Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence

Sacral neuromodulation with the InterStim™ system for faecal incontinence: results from a prospective French multicentre observational study

AIM

The aim of this work was to evaluate the effectiveness, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) and the safety of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with the InterStim^TM system for the treatment of faecal incontinence (FI) and establish whether results published predominantly by expert sites are generalisable.

METHOD

This is a prospective, multicentre, observational study that invited all French sites treating FI with the InterStim™ system to enrol subjects indicated for an SNM therapy evaluation. Data were collected at three follow-up visits within 1 and 15 months. Therapeutic effectiveness was evaluated by the reduction in leakages per week and improvements over time in the ability to defer defaecation and QoL (as measured with the Faecal Incontinence Quality of Life score). Safety was assessed through reported adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 221 subjects with a mean age of 62.1 years were tested (184 women) and 178 received a permanent implant. For all implanted subjects with diary data at baseline and follow-up, a reduction in leakage of more than 50% was observed in 80%, 76% and 83% at 1-3, 4-8 and 9-15 months, respectively. The mean number of leakage episodes and urgency improved significantly compared with the baseline (p < 0.0001). Subjects showed improvements in QoL and time to defer defaecation and were generally satisfied with their therapy. The main device-related adverse event was the requirement to undertake reprogramming (in 52% of subjects with actions following an event). The rates of infection (in 6% of subjects) and surgical revision (in 10% of subjects) were in agreement with literature reports.

CONCLUSION

This study confirms the clinical effectiveness, safety and positive effect of SNM on QoL as well as high patient satisfaction for the treatment of FI in real-life.

Infection Rates of Electrical Leads Used for Percutaneous Neurostimulation of the Peripheral Nervous System

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous neurostimulation of the peripheral nervous system involves the insertion of a wire "lead" through an introducing needle to target a nerve/plexus or a motor point within a muscle. Electrical current may then be passed from an external generator through the skin via the lead for various therapeutic goals, including providing analgesia. With extended use of percutaneous leads sometimes greater than a month, infection is a concern. It was hypothesized that the infection rate of leads with a coiled design is lower than for leads with a noncoiled cylindrical design.

METHODS

The literature was retrospectively reviewed for clinical studies of percutaneous neurostimulation of the peripheral nervous system of greater than 2 days that included explicit information on adverse events. The primary endpoint was the number of infections per 1,000 indwelling days.

RESULTS

Forty-three studies were identified that met inclusion criteria involving coiled (n = 21) and noncoiled (n = 25) leads (3 studies involved both). The risk of infection with noncoiled leads was estimated to be 25 times greater than with coiled leads (95% confidence interval [CI] 2 to 407, P = 0.006). The infection rates were estimated to be 0.03 (95% CI 0.01 to 0.13) infections per 1,000 indwelling days for coiled leads and 0.83 (95% CI 0.16 to 4.33) infections per 1,000 indwelling days for noncoiled leads (P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Percutaneous leads used for neurostimulation of the peripheral nervous system have a much lower risk of infection with a coiled design compared with noncoiled leads: approximately 1 infection for every 30,000 vs. 1,200 indwelling days, respectively.

Evidence-Based Update on Treatments of Fecal Incontinence in Women

Fecal incontinence is a highly prevalent and distressing condition that has a negative impact on quality of life. The etiology is often multifactorial, and the evaluation and treatment of this condition can be hindered by a lack of understanding of the mechanisms and currently available treatment options. This article reviews the evidence-based update for the management of fecal incontinence.

Advances in the Surgical Treatment of Fecal Incontinence

Although surgery for fecal incontinence has been shown to be effective, it is still very challenging and sometimes frustrating. Overlapping sphincteroplasty, by far the most common procedure, is effective in patients with sphincter defects; however, recent data suggest that success rates tend to deteriorate over time. A thorough preoperative evaluation incorporates numerous factors, including patient characteristics, severity of incontinence, type and size of the sphincter defect as assessed by physical examination, anal ultrasound, and anorectal physiology studies including anal manometry, electromyography, and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency assessment. The use of these evaluation methods has allowed better patient assignment for a variety of new alternative treatment options. Innovations in the surgical treatment of fecal incontinence range from simple, office-based sphincter augmentation techniques to surgical implantation of mechanical devices. This article reviews 5 alternative surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence: injection of carbon-coated beads in the submucosa of the anal canal, radiofrequency energy delivery, stimulated graciloplasty, artificial bowel sphincter, and sacral nerve stimulation.

Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration

AIM: To investigate the nature and severity of AE related to sacral neurostimulation (SNS).

METHODS: Based on Pubmed and Embase searches, we identified published trials and case series of SNS for fecal incontinence (FI) and extracted data on adverse events, requiring an active intervention. Those problems were operationally defined as infection, device removal explant or need for lead and/or generator replacement. In addition, we analyzed the Manufacturer and User Device Experience registry of the Federal Drug Administration for the months of August - October of 2015. Events were included if the report specifically mentioned gastrointestinal (GI), bowel and FI as indication and if the narrative did not focus on bladder symptoms. The classification, reporter, the date of the recorded complaint, time between initial implant and report, the type of AE, steps taken and outcome were extracted from the report. In cases of device removal or replacement, we looked for confirmatory comments by healthcare providers or the manufacturer.

RESULTS: Published studies reported adverse events and reoperation rates for 1954 patients, followed for 27 (1-117) mo. Reoperation rates were 18.6% (14.2-23.9) with device explants accounting for 10.0% (7.8-12.7) of secondary surgeries; rates of device replacement or explant or pocket site and electrode revisions increased with longer follow up. During the period examined, the FDA received 1684 reports of AE related to SNS with FI or GI listed as indication. A total of 652 reports met the inclusion criteria, with 52.7% specifically listing FI. Lack or loss of benefit (48.9%), pain or dysesthesia (27.8%) and complication at the generator implantation site (8.7%) were most commonly listed. Complaints led to secondary surgeries in 29.7% of the AE. Reoperations were performed to explant (38.2%) or replace (46.5%) the device or a lead, or revise the generator pocket (14.6%). Conservative management changes mostly involved changes in stimulation parameters (44.5%), which successfully addressed concerns in 35.2% of cases that included information about treatment results.

CONCLUSION: With reoperation rates around 20%, physicians need to fully disclose the high likelihood of complications and secondary interventions and exhaust non-invasive treatments, including transcutaneous stimulation paradigms.

Systematic Review of Surgical Treatments for Fecal Incontinence

BACKGROUND

No systematic review has examined the collective randomized and nonrandomized evidence for fecal incontinence treatment effectiveness across the range of surgical treatments.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy, comparative effectiveness, and harms of surgical treatments for fecal incontinence in adults.

DATA SOURCES

Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Allied and Complementary Medicine, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, as well as hand searches of systematic reviews, were used as data sources.

STUDY SELECTION

Two investigators screened abstracts for eligibility (surgical treatment of fecal incontinence in adults, published 1980-2015, randomized controlled trial or observational study with comparator; case series were included for adverse effects). Full-text articles were reviewed for patient-reported outcomes. We extracted data, assessed study risk of bias, and evaluated strength of evidence for each treatment-outcome combination.

INTERVENTIONS

Surgical treatments for fecal incontinence were included interventions.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Fecal incontinence episodes/severity, quality of life, urgency, and pain were measured.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria (13 randomized trials and 9 observational trials); 53 case series were included for harms. Most patients were middle-aged women with mixed FI etiologies. Intervention and outcome heterogeneity precluded meta-analysis. Evidence was insufficient for all of the surgical comparisons. Few studies examined the same comparisons; no studies were high quality. Functional improvements varied; some authors excluded those patients with complications or lost to follow-up from analyses. Complications ranged from minor to major (infection, bowel obstruction, perforation, and fistula) and were most frequent after the artificial bowel sphincter (22%-100%). Major surgical complications often required reoperation; few required permanent colostomy.

LIMITATIONS

Most evidence is intermediate term, with small patient samples and substantial methodologic limitations.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence was insufficient to support clinical or policy decisions for any surgical treatments for fecal incontinence in adults. More invasive surgical procedures had substantial complications. The lack of compliance with study reporting standards is a modifiable impediment in the field. Future studies should focus on longer-term outcomes and attempt to identify subgroups of adults who might benefit from specific procedures.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence - efficacy confirmed from a two-centre prospectively maintained database

INTRODUCTION

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has been recognised as an effective treatment for faecal incontinence. Many unresolved questions could be answered when comparing large data-series from different centres providing prospective data.

AIM

To present data, from an international two-centre SNS prospective database (SNSPD) on functional outcome and management of surgical complications in patients treated with SNS for faecal incontinence.

METHOD

The SNSPD was designed in order to gather detailed pre- and perioperative information followed by a close follow-up in all patients undergoing SNS for bowel dysfunction. The SNSPD was open for inclusion of newly SNS implanted patients in May 2009, and closed on 31 December 2013. Two-centres Aarhus, Denmark, and Nantes, France, included and monitored all patients implanted due to bowel dysfunction according to database criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 164 faecal incontinent patients with a median follow-up of 22 (range 1-50) months were implanted. The Wexner incontinence score improved from 15 (range, 3-20) at baseline to 9 (range, 0-20) at latest follow-up (P < 0.001) and VAS impact on daily life improved from 85.5 (range, 3-100) to 20 (range, 0-100) (P < 0.001). Additional surgical intervention was required in 19.5 % during follow-up. Repositioning of the pacemaker due to pain or migration was the most common complication in 12.1 %. Infections leading to explantation occurred in 3.0 %.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence and constipation: a European consensus statement

AIM

In Europe during the last decade sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) or sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been used to treat faecal incontinence (FI) and constipation. Despite this, there is little consensus on baseline investigations, patient selection and operative technique. A modified Delphi process was conducted to seek consensus on the current practice of SNS/SNM for FI and constipation.

METHOD

A systematic literature search of SNS for FI and constipation was conducted using PubMed. A set of questions derived from the search and expert opinion were answered on-line on two occasions by an international panel of specialists from Europe. A 1-day face-to-face meeting of the experts finalized the discussion.

RESULTS

Three hundred and ninety-three articles were identified from the literature search, of which 147 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-two specialists in FI and constipation from Europe participated. Agreement was achieved on 43 (86%) of 50 domains including the set-up of service, patient selection, baseline investigations, operative technique and programming of the device. The median of agreement was 95% (35-100%).

CONCLUSION

Consensus was achieved on the majority of domains of SNS/SNM for FI and constipation. This should serve as a benchmark for safe and quality practice of SNS/SNM in Europe.

A systematic review of sacral nerve stimulation mechanisms in the treatment of fecal incontinence and constipation

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is now well established as a treatment for fecal incontinence (FI) resistant to conservative measures and may also have utility in the management of chronic constipation; however, mechanism of action is not fully understood. End organ effects of SNS have been studied in both clinical and experimental settings, but interpretation is difficult due to the multitude of techniques used and heterogeneity of reported findings. The aim of this study was to systematically review available evidence on the mechanisms of SNS in the treatment of FI and constipation.

METHODS

Two systematic reviews of the literature (performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses framework) were performed to identify manuscripts pertaining to (a) clinical and (b) physiological effects of SNS during the management of hindgut dysfunction.

KEY RESULTS

The clinical literature search revealed 161 articles, of which 53 were deemed suitable for analysis. The experimental literature search revealed 43 articles, of which nine were deemed suitable for analysis. These studies reported results of investigative techniques examining changes in cortical, gastrointestinal, colonic, rectal, and anal function.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The initial hypothesis that the mechanism of SNS was primarily peripheral motor neurostimulation is not supported by the majority of recent studies. Due to the large body of evidence demonstrating effects outside of the anorectum, it appears likely that the influence of SNS on anorectal function occurs at a pelvic afferent or central level.

Prospective clinical audit of two neuromodulatory treatments for fecal incontinence: sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Two types of neuromodulation are currently practised for the treatment of fecal incontinence (FI): sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) and percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS). This study compares these therapies, as no data exist to prospectively assess their relative efficacy and costs.

METHODS

The subjects of this study were two distinct cohorts undergoing SNS (between 2003 and 2008) or PTNS (2008-onwards) for FI. Clinical outcomes assessed at 3 months included incontinence scores and the number of weekly incontinence episodes. The direct medical costs for each procedure were calculated from the audited expenditure of our unit.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients (94.6 % women) underwent permanent SNS and 146 (87.7 % women) underwent PTNS. The mean pre-treatment incontinence score (± SD) was greater in the SNS cohort (14 ± 4 vs. 12 ± 4) and the mean post-treatment incontinence scores were similar for the two therapies (9 ± 5 vs. 10 ± 4), with a greater effect size evident in the SNS patients. In a 'pseudo case-control' analysis with 37 "matched" patients, the effect of both treatments was similar. The cost of treating a patient for 1 year was £ 11,374 ($ 18,223) for permanent SNS vs. £ 1740 ($ 2784) for PTNS.

CONCLUSION

Given the lesser cost and invasive nature of PTNS, where both techniques are available, a trial of PTNS could be considered for all patients.

Sacral neuromodulation and peripheral nerve stimulation in patients with anal incontinence: an overview of techniques, complications and troubleshooting

Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) therapy has revolutionized the management of many forms of anal incontinence, with an expanded use and a medium-term efficacy of 75% overall. This review discusses the technique of SNM therapy, along with its complications and troubleshooting and a discussion of the early data pertaining to peripheral posterior tibial nerve stimulation in incontinent patients. Future work needs to define the predictive factors for neurostimulatory success, along with the likely mechanisms of action of their therapeutic action.

Current status: new technologies for the treatment of patients with fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence is a frequent and debilitating condition that may result from a multitude of different causes. Treatment is often challenging and needs to be individualized. During the last several years, new technologies have been developed, and others are emerging from clinical trials to commercialization. Although their specific roles in the management of fecal incontinence have not yet been completely defined, surgeons have access to them and patients may request them. The purpose of this project is to put into perspective, for both the patient and the practitioner, the relative positions of new and emerging technologies in order to propose a treatment algorithm.

Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Over the past 18 years neuromodulation therapies have gained support as treatments for faecal incontinence (FI); sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is the most established of these. A systematic review was performed of current evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of neuromodulation treatments for FI.

METHODS

The review adhered to the PRISMA framework. A comprehensive search of the literature included PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews. Methodological quality assessment and data extraction were completed in a systematic fashion.

RESULTS

For SNS, 321 citations were identified initially, of which 61 studies were eligible for inclusion. Of studies on other neuromodulation techniques, 11 were eligible for review: seven on percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS) and four on transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS). On intention-to-treat, the median (range) success rates for SNS were 63 (33-66), 58 (52-81) and 54 (50-58) per cent in the short, medium and long terms respectively. The success rate for PTNS was 59 per cent at the longest reported follow-up of 12 months. SNS, PTNS and TTNS techniques also resulted in improvements in Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score and quality-of-life measures. Despite significant use of neuromodulation in treatment of FI, there is still no consensus on outcome reporting in terms of measures used, aetiologies assessed, length of follow-up or assessment standards.

CONCLUSION

Emerging data for SNS suggest maintenance of its initial therapeutic effect into the long term. The clinical effectiveness of PTNS is comparable to that of SNS at 12 months, although there is no evidence to support its continued effectiveness after this period. PTNS may be a useful treatment before SNS. The clinical effectiveness of TTNS is still uncertain owing to the paucity of available evidence. A consensus to standardize the use of outcome measures is recommended in order that further reports can be compared meaningfully.

Does sacral nerve stimulation improve global pelvic function in women?

AIM

Many women undergoing sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence have coexisting pelvic floor dysfunction. We used a global pelvic-floor assessment questionnaire to evaluate the effect of sacral neuromodulation on non-bowel related symptomatology.

METHOD

The electronic Personnel Assessment Questionnaire - Pelvic Floor (ePAQ-PF) is a validated Web-based electronic pelvic floor questionnaire. Women with faecal incontinence underwent assessment using the ePAQ. Pre- and poststimulator data were analysed over a 4.5-year period.

RESULTS

Forty-three women (mean age 56.5 years; median follow up 6.8 months) were included. All (100%) had urinary symptoms, 81.4% had vaginal symptoms and 85.7% described some sexual dysfunction. There was a significant improvement in faecal incontinence and in bowel-related quality of life (P < 0.005) as well as in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-related symptoms (P < 0.01) and in bowel-related sexual heath (P < 0.01). Symptoms of vaginal prolapse significantly improved (P = 0.05). There was also improvement in symptoms of overactive bladder (P = 0.005) and in urinary-related quality of life (P < 0.05). A global health improvement was reported in 58.1%, mainly in bowel evacuation (P < 0.01) and in vaginal pain and sensation (P < 0.05). In sexually active female patients, significant improvements in vaginal and bowel-related sexual health were seen (P < 0.005). Improvement in general sex life following stimulation was reported in 53.3%.

CONCLUSION

A Web-based electronic pelvic-floor assessment questionnaire has demonstrated global improvement in pelvic floor function in bowel, urinary, vaginal and sexual dimensions in women following sacral neuromodulation for faecal incontinence.

The effect of sacral nerve stimulation on distal colonic motility in patients with faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective treatment for neurogenic faecal incontinence (FI). However, the clinical improvement that patients experience cannot be explained adequately by changes in anorectal function. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of SNS on colonic propagating sequences (PSs) in patients with FI in whom urgency and incontinence was the predominant symptom.

METHODS

In patients with FI a high-resolution fibre-optic manometry catheter, containing 90 sensors spaced at 1-cm intervals, was positioned colonoscopically and clipped to the caecum. A unipolar or quadripolar tined electrode was implanted into the S3 sacral nerve foramen. Colonic manometry was evaluated in a double-blind randomized crossover trial, using true suprasensory stimulation or sham stimulation. Each stimulation period, lasting 2 h, was preceded by a 2-h basal manometric recording.

RESULTS

All 11 patients studied showed a colonic response to SNS. In ten patients there was a significant increase in the frequency of retrograde PSs throughout the colon during true stimulation compared with sham stimulation (P = 0·014). In one outlier, with baseline retrograde PS frequency nine times that of the nearest patient, a reduction in retrograde PS frequency was recorded. Compared with sham stimulation, SNS had no effect on the frequency of antegrade PSs or high-amplitude PSs.

CONCLUSION

SNS modulates colonic motility in patients with faecal urge incontinence. These data suggest that SNS may improve continence and urgency through alteration of colonic motility, particularly by increasing retrograde PSs in the left colon.

Postoperative issues of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation: a systematic literature review and treatment guideline

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of knowledge on the incidence and management of suboptimal therapeutic effect and the complications associated with sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence and constipation.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to review current literature on postoperative issues and to propose a treatment algorithm.

DATA SOURCE

PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE were searched using the keywords "sacral nerve stimulation," "sacral neuromodulation," "fecal incontinence," and "constipation" for English-language articles published from January 1980 to August 2010. A further search was conducted on a wider literature using the keywords "complication," "adverse effect," "treatment failure," "equipment failure," "infection," "foreign-body migration," "reoperation," "pain," and "algorithm."

STUDY SELECTION

Four hundred sixty-one titles were identified, and after a title and abstract review, 135 were subjected to full article review; 89 were finally included in this review. Five articles were added by manual search and consensus.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies were identified as cohort studies reporting on postoperative issues, including 1661 patients who underwent percutaneous nerve evaluation and 1600 patients who proceeded to sacral nerve stimulation therapy. Pooled data showed that the most common problem during percutaneous nerve evaluation was lead displacement (5.3%). The incidence of suboptimal outcome, pain, and infection after implantation was 12.1%, 13.0%, and 3.9%.

LIMITATIONS

There was significant underreporting of untoward events, because 60% of the studies did not report complications during percutaneous nerve evaluation, and suboptimal outcome after implantation was not disclosed in 44% of the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of untoward events associated with sacral nerve stimulation appears to be low. However, there is a significant underreporting of the incidence. Using the information from the structured and systematic literature review, we formulated a clinically relevant guideline for reporting and managing postoperative issues. The guideline can provide a framework for clinical practice.

Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation has been shown to be an effective treatment for fecal incontinence and early studies reported success rates of 67% to 100%. However, "success" has been arbitrarily set at a 50% reduction in symptoms, and data are rarely reported with "intention to treat."

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess the true efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence compared with the published literature.

DESIGN

This prospective 5-year study was conducted to assess 50 patients with fecal incontinence treated with sacral nerve stimulation. All analyses were performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

SETTINGS

This study took place in a single tertiary referral colorectal department.

PATIENTS

Fifty consecutive patients with fecal incontinence refractory to conservative management were included in the study.

INTERVENTIONS

The interventions performed were temporary evaluation with or without permanent sacral nerve stimulation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

: Primary outcome measures were 1) attainment of continence, 2) reduction in fecal incontinence episodes, 3) improvement in Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence scores, and 4) improvement in the ability to defer defecation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (26%) did not respond at the temporary evaluation stage or were dissatisfied with the result. Ten further patients (20%) did not achieve a 50% reduction in symptoms following permanent implantation. The median follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-55), at which time 27 patients (54%) experienced a 50% or more reduction in symptoms, including 13 (26%) who achieved apparent continence. Median fecal incontinence episodes per fortnight reduced from 14 (range, 0-53) to 2 (range, 0-20; P < .0001). Median Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence scores reduced from 15 (range, 3-20) to 8 (range, 0-17; P < .0001). The ability to defer defecation improved significantly (P < .0001). These results compare favorably with the published literature.

LIMITATIONS

Quality of life was not assessed.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that sacral nerve stimulation can be an effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence; however, when analyzed by intention to treat, the symptoms of fecal incontinence continue in the majority (74%) of patients.

Long-term efficacy and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Sacral nerve stimulation is effective in the treatment of urinary incontinence and is currently under Food and Drug Administration review in the United States for fecal incontinence. Previous reports have focused primarily on short-term results of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. The present study reports the long-term effectiveness and safety of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in a large prospective multicenter study.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Patients with fecal incontinent episodes more than twice per week were offered participation in this multicentered prospective trial. Patients showing ≥ 50% improvement during test stimulation were offered chronic implantation of the InterStim Therapy system (Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN). The aims of the current report were to provide 3-year follow-up data on patients from that study who underwent sacral nerve stimulation and were monitored under the rigors of an Food and Drug Administration-approved investigational protocol.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-three patients underwent test stimulation with a 90% success rate, of whom 120 (110 females) with a mean age of 60.5 years and a mean duration of fecal incontinence of 7 years received chronic implantation. Mean length of follow-up was 3.1 (range, 0.2-6.1) years, with 83 patients completing all or part of the 3-year follow-up assessment. At 3 years follow-up, 86% of patients (P < .0001) reported ≥ 50% reduction in the number of incontinent episodes per week compared with baseline and the number of incontinent episodes per week decreased from a mean of 9.4 at baseline to 1.7. Perfect continence was achieved in 40% of subjects. The therapy also improved the fecal incontinence severity index. Sacral nerve stimulation had a positive impact on the quality of life, as evidenced by significant improvements in all 4 scales of the Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life instrument at 12, 24, and 36 months of follow-up. The most common device- or therapy-related adverse events through the mean 36 months of follow-up included implant site pain (28%), paresthesia (15%), change in the sensation of stimulation (12%), and infection (10%). There were no reported unanticipated adverse device effects associated with sacral nerve stimulation therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacral nerve stimulation using InterStim Therapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with fecal incontinence. These data support long-term safety and effectiveness to 36 months.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: patient selection, service provision and operative technique

AIM

Faecal incontinence is estimated to affect between 2 and 3% of Western adult populations. In recent years sacral nerve stimulation has become an important treatment modality, often as the first-line surgical therapy. The aim of this article was to review the current evidence regarding patient selection and surgical technique and to evaluate the logistics of providing a neurostimulation service.

METHOD

A Medline search was performed including the keywords and/or MeSH headings of sacral nerve stimulation, neuromodulation, artificial pacemaker, faecal incontinence, patient selection, predictive factors and anal canal. Further studies were identified by cross-referencing from relevant articles and by appraisal of recent peer-reviewed conference abstracts and proceedings.

RESULTS

Despite the success of sacral nerve stimulation for several pathophysiological causes of incontinence, case selection is of paramount importance. Sacral nerve stimulation should not be offered outside a multidisciplinary pelvic floor unit. Temporary evaluation using diary cards can lead to false positive and negative results. Adherence to a meticulous surgical technique, using low amplitude stimulation to guide lead placement, provides optimal clinical outcome.

CONCLUSION

The short-term outcome of sacral nerve stimulation is dependent on patient factors and operative technique. Despite this, specific preoperative predictive factors of treatment success have yet to be identified.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: its role in the treatment algorithm

AIM

Indications for sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence have expanded over the last decade. This report aims to determine the clinical outcome of the current use of SNS in the treatment of faecal incontinence. Its objective is also to review the most recent role of SNS in patients with anal sphincter lesions.

METHOD

The literature was searched using Medline and Cochrane databases. The search was restricted to publications in English. For the analysis, studies with <25 patients were excluded. For SNS in patients with sphincter defects, all papers were included.

RESULTS

Thirteen publications on the clinical outcome of SNS were included. Nine papers were identified reporting the application of SNS in patients with a morphological sphincter lesion. The most common outcome measures of clinical efficacy were frequency of incontinence using the Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. All studies demonstrated highly improved function across all outcome measures and improvement was statistically significant in all. Outcomes remain stable at long-term follow up. In patients with sphincteric gaps ranging from 17 to 180°, SNS was clinically effective at short-term follow up. The size of the gap appears to have no impact on outcome.

CONCLUSION

SNS has evolved to become a clinical efficient therapy applicable across a wide spectrum of causes of faecal incontinence with reproducible results. SNS can be considered to be an essential part of the current surgical treatment algorithm for faecal incontinence.

The influence of sacral nerve stimulation on anorectal dysfunction

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has become an established option in the management of defaecatory disorders. There are many data on the end-organ effects of SNS, but limited consensus on its mechanism of action. The objective of this review was to determine the effect of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) on anorectal function.

METHOD

Systematic literature review of the effect of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) on anorectal function.

RESULTS

There was significant heterogeneity of data pertaining to the effects of SNS on anorectal function, with no consistent change in physiological measures identified. Most data supported a mixed mechanism of action on anal motor and rectal sensory functioning.

CONCLUSION

To date, conflicting data exist on the mechanism of action of SNS as determined by end-organ changes in anorectal physiology. Nevertheless, the data as they stand best support a mixed mechanism of action on anal motor and rectal sensory functions.

Meta-analysis: sacral nerve stimulation versus conservative therapy in the treatment of faecal incontinence

AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has recently been used in the management of faecal incontinence (FI). This study compared SNS to conservative management with regards to functional and quality of life outcomes.

METHODS

Meta-analysis of studies published between 1995 and 2008 on SNS for FI was performed. Outcomes evaluated were functional, physiological and quality of life. A random-effects model was used and sensitivity analyses performed. Subgroup analyses were performed on age and sphincter status.

RESULTS

Thirty-four studies were included, reporting on 944 patients undergoing peripheral nerve evaluation; 665 underwent permanent SNS. Weekly incontinence episodes (weighted mean difference [WMD] -6.83; 95% confidence intervals [CI] -8.05, -5.60; p < 0.001) and incontinence scores (WMD -10.57; 95% CI -11.89, -9.24; p < 0.001) were significantly reduced with SNS; ability to defer defecation (WMD 7.99 min; 95% CI 5.93, 10.05; p < 0.001) was increased. Most SF-36 and FIQL domains improved following SNS, and mean anal pressures increased significantly (p < 0.001). Results remained consistent on sensitivity analysis. The under-56 years age group showed smaller functional but greater physiological and quality of life improvements. Results were similar between sphincter intact and impaired subgroups. The complication rate was 15% for permanent SNS, with 3% resulting in permanent explantation.

CONCLUSION

SNS results in significant improvements in objective and subjective measures for faecally incontinent patients.

Sacral nerve stimulation for the treatment of faecal incontinence related to dysfunction of the internal anal sphincter

PURPOSE

In patients with faecal incontinence related to isolated internal anal sphincter (IAS) disruption, conservative management is the mainstay of treatment. Surgical repair of the internal sphincter is not successful. This study evaluated the use of sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) in those with faecal incontinence and IAS disruption in whom medical and behavioural treatments had failed.

METHODS

Nine patients (seven women, median age 44 years, range 39-62 years), with a history of obstetric or iatrogenic anal sphincter trauma, underwent a trial of SNS. All had passive faecal incontinence, low resting anal sphincter pressure and full thickness IAS muscle disruption of greater than 30 degrees radial extent. The effect of SNS on symptoms was measured by a bowel habit diary and validated questionnaires used to assess impact on quality of life.

RESULTS

Eight (89%) patients benefited from temporary stimulation and proceeded to permanent device implantation. Follow-up was at a mean of 46 months (range 2-81). Faecal incontinence decreased from a mean (SD) of 9.9 (10.9) to 1.0 (2.4) episodes per week (p = 0.031), and soiling decreased from 6.1 (1.6) to 1.7 (2.4) episodes per week (p = 0.031), with chronic stimulation. At latest follow-up, three patients had no incontinence, three patients had episodes of minor soiling only, one patient had >75% reduction of incontinent episodes, and two patients remained incontinent.

CONCLUSIONS

Sacral nerve stimulation is effective in treating faecal incontinence related to a structurally and functionally abnormal internal anal sphincter. Treatment should not be refused on the basis of IAS disruption.

Sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence: response rate, satisfaction and the value of preoperative investigation in patient selection

OBJECTIVE

Before undergoing sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) for faecal incontinence (FI), patients are investigated with morphologic, dynamic and electrophysiologic tests. The purpose of our study was to evaluate their value in the selection of patients who may benefit most from neuromodulation.

METHOD

If temporary stimulation resulted in a good objective response, a permanent neuromodulator was implanted. Patients were reviewed at 3 months and then at 6 monthly intervals. Asked by telephone, patient's satisfaction was described as good, satisfactory or poor.

RESULTS

Forty-five consecutive patients (41 females, median age 59 years) with FI (Wexner 16.1 +/- 2.9) underwent SNS. Temporary stimulation was successful in 32 (71)% patients. At a median follow-up of 33 months, the neuromodulator remained in place in 25 (55%) patients, two do whom switched it off, leaving 23 (51%) with a functioning neuromodulator. There was no statistically significant difference between the characteristics (including manometry, ultrasound and electrophysiology) of patients undergoing implantation (n = 32) or not (n = 13) and those with or without a functioning stimulator (n = 23: n = 13). In the 23 patients with a functioning stimulator the result was good in 12, satisfactory in five and poor in six. There was no statistically significant difference in the patient characteristics between those with a good result (n = 12) and the remainder (n = 32).

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that investigation for FI does not facilitate patient selection for SNS and cannot be used to predict outcome.

Factors associated with percutaneous nerve evaluation and permanent sacral nerve modulation outcome in patients with fecal incontinence

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve modulation is an established treatment for fecal incontinence. Little is known about predictive factors for successful percutaneous nerve evaluation (or test stimulation) and permanent sacral nerve modulation outcome. The purpose of this retrospective study was to discover predictive factors associated with temporary and permanent stimulation.

METHODS

We analyzed data from test stimulations performed in patients with fecal incontinence from March 2000 until May 2007. Successful outcome was defined as >50% improvement of incontinence episodes in three weeks. Patients with a successful test stimulation were eligible for permanent sacral nerve modulation implantation. All patients who subsequently had permanent sacral nerve modulation were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictive power of baseline demographics and diagnostic variables.

RESULTS

Test stimulations were performed in 245 patients (226 females; mean age, 56.6 (standard deviation, 12.8) years). Our analysis showed that older age (P = 0.014), external anal sphincter defects (P = 0.005), and repeated procedures after initial failure (P = 0.001) were significantly related to failure. One hundred seventy-three patients (70.6%) were eligible for permanent sacral nerve modulation implantation. The analysis showed no significant predictive factors related to permanent sacral nerve modulation.

CONCLUSION

Three predictive factors were negatively associated with the outcome of test stimulation: older age, repeated procedures, and a defect in the external anal sphincter. These factors may indicate lower chances of success for test stimulation but do not exclude patients from sacral nerve modulation treatment. Although assessed in a selected patient group, no factors were predictive of the outcome of permanent stimulation.

Neuromodulation for functional bowel disorders

In patients with functional bowel disorders not responding to maximal medical treatment, bowel lavage or biofeedback therapy, can nowadays be treated by sacral nerve neuromodulation (SNM). SNM therapy has evolved as a treatment for faecal incontinence and constipation. The exact working mechanism remains unknown. It is known that SNM therapy causes direct stimulation of the anal sphincter and causes changes in rectal sensation and several central nervous system areas. The advantage of SNM therapy is the ability to do a minimally invasive temporary screening phase to assess permanent stimulation outcome. Ideal candidates for SNM therapy are not known. Several studies have described positive and negative predictive factors, but the temporary screening remains the instrument of choice. Clinical results are good and as the technique is developing, fewer complications occur. New indications for SNM include constipation and anorectal or pelvic pain.

Efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence in patients with anal sphincter defects

PURPOSE

Sacral nerve stimulation has traditionally been used to treat patients with fecal incontinence with intact anal sphincters. This rationale has been challenged, but it remains unknown if its efficacy is related to the extent of the sphincter injury.

METHODS

This was a prospective study of 15 patients with sphincter defects (9 combined, 2 external only, and 4 internal only) undergoing sacral nerve stimulation for fecal incontinence. Endoanal ultrasound scans were reviewed and defects scored (0-16) with use of a system published by two independent observers. These were correlated with the following outcomes: 1) reduction in fecal incontinence episodes, 2) reduction in soiling, 3) improvement in Cleveland Clinic scores, and 4) improvement in ability to defer defecation. All patients were studied after temporary stimulation and again at three to six months after permanent implantation.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (87%) progressed to permanent stimulation. Median fecal incontinence episodes per two weeks decreased from 15 (range, 1-53) to 3 (range, 0-16; P = 0.01). Median soiling episodes were reduced from 10 (range, 1-14) to 6 (range, 0-14; P = 0.009). Median Cleveland Clinic scores decreased from 12 (range, 9-18) to 9 (range, 4-14; P = 0.0005). The ability to defer defecation was improved significantly (P = 0.05). There were no relationships between sphincter defect scores and outcome measures after sacral nerve stimulation (r = 0.001-0.10; P = 0.28-0.94).

CONCLUSION

Sacral nerve stimulation is an effective treatment in patients with fecal incontinence who have anal sphincter defects, and outcome is not associated with severity of sphincter disruption.

Improving the efficacy of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence by alteration of stimulation parameters

Background

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an effective treatment for faecal incontinence, but only standard stimulation parameters have been used. This study assessed the clinical impact of altering the parameters.

Methods

Twelve patients with partially improved faecal incontinence following SNS underwent acute testing to select optimal stimulation parameters; rectal compliance was used as a surrogate marker. Parameters tested were: stimulation off; frequency 14 (standard), 31 or 6·9 Hz; and pulse duration 210 (standard), 450 or 90 µs. Patients completed a 2-week bowel diary, St Mark's continence score (SMCS) and Rockwood faecal incontinence quality-of-life (FIQL) score before testing using standard settings, and after testing using optimized settings.

Results

Optimal settings, determined by greatest increase in rectal compliance, were shorter pulse width in five patients and higher frequency in seven. Optimized stimulation resulted in a decrease in mean episodes of incontinence from 2·3 to 1·2 per week (P = 0·031), soiling from 3·3 to 1·7 days per week (P = 0·016), faecal urgency from 31 to 18 per cent of all evacuations (P = 0·055) and SMCS from 12·3 to 8·7 (P = 0·008); the FIQL coping/behaviour score improved (P = 0·008).

Conclusion

With a shorter pulse width and higher frequency, clinical efficacy in patients undergoing SNS for faecal incontinence can be improved.

Surgery and sacral nerve stimulation for constipation and fecal incontinence

Fecal continence is a complex bodily function, which requires the interplay of sensation, rectal capacity, and anal neuromuscular function. Fecal incontinence affects approximately 2% of the population and has a prevalence of 15% in elderly patients. Constipation is one of the most common gastrointestinal disorders. The variety of symptoms and risk factors suggest a multifactorial origin. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma. Before any invasive intervention, the surgeon should have a thorough understanding of the etiology of these conditions. Appropriate medical management can improve symptoms in the majority of patients. Surgery is indicated when all medical possibilities are exhausted. This review discusses the most used surgical procedures emphasizing the latest experiences. Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is a promising option for patients with fecal incontinence and constipation. The procedure affords patients improved continence and quality of life. The mechanism of action is still poorly understood. This treatment has been used before in other more invasive surgical procedures or even after their failure to improve patients' symptoms and avoid a definitive stoma.

Bowel dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer

INTRODUCTION

Rectal cancer is a common disease in Western populations. Improved treatment modalities have resulted in increased survival and tumour control. With increasing survival there is a growing need for knowledge about the long-term side effects and functional results after the treatment.

AIM

To describe the long-term functional outcome in patients treated for rectal cancer through a systematic review of the current literature and to provide an outline of the promising developments within this area.

RESULTS

Standard resectional surgery with loss of the rectal reservoir function results in poor functional results in up to 50-60% of the patients. New methods of surgery including the construction of a neoreservoir and improvement of the technique for local excision have been developed to minimize the functional disturbances without compromising the oncological result. The addition of chemo and/or radiotherapy approximately doubles the risk of poor functional results. During the last decades the techniques for chemo/radiotherapy has been markedly improved with a positive impact on functional outcome. New methods for treatment of functional disturbances e.g. bowel irrigation and sacral nerve stimulation are currently under development.

PERSPECTIVES

To improve the functional outcome in this growing patient population several approaches can be taken. The primary cancer treatment must be improved by minimizing the surgical trauma and optimizing the imaging and radiation techniques. Population screening should be considered in order to find the cancers at an earlier stage, hereby increasing the proportion of patients eligible for local excision without the need for chemo/irradiation. All patients recovering from rectal resection should be examined and registered systematically regarding their functional results and treatment should be offered to the severely affected patients. More studies are still needed to evaluate the efficacy of irrigation and nerve stimulation in this patient group.

[Proposal for a new consensus classification for faecal incontinence]

Due to the complexities of the mechanisms involved in incontinence, there are many potential causes for this disorder. The causes of incontinence and the grouping of patients according to aetiological factors are described in the literature in various forms, without there being a consensus as such. Therefore, the objective of this review is to propose a new classification of faecal incontinence to the scientific community, which will enable criteria to be unified, which should lead to an improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with faecal incontinence. It is an aetiopathogenic classification that can be obtained from the clinical history of the patient along with an endoanal ultrasound.

Clinical and cost effectiveness of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) has better results and safety than other surgical procedures for faecal incontinence. This prospective study assessed the clinical effectiveness and costs of SNS at a single centre.

METHODS

Patients who had experienced one or more episodes of faecal incontinence were studied for up to 5 years by continence diary, anorectal manometry and quality of life questionnaires. Direct medical costs were calculated and the cost-effectiveness of the treatment was analysed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven percutaneous nerve evaluations were performed in 47 patients between June 1999 and February 2006; 29 patients underwent permanent implantation. After a median follow-up of 34.7 (range 2.3-81.2) months, 25 of the 29 patients had a significant reduction in incontinence episodes; 14 patients were in complete remission. At 3-year follow-up, the mean reduction in incontinence episodes was 89 per cent. No change was observed in anal manometric values. Patients reported a significant improvement in quality of life. The introduction of SNS has an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, below the accepted Spanish threshold.

CONCLUSION

The introduction of SNS to the management of faecal incontinence within the Spanish setting is both effective and efficient.

Rectal augmentation: short- and mid-term evaluation of a novel procedure for severe fecal urgency with associated incontinence

BACKGROUND

Rectal augmentation (RA) with or without electrically stimulated gracilis neosphincter (ESGN) was developed to address the physiologic and anatomic abnormalities present in a subset of patients with incapacitating fecal urgency and associated urge fecal incontinence (UFI). This study evaluated the short- and medium-term clinical and physiologic results.

METHODS

Eleven patients with fecal urgency and UFI underwent RA, 6 with concomitant ESGN formation. Patients were evaluated preoperatively, and at a median of 12.5 and 54 months after surgery.

RESULTS

At 4.5 years, 7/11 patients had avoided stoma construction. Symptoms recurred leading to permanent stoma formation in 1 patient, whereas one other developed evacuatory difficulty with overflow incontinence. Median ability to defer defecation improved from seconds preoperatively to 10 minutes at 1 year (P = 0.0002), and 15 minutes at 4.5 years (P = 0.002). Median Wexner incontinence scores improved from 15 preoperatively to 3 at 1 year (P = 0.002), and 4 at 4.5 years (P = 0.02). At 1 year, 2 of the rectal sensory thresholds (DDV: P = 0.008; MTV: P = 0.008) and compliance were normalized (P = 0.008), whereas at 4.5 years, all sensation thresholds improved (FCS: P = 0.002; DDV: P = 0.002; MTV: P = 0.002), but changes in compliance were not significant.

CONCLUSION

RA with or without ESGN improved reported symptoms and normalized rectal sensation. Improvements were sustained in the medium term. The procedure had no associated morbidity or mortality, and should be considered in the surgical management of a select group of patients presenting with severe urgency and UFI.

Predictive factors for successful sacral nerve stimulation in the treatment of faecal incontinence: a 10-year cohort analysis

OBJECTIVE

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) is an established treatment for faecal incontinence. We aimed to identify specific factors that could predict the outcome of temporary and permanent stimulation.

METHOD

A cohort analysis was performed to identify potential predictive factors in 81 patients who underwent temporary SNS at a single institution over a 10-year period (June 1996 to June 2006). Data were obtained from prospectively collected patient symptom diaries and quality of life questionnaires, operation reports, anorectal physiological studies, endoanal ultrasound images and radiology of lead placement.

RESULTS

Clinical outcome of temporary screening was not affected by patient gender, age, body mass index, severity or length of symptoms. The need for a repeated temporary procedure was associated with subsequent failure during screening (P = 0.008). A low threshold to obtain a motor response during temporary lead insertion was associated with improved outcome (P = 0.048). Evidence of anal sphincter trauma was associated with a greater risk of failure (P = 0.040). However, there was no difference in medium-term outcome between patients with external anal sphincter (EAS) defects and patients with intact anal sphincter muscles.

CONCLUSION

Variables have been identified that help to predict the outcome of SNS. The presence of an EAS defect should not preclude treatment.

Optimizing electrode implantation in sacral nerve stimulation--an anatomical cadaver study controlled by a laparoscopic camera

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Sacral nerve stimulation is the therapy of choice in patients with neurogenic faecal and urine incontinence, constipation and some pelvic pain syndromes. The aim of this study is to determine the best insertion angles of the electrode under laparoscopic visualization of the sacral nerves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five fresh cadaver pelvises were dissected through an anterior approach of the presacral space, exposing the ventral sacral roots. Needles and electrodes were inserted into the S3 foramen. Both right and left sides were used, with the traditional percutaneous procedure. The validation was done by a laparoscopic camera controlling the position of the needle and electrode on the nerve. The angles were assessed with a goniometer and were confirmed in two living patients.

RESULTS

The mean angle of insertion in the sagittal plane was 62.9+/-3 degrees (range, 59-70). In the axial plane, the mean angle for the left side was 91.7+/-13.5 degrees (range, 80-110) and 83.2+/-7.7 degrees for the right side (range, 75-95). These angles resulted in the optimal placement of the leads along the S3 sacral root, in all these cases.

CONCLUSIONS

This study allows direct visualization during the placement of the needle and electrode, thus permitting accurate calculations of the best angle of approach during the surgical procedure in sacral nerve stimulation. These objective findings attempt to standardize this technique, which is often performed with the aid of intra-operative fluoroscopy but still leaving a lot to chance. These insertion angles should help to find more consistent and reproducible results and thus improved outcome in patients.

Evolving therapy for fecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Fecal incontinence is common and can be socially debilitating. Nonoperative management of fecal incontinence includes dietary modification, antidiarrheal medication, and biofeedback. The traditional surgical approach is sphincteroplasty if there is a defect of the external sphincter. Innovative treatment modalities have included sacral nerve stimulation, injectable implants, dynamic graciloplasty, and artificial bowel sphincter.

DISCUSSION

This review was designed to assess the various surgical options available for fecal incontinence and critically evaluate the evidence behind these procedures. The algorithm in the surgical treatment of fecal incontinence is shifting. Injectable therapy and sacral nerve stimulation are likely to be the mainstay in future treatment of moderate and severe fecal incontinence, respectively. Sphincteroplasty is limited to a small group of patients with isolated defect of the external sphincter. A stoma, although effective, can be avoided in most cases.

Biofeedback for fecal incontinence: short-term outcomes of 513 consecutive patients and predictors of successful treatment

PURPOSE

Biofeedback is well established as a treatment for fecal incontinence but little is known about factors that may be associated with its effectiveness. This study assessed short-term outcomes, predictors of patients who completed treatment, and predictors of treatment success.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated with biofeedback at a tertiary referral colorectal clinic during ten years. Clinical, physiologic, and quality of life measures were collected prospectively at the time of treatment. Regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Of 513 patients, 385 (75 percent) completed the treatment program. Each outcome was improved for more than 70 percent of patients. Incontinence scores decreased by 32 percent (from 7.5 to 5.2 of 13), patient assessment of continence increased by 40 percent (from 5.3 to 3.2 of 10), quality of life improved by 89 percent (from 0.34 to 0.67 of 1.0), and maximum anal sphincter pressure increased by a mean 12 mmHg (14 percent; from 90 to 102 mmHg). Patients who did not complete treatment were younger, were more likely to be male, and had less severe incontinence. Treatment success was predicted by completion of all treatment sessions (odds ratio, 10.34; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.46-24.19), female gender (odds ratio, 4.11; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04-7.5), older age (odds ratio, 1.02 per year; 95 percent confidence interval, 1-1.04), and more severe incontinence before treatment (odds ratio, 1.19 per unit increase in St. Mark's score; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.05-1.34).

CONCLUSIONS

More than 70 percent of patients in this large series demonstrated improved short-term outcomes. Treatment success was more likely in those who completed six training sessions, were female, older, or had more severe incontinence. Patients were less likely to complete treatment if they were male, younger, or had milder incontinence.

Sacral neuromodulation in the treatment of defecation disorders

A large number of patients present with fecal incontinence due to idiopathic pelvic neuropathy or lesions of pelvic nerves, iatrogenic or secondary to other pelvic diseases or dysfunctions, involving sacral nerves. On the other hand, in many patients, constipation could be related to a peripheral neuropathy impairing normal defecation. Sacral neuromodulation (SNM) has been demonstrated as an effective approach in neuropathic defecation disorders. Its application is usually safe and easy, with a limited rate of complications or adverse events. The surgical procedure is made under local anesthesia. SNM effectiveness can be reliably tested during a short term period (up to 30 days) before the decision for a permanent implant. Results in most series show significant clinical improvement, with reduction in the number of incontinence episodes, decrease of incontinence score and improvement in patients' quality of life. A few reports suggest a potential and interesting application of SNM in constipation. Findings from anorectal manometry and other physiology examinations are not conclusive in order to define SNM mechanisms of actions and suggest that a multifactorial effect "modulates" the deficient neuromuscular system causing the defecation disorders.

Outcome and cost analysis of sacral nerve stimulation for faecal incontinence

BACKGROUND

Sacral nerve stimulation (SNS) may be successful in treating incapacitating faecal incontinence. The technique is expensive, and no cost analysis is currently available. The aim of this study was to assess clinical outcome and analyse cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

Thirty-six consecutive patients underwent a two-stage SNS procedure. Outcome parameters and real costs were assessed prospectively.

RESULTS

SNS was tested successfully in 33 of 36 patients, and 31 patients were stimulated permanently. In the first stage, eight of 36 patients reported minor complications (pain, infection or electrode dislocation), resulting in a cost of euro 4053 (range euro 2838-7273) per patient. For the second stage (permanent stimulation), eight of 33 patients had an infection, pain or loss of effectiveness, resulting in a cost of euro 11,292 (range euro 7406-20,274) per patient. Estimated costs for further follow-up were euro 997 per year. The 5-year cumulative cost for SNS was euro 22,150 per patient, compared with euro 33,996 for colostomy, euro 31,590 for dynamic graciloplasty and euro 3234 for conservative treatment.

CONCLUSION

SNS is a highly cost-effective treatment for faecal incontinence. Options for further reduction of SNS costs include strict patient selection, treatment in an outpatient setting and using cheaper devices.