D-dimer increase after percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and clinical recurrence after primary revascularization in acute myocardial infarction? A pilot study

Prognostic Value of Age-Adjusted D-Dimer Cutoff Thresholds in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated by Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

Associations between D-dimer and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) remain controversial. Using age-adjusted D-dimer cutoff thresholds improve the diagnostic accuracy for thrombotic diseases. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of age-adjusted D-dimer in ACS patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

A total of 3972 consecutive patients with ACS treated by PCI were retrospectively recruited. The basal age-adjusted D-dimer threshold was 500 ng/mL and was calculated as age × 10 in patients older than 50 years. Cox regression was used for outcome analysis. C-index, net reclassification index (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were calculated to assess the additional prognostic value of age-adjusted D-dimer when combined with established clinical risk factors. The primary outcome was all-cause death.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 720 days, a total of 225 deaths occurred. High D-dimer level, as defined by age-adjusted thresholds, was an independent predictor for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.75, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.32-2.31, P < 0.001), cardiac death (HR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.30-2.60, P = 0.001), and MACE (HR: 1.48, 95% CI: 1.19-1.83, P < 0.001). Sensitivity and subgroup analysis showed that high D-dimer levels were constantly associated with worse outcomes across common risk factors and comorbidities. Besides, age-adjusted elevation of D-dimer significantly improved the risk predictions for all-cause death when added to the model of established risk factors (C-index: 0.846 vs 0.838, Δ C-index: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001-0.015, Pdifference = 0.027; NRI: 0.645, 95% CI: 0.464-0.826, P < 0.001; IDI: 0.008, 95% CI: 0.001-0.017, P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

In ACS patients treated by PCI, age-adjusted elevation of D-dimer was an independent predictor for adverse outcomes and improved the risk predictions for long-term mortality.

D-dimer for risk stratification and antithrombotic treatment management in acute coronary syndrome patients: asystematic review and metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Data on the prognostic role of D-dimer in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are controversial. Our aim was to summarize current evidence on the association between D-dimer levels and short/long-term poor prognosis of ACS patients. We also investigated the association between D-dimer and no-reflow phenomenon.

METHODS

Systematic review and metanalysis of observational studies including ACS patients and reporting data on D-dimer levels. PubMed and SCOPUS databases were searched. Data were combined with hazard ratio (HR) and metanalysed. The principal endpoint was a composite of cardiovascular events (CVEs) including myocardial infarction, all-cause and cardiovascular mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 32 studies included in the systematic review with 28,869 patients. Of them, 6 studies investigated in-hospital and 26 studies long-term outcomes. Overall, 23 studies showed positive association of high D-dimer levels with CVEs. D-dimer levels predicted poor prognosis in all studies reporting in-hospital outcomes. Five studies satisfied inclusion criteria and were included in the metanalysis, with a total of 8616 patients. Median follow-up was 13.2 months with 626 CVEs. The pooled HR for D-dimer levels and CVEs was 1.264 (95% CI 1.134-1.409). Five out of 7 studies (4195 STEMI patients) investigating the association between D-dimer levels and no-reflow showed a positive correlation of D-dimer levels with no-reflow.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with ACS, D-dimer was associated with higher in-hospital and short/long-term complications. D-dimer was also higher in patients with no-reflow phenomenon. The use of D-dimer may help to identify patients with residual thrombotic risk after ACS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews: CRD42021267233 .

Prognostic Value of D-dimer in patients with acute coronary syndrome treated by percutaneous coronary intervention: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Associations between D-dimer and outcomes of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) remain controversial. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of D-dimer in ACS patients treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).

METHODS

In this observational study, 3972 consecutive patients with ACS treated by PCI were retrospectively recruited. The X-tile program was used to determine the optimal D-dimer thresholds for risk stratifications. Cox regression with multiple adjustments was used for outcome analysis. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) analysis was performed to assess the dose-response association between D-dimer and outcomes. The C-index was calculated to evaluate the additional prognostic value of D-dimer when added to clinical risk factors and commonly used clinical risk scores, with internal validations using bootstrapping methods. The primary outcome was all-cause death.

RESULTS

During a median follow-up of 720 days, 225 deaths occurred. Based on the thresholds generated by X-tile, ACS-PCI patients with median (420-1150 ng/mL, hazard ratio [HR]: 1.58, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.14-2.20, P = 0.007) and high (≥ 1150 ng/mL, HR: 1.98, 95 % CI: 1.36-2.89, P < 0.001) levels of D-dimer showed substantially higher risk of death compared to those with low D-dimer (< 420 ng/mL). RCS analysis depicted a constant relation between D-dimer and various outcomes. The addition of D-dimer levels significantly improved risk predictions for all-cause death when combined with the fully adjusted models (C-index: 0.853 vs. 0.845, P difference = 0.021), the GRACE score (C-index: 0.826 vs. 0.814, P difference = 0.027), and the TIMI score (C-index: 0.804 vs. 0.776, P difference < 0.001). The predicted mortality at the median follow-up (two years) was 1.7 %, 5.2 %, and 10.9 % for patients with low, median, and high D-dimer, respectively, which was well matched with the observed mortality (low D-dimer group: 1.2 %, median D-dimer group: 5.2 %, and high D-dimer group: 12.6 %).

CONCLUSIONS

For ACS patients treated by PCI, D-dimer level was an independent predictor for adverse outcomes, and provided additional prognostic value when combined with clinical risk factors and risk scores. Risk stratifications based on D-dimer was plausible to differentiate ACS-PCI patients with higher risk of death.

Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 in acute coronary syndromes

Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1) is the main regulator of endogenous fibrinolysis, overriding the impact of other constituents of fibrinolysis. In plasma, it can be found in three forms: active, latent and inactive. There are numerous commercially available tests, analysing the activity of PAI-1 or the antigen level, with variable correlations between the two. PAI-1 has been extensively studied regarding incidence and outcomes of acute coronary syndromes, and showed positive association with both in numerous studies. Higher PAI-1 has been associated with worse short- and long-term outcomes. Studies are more consistent in the primary percutaneous coronary intervention era. Higher rise of PAI-1 within the first 24 h of acute myocardial infarction has been linked to some of its high-risk features. The circadian pattern of PAI-1 kinetics has been previously described, and the mechanisms behind this phenomenon and its impact on the incidence of acute coronary syndromes are well known. Further investigations are needed to test the safety and efficacy of PAI-1 as a pharmacological target in cardiovascular diseases.

Association between plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 and cardiovascular events: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Small studies have implicated plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1) as a predictor of cardiovascular events; however, these findings have been inconsistent.

We sought out to examine the potential role of PAI-1 as a marker for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

Methods

We systematically reviewed all indexed studies examining the association between PAI-1 and MACE (defined as death, myocardial infarction, or cerebrovascular accident) or restenosis. EMBASE, Web of Science, Medline, and the Cochrane Library were searched through October 2016 to identify relevant studies, supplemented by letters to authors and review of citations. Studies reporting the results of PAI-1 antigen and/or activity levels in association with MACE in human subjects were included.

Results

Of 5961 articles screened, we identified 38 articles published between 1991 to 2016 that reported PAI-1 levels in 11,557 patients. In studies that examined PAI-1 antigen and activity levels, 15.1% and 29.6% of patients experienced MACE, respectively. Patients with MACE had higher PAI-1 antigen levels with a mean difference of 6.11 ng/mL (95% CI, 3.27-8.96). This finding was similar among patients with and without known coronary artery disease. Comparatively, studies that stratified by PAI-1 activity levels were not associated with MACE. In contrast, studies of coronary restenosis suggest PAI-1 antigen and activity levels are negatively associated with MACE.

Conclusions

Elevated plasma PAI-1 antigen levels are associated with MACE. Definitive studies are needed to ascertain if PAI-1 acts simply as a marker of risk or if it is indeed a bona fide therapeutic target.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12959-018-0166-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The current role and future prospects of D-dimer biomarker

D-dimers have been discovered as by-products of fibrinolysis. In situations where the fundamental pathology is associated with increased thrombolytic activity, D-dimer assays could serve an integral role in the clinical workup, and have an already established role in the diagnosis of clinical disorders of venous thromboembolism, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. However, there is growing literature suggesting that this is not the only clinical scenario where D-dimers may be of significance. They may also become an important biomarker in coronary and carotid artery atherosclerosis and aortic diseases. Being a non-invasive and quick means of diagnosis, D-dimers are a cost-effective tool used for diagnosing diseases. With the future being steered in the direction of preventive cardiology, it is imperative for clinicians to understand how to effectively utilize biomarkers in order to diagnose disorders. In this context, we review D-dimer's origin, current clinical utility, and potential future applications.

Usefulness of aspirin resistance after percutaneous coronary intervention for acute myocardial infarction in predicting one-year major adverse coronary events

Recently, great interest has focused on the phenomenon of aspirin resistance, which may be defined as clinical or laboratory resistance. Monitoring the antiplatelet effect appears to be relevant in the presence of clinical implications, but no data are available on the possible clinical implications of the failure of aspirin to inhibit tests of platelet function in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. This study evaluated the role of aspirin resistance in the occurrence of 1-year major adverse coronary events (MACEs) in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We prospectively evaluated 146 patients (115 men and 31 women; median age 65 years, range 30 to 84) with AMI who underwent primary PCI. Exclusion criteria were the use of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, hematocrit <or=30%, and a platelet count <100,000/mm3. Platelet function analyzer-100 closure times by collagen-epinephrine were used for measuring platelet function in venous blood samples obtained 12 to 15 hours after revascularization. Patients were considered aspirin resistant in the presence of a collagen-epinephrine closure time of <203 seconds. After 1-year follow-up, MACEs were recorded in 44 of 146 patients (30.1%). A significantly higher percentage of patients with MACEs had aspirin resistance (39.1% vs 23.2%, p <0.05). A Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that the overall risk of MACEs was significantly higher among patients with aspirin resistance (p = 0.02). A Cox regression analysis that adjusted for age, gender, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, systolic left ventricular function, number of stenosed coronary arteries, and previous AMI, PCI, or coronary artery bypass graft showed aspirin resistance to be a significant and independent risk factor for the future MACEs (hazard ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1 to 9.2, p <0.05). In conclusion, our data demonstrate that aspirin resistance after PCI is a significant and independent predictor of MACEs in patients with AMI undergoing primary PCI.

Homocysteine Levels, Haemostatic Risk Factors and Patency Rates After Endovascular Treatment of the Common Iliac Arteries

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the impact of clinical risk factors, plasma homocysteine and haemostatic variables on the results after endovascular treatment of symptomatic atherosclerosis of the common iliac artery.

DESIGN

Prospective observational study.

SETTING

University hospital.

PATIENTS AND METHOD

The study included 139 technically successful interventions in 103 patients. Technical success was defined as < or = 30% residual stenosis as seen on the post treatment angiogram. Blood samples for analyses of fasting plasma values of homocysteine, fibrinogen, D-dimer, activated protein C resistance were drawn upon admission. Median follow-up for all procedures was 22 months (range 0-55 months). Patency was defined as freedom from > or = 50% restenosis or reocclusion.

RESULTS

The technical success rate for all procedures was 93%. The 1-year cumulative primary patency rate based on intention to treat was 85%. Multivariate analysis revealed a significant independent association between patency rates and levels of fibrinogen and homocysteine and the nature of the lesion treated (stenosis vs. occlusion).

CONCLUSION

The aetiology of restenoses and reocclusions is probably multifactorial. Procoagulant activity, the nature of the lesion treated and homocysteine levels within and above the upper range of normal limits are important risk factors for failure after endovascular treatment of the common iliac arteries.