan Floods hit western Japan causing extensive destruction and many deaths, especially among vulnerable elderly. Such affected elderly would need long-term care due to the various health problems caused by the disaster. A Long-Term Care Insurance (LTCI) system provides care services in Japan. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the 2018 Japan Floods on LTCI costs and service utilization.

METHODS

The participants of this retrospective cohort study were all verified persons utilizing LTCI services in Hiroshima, Okayama and Ehime prefectures. The observation period was from 2 months before to 6 months after the disaster. We used Generalized Estimating Equations (GEEs) to examine the association between disaster status (victims or non-victims) and the monthly total costs of LTCI service (with gamma-distribution/log-link) by residential environment (home or facility). Among home residents, we also examined each service utilization (home-based service, short-stay service and facility service), using the GEEs. After the GEEs, we estimated Average Marginal Effects (AME) over all observation periods by months as the attributable disaster effect.

RESULTS

The total number of participants was 279,578. There were 3024 flood victims. The disaster was associated with significantly higher total costs. The AME for home residents at 2 months after was $214 (Standard Error (SE): 12, p < 0.001), which was the highest through the observation period. Among facility residents, the AME immediately after the disaster increased by up to $850 (SE: 29, p < 0.001). The service utilization among home residents showed a different trend for each service. The AME of home-based services decreased by up to - 15.2% (SE:1.3, p < 0.001). The AME for short-stay service increased by up to 8.2% (SE: 0.9, p < 0.001) and the AME for facility service increased by up to 7.4% (SE: 0.7, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2018 Japan Floods caused an increase in LTCI costs and the utilization of short-stay and facility services, and a decrease in utilization of home-based services.

The Excess Costs of Dementia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Dementia is one of the costliest diseases for health care systems with growing importance for policy makers.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study is to systematically review the current literature of excess cost studies for dementia and to analyze excess costs in a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, EconLit, NHS-EED, and Cochrane Library. 22 studies were included and assigned to one of three subgroups according to the time period that they analyzed during disease progression: the time of diagnosis, the time between diagnosis and death, and the time prior to death. Excess costs were analyzed using the ratio of means (ROM) and meta-analysis was performed by pooling ROMs in a random effects model.

RESULTS

Total costs were significantly higher for demented persons compared to non-demented persons at the time of diagnosis (ROM: 2.08 [1.71, 2.54], p <  0.00001, I2 = 98%) and in the time period between diagnosis and death (ROM: 2.19 [1.97, 2.44], p <  0.00001, I2 = 100%). The ROM was highest for professional home care (ROM: 4.96 [2.62, 9.40], p <  0.0001, I2 = 88%) and for nursing facilities (ROM: 4.02 [2.53, 6.40], p <  0.00001, I2 = 100%) for the time period between diagnosis and death.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis is the first to assess excess costs of dementia by the ROM method on a global scale. We conclude that our findings demonstrate that costs of dementia constitute a substantial economic burden.

Activities of Daily Living and Associated Costs in the Most Widespread Neurodegenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review

Nowadays, the population is rapidly ageing because of increasing life expectancy and decreasing birth rates. Thus, the purpose of this systematic review is to prepare a comprehensive overview which identifies the activities of daily living (ADLs) that are gradually reduced among patients with dementia, as well as explore the therapies applied in relation to dementia and how they effectively improve the quality of life (QoL) of patients and caregivers. Furthermore, we aim to summarise the ADL activities influenced by therapies and examine the treatment costs and care for patients so that recommendations for research and development (R&D) can be made to improve both the QoL of people with dementia and cost-saving measures. The research focuses on four selected neurodegenerative diseases: Alzheimer, Parkinson, vascular dementia, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Therefore, the peer-reviewed English written articles from 2014 to 2019 were searched between September 1 and December 13, 2019. Twenty-seven papers were included in the analysis. The results show that essential assistance occurs in connection with activities: eating, drinking, dressing, bathing, personal hygiene, use of the toilet, and transport. By contrast, shopping or cleaning is not addressed as much. A lower ability to take care of oneself is connected with poor patient health and higher social care costs because the patient requires care from external sources, such as home aid or nurse visits. The challenge that remains is to shift new knowledge from scientific disciplines and connect it with the needs of patients to remove legitimate barriers and increase the acceptance of new solutions by popularisation. Additionally, regarding the burden on caregivers, it would be appropriate to promote this area of education and employment so that family members can use formal caregivers, ensuring them free time and much-needed rest.

Predictors of high hospital care and medication costs and cost trajectories in community-dwellers with Alzheimer's disease

Objectives: We studied the determinants of high healthcare costs (highest decile of hospital care and medication costs) and cost trajectories among all community-dwellers with clinically verified Alzheimer's disease (AD), diagnosed during 2005-2011 in Finland (N = 70,531). Methods: The analyses were done separately for hospital care costs, medication costs and total healthcare costs that were calculated for each 6-month period from 5 years before to 3 years after AD diagnosis. Results: Total healthcare costs were driven mainly by hospital care costs. The definition of "high-cost person" was time-dependent as 63% belonged to the highest 10% at some timepoint during the study period and six distinct cost trajectories were identified. Strokes, cardiovascular diseases, fractures and mental and behavioural disorders were most strongly associated with high hospital care costs. Conclusions: Although persons with AD are often collectively considered as expensive patient group, there is large temporal and inter-individual variation in belonging to the highest decile of hospitalization and/or medication costs. It would be important to assess whether hospitalization rate could be decreased by, e.g., comprehensive outpatient care with more efficient management of comorbidities. In addition, other interventions that could decrease hospitalization rate in persons with dementia should be studied further in this context. Key messages Persons with AD had large individual fluctuation in hospital care costs and medication costs over time. Hospital care costs were considerably larger than medication costs, with fractures, cardiovascular diseases and mental and behavioural disorders being the key predictors. Antidementia medication was associated with lower hospital care costs.